ABSTRACT
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) remains a highly effective therapy in the management of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and is an important therapeutic option in the management of persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) when clinically indicated. Lesion size is influenced by many parameters, which include those related to energy application (RFA power, temperature, and time), delivery mechanism (electrode size, orientation, and contact force), and the environment (blood flow and local tissue contact, stability, and local impedance). Successful durable RFA is dependent on achieving lesions that are reliably transmural and contiguous, whilst also avoiding injury to the surrounding structures. This review focuses on the variables that can be adjusted in connection with RFA to achieve long-lasting lesions that enable patients to derive the maximum sustained benefit from pulmonary vein isolation and additional lesion sets if utilized.
ABSTRACT
Symptomatic heart failure (HF) patients despite optimal medical therapy and advances such as invasive hemodynamic monitoring remain challenging to manage. While cardiac resynchronization therapy remains a highly effective therapy for a subset of HF patients with wide QRS, a majority of symptomatic HF patients are poor candidates for such. Recently, cardiac contractility modulation, neuromodulation based on carotid baroreceptor stimulation, and phrenic nerve stimulation have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and are emerging as therapeutic options for symptomatic HF patients. This state-of-the-art review examines the role of these evolving electrical therapies in advanced HF.
Subject(s)
Autonomic Nervous System/physiopathology , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart/innervation , Myocardial Contraction , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left , Animals , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial , Electric Stimulation Therapy/adverse effects , Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Pacemaker, Artificial , Prevalence , Recovery of Function , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Treatment Outcome , Vagus Nerve StimulationABSTRACT
Genetic cardiomyopathies are associated with increased risk for cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The management of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in patients with these conditions can be nuanced due to particular disease-based considerations, yet data specifically addressing management in these patients are limited. Here we describe the current evidence-based approach to the management of ventricular rhythm disorders in patients with genetic forms of cardiomyopathy, namely, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular noncompaction, and Brugada syndrome, including recommendations from consensus guideline statements when available.
