Hepatic manifestations of COVID-19 and effect of remdesivir on liver function in patients with COVID-19 illness.

COVID-19 has emerged as a major global health crisis since the first cases were reported in China in December 2019. Remdesivir is the only broad-spectrum antiviral approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection. Although the adverse effects of remdesivir are largely unknown, data from randomized controlled trials have demonstrated its deleterious effect on the liver. This review briefly addresses the hepatic manifestations of COVID-19 infection and the data regarding the efficacy and adverse effects of remdesivir on liver function when used in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Through a literature search, we identified five randomized controlled trials, two case reports, and one case series, including a total of 2375 patients. Although mild transaminase elevation has been reported as a feature of COVID-19, there has been a concern of hepatotoxicity associated with the use of remdesivir. Based on the limited available data regarding the adverse effects of remdesivir on hepatic function, it is prudent to exercise caution by evaluating baseline liver function, avoiding the use of potentially hepatotoxic drugs, and closely monitoring liver function when using remdesivir in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

ST Elevation in a Patient With COVID-19 Infection-Associated Fever: A Case of Brugada Pattern.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic presenting with various cardiovascular manifestations. Although Brugada pattern ST-segment elevation (STE) is well described in patients admitted with febrile illness, the implication of recognizing this abnormality in patients with COVID-19 is critical in providing appropriate care for the patient and also reducing the exposure of healthcare professionals to the risk of infection. We report a patient with COVID-19 infection presenting with STE due to fever-related unmasking of Brugada pattern, who was managed conservatively.

Rate and predictors of electrical failure in non-recalled defibrillator leads.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads are considered as the 'weakest link' in defibrillator systems due to FDA recalls and advisories involving popular lead models from major manufacturers. The rate of electrical failure of ICD leads not implicated in a recall is however not well determined. METHODS: Medical records of patients implanted with ICDs at hospitals of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between 2002 and 2014 were analyzed. Leads were classified as having electrically failed if removed or replaced for reasons other than infection or heart transplantation. Patients were followed to endpoint of death or electrical lead failure. RESULTS: 2410 consecutive ICD recipients (mean age 66 ±â€¯13 years, women 22%, single/dual/biventricular-ICD 20%/44%/36%) were included. During a mean follow-up of 3.9 ±â€¯3.3 years, 1272 patients (53%) died, 55 patients (2.3%) had ICD lead electrical failure, and 1052 (44%) patients were alive with functional leads at the time of last follow-up. Patients with failed leads had higher BMI (p = 0.07), better functional status (p = 0.04), higher serum creatinine (p = 0.004), wider QRS complex (p = 0.01), higher number of implanted leads (p = 0.06) and were more likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy (p = 0.03). After adjusting for these variables in a binary logistic regression model, only a lower BMI, presence of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, and a better functional status remained independently predictive of electrical failure. CONCLUSIONS: Only 2.3% of non-recalled ICD leads experience electrical failure (annual failure rate of 0.6%). A higher patient functional status, lower BMI, and non-ischemic etiology of cardiomyopathy are independently associated with higher rates of ICD lead failure.

Usefulness of the CHA2DS2-VASc Score to Predict Mortality in Defibrillator Recipients.

The CHA2DS2-VASC score is a well-validated stratification tool that predicts the risk of thromboembolism and stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Several studies have examined its application as a predictor of mortality in clinical applications other than atrial fibrillation. However, there are current no studies examining its use as an outcome prediction tool in a population of patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs). In this study, we examined data from 2,258 patients who underwent ICD device implantation at the hospitals of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from February 2002 to April 2014 (median follow-up 5.1 years) and examined the impact of their CHA2DS2-VASC score at the time of device implantation on all-cause mortality. Survival curves based on CHA2DS2-VASC scores were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were adjusted for unbalanced covariates using the Cox proportional hazards model. The mean CHA2DS2-VASC score was 3.15 ± 1.52 (range 1 to 8, mode 3). The CHA2DS2-VASC score predicted all-cause mortality in a significant and dose-dependent fashion. Analyzing the population by quartiles revealed increasing all-cause mortality from Q1 to Q4 (p <0.001). Using a Cox multivariate model adjusting for ejection fraction, BMI, serum creatinine, hemoglobin level, and QRS width, the CHA2DS2-VASC score remained a strong predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.26 per 1-point increase, 95% confidence interval 1.20 to 1.32). In conclusion, the CHA2DS2-VASC score is a simple tool that highly predicts all-cause mortality in patients with ICD.

Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infections: Risk Scoring and Role of Antibiotic Envelope in Prevention.

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) has been increasingly used with expanding indications in patients with cardiac diseases. There is substantial evidence to suggest of their role in improving outcomes in patients with and without heart failure. Complications of the device implantation including infections are associated with increased morbidity and mortality and also substantial financial burden to the society. Several clinical characteristics have been recognized as risk factors for the occurrence of the infections. Considering that infections occur in the presence of multiple risk factors acting together, scoring systems have been developed in identifying patients at risk. Despite preventive measures, the rates of infections associated with CIEDs have increased over the last decade. Recent studies have documented the role of implantable antibiotic eluting pouches in reducing infections in patients undergoing CIED implantation. The present review will address the risk scoring systems studied and also address the role of antibiotic pouch and the recent patents in developing this technology.

Health and Economic Outcomes Associated with Use of an Antimicrobial Envelope as a Standard of Care for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Infection of cardiac implanted electrical devices (CIED) is a problem. In selected patients, use of an "antibacterial envelope" (AIGISRx®) is associated with low CIED infection rates. The value of this device when used as a standard of care is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective analysis of all patients (N = 1,476) who underwent CIED implantation at a single hospital. During the study period, some implanters used the AIGISRx as a standard of care (Yes-AIGISRx Group, N = 365), whereas others did not use it at all (No-AIGISRx Group, N = 1,111). A risk score based on preoperative factors was calculated for each patient. Rates of CIED infection within 6 months were measured, and associated costs were estimated. The Yes-AIGISRx and No-AIGISRx groups had similar preoperative infection risk. In the No-AIGISRx group, 19 infections were observed (1.7%), versus 0 in the Yes-AIGISRx group (P = 0.006). The 6-month mortality rate among patients with infection was significantly greater than among those without infection (15.7% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.021). The average hospital duration for infection care was 13 days. By extrapolating the infection rate and costs observed in the No-AIGISRx group to the Yes-AIGISRx group, we estimated that there would have been 6.2 additional infections costing approximately $340,000. This cost was similar to the actual cost of the devices in the Yes-AIGISRx group, estimated at $320,000. CONCLUSIONS: Standard of care use of an antibacterial envelope as a standard of care was associated with a significantly lower rate of CIED infection, and appeared to be economically reasonable. Prospective trials to address these findings may be worthwhile.

Failure rates of single- versus dual-coil nonrecalled sprint quattro defibrillator leads.

Electrical failure is more common in single-coil compared with dual-coil implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads in the case of the recalled Riata lead. Single-coil leads are however favored in most patients given their lower risk of extraction. We therefore evaluated the failure-free survival of single- versus dual-coil ICD leads not included in Food and Drug Administration recalls. All patients receiving a Medtronic transvenous Sprint Quattro single- or dual-coil ICD lead were included in this analysis. Leads were followed to the end point of electrical failure. A total of 1,020 dual-coil and 631 single-coil ICD leads were implanted at our institution from November 2000 to March 2014. As expected, dual-coil leads had a longer follow-up time (3.4 ± 2.6 years vs 1.3 ± 1.0 years, p <0.001) because they were approved many years earlier by the Food and Drug Administration. The overall lead survival rates free from electrical failure at 1, 2, and 3 years after implantation were 98.8%, 98.2%, and 95.1%, respectively, for the single-coil leads versus 99.7%, 99.4%, and 99.3%, respectively, for the dual-coil leads (p = 0.0013). In conclusion, single-coil leads are associated with higher electrical failure rates compared with dual-coil leads even for nonrecalled lead models from the same family and manufacturer. These findings have implications on the choice of ICD lead at the time of device implantation.

Long-term outcome of defibrillator recipients included in the federal audit conducted by the Department of Justice.

Institutions across the United States have been subjected to a federal audit for defibrillator implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD] implantations that violated the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid payment policy. We examined the long-term outcome of ICD recipients whose implantation procedures were audited by the Department of Justice (DOJ). Patients (n = 225) included in the DOJ audit at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between the years 2003 and 2010 were followed to the end point of all-cause mortality. A cohort of 206 consecutive and contemporary ICD recipients not included in the federal audit served as controls. Compared with the controls, the audited cases were older (p <0.001), had more preserved ejection fraction (p <0.001), and were less likely to be implanted for a primary prevention indication (p = 0.001). They also had significantly shorter time from myocardial infarction (p <0.001) or revascularization (p <0.001) to ICD implantation. Over a median follow-up of 3.6 years, 187 patients died and 71 received ICD therapy for ventricular arrhythmias. Patients whose cases were audited had worse survival compared with controls (hazard ratio 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.90, p = 0.023) even after correcting for differences in baseline characteristics (hazard ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.02, p = 0.023). Rates of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapies were similar between the audited cases and controls. In conclusion, patients whose ICD implantations were audited by the DOJ have worse long-term survival compared with nonaudited control patients. These data support compliance with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid guidelines when the individual patient's clinical condition allows it.

Acute disseminated intravascular coagulation following ICD lead extraction.

We present an unusual case of disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) complicating percutaneous laser-assisted lead extraction. DIC has not been previously reported in association with lead extraction. It is possible to have occurred following the denudement of venous endothelium and exposure of underlying fibrous tissue. Practitioners need to be aware of this rare but potentially fatal complication of transvenous lead extraction.

Rate-control versus rhythm-control strategies and outcomes in septuagenarians with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation substantially increases after 70 years of age. However, the effect of rate-control versus rhythm-control strategies on outcomes in these patients remains unclear. METHODS: In the randomized Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) trial, 4060 patients (mean age 70 years, range 49-80 years) with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation were randomized to rate-control versus rhythm-control strategies. Of these, 2248 were 70-80 years, of whom 1118 were in the rate-control group. Propensity scores for rate-control strategy were estimated for each of the 2248 patients and were used to assemble a cohort of 937 pairs of patients receiving rate-control versus rhythm-control strategies, balanced on 45 baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Matched patients had a mean age of 75 years; 45% were women, 7% were nonwhite, and 47% had prior hospitalizations due to arrhythmias. During 3.4 years of mean follow-up, all-cause mortality occurred in 18% and 23% of matched patients in the rate-control and rhythm-control groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] associated with rate control, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.94; P = .010). HRs (95% CIs) for cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality associated with rate control were 0.88 (0.65-1.18) and 0.62 (0.46-0.84), respectively. All-cause hospitalization occurred in 61% and 68% of rate-control and rhythm-control patients, respectively (HR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.86). HRs (95% CIs) for cardiovascular and noncardiovascular hospitalization were 0.66 (0.56-0.77) and 1.07 (0.91-1.27), respectively. CONCLUSION: In septuagenarian patients with atrial fibrillation, compared with rhythm-control, a rate-control strategy was associated with significantly lower mortality and hospitalization.

Cerebral Embolization During AF Ablation -Pathophysiology, Prevention and Management.

Catheter based ablation therapy has evolved as an invaluable tool in the management of symptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The procedure of AF ablation requires instrumentation in the systemic circulation predisposing to various concerns that can result in systemic embolization. We will describe the reported incidence of these events and refer to the various pathophysiologic explanations for their occurrence. Details on the risk factors and the relevant studies will also be reviewed. Preventive and treatment strategies in patients undergoing the ablation procedure will be discussed.

Venous thromboembolism in patients with heart failure: in-hospital and chronic use of anti-coagulants for prevention.

Heart failure (HF) is a common clinical syndrome characterized by high morbidity and frequent hospitalizations. HF is an independent and major risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE occurring in patients with HF carries a worse prognosis. The present review will focus on short and long term role of anti-coagulants in prevention of venous thrombosis in HF patients. We will also be discussing the recently investigated and patented anti-coagulants which could have a role in this specific population.

Atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: Role of catheter ablation therapies.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in patients with heart failure (HF). AF in HF patients is associated with worsening of symptoms and also results in a substantial increase in mortality. Although HF patients in sinus rhythm have a better outcome than patients with AF, several randomized studies investigating pharmacological rhythm control versus rate control have shown no advantage of one strategy over the other in terms of patient outcomes. Catheter-based ablation therapy is a newer therapeutic option with a rapidly evolving and changing role in the management of this arrhythmia. In the present review, the authors discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology and prognostic significance of AF in patients with HF. Exclusively addressed are studies investigating catheter-based ablation for rhythm-control and rate-control therapies in the management of AF in HF patients.

AF and Venous Thromboembolism - Pathophysiology, Risk Assessment and CHADS-VASc score.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are the two most common medical conditions managed with anti-coagulation therapy. Not all the patients with decreased mobility or AF have a similar risk for thromboembolism. The risk factors for venous thromboembolism and thromboembolism associated with AF are described in various studies. Considering that the two conditions have similar pathophysiologic basis of clot formation, one could imply that the risk factors for the occurrence of thrombosis could be similar. The present review focuses on the similarities and differences in the clinical risk factors of VTE and AF related thromboembolism. We will also be discussing the role of CHADS2-VASc scoring system in the risk assessment of VTE.

Atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: established and emerging strategies of prevention.

More than 250,000 patients undergo cardiac surgery every year. Although advances in surgical techniques have reduced the peri-operative morbidity and mortality in these patients, atrial fibrillation persists to commonly occur following these surgeries. Traditional therapies have reduced their occurrence; however there are still a significant number of patients who develop this complication. Newer and non-conventional medications are being studied to reduce this cardiac arrhythmia. This review will elaborate on the patho-physiology, and prevention of this arrhythmia. We also aim to summarize recent investigated and patented medications which may result in more effective strategies for prophylaxis against this cardiac arrhythmia.