Attitudes, concerns, and perceptions of patients undergoing fertility treatments in an abortion restrictive state in the aftermath of the Roe v. Wade reversal.

PURPOSE: To investigate the abortion views and reproductive concerns of current in vitro fertilization patients after the US Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson decision, which overturned the Roe v. Wade decision guaranteeing abortion access. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional survey of English-speaking patients undergoing in vitro fertilization from January to November 2022 at a large academic institution in a state with restricted abortion care. Participants completed a 43-question electronic survey which measured feelings about abortion, future fertility treatments, and embryo disposition both quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: Of 543 eligible patients, 267 (49%) consented to participate when called and were sent the survey. Of those, 180 (67%) completed it, resulting in a total completion rate of 33%. The majority believe abortion should be legal in the case of birth defects (90.8%) or rape or incest (90.3%). A significant proportion (91.4%) expressed concerns about abortion being illegal in the state that they receive infertility care. They reported some concern about making embryos (89.6%), controlling what happens to them (95.4%), and discarding them (94.4%). Patients wrote about their concerns with pursuing fertility treatments, fear of not having access to needed medical care, and the desire to remain close to states with less restrictive abortion laws. CONCLUSIONS: The evolving political landscape surrounding access to reproductive care has created significant concerns regarding legal regulation of these treatments and the disposition of embryos. By understanding patients' concerns, health care providers can more effectively advocate for the protection of fertility treatments and patients' autonomy in embryo disposition.

Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for cesarean delivery on postoperative pain.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize perioperative care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to holistically investigate the effect of implementing an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for all cesarean deliveries on postoperative pain experience. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prepost study comparing subjective and objective measures of postoperative pain before and after the implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for cesarean delivery. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway was developed by a multidisciplinary team and included preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative components, with emphasis on preoperative preparation, hemodynamic optimization, early mobilization, and multimodal analgesia. All individuals undergoing cesarean delivery, whether scheduled, urgent, or emergent, were included. Demographic, delivery, and inpatient pain management data were obtained through medical record review. Of note, 2 weeks after discharge, patients were surveyed about their delivery experience, analgesic usage, and complications. The primary outcome was inpatient opioid use. RESULTS: The study included 128 individuals, 56 in the preimplementation cohort and 72 in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery cohort. Baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were similar. The survey response rate was 73% (94/128). Opioid use in the first 48 hours postoperatively was significantly lower in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group than the preimplementation group (9.4 vs 21.4 morphine milligram equivalents 0-24 hours after delivery [P<.001]; 14.1 vs 25.4 morphine milligram equivalents 24-48 hours after delivery [P<.001]) with no increase in either average or maximum postoperative pain scores. Individuals in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group used fewer opioid pills after discharge (10 vs 20; P<.001). Patient satisfaction and complication rates did not change after the implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for all cesarean deliveries decreased both inpatient and outpatient postpartum opioid use without increasing pain scores or decreasing patient satisfaction.

Clinically effective OCD treatment prevents 5-HT1B receptor-induced repetitive behavior and striatal activation.

RATIONALE: Serotonin-1B receptor (5-HT1BR) agonist treatment induces obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)-like behaviors including locomotor stereotypy, prepulse inhibition deficits, and delayed alternation disruptions, which are selectively prevented by clinically effective OCD treatment. However, the role of 5-HT1BRs in modulating other repetitive behaviors or OCD-like patterns of brain activation remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the effects of 5-HT1BR agonism on digging, grooming, and open field behaviors in mice. We also quantified effects on neuronal activation in brain regions overactivated in OCD. Finally, we assessed whether effects of the 5-HT1BR challenge could be blocked by clinically effective, but not ineffective, drug treatments. METHODS: Mice were tested in open field, dig, and splash tests after acute treatment with saline, 1, 3, 5, or 10 mg/kg RU24969 (5-HT1B/1A agonist). Behavioral effects of RU24969 were also tested following co-treatment with vehicle, 1 mg/kg WAY100635 (5-HT1A antagonist) and 5 or 10 mg/kg GR127935 (5HT1B/D antagonist). Separate mice were behaviorally assessed following chronic pretreatment with vehicle with 10 mg/kg fluoxetine or 20 mg/kg desipramine and acute treatment with saline or 10 mg/kg RU24969. Brains were analyzed for Fos expression in the orbitofrontal cortex, the dorsal striatum, and the cerebellum. RESULTS: RU24969 induced robust locomotor stereotypy and decreased rearing, digging, and grooming. Effects were blocked by GR127935 but not by WAY100635. RU24969 also increased Fos expression in the dorsal striatum. Chronic fluoxetine, but not desipramine, alleviated 5-HT1BR-induced effects. CONCLUSIONS: We report novel 5-HT1BR-induced behaviors and striatal activation that were alleviated only by clinically effective pharmacological OCD treatment. Studying the mechanisms underlying these effects could provide insight into OCD pathophysiology.