ABSTRACT
Identifying the underlying cause of unexplained syncope is crucial for appropriate management of recurrent syncopal episodes. Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) have emerged as valuable diagnostic tools for monitoring patients with unexplained syncope. However, the predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with ILR and unexplained syncope remain unclear. In this study, we shed light on these prognostic factors. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were systematically searched until May 04, 2023. Studies that evaluated the predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with implantable loop recorder and unexplained syncope were included. The "Quality In Prognosis Studies" appraisal tool was used for quality assessment. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated. The publication bias was evaluated using Egger's and Begg's tests. Ten studies (n = 4200) were included. Right bundle branch block (OR: 3.264; 95% CI: 1.907-5.588, p < .0001) and bifascicular block (OR: 2.969; 95% CI: 1.859-4.742, p < .0001) were the strongest predictors for pacemaker implantation. Pacemaker requirement was more than two times in patients with atrial fibrillation, sinus bradycardia and first degree AV block. Valvular heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension were also significantly more in patients with pacemaker implantation. Age (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.560; 95% CI: 0.410/0.710, p < .0001) and PR interval (SMD: 0.351; 95% CI: 0.150/0.553, p = .001) were significantly higher in patients with pacemaker requirement. Heart conduction disorders, atrial arrhythmias and underlying medical conditions are main predictors of pacemaker device implantation following loop recorder installation in unexplained syncopal patients.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Atrioventricular Block , Heart Valve Diseases , Pacemaker, Artificial , Humans , Bundle-Branch BlockABSTRACT
Background and Aims: Fragmented QRS (fQRS), which is associated with rhythm disturbances, can predispose the heart to fatal ventricular arrhythmias. Recently, accumulating studies indicates that fQRS is associated with poor prognosis in various types of cardiomyopathies. Therefore, we assessed the association between fQRS with all-cause mortality and major arrhythmic events (MAEs) in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, in this systematic review and meta-analysis study. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search in databases of PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science from the beginning to December 31, 2022. Published observational studies (cohorts, case-control, or analytical cross-sectional studies) were included that report the prognostic value of fQRS in patients with different types of nonischemic cardiomyopathies for MAEs (sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest, sustained ventricular tachycardia [VT], ventricular fibrillation [VF], and appropriate shock) and all-cause mortality. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) through raw data and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) using "Comprehensive Meta-Analysis" software, Version 2.0. Results: Nineteen cohort and three analytical cross-sectional studies were included in this meta-analysis involving a total of 4318 subjects with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (1279 with fQRS and 3039 without fQRS). FQRS was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (pooled RR: 1.920; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.388-2.656, p < 0.0001/pooled HR: 1.729; 95% CI: 1.327-2.251, p < 0.0001). Also, the risk of developing MAEs in the presence of fQRS was significantly increased (pooled RR: 2.041; 95% CI: 1.644-2.533, p < 0.0001/pooled HR: 3.626; 95% CI: 2.119-6.204, p < 0.0001). In the subgroup analysis, the strongest association between fQRS presence and increased MAEs was observed in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (pooled RR: 3.44; 95% CI: 2.07-5.71, p < 0.0001/pooled HR: 3.21; 95% CI: 2.04-5.06, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Fragmented QRS could be a prognostic marker for all-cause mortality and MAEs in patients with various types of nonischemic cardiomyopathies, particularly HCM.
