Early post-septal myectomy outcomes for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate early outcomes of septal myectomy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data collected over a 9-year period from 583 patients who underwent septal myectomy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at our institution. RESULTS: The mean age was 55.7 ± 13.1 years, and 338 (58%) patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. There were 11 (1.9%) early deaths, including 3 (0.5%) intraoperative deaths. Early mortality was lowest after isolated septal myectomy (0.8%) and highest after concomitant mitral valve replacement (6.1%). There were 4 (0.7%) and 9 (1.5%) patients with left ventricular wall rupture and ventricular septal defect, respectively, after myectomy. New pacemaker implantation caused by atrioventricular disturbances was required in 29 (5.0%) patients, and was associated with previous alcohol septal ablation (odds ratio 3.34, 95% confidence interval 1.02-11.0, P = 0.047). Left ventricular wall rupture, intraoperative residual (15.5% moderate, 0.3% severe) mitral regurgitation, and pre-discharge residual outflow tract gradient >30 mm Hg (4.6%) occurrences were surgeon-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: The early results are consistent with example targets reported in the 2020 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for septal reduction therapy outcomes. Septal myectomy safety and efficacy are surgeon-dependent. Previous alcohol septal ablation increases the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation due to postoperative complete atrioventricular block. Therefore, continuous education, mentoring, and learning by doing may play an important role in achieving reasonable septal myectomy safety and efficacy.

Rigid Ring Versus Flexible Band for Tricuspid Valve Repair in Patients Scheduled for Mitral Valve Surgery: A Prospective Randomised Study.

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid valve repair for functional regurgitation is effectively performed with different annuloplasty devices. However, it remains unclear whether there are advantages associated with rigid rings compared to flexible bands. This prospective randomised study aimed to compare results of using a flexible band ring versus a rigid ring for functional tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. METHODS: A single-centre randomised study was designed to allocate patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation undergoing mitral valve surgery to be treated with a flexible band or rigid ring. These patients were analysed by echocardiographic follow-up. The primary outcome was freedom from recurrent tricuspid regurgitation at 12-months follow-up. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, survival, freedom from tricuspid valve reoperation, right ventricular reverse remodelling, and rate of major adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were allocated to receive concomitant tricuspid valve annuloplasty with the flexible band or rigid ring. There was no between-group difference in freedom from recurrent tricuspid regurgitation: 97.3% in Rigid group (95% CI, 93.0-98.8) and 96.2% in the Flexible group (95% CI, 92.0-98.5) at 12-months follow-up (log-rank, p=0.261). Early mortality, survival, freedom from tricuspid valve reoperation, and global right ventricle systolic function were also comparable in both groups of patients. However, the flexible band had advantage in restoring regional right ventricle function (Doppler-derived systolic velocities of the annulus [S], tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion) at 12-months follow-up. CONCLUSION: Both the rigid ring and flexible band offered acceptable outcomes for functional tricuspid regurgitation correction without significant differences, as assessed at 12-months follow-up.

Edge-to-Edge Repair Versus Secondary Cord Cutting During Septal Myectomy in Patients With Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: A Pilot Randomised Study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether the Alfieri technique improves clinical and haemodynamic results and compare it with transaortic mitral valve secondary cord cutting in patients scheduled for septal myectomy for severely symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Forty-eight (48) patients with moderate-to-severe systolic anterior motion (SAM)-mediated mitral regurgitation were randomly assigned to the Alfieri or Cutting groups in addition to septal myectomy. The primary endpoint was postoperative mean transmitral pressure gradient (TPG). The secondary endpoints were residual left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient after procedure, residual mitral regurgitation (MR), postoperative SAM, repeating bypass, and survival. RESULTS: There were no 30-day mortality and ventricular septal defects. The postoperative LVOT gradient was 15.4±7.6 mmHg and 11.1±4.9 mmHg (p=0.078) in the Alfieri and Cutting groups, respectively. The Alfieri technique was associated with higher peak (7.8±3.3 vs 4.7±2.8 mmHg; p=0.014) and mean (3.9±1.7 vs 2.1±1.6 mmHg; p=0.013) TPG. The Cutting group was associated with higher mild MR rate at discharge (six vs no patients; p=0.009). One (1) patient (4.2%) in the Alfieri group required pacemaker implantation owing to conduction disturbances (p=0.312). Two-year (2-year) freedom from late mortality and sudden cardiac death rates were 95.5%±4.4% and 100% for the Alfieri and Cutting groups, respectively (log rank, p=0.317). No patients had New York Heart Association functional class III or IV or moderate or severe MR. The maximum LVOT gradient was 20.4±15.2 mmHg and 16.7±10.4 mmHg, respectively (p=0.330). There were no reoperations during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques with septal myectomy effectively eliminated SAM-induced MR and LVOT obstructions in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients.

Surgical Atrial Fibrillation Ablation With and Without Left Atrium Reduction for Patients Scheduled for Mitral Valve Surgery: A Prospective Randomised Study.

BACKGROUND: The influence of left atrium (LA) enlargement on atrial arrhythmia recurrence (AAR) after surgical ablation in patients with mitral valve (MV) disease remains unresolved. OBJECTIVE: Left atrial size is critical to the success of concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients scheduled for MV surgery. However, a large LA should not be a limiting factor when evaluating surgical candidates with AF if they receive appropriate treatment during concomitant ablation. This randomised study assessed whether adding LA reduction (LAR) to the maze procedure for MV surgery patients can improve freedom from AAR. METHODS: From September 2014 to September 2017, 140 patients were randomly assigned into two groups. The maze group underwent MV surgery with concomitant surgical AF ablation (n=70). The maze + LA reduction group underwent MV surgery with concomitant AF ablation and LA reduction procedure (n=70). Rhythm outcomes were estimated by Holter monitoring, according to Heart Rhythm Society guidelines. RESULTS: The concomitant LA reduction procedure did not increase early mortality and complications rates. Significant differences in freedom from AAR were observed at 24 months (maze, 78.4%; maze + LAR group, 92.3%; p=0.025). A significant difference in LA volume was detected at discharge (p<0.0001); however, it was not significantly different at 24 months (p=0.182). CONCLUSIONS: Adding LA reduction to the maze procedure led to improvements in freedom from AAR for patients with AF and LA enlargement scheduled for MV surgery. A concomitant LA reduction procedure did not increase mortality and perioperative risk.

Myectomy versus alcohol septal ablation in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: There is very little evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of alcohol septal ablation versus septal myectomy for a septal reduction in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. This study aimed to compare the immediate and long-term outcomes of these procedures. METHODS: Following propensity score matching, we retrospectively analysed outcomes in 105 patients who underwent myectomy and 105 who underwent septal ablation between 2011 and 2017 at 2 reference centres. RESULTS: The mean age was 51.9 ± 14.3 and 52.2 ± 14.3 years in the myectomy and ablation groups, respectively (P = 0.855), and postoperative left ventricular outflow tract gradients were 13 (10-19) mmHg vs 16 (12-26) mmHg; P = 0.025. The 1-year prevalence of the New York Heart Association class III-IV was higher in the ablation group (none vs 6.4%; P = 0.041). The 5-year overall survival rate [96.8% (86.3-99.3) after myectomy and 93.5% (85.9-97.1) after ablation; P = 0.103] and cumulative incidence of sudden cardiac death [0% and 1.9% (0.5-7.5), respectively P = 0.797] did not differ between the groups. The cumulative reoperation rate within 5 years was lower after myectomy than after ablation [2.0% (0.5-7.6) vs 14.6% (8.6-24.1); P = 0.003]. Ablation was associated with a higher reoperation risk (subdistributional hazard ratio = 5.9; 95% confidence interval 1.3-26.3, P = 0.020). At follow-up, left ventricular outflow tract gradient [16 (11-20) vs 23 (15-59) mmHg; P < 0.001] and prevalence of 2+ mitral regurgitation (1.1% vs 10.6%; P = 0.016) were lower after myectomy than after ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures improved functional capacity; however, myectomy better-resolved classes III-IV of heart failure. Septal ablation was associated with higher reoperation rates. Myectomy demonstrated benefits in gradient relief and mitral regurgitation elimination. The results suggest that decreasing rates of myectomy procedures need to be investigated and reconsidered.

Single-Centre Experience of Surgical Myectomy for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Septal myectomy is the gold standard treatment for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. This study aimed to evaluate the results from patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who had undergone septal myectomy. METHODS: Data were analysed that has been prospectively collected over 7 years from 345 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who underwent septal myectomy at Meshalkin National Medical Research Center. RESULTS: Six (6) patients (1.7%) died within 30 days of surgery. The mean (standard deviation, SD) resting left ventricular outflow tract gradients reduced from 83.4 (24.2) mmHg preoperatively to 16.2 (8.5) mmHg at discharge (p < 0.001). Of the 345 patients, 329 (95.4%) attended the most recent follow-up assessments, and of these, 254 (77.2%) were categorised as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I, 64 (19.5%) class II, and 11 (3.3%) class III. The mean overall long-term survival rate after septal myectomy was 95.7% (SD 1.7%) (95% CI, 90.0-97.9). This did not differ from the age-matched and gender-matched general population (log-rank, p = 0.109). At the last follow-up assessments, six of 67 patients who had undergone concomitant Cox-Maze IV procedures had late atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences. A preoperative short-axis view of left atrial diameter of 57.5 mm (hazard ratio, 1.30 (95% CI, 1.03-1.65), p < 0.001) predicted late atrial tachyarrhythmias (p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: At this hypertrophic cardiomyopathy centre, septal myectomy is associated with low operative and early mortality rates (<2%), a low risk of early adverse events, and acceptable intermediate-term clinical and haemodynamic results.

A left atrial versus a biatrial lesion set for persistent atrial fibrillation ablation during open heart surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of left atrial ablation and biatrial (BA) ablation in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing open heart surgery. METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2016, 588 consecutive patients with either persistent (20.9%) or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (79.1%) were enrolled in this study. To reduce between-group differences, propensity score-matched groups (156 patients/group) were obtained, with similar preoperative and perioperative characteristics. RESULTS: The propensity score-matched left atrial and BA groups did not differ regarding 30-day mortality (1.9% vs 0.6%; P = 0.617), 5-year overall survival (93.5 ± 2.2% vs 92.8 ± 2.9%, P = 0.998) or survival free from thromboembolic events (97.1 ± 2.8% vs 96.2 ± 2.7%, P = 0.309). The BA lesion set was more beneficial in terms of freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence (85.3 ± 4.5% vs 91.9 ± 3.1%, P = 0.049; hazard ratio 3.26; 95% confidence interval 1.33-7.99), but it was associated with higher pacemaker implantation rate (3.8% vs 17.3%; P < 0.001) due to sinus node dysfunction. There was no significant between-group difference regarding the incidence of atrioventricular conduction disturbances (3.2% vs 7.0%, respectively; P = 0.211). CONCLUSIONS: The 2 lesion sets (left atrial and BA) are associated with similar 30-day mortality, survival rates, incidences of embolic events and atrioventricular conduction disturbances. In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, concomitant surgical ablation with BA lesion set provided better freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence, but BA ablation was associated with a higher incidence of sinus node dysfunction and a higher rate of pacemaker implantation.

Concomitant ablation for atrial fibrillation during septal myectomy in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE: The appearance of atrial fibrillation is associated with significant clinical deterioration in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; therefore, maintenance of sinus rhythm is desirable. Guidelines and most articles have reported the results of catheter ablation and pharmacologic atrial fibrillation treatment; nevertheless, data regarding concomitant procedures during septal myectomy are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of concomitant atrial fibrillation treatment in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2013 in our clinic, 187 patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy underwent extended myectomy. In 45 cases, concomitant Cox-Maze IV procedure was performed; however, obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was the primary indication for surgery. Atrial fibrillation was paroxysmal in 26 patients (58%) and nonparoxysmal in 19 patients (42%). The mean age of patients was 52.8 ± 14.2 years (range, 22-74 years). Mean peak gradient was 90.7 ± 24.2 mm Hg, and interventricular septum thickness was 26.1 ± 4.3 mm. Mean atrial fibrillation duration was 17.3 ± 8.5 months. RESULTS: There were no early deaths. No procedure-related complications occurred with regard to ablation procedure. Complete atrioventricular block was achieved in 2 patients (4.0%). Mean crossclamping time was 61 ± 36 minutes. Peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient was 12.6 ± 5.5 mm Hg based on transesophageal echocardiography. The Maze IV procedure was used for ablation in all patients (radiofrequency ablation with bipolar clamp + cryolesion for mitral and tricuspid lines). Because of the atrial wall thickness (5-6 mm), applications were performed 8 to 10 times on each line. There were no cases of pacemaker implantation due to sinus node dysfunction. All patients were discharged in stable sinus rhythm. Mean follow-up was 23.7 ± 1.3 months. The rate of atrial fibrillation freedom was 100% (45 patients) at 6 months, 89% (40 patients) at 1 year, and 78% (35 patients) at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant ablation atrial fibrillation during septal myectomy in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a safe and effective procedure and should be considered carefully in this patient group.

Mid-term results of mitral valve repair using flexible bands versus complete rings in patients with degenerative mitral valve disease: a prospective, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the outcomes of mitral valve repair with flexible band (FB) versus complete semirigid ring (SR) in degenerative mitral valve disease patients. METHODS: From September 2011 to 2014, 171 patients were randomized and underwent successful mitral valve repair using a SR (n = 85) or FB (n = 86). There were no significant between-group differences at baseline. RESULTS: There were no early mortalities. The mean follow up was 24.7 months. The 2-year survival was 96.0 ± 2.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.6-98.7%) and 94.3 ± 2.8% (95% CI, 85.5-97.9%) in the SR and FB groups, respectively (p = 0.899). The left ventricle remodeling was similar between the groups. Higher transmitral peak (8.5 [3.9-17] vs. 6 [2.1-18] mmHg, p < 0.001), mean pressure gradients (3.7 [1.3-8] vs. 2.8 [0.6-6.8] mmHg, p = 0.001), and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (34.5 [20-68] vs. 29.5 [8-48] mmHg, p < 0.001) was observed in the SR group. The 2-year freedom from recurrence of significant mitral regurgitation was significantly higher in the FB group than the SR group (p = 0.002). Residual mitral regurgitation was an independent prognostic factor of recurrence of mitral regurgitation. The 3-year freedom from reoperation was significantly higher in the FB group than the SR group (p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: Patients with degenerative mitral valve disease may benefit from valve repair with FBs. Residual mitral regurgitation before discharge is an independent risk factor of late insufficiency recurrence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03278574 , retrospectively registered on 06.09.2017.