Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
3.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 54(1): 53-5, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26574140

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: MicroRNA 122 (miR-122) is a new circulating biomarker for liver injury, which increases earlier than conventional markers in patients with acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. However, as co-ingestion of ethanol is common with drug overdose, a confounding effect of acute ethanol consumption on serum miR-122 must be examined. METHODS: Blood was collected from healthy volunteers before and after recreational consumption of ethanol. Routine biochemistry and haematology measurements were performed, and serum miR-122 was measured by qPCR. The primary outcome was the difference in serum miR-122 with ethanol consumption. RESULTS: We recruited 18 participants (72% male). Their mean serum ethanol concentration was 113 mg/dl (95% confidence interval [CI] 91-135 mg/dl) after consuming ethanol. Serum miR-122 increased from a mean of 71.3 million (95% CI 29.3-113.2 million) to 139.1 million (95% CI 62.6-215.7 million) copies/ml (2.2-fold increase). There was no significant difference in serum alanine aminotransferase activity before and after ethanol consumption. CONCLUSION: miR-122 increased with moderate ethanol consumption, but the fold change was modest. As increases with acetaminophen toxicity are 100- to 10 000-fold, moderate ethanol intoxication is unlikely to confound the use of this biomarker of hepatotoxicity.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/genetics , Ethanol/administration & dosage , MicroRNAs/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alcohol Drinking/blood , Blood Alcohol Content , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , MicroRNAs/blood , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Up-Regulation , Young Adult
4.
Gerontology ; 58(3): 282-8, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21952502

ABSTRACT

Rapid advances in service robotics together with dramatic shifts in population demographics have led to the notion that technology may be the answer to our eldercare problems. Robots are being developed for feeding, washing, lifting, carrying and mobilising the elderly as well as monitoring their health. They are also being proposed as a substitute for companionship. While these technologies could accrue major benefits for society and empower the elderly, we must balance their use with the ethical costs. These include a potential reduction in human contact, increased feeling of objectification and loss of control, loss of privacy and personal freedom as well as deception and infantilisation. With appropriate guidelines in place before the introduction of robots en masse into the care system, robots could improve the lives of the elderly, reducing their dependence and creating more opportunities for social interaction. Without forethought, the elderly may find themselves in a barren world of machines, a world of automated care: a factory for the elderly.


Subject(s)
Geriatrics/methods , Health Services for the Aged/organization & administration , Nursing Homes/organization & administration , Quality of Life , Robotics/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aging/ethics , Aging/physiology , Dementia/diagnosis , Dementia/epidemiology , Dementia/therapy , Female , Forecasting , Frail Elderly , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Geriatrics/ethics , Health Services for the Aged/ethics , Health Services for the Aged/trends , Humans , Life Expectancy , Male , Needs Assessment , Nursing Homes/ethics , Nursing Homes/trends , Robotics/ethics , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...