Computed tomography analysis of knee pose and geometry before and after total knee arthroplasty.

Using a three-dimensional (3D) modality to image patients' knees before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) allows researchers and clinicians to evaluate causes of pain after TKA, differences in implant design, and changes in the articular geometry as a result of surgery. Computed tomography (CT) has not been fully utilized to date for evaluating the knee after TKA due to metal artifacts obscuring part of the image. We describe an accurate, validated protocol, which has been implemented in vivo, that improves visibility of the patellofemoral joint, matches implant models automatically in 3D, segments preoperative bone semi-automatically, detects and sets coordinate systems automatically, determines the six degrees of freedom of knee pose and geometry, and allows for multiple other measurements that are clinically relevant. Subjects are imaged at 0° and 30° knee flexion, while pushing on a custom-made knee rig to provide partial loadbearing. With some modifications, the protocol can be adopted by any group with access to a CT scanner and image analysis software, allowing for the investigation of numerous clinical and biomechanical questions.

Radiological method for measuring patellofemoral tracking and tibiofemoral kinematics before and after total knee replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Numerous complications following total knee replacement (TKR) relate to the patellofemoral (PF) joint, including pain and patellar maltracking, yet the options for in vivo imaging of the PF joint are limited, especially after TKR. We propose a novel sequential biplane radiological method that permits accurate tracking of the PF and tibiofemoral (TF) joints throughout the range of movement under weightbearing, and test it in knees pre- and post-arthroplasty. METHODS: A total of three knees with end-stage osteoarthritis and three knees that had undergone TKR at more than one year's follow-up were investigated. In each knee, sequential biplane radiological images were acquired from the sagittal direction (i.e. horizontal X-ray source and 10° below horizontal) for a sequence of eight flexion angles. Three-dimensional implant or bone models were matched to the biplane images to compute the six degrees of freedom of PF tracking and TF kinematics, and other clinical measures. RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation for the six degrees of freedom of PF tracking and TF kinematics were computed. TF and PF kinematics were highly accurate (< 0.9 mm, < 0.6°) and repeatable. CONCLUSIONS: The developed method permitted measuring of in vivo PF tracking and TF kinematics before and after TKR throughout the range of movement. This method could be a useful tool for investigating differences between cohorts of patients (e.g., with and without pain) impacting clinical decision-making regarding surgical technique, revision surgery or implant design.