ABSTRACT
Reliable methods for measuring human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence are a high priority for HIV prevention. They are particularly important to assess the population-level effectiveness of new prevention strategies, to evaluate the community-wide impact of ongoing prevention programs, and to assess whether a proposed prevention trial can be performed in a timely and cost-efficient manner in a particular population and setting. New incidence assays and algorithms that are accurate, rapid, cost-efficient, and can be performed on easily-obtained specimens are urgently needed. On May 4, 2011, the Division of AIDS (DAIDS), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), sponsored a 1-day workshop to examine strategies for developing new assays to distinguish recent from chronic HIV infections. Participants included leading investigators, clinicians, public health experts, industry, regulatory specialists, and other stakeholders. Immune-based parameters, markers of viral sequence diversity, and other biomarkers such as telomere length were evaluated. Emerging nanotechnology and chip-based diagnostics, including algorithms for performing diverse assays on a single platform, were also reviewed. This report summarizes the presentations, panel discussions, and the consensus reached for pursuing the development of a new generation of HIV incidence assays.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections/immunology , HIV-1/immunology , Immunoglobulin A/immunology , Telomere Homeostasis/immunology , Algorithms , Biomarkers/blood , CD4-CD8 Ratio , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Genetic Variation , HIV Infections/genetics , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Immunoglobulin A/genetics , Incidence , Male , National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.) , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Needs Assessment , Telomere Homeostasis/genetics , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Monitoring the performance of routinely used infectious disease serologic tests is necessary to evaluate their effectiveness in identifying true-positive units and erroneously disqualifying safe blood donors. METHODS: With two large screening test data sets collected between 1991 and 1998 and between 1997 and 2000, the impact of changes in screening assays for HIV, HCV, and HBsAg was analyzed with regard to the prevalence of confirmed-positive, indeterminate, and confirmed-negative results and the deferral of donors with an indeterminate or negative results (donor loss). RESULTS: The prevalence of indeterminate results and donors loss increased significantly in the 6 months after introduction of an HIV-1/2 EIA. A second-generation HCV EIA increased the detection of confirmed-positive donations in repeat donors (p < 0.001) and increased the prevalence of indeterminate donations. Implementation of a third-generation HCV EIA resulted in a significant decrease in indeterminate results in first-time donors. Nonspecific test results increased when HBsAg test kits from a different manufacturer were introduced or different lots of HIV antibody screening test kits from the same manufacturer were used. CONCLUSION: Introduction of newly licensed versions of assays, switching kit manufacturers, and lot-to-lot variations have an impact on rates of deferrals of safe donors as well as sensitivity of routine screening. Before considering changes in screening tests, blood centers should be aware of, and evaluate, the potential impact on donor loss.
