Emotional empathy across adulthood: A meta-analytic review.

Emotional empathy is a congruent emotional response stemming from another's emotional state and has mixed evidence for its association with age. We sought to synthesize existing data to investigate cross-sectional changes in emotional empathy across adulthood using random-effects meta-analyses. Embase, APA PsycInfo, Medline, and Scopus databases were systematically searched until October 2022. Thirty-three studies assessed age categorically by comparing older (M = 68.42, SD = 4.95) with younger (M = 27.55, SD = 6.82) adults and demonstrated higher emotional empathy in older adults (g = 0.10, p = .039). Seven studies examined age continuously (18-100 years), resulting in a positive correlation with age (zr = .08, p = .033). Subgroup analyses identified age effects differed based on the emotional empathy measure but not on measure type (state vs. trait) or gender ratio (73% women and 27% men). Cross-sectional results indicate emotional empathy may increase across adulthood. These results clarify the previously mixed reports of typical emotional empathy functioning in later life. Age effects varying due to the emotional empathy measure examined indicate that these measures' convergent validity should be reexamined. Further research should employ older, population-based, non-western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic samples and longitudinal designs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Burden of mood symptoms and disorders in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 39 954 patients.

AIMS: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) prevent sudden cardiac death. Anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are underappreciated symptoms. We aimed to systematically synthesize prevalence estimates of mood disorders and symptom severities, pre- and post-ICD insertions. Comparisons were made with control groups, as well as within ICD patients by indication (primary vs. secondary), sex, shock status, and over time. METHODS: Databases (Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Embase) were searched without limits from inception to 31 August 2022; 4661 articles were identified, 109 (39 954 patients) of which met criteria. RESULTS: Random-effects meta-analyses revealed clinically relevant anxiety in 22.58% (95%CI 18.26-26.91%) of ICD patients across all timepoints following insertion and depression in 15.42% (95%CI 11.90-18.94%). Post-traumatic stress disorder was seen in 12.43% (95%CI 6.90-17.96%). Rates did not vary relative to indication group. Clinically relevant anxiety and depression were more likely in ICD patients who experienced shocks [anxiety odds ratio (OR) = 3.92 (95%CI 1.67-9.19); depression OR = 1.87 (95%CI 1.34-2.59)]. Higher symptoms of anxiety were seen in females than males post-insertion [Hedges' g = 0.39 (95%CI 0.15-0.62)]. Depression symptoms decreased in the first 5 months post-insertion [Hedges' g = 0.13 (95%CI 0.03-0.23)] and anxiety symptoms after 6 months [Hedges' g = 0.07 (95%CI 0-0.14)]. CONCLUSION: Depression and anxiety are highly prevalent in ICD patients, especially in those who experience shocks. Of particular concern is the prevalence of PTSD following ICD implantation. Psychological assessment, monitoring, and therapy should be offered to ICD patients and their partners as part of routine care.

How do predisposing factors differ between delirium motor subtypes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common neurocognitive disorder in hospitalised older adults with vast negative consequences. The predominant method of subtyping delirium is by motor activity profile into hypoactive, hyperactive and mixed groups. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated how predisposing factors differ between delirium motor subtypes. METHODS: Databases (Medline, PsycINFO, Embase) were systematically searched for studies reporting predisposing factors (prior to delirium) for delirium motor subtypes. A total of 61 studies met inclusion criteria (N = 14,407, mean age 73.63 years). Random-effects meta-analyses synthesised differences between delirium motor subtypes relative to 22 factors. RESULTS: Hypoactive cases were older, had poorer cognition and higher physical risk scores than hyperactive cases and were more likely to be women, living in care homes, taking more medications, with worse functional performance and history of cerebrovascular disease than all remaining subtypes. Hyperactive cases were younger than hypoactive and mixed subtypes and were more likely to be men, with better cognition and lower physical risk scores than all other subtypes. Those with no motor subtype (unable to be classified) were more likely to be women and have better functional performance. Effect sizes were small. CONCLUSIONS: Important differences in those who develop motor subtypes of delirium were shown prior to delirium occurrence. We provide robust quantitative evidence for a common clinical assumption that indices of frailty (institutional living, cognitive and functional impairment) are seen more in hypoactive patients. Motor subtypes should be measured across delirium research. Motor subtyping has great potential to improve the clinical risk assessment and management of delirium.

The neuropsychological profile of delirium vulnerability: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Delirium is a common neurocognitive disorder in hospitalised older adults with substantial negative consequences. Impaired global cognition is a well-established delirium risk factor. However, poor performance on attention tests and higher intra-subject variability may be more sensitive delirium risk factors, given the disorder is characterised by a fluctuating course and attentional deficits. We systematically searched databases (Embase, PsycINFO, MEDLINE) and 44 studies satisfied inclusion criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis models showed poor performance in all cognitive domains except perception was significantly associated with incident delirium. Largest effects were for orientation (g=-1.20) and construction and motor performance (g=-0.60). These effects were no longer significant in the subgroup without pre-existing cognitive impairment, where executive functions and verbal functions and language skills were associated with incident delirium. A small, non-significant association between intra-subject variability and incident delirium was found (g=0.42). Cognitive domain specific tests may be quicker and more sensitive predictors of incident delirium. This pattern of neuropsychological findings supports the proposition that vulnerability for delirium manifests as a dysfunction of whole-brain information integration.