Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AIDS Care ; 33(6): 827-832, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32490685

ABSTRACT

Antiretroviral medications are expensive, and people living with HIV often experience challenges accessing and paying for medication due to various obstacles. We used concept mapping to explore the challenges people living with HIV in Ontario, Canada, face when accessing medication. In brainstorming, 68 participants generated 447 statements in response to the focus prompt "Some people living with HIV have trouble getting and paying for prescription drugs because … ". These were consolidated into 77 statements, which were sorted (n = 30) and rated (n = 32) on importance and commonality. A ten-cluster concept map consisting of individual- and health system-related clusters was generated. Clusters included: (1) Stigma, (2) Medication-Related Issues, (3) Individual Challenges, (4) Basic Needs, (5) Immigration, (6) Coverage, (7) Trillium Drug Program, (8) Access to Services, (9) System-Level Issues and (10) Access to Professional Services. Statements in Coverage and Basic Needs were rated most important and common although there was variability by Ontario residence and drug coverage mechanisms. Strategies to address challenges were generated in Interpretation (n = 25 participants). Given that continuous access to antiretroviral therapy is necessary to fully realize treatment benefits, policies and interventions that address these challenges are needed.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Ontario , Social Stigma
3.
Int J Infect Dis ; 40: 142-4, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26616402

ABSTRACT

Data evaluating the screening practices for viral hepatitides and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in patients presenting for non-occupational HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) care are limited. Screening practices and prevalences of viral hepatitides and STIs were evaluated in 126 patients presenting to a dedicated HIV prevention clinic for HIV nPEP. Three patients (2.4%) were diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C infection, 28 (22.2%) did not have surface antibodies in sufficient quantity to confer immunity to hepatitis B, and six (4.8%) were diagnosed with an STI. A multivariate regression model did not predict any demographic or clinical features predictive of HBV non-immunity. Beyond screening for HIV infection, evaluation for viral hepatitides and STIs is an important feature in the care of patients presenting for HIV nPEP.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/epidemiology , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Chlamydia Infections/complications , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Hepatitis B/complications , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/complications , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/complications , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/complications , Young Adult
4.
AIDS Patient Care STDS ; 29(8): 431-6, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26154174

ABSTRACT

The uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention remains low. We hypothesized that a high proportion of patients presenting for HIV non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) would be candidates for PrEP based on current CDC guidelines. Outcomes from a comprehensive HIV Prevention Clinic are described. We evaluated all patients who attended the HIV Prevention Clinic for nPEP between January 1, 2013 and September 30, 2014. Each patient was evaluated for PrEP candidacy based on current CDC-guidelines and subjectively based on physician opinion. Patients were then evaluated for initiation of PrEP if they met guideline suggestions. Demographic, social, and behavioral factors were then analyzed with logistic regression for associations with PrEP candidacy and initiation. 99 individuals who attended the nPEP clinic were evaluated for PrEP. The average age was 32 years (range, 18-62), 83 (84%) were male, of whom 46 (55%) men who had have sex with men (MSM). 31 (31%) met CDC guidelines for PrEP initiation, which had very good agreement with physician recommendation (kappa=0.88, 0.78-0.98). Factors associated with PrEP candidacy included sexual exposure to HIV, prior nPEP use, and lack of drug insurance (p<0.05 for all comparisons). Combining nPEP and PrEP services in a dedicated clinic can lead to identification of PrEP candidates and may facilitate PrEP uptake. Strategies to ensure equitable access of PrEP should be explored such that those without drug coverage may also benefit from this effective HIV prevention modality.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/prevention & control , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Adolescent , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk-Taking , Socioeconomic Factors , Unsafe Sex
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...