Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes in symptomatic patients with 70% to 99% carotid artery stenosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In 1991, the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) reported the benefit of carotid endarterectomy for 659 patients with 70% to 99% stenosis. Follow-up continued until 1997. METHODS: The present study examined the risks and causes of ipsilateral stroke in the randomized groups and in those who had delayed endarterectomy or continued on medical therapy and also examined the evolution of carotid disease on follow-up imaging. RESULTS: By on-treatment (efficacy) analysis, the risk of any ipsilateral stroke at 3 years was 28.3% for medically randomized and 8.9% for surgically randomized patients (19.4% absolute risk reduction, P:<0.001). For combined disabling or fatal ipsilateral stroke, the risks were 14.0% and 3.4%, respectively (10. 6% absolute risk reduction). In medical patients, >80% of the first strokes at 3 years were of large-artery origin. After February 1991, 116 suitable medical patients underwent endarterectomy within 6 months, and 115 continued on medical therapy. The 3-year risk of any ipsilateral stroke in the groups of 116 and 115 patients was 7.9% and 15.0%, respectively (7.1% absolute risk reduction). During follow-up, 81 patients had angiograms comparable to the baseline images. Progression by >/=10% occurred in 7 patients; regression, in 8; no change, in 39; and occlusion, in 27. By use of both angiography and ultrasound, 63 (25.5%) of the 247 medically treated patients progressed to occlusion, of whom 31.7% had an ipsilateral stroke before or on the day of occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: Endarterectomy for patients with 70% to 99% stenosis and recent symptoms was efficacious in the long term. Compared with patients who continued on medical therapy, medical patients with delayed endarterectomy experienced a moderate benefit. Medically treated patients experienced a high risk of occlusion.

The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.

BACKGROUND: The causes of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid-artery stenosis have not been carefully studied. Information about causes might influence decisions about the use of carotid endarterectomy in such patients. METHODS: We studied patients with unilateral symptomatic carotid-artery stenosis and asymptomatic contralateral stenosis from 1988 to 1997. The causes, severity, risk, and predictors of stroke in the territory of the asymptomatic artery were examined and quantified. RESULTS: The risk of stroke at five years after study entry in a total of 1820 patients increased with the severity of stenosis. Among 1604 patients with stenosis of less than 60 percent of the luminal diameter, the risk of a first stroke was 8.0 percent (1.6 percent annually), as compared with 16.2 percent (3.2 percent annually) among 216 patients with 60 to 99 percent stenosis. In the group with 60 to 99 percent stenosis, the five-year risk of stroke in the territory of a large artery was 9.9 percent, that of lacunar stroke was 6.0 percent, and that of cardioembolic stroke 2.1 percent. Some patients had more than one stroke of more than one cause. In the territory of an asymptomatic occluded artery (as was identified in 86 patients), the annualized risk of stroke was 1.9 percent. Strokes with different causes had different risk factors. The risk factors for large-artery stroke were silent brain infarction, a history of diabetes, and a higher degree of stenosis; for cardioembolic stroke, a history of myocardial infarction or angina and hypertension; for lacunar stroke, age of 75 years or older, hypertension, diabetes, and a higher degree of stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of stroke among patients with asymptomatic carotid-artery stenosis is relatively low. Forty-five percent of strokes in patients with asymptomatic stenosis of 60 to 99 percent are attributable to lacunes or cardioembolism. These observations have implications for the use of endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients. Without analysis of the risk of stroke according to cause, the absolute benefit associated with endarterectomy may be overestimated.

Risk factors and outcome of patients with carotid artery stenosis presenting with lacunar stroke. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Group.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between carotid artery stenosis, other risk factors, and lacunar stroke. BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenosis in patients presenting with lacune stroke may be coincidental or causal. The distinction by risk factor profile is uncertain. The risk and cause of subsequent stroke, and benefit of carotid endarterectomy (CE) is unknown. METHODS: Stroke in patients entering the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial were classified as nonlacunar, possible lacune (symptoms without CT lacunae), or probable lacune (symptoms with CT lacunae). RESULTS: Of 1,158 patients with hemispheric stroke, 493 had features of lacunar stroke (283 possible and 210 probable). Lacunar stroke presented more commonly in patients with milder (<50%) degrees of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (p = 0.003). History of diabetes and hyperlipidemia, not hypertension, were associated independently even after accounting for the degree of stenosis. Medically treated patients presenting with nonlacunar stroke had a low risk of subsequent lacunar events of 2.9% at 3 years in comparison with 9.2% for probable lacunar presentation (p = 0.03). For patients with 50 to 99% ICA stenosis, the relative risk reductions (RRRs) in stroke from CE were 35% when the presenting stroke was probable lacunar versus 61% when the stroke was nonlacunar. Patients presenting with a possible lacunar stroke had a 53% RRR. CONCLUSIONS: History of diabetes and hyperlipidemia were more important than arterial hypertension as risk factors for patients with lacunar stroke. Patients presenting with lacunar stroke more often had milder ICA stenosis. Although CE reduced the risk of stroke in all patients with 50 to 99% ICA stenosis, lesser benefits were observed in patients presenting with lacunar stroke.

Importance of intracranial atherosclerotic disease in patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trail.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The estimated prevalence of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (IAD) in patients with stenosis of the extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) varies between 20% and 50%. The benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CE) in patients with both IAD and symptomatic extracranial ICA stenosis are uncertain. METHODS: The association between IAD and other vascular risk factors and with the risk of stroke at 3 years were studied in patients with symptomatic extracranial ICA stenosis who participated in the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET). Since the NASCET protocol excluded severe IAD, only a modest number of patients in this category could be studied. RESULTS: IAD was observed in one third of the patients. In medically treated patients, the relative risk of stroke associated with IAD varied from 1.3 (95% CI, 0.9 to 1.9) with extracranial ICA stenosis of <50% to 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1 to 3.2) with 85% to 99% ICA stenosis. In contrast, IAD did not affect the risk of stroke among surgically treated patients. To prevent 1 stroke ipsilateral to the symptomatic ICA stenosis over 3 years in patients who have also IAD, 12 patients with 50% to 69%, 5 patients with 70% to 84%, and 3 patients with 85% to 99% ICA stenosis have to undergo CE. In patients without IAD these numbers are 26, 7, and 6, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IAD is an independent risk factor for subsequent stroke in medically treated patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis. CE reduces this risk. The additional risk imposed by IAD in medically treated patients enhances the value of CE in patients with moderate symptomatic extracranial ICA stenosis. Detection of IAD, requiring angiography, is an important prelude to planning CE in symptomatic patients with moderate extracranial ICA stenosis.

Carotid artery stenosis: external validity of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial measurement method.

PURPOSE: To assess the generalizability of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial method for determining the degree of stenosis on angiograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six good-quality, baseline angiograms of carotid arteries that were less than 70% stenosed were reviewed by 14 experienced neuroradiologists at different academic institutions. All reviewers determined the degree of stenosis by calculating the ratio of the diameter of the artery at the point of maximal narrowing to the normal diameter distal to the stenosis (well beyond the carotid artery bulb). The reviewers marked the location of their measurements on the angiogram. Comparisons were performed among the reviewers' results and with the reference measurements. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was 0.84 (95% confidence interval = 0.65, 0.97). The average interobserver disagreement of +/-7% was comparable with that reported in the literature. The overall bias was 6%, which indicated a tendency of the reviewers to overestimate the degree of stenosis in comparison with the reference determination. CONCLUSION: The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial reference measurements can be generalized beyond the bounds of this clinical trial, provided that attention is paid to details of the measurement method.

The risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy in patients with near occlusion of the carotid artery. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group.

Some believe that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for carotid near occlusion is a necessary emergency procedure while others call it dangerous. We used the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) data to perform an observational study to examine the safety and benefit of CEA for carotid near occlusion. We divided the data of 659 patients into stenosis groups: 70 to 79%, 80 to 89%, 90 to 94%, and near occlusion. The 106 carotid-near-occlusion patients were subdivided into those with a string-like lumen (n = 29) and those without a string-like lumen (n = 77). Of the 48 patients with near occlusion treated with CEA, 3 (6.3%) had perioperative strokes, similar to the 70-94% stenosis group. Only 1 of 58 patients (1.7%) with near occlusion treated medically had a stroke in the first month, suggesting that CEA is not needed on an emergency basis in this circumstance. For medically treated patients, the 1-year risk of stroke increases with escalating degrees of carotid stenosis, where the risk is 35.1% for patients with 90-94% stenosis. For patients with near occlusion, the 1-year stroke risk diminishes to 11.1%, which approximates the risk for patients with 70-89% stenosis. A comparison of treatment differences indicates that surgery reduces the risk of stroke at 1 year by approximately one-half (p < 0.001), regardless of the degree of stenosis or the subcategory of carotid near occlusion (p = 0.89). Our data suggest that CEA is beneficial for near occlusion and not more dangerous than in patients with 70-94% stenosis, provided that the procedure is performed by an experienced surgeon with a low complication rate.