Visual outcomes comparing emmetropia versus mini-monovision following bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive extended vision intraocular lens:randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes and patient satisfaction following bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive extended vision intraocular lens(IOL) when targeting emmetropia versus mini-monovision. SETTING: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre,India. DESIGN: Prospective,randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with an extended vision IOL(Vivity, Alcon Laboratories, USA) randomized to: group I- IOL implantation with emmetropic target in both eyes, or group II- IOL implantation with mini-monovision of -0.5 diopters(D). Outcome measures evaluated 6 months postoperatively were: unaided and corrected near visual acuity(UNVA, CNVA) at 40 centimeters(cm), unaided and corrected distance(UDVA, CDVA) and intermediate (UIVA, CIVA) visual acuity at 66cm. Mesopic contrast sensitivity, binocular defocus curve, patient reported spectacle independence questionnaire and satisfaction on the McAlinden questionnaire were also assessed. RESULTS: 70 patients enrolled in study. 34 and 33 patients in groups I and II completed follow-up. Binocular UNVA was significantly better in group II (0.26+0.05 vs 0.22+0.08 LogMAR, P=0.03). Reading add required in group II was significantly lower. UIVA (0.09+0.06 vs 0.07+0.08 LogMAR, P=0.15) and UDVA (0.02+0.04 vs 0.02+0.05 LogMAR, P=0.78) were not significantly different between groups. Mesopic contrast sensitivity was not significantly different between the groups. Binocular defocus curve showed significantly better mean visual acuities between -2.0 to -3.0 diopters in group II. Patients in both groups had high levels of spectacle independence, with no patient reporting dysphotopsia. CONCLUSION: Binocular UNVA was significantly better, with comparable UDVA and mesopic contrast sensitivity when targeting mini monovision with the non-diffractive extended vision IOL as compared to targeting binocular emmetropia.

Visual outcomes after toric intraocular lens implantation in pediatric eyes undergoing cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term visual outcomes and complications after toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in children with preexisting corneal astigmatism undergoing cataract surgery. SETTING: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Center, Ahmedabad, India. DESIGN: Prospective, interventional case series. METHODS: Children with regular corneal astigmatism of at least 1.5 diopters (D) were included. A standardized surgical technique with in-the-bag implantation of a toric IOL was performed. All children were followed up on postoperative day 1 and periodically thereafter, until 36 months postoperatively. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and residual refractive astigmatism were documented 36 months postoperatively. Rotational stability of toric IOL was also evaluated through the follow-up duration. Complications, particularly visual axis obscuration (VAO) and glaucoma, were documented. RESULTS: In total, 76 eyes (51 children) were included in the study. Mean age at surgery was 7.41 ± 2.82 years (SD) and mean preoperative keratometric astigmatism was 1.56 ± 2.13 D. The CDVA (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) improved significantly from 0.59 ± 0.43 preoperatively to 0.23 ± 0.27 36 months postoperatively (P = .03). Mean postoperative UDVA was 0.32 ± 0.26 logMAR. Mean refractive astigmatism at final follow-up was -0.55 ± 0.40 D, with 74% patients having a UDVA of at least 20/40; 5% of eyes needed VAO treatment and none developed glaucoma. No eye required repositioning of toric IOL until final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Toric IOL implantation reduced postoperative refractive astigmatism and gave excellent UDVA at 36 months follow-up in pediatric eyes undergoing nontraumatic cataract surgery.

Corticocapsular adhesions and their effect during cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To identify the types of corticocapsular adhesions by their preoperative clinical appearance and evaluate the difficulties they pose during cataract surgery. SETTING: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Center, Ahmedabad, India. METHODS: Seventy-six eyes with age-related senile cataract scheduled for phacoemulsification were identified as having corticocapsular adhesions. Preoperatively, the eyes were assessed at the slitlamp to determine the type of corticocapsular adhesions present. During surgery, the surgeon graded nucleus rotation after single-site cortical-cleaving hydrodissection as easy, difficult, or not possible. Additional multiquadrant-focal hydrodissection was performed. The surgeon's impressions of the presence of corticocapsular adhesions and visualization of the furry surface of the epinucleus were noted. RESULTS: Corticocapsular adhesions were confirmed in 86.84% of eyes. Equatorial corticocapsular adhesions alone or in combination were present in 72 eyes (94.74%) eyes, anterior corticocapsular adhesions in 40 (52.74%), and posterior corticocapsular adhesions in 42 (56.26%). Rotation of nucleus was not possible in 47.37% eyes, difficult in 39.47%, and easy in 13.16%. CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon should perform a thorough preoperative slitlamp evaluation in extreme gaze with a fully dilated pupil. Equatorial corticocapsular adhesions, which were present in most eyes, made nucleus rotation difficult. Additional multiquadrant and focal cortical-cleaving hydrodissection helped separate the adhesions and achieve successful rotation.

Cell response to AcrySof intraocular lenses in an Indian population.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the quantitative cytological response to AcrySof (Alcon) intraocular lenses (IOLs) in an Indian population by studying the incidence, fate, progression, and severity of cell deposits after uneventful phacoemulsification. SETTING: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Center, Ahmedabad, India. METHOD: This clinical prospective study comprised 64 eyes of 64 healthy patients with senile cataract and no other ocular pathology having phacoemulsification and implantation of an AcrySof IOL. The eyes were observed for cell deposits. One week and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 15 months postoperatively, specular reflex was obtained by slitlamp biomicroscopy under x 20 magnification to record the incidence, progression, morbidity, and severity of small and large (including giant) cells on the IOLs. RESULTS: The highest incidence of small cells was 18.7%. The cell deposits appeared at 1 week, peaked at 1 month, and were gone after 6 months. The severity was never more than grade 2 (5 to 10 cells). The highest incidence of large cells, including giant cells, was 23.4%. The deposits appeared at 1 month, peaked at 3 months, and were gone after 12 months. The severity was never more than grade 2 (3 to 5 cells). The highest incidence of giant cells was 6.2%. The deposits appeared at 3 months and were gone by 15 months. Severity was never more than grade 1 (2 cells). No IOL had cell deposits at the last follow-up (mean 14 months +/- 3.25 [SD]). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence, and especially the severity, of cell deposits in the Indian population was low. All cell types, including giant cells, disappeared within 12 months. This could reflect the biocompatibility of the AcrySof IOL and the appropriate surgical technique.