Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
1.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 46(11): 1688-93, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17938138

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: New onset heart failure (HF) has been associated with the use of TNF-alpha antagonists etanercept and infliximab based upon spontaneous adverse event reports. HF clinical trials of these agents were stopped early due to futility or worsening of existing HF. A potential association between etanercept and infliximab and new onset HF has been studied minimally at a population level. METHODS: Using administrative claims from a large U.S. health care organization, we identified rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Crohn's disease (CD) patients receiving infliximab or etanercept (exposed), and comparator cohorts of RA and CD patients receiving non-biologic immunosuppressives (unexposed). We studied adults < 50 years to reduce potential confounding related to common age-related comorbidities. Based on abstracted medical records of suspected HF cases, a physician panel adjudicated cases as definite, possible or no HF. RESULTS: Among 4018 RA and CD patients with mean duration follow-up of 18 months, 9 of 33 suspected HF cases (identified using claims data) were adjudicated as definite (n = 5) or possible (n = 4) HF. The relative risk of HF among TNF-alpha antagonist-treated RA and CD patients was 4.3 and 1.2, respectively (P = NS for both). The absolute difference in cumulative incidence of HF among infliximab or etanercept-exposed compared to unexposed patients was 3.4 and 0.3 cases per 1000 persons for RA and CD (P = NS), respectively, yielding a number needed to harm of 294 for RA and 3333 for CD. CONCLUSION: We found only a small number of presumed HF cases (n = 9, or 0.2%) in a large population of relatively young RA and CD patients. Although there was an increased relative risk of incident, HF that was not statistically significant among those exposed to TNF-alpha antagonists compared to those unexposed, larger cohorts are needed to provide more precise risk estimates and permit adjustment for potential confounding.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Heart Failure/chemically induced , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Etanercept , Female , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin G/therapeutic use , Infliximab , Male , Middle Aged , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor/therapeutic use , United States/epidemiology
4.
JAMA ; 286(7): 831-3, 2001 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11497537

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Soon after initial marketing in March 1997, troglitazone, the first thiazolidinedione antidiabetic agent, was found to cause life-threatening acute liver failure. The drug was removed from the market in March 2000. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) risk management efforts, including repeated labeling changes and "Dear Healthcare Professional" letters, on periodic liver enzyme monitoring of patients taking troglitazone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Claims data from a large, multistate managed care organization were used to establish 4 cohorts of patients (N = 7603) with at least 90 days of health plan enrollment before first troglitazone prescription during 4 consecutive periods spanning April 1997 to September 1999 and representing 4 progressively stringent liver monitoring recommendations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of eligible troglitazone users in each cohort with baseline, monthly (for up to 6 months of continuous use), and complete (baseline and monthly) enzyme monitoring, based on computerized records of laboratory claims. RESULTS: Baseline testing increased from 15% before any FDA monitoring recommendations (cohort 1) to 44.6% following 4 separate FDA interventions (cohort 4; P<.001). In cohort 4, 33.4% of users had follow-up testing after 1 month of therapy, falling to 13% after 5 months of continuous use. In all cohorts, less than 5% received all recommended liver enzyme tests by the third month of continuous use. CONCLUSIONS: The FDA risk management efforts did not achieve meaningful or sustained improvement in liver enzyme testing. Evaluation of the impact of regulatory actions is needed before such actions can be regarded as effective or sufficient.


Subject(s)
Chromans/adverse effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Liver Failure, Acute/chemically induced , Liver Failure, Acute/prevention & control , Liver Function Tests , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Thiazolidinediones , Chromans/therapeutic use , Drug Labeling , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Liver/enzymology , Liver Failure, Acute/enzymology , Risk Management , Thiazoles/therapeutic use , Transaminases/blood , Troglitazone , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
5.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 20(4): 410-6, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11332666

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the first year that the rhesus rotavirus tetravalent vaccine (RRV-TV) was licensed, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System received several reports of intussusception after vaccination. To evaluate the risk of intussusception, we conducted a retrospective cohort study in ten managed care organizations. METHODS: Cases of intussusception were identified by searching electronic databases for diagnoses of intussusception (ICD-9 Code 560.0) in infants 1 to 11 months of age and confirmed by medical chart review. Vaccination and enrollment data were obtained from administrative databases. Incidence rate ratios (RR) of intussusception were computed by dividing incidence rates in prespecified risk intervals after vaccination by the background rate of intussusception and adjusted for age by Poisson regression. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate risk by vaccine dose. RESULTS: Of 463,277 children 56,253 had been vaccinated with a total of 91 371 doses of RRV-TV. The incidence rate of intussusception was 25/100,000 person years among unexposed infants and 340/100,000 person years 3 to 7 days postvaccination. In the interval 3 to 7 days after vaccination, the age-adjusted RR was 16.0 (95% confidence interval, 5.5 to 46.7) for all doses combined and 30.4 (95% confidence interval, 8.8 to 104.9) after the first dose. RRs for the 8- to 14- and 15- to 21-day risk intervals were >1.0, but the confidence intervals substantially overlapped 1.0. The attributable risk was one case of intussusception per 11 073 children vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS: RRV-TV is associated with an increased risk of intussusception. The risk is greatest 3 to 7 days after the first vaccination dose.


Subject(s)
Intussusception/etiology , Rotavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Infant , Intussusception/epidemiology , Poisson Distribution , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Vaccination/adverse effects
6.
Am J Manag Care ; 7(4): 377-86, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11310192

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate satisfaction with the Healthy Pregnancy Program (HPP), which was developed to educate and coordinate the care of pregnant women in a managed care setting. STUDY DESIGN: Telephone survey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A random sample of program participants at 3 large health plans were contacted by telephone to evaluate their satisfaction with the program overall and with its components, including an educational booklet and telephone contact with a HPP nurse as needed. Women also were asked about changes in health behaviors (smoking, alcohol use, diet, and stress) resulting directly from participation in the HPP. Of 1155 eligible women participating in HPP who delivered a baby from April 1997 through March 1998, 684 completed the survey. The response rate was 59%. RESULTS: Overall satisfaction with the HPP was reported by 96% of the women, and 76% reported the 2 highest ratings of satisfaction (completely or very satisfied). Reports of satisfaction were more likely for women who entered the program early in pregnancy, who read the booklet, and who had more telephone contacts. In general, at least half of the women in each behavior category reported improving their behavior, especially if they were younger, identified as high risk, or having their first child. Verbatim comments supported the high satisfaction levels. CONCLUSIONS: The HPP is an example of a program that was developed to improve healthcare delivery in a managed care setting and, when evaluated, was found to result in highly satisfied mothers likely to improve their health behaviors.


Subject(s)
Managed Care Programs/organization & administration , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/organization & administration , Adult , Data Collection , Female , Health Behavior , Humans , Managed Care Programs/standards , Minnesota , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/standards , Sampling Studies
7.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 10(5): 367-71, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11802578

ABSTRACT

An understanding of the organizational context and taxonomy of health care databases is essential to appropriately use these data sources for research purposes. Characteristics of the organizational structure of the specific health care setting, including the model type, financial arrangement, and provider access, have implications for accessing and using this data effectively. Additionally, the benefit coverage environment may affect the utility of health care databases to address specific research questions. Coverage considerations that affect pharmacoepidemiologic research include eligibility, the nature of the pharmacy benefit, and regulatory aspects of the treatment under consideration.


Subject(s)
Databases as Topic/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Databases as Topic/classification , Databases as Topic/economics , Delivery of Health Care/classification , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Eligibility Determination/classification , Eligibility Determination/economics , Eligibility Determination/organization & administration , Fees, Pharmaceutical , Health Maintenance Organizations/classification , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Health Maintenance Organizations/organization & administration , Health Services Research/classification , Health Services Research/economics , Health Services Research/organization & administration , Humans , Insurance Benefits/economics , Medicaid/classification , Medicaid/economics , Medicaid/organization & administration , Pharmacoepidemiology/classification , Pharmacoepidemiology/economics , Pharmacoepidemiology/organization & administration , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration/standards
8.
Pharmacotherapy ; 20(12): 1423-31, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11130214

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the occurrence of tramadol-associated seizures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort and case-control studies. SETTING: UnitedHealth Group-affiliated independent practice model health plans, from different regions of the United States, contracting with large networks of physicians. INTERVENTION: Analysis of administrative data from a large U.S. managed care population. PATIENTS: A cohort of 9218 adult tramadol users and 37,232 concurrent nonusers. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fewer than 1% of users (80) had a presumed incident seizure claim after the first tramadol prescription. Risk of seizure claim was increased 2- to 6-fold among users adjusted for selected comorbidities and concomitant drugs. Risk was highest among those aged 25-54 years, those with more than four tramadol prescriptions, and those with history of alcohol abuse, stroke, or head injury. A case-control study among users was conducted to validate incident seizure outcomes from medical records. Only eight cases were confirmed, and all had cofactors associated with increased seizure risk. CONCLUSION: In a general population, risk of seizure may be associated with long-term therapy with tramadol or the presence of cofactors, or confined to a small sensitive population subset.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Seizures/chemically induced , Tramadol/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Drug Interactions , Female , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Managed Care Programs , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
9.
JAMA ; 284(23): 3036-9, 2000 Dec 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11122591

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Cisapride, a gastrointestinal tract promotility agent, can cause life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias in patients susceptible either because of concurrent use of medications that interfere with cisapride metabolism or prolong the QT interval or because of the presence of other diseases that predispose to such arrhythmias. In June 1998, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that use of cisapride was contraindicated in such patients and informed practitioners through additions to the boxed warning in the label and a "Dear Health Care Professional" letter sent by the drug's manufacturer. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the FDA's 1998 regulatory action regarding contraindicated use of cisapride. DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of data for the 1-year periods before (July 1997-June 1998) and after (July 1998-June 1999) the regulatory action from the population-based, pharmacoepidemiology research databases of 2 managed care organizations (sites A and B) and a state Medicaid program (site C). PARTICIPANTS: Patients with at least 180 days of prior enrollment in 1 of the 3 sites who were prescribed cisapride at least once in the period before (n = 24 840) or after (n = 22 459) regulatory action. Patients could be included in both cohorts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of cisapride users in each period for whom cisapride use was contraindicated by the product label, based on computerized patient medical encounter records. RESULTS: In the year prior to regulatory action, cisapride use was contraindicated for 26%, 30%, and 60% of users in study sites A, B, and C, respectively. In the year after regulatory action, use was contraindicated for 24%, 28%, and 58% of users, a reduction in contraindicated use of approximately 2 per 100 cisapride users at each site. When the analysis was restricted to new users of cisapride after regulatory action, only minor reductions in contraindicated use were found. CONCLUSION: The FDA's 1998 regulatory action regarding cisapride use had no material effect on contraindicated cisapride use. More effective ways to communicate new information about drug safety are needed.


Subject(s)
Cisapride , Drug Labeling , Gastrointestinal Agents , Legislation, Drug , United States Food and Drug Administration , Cisapride/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Contraindications , Drug Prescriptions , Gastrointestinal Agents/adverse effects , Humans , United States
10.
Neurology ; 55(9): 1341-9, 2000 Nov 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11087779

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare care for adults with MS across managed care and fee-for-service (FFS) health systems. METHODS: The authors sampled adults with MS having physician visits over a 2-year period from a group model health maintenance organization (HMO) in southern California, from a midwestern independent practice association (IPA) model managed care plan, and from the FFS portion of the practices of a random sample of southern California neurologists. The authors mailed surveys to subjects in mid-1996; 930 of 1,164 (80%) of those eligible responded. The authors measured sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, management of recent changes in mobility, bladder control, and fatigue, use of a disease-modifying agent, assessment of general health symptoms and issues, and unmet information needs. The authors adjusted comparisons between systems for comorbidity, disease severity, and disease type. RESULTS: The groups differed on most sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. There were few differences in symptom management; differences that did exist tended toward more referrals or treatment for the FFS group. Access to the disease-modifying agent available at the time of the survey did not differ across systems, although patients' perceptions of the rationale for not using the drug did vary. General health issues and symptoms were more often assessed in the FFS and IPA systems than in the HMO, but improvement was needed across all three systems of care. There were substantial unmet information needs in all groups and especially high ones in the FFS and HMO samples. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to improve care for people with MS should be developed and evaluated, particularly in areas like symptom assessment and meeting patient information needs. Where variations in service delivery exist, longitudinal studies are also needed to evaluate the potential impact on outcomes and to evaluate reasons for variation.


Subject(s)
Fee-for-Service Plans , Managed Care Programs , Multiple Sclerosis/economics , Multiple Sclerosis/physiopathology , Activities of Daily Living , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Humans , Socioeconomic Factors
11.
Clin Ther ; 22(1): 91-102, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10688393

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of Clostridium difficile diarrhea (CDD) and the risk for CDD associated with different oral antibiotics commonly used in the ambulatory care setting. METHODS: The prevalence of CDD was determined for enrollees in 4 UnitedHealth Group-affiliated health plans between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1994. Cases were identified based on the presence of an inpatient or outpatient claim with a primary diagnosis of diarrhea, a pharmacy claim for a prescription drug used to treat CDD, or a physician or facility claim for the C. difficile toxin test, and were confirmed using full-text medical records. Within a retrospective cohort design, periods of risk for CDD were defined on the basis of duration of antibiotic therapy. To control for potential selection bias created by heterogeneous rates of C. difficile testing and to limit confounding due to multiple antibiotic exposures, we used a nested case-control design, restricting eligibility to subjects who underwent screening for C. difficile and who had been exposed to only 1 antibiotic risk period with a single antibiotic. RESULTS: The global prevalence of CDD in 358,389 ambulatory care enrollees was 12 per 100,000 person-years. In the nested case-control study, after controlling for other risk factors, 2 antibiotics demonstrated an increased association with CDD: cephalexin (odds ratio [OR] = 7.5, 95% CI = 1.8 to 34.7) and cefixime (OR = 6.4, 95% CI = 1.2 to 39.0). CONCLUSIONS: Although CDD is thought to occur primarily in hospitalized patients, it was found to be present in an ambulatory care population, but at a low frequency. In this population, it appeared to be associated with 2 cephalosporins but not with other types of antibiotics usually linked with nosocomial CDD. Because the frequency of C. difficile testing was shown to be more common with high-risk antibiotics, CDD may be underdiagnosed in the ambulatory care setting.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Diarrhea/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
12.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 9(7): 549-56, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11338912

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This retrospective surveillance study used linked administrative claims data and medical records to determine the rate and types of birth malformations in infants born to women exposed to the antibiotic, clarithromycin (Biaxin), during the first trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: Pharmacy and hospital claims from eight geographically diverse health plans were used to identify women who had a delivery claim within 270 days of a clarithromycin prescription over a 5-year period (1991-1995). Hospital delivery admission medical records for 143 mothers and their 149 infants were abstracted to identify birth malformations. RESULTS: Five infants were identified with major malformations, three with minor malformations, and four with undescended testicles likely to resolve with time. The observed rate of 3.4% (95% CI, 0.5, 6.3) for major malformations was not statistically significantly different compared to an expected rate of 2.8% based on earlier national data. There was no consistency across types of major malformations. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide no evidence that clarithromycin is a likely major teratogen in humans. Use of claims data is one way to evaluate quickly and efficiently the safety of prescription medications in humans during pregnancy, especially when both exposure and outcome are rare.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Clarithromycin/adverse effects , Pregnancy Outcome , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing , Adult , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Medical Records , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
13.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 9(5): 371-6, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19025842

ABSTRACT

Purpose- To estimate the incidence of adverse gastrointestinal events in alendronate users.Methods- The computerized pharmacy claims of 12 geographically dispersed United Health Group-affiliated health plans were used to identify 1421 persons who received alendronate prescriptions. The medical claims data of these individuals were searched for subsequent diagnoses of oesophagitis, ulcer of the oesophagus, oesophageal perforation, gastric ulcer, and gastritis/duodenitis. The incidence level was estimated as cumulative incidence and incidence density and their 95% confidence intervals.Results- Thirty-nine persons had a diagnostic code indicating an incident oesophageal or gastric diagnosis of interest, including 22 with oesophagitis, two with oesophageal ulcer, one with gastric ulcer, and 15 with gastritis/duodenitis. Thirteen cases (33.3%) underwent upper endoscopic examination. Five (12.8%) patients were hospitalized. Reflecting alendronate use, 95% of patients were female. The cumulative incidence of oesophageal and gastric events for alendronate users was 3.1% in females, 2.0% in males, and 3.0% overall. The incidence density of a diagnosis of oesophageal or gastric events was 9.0 per 100 woman-years of exposure. There was no significant variation in the cumulative incidence among different age groups.Conclusions- These results suggest the incidence of oesophageal and gastric diagnostic codes is high among alendronate users. Further research is needed to assess the possible association between alendronate and adverse upper gastrointestinal events. Copyright (c) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

14.
Neurology ; 53(6): 1190-7, 1999 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10522871

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare general neurologists and MS specialists on patients' clinical characteristics and MS care as perceived by patients with MS. METHODS: We sampled all adult patients with MS having physician visits over a 2-year period from a Midwestern managed-care organization and from the fee-for-service portion of 23 randomly selected California neurologists' practices. In mid-1996, 694 subjects were mailed questionnaires; 532 (77%) responded. Sociodemographic/clinical characteristics, recent utilization of services/treatments, unmet needs, symptom care, and research participation were measured. Of 502 subjects (94%) who indicated their usual physician providing MS care was a neurologist, 217 (43%) reported having a general neurologist and 285 (57%) reported having an MS specialist. Comparisons between these two groups were adjusted for comorbidity and disease severity. RESULTS: General neurologist and MS specialist patient groups did not differ on any sociodemographic or clinical characteristic except age (p<0.05). Although health care utilization generally was similar, higher proportions of the MS specialist group were aware of or had discussed interferon beta-1b (IFNbeta-1b) with their physician (p<0.05) and were currently taking it (p<0.05); a smaller proportion of the MS specialist group reported stopping it because of side effects (p<0.01). Overall, levels of unmet need and care for recent symptoms were similar, but the MS specialist group reported more confidence in their physician/carefulness in listening (p<0.05). Twice as many MS specialist subjects had participated in nondrug research (p<0.05); drug study participation was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perceptions of their care were similar in most ways for those who designated their main MS provider as a general neurologist compared to an MS specialist; however, care differed in potentially important areas. Prospective, longitudinal studies are needed to measure and relate neurologists' training, experience, knowledge, and MS patient volume with both process and outcome measures of quality of MS care.


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis/psychology , Neurology , Patients/psychology , Self Concept , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Data Collection , Female , Health Services , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States
15.
Health Serv Res ; 34(1 Pt 2): 417-25, 1999 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10199685

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of state legislation requiring patient informed consent prior to medical record abstraction by external researchers for a specific study. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Informed consent responses obtained from November 1997 through April 1998 from members of a Minnesota-based IPA model health plan. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive case study of consent to gain access to medical records for a pharmaco-epidemiologic study of seizures associated with use of a pain medication that was conducted as part of the FDA's post-marketing safety surveillance program to evaluate adverse events associated with approved drugs. DATA COLLECTION: The informed consent process approved by an institutional review board consisted of three phases: (1) a letter from the health plan's medical director requesting participation, (2) a second mailing to nonrespondents, and (3) a follow-up telephone call to nonrespondents. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of 140 Minnesota health plan members asked to participate in the medical records study, 52 percent (73) responded and 19 percent (26) returned a signed consent form authorizing access to their records for the study. For 132 study subjects enrolled in five other health plans in states where study-specific consent was not required, health care providers granted access to patient medical records for 93 percent (123) of the members. CONCLUSION: Legislation requiring patient informed consent to gain access to medical records for a specific research study was associated with low participation and increased time to complete that observational study. Efforts to protect patient privacy may come into conflict with the ability to produce timely and valid research to safeguard and improve public health.


Subject(s)
Health Services Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Privacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Cohort Studies , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Independent Practice Associations/statistics & numerical data , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Informed Consent/statistics & numerical data , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Minnesota , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing/statistics & numerical data , State Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
16.
JAMA ; 281(4): 319-20; author reply 320-1, 1999 Jan 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9929076
17.
Diabetes Care ; 21(12): 2062-8, 1998 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9839095

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop a diabetes surveillance system that estimates the prevalence of diabetes and characterizes service use in diverse managed care organizations (MCOs). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Computerized inpatient, pharmacy, outpatient, and laboratory records were used to develop an algorithm to identify diabetes patients and to develop surveillance indicators common to the three participating MCOs. Using 1993 data, the availability, specifications, and limitations of various surveillance indicators were determined. RESULTS: An extensive set of diabetes surveillance indicators was identified from the four sources of data. Consistent data specifications across MCOs needed to consider variation in the type of data collected, a lack of documentation on level of coverage, differences in coding data, and different models of health care delivery. A total of 16,363 diabetes patients were identified. The age-adjusted prevalence of diabetes ranged from 24 to 29 per 1,000 enrollees. Approximately one-third of patients with diabetes (32-34%) were taking insulin. The majority had one or more visits to a primary care physician during the year (72-94%). Visits to specialists were less frequent. Ophthalmologists and optometrists were the most commonly used specialists: 29-60% of the patients with diabetes at the three MCOs had visited an ophthalmologist or optometrist. About one-fifth had an overnight hospital stay during the year. CONCLUSIONS: This diabetes surveillance system is a useful tool for MCOs to track trends in prevalence of diabetes, use of health services, and delivery of preventive care to individuals with diabetes. This system may also be useful for health care planning and for assessing use changes after new developments in diabetes care or new quality management initiatives.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Algorithms , Child , Child, Preschool , Delivery of Health Care , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Documentation , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Sex Factors , United States/epidemiology
18.
Pediatrics ; 102(4): E44, 1998 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9755281

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study compared utilization of health care services by children with chronic conditions who were insured by either Medicaid or an employer group in 1992 and 1993. Five chronic conditions were selected to illustrate patterns of service use: asthma, attention deficit disorder, diabetes, epilepsy, and sickle cell anemia. METHODOLOGY: Administrative databases were used to develop estimates of health services utilization for children <18 years of age with the five selected conditions, who had been enrolled for at least 6 continuous months. All claims for a child identified with one of these five conditions were included in the analysis, including claims for diagnoses and procedures not directly related to the primary diagnosis. Estimates were derived for eight services (eg, hospital admissions, emergency department (ED), home health). Data were used from two Independent Practice Association model health plans in two states. Differences across the states were controlled by selecting one Medicaid and one employer-insured program from each of the two plans in both states. Regional variation was controlled for because both health plans were located in one geographical region. In each case, physicians were paid on a fee-for-service basis, with generally open access to specialists rather than primary care gatekeeper models of delivery: t tests were used to compare service use rates between Medicaid and employer-insured populations. RESULTS: A total of 8668 children across all health plan groups had at least one of the selected conditions. Because Medicaid enrolled-children tended to be younger, analyses were adjusted for age. In both systems, a greater percentage of Medicaid children had these five study conditions (5%) compared with employer-insured children (3%), suggesting that the Medicaid population was sicker. Mean length of enrollment during the 2-year study was longer for children in employer-insured programs. Children with chronic conditions enrolled in Medicaid managed care generally used services at a higher rate compared with children with similar conditions enrolled in employer-insured managed care. The extent of the increased use varied by condition, by service type, and by plan. Children with any of the chronic conditions studied had from 2 to almost 5 times more ED visits if they were enrolled in Medicaid than if they were enrolled in employer-based managed care, depending on the specific condition. In one of the two plans, Medicaid-enrolled children had more outpatient services, laboratory services, and radiography services than their counterparts in employer-based managed care. The same pattern of use was found for home health services (except for children with diabetes) and for office visits (except for children with sickle cell). The results show higher use of all services by children with asthma and diabetes in Medicaid managed care compared with employer-based managed care. In contrast, the pattern is mixed for children with epilepsy and sickle cell. The sample size of children with these conditions was smaller than with the three other conditions, which may account, in part, for a varied pattern of results. The pattern of use for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was generally different from the other conditions. Children with ADHD in employer-based managed care had more hospital admissions, hospital days, and office visits than their counterparts in Medicaid managed care. In contrast, Medicaid-enrolled children with ADHD had more ED visits, laboratory services, outpatient hospital visits, and radiography services. Other than ED visits, the differences in service use between Medicaid and employer-insured children with ADHD were minimal. Of note, the pattern for ADHD is the same for most services for Plans A and B (excluding home health visits). This utilization pattern may reflect service use for comorbid conditions. Part of this difference may be explained by differences in Medicaid e


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/statistics & numerical data , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Managed Care Programs/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Male , United States
19.
Am J Manag Care ; 4 Spec No: SP139-50, 1998 Sep 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10185990

ABSTRACT

With the profusion of new medical technology, managed care organizations are faced with the challenge of determining which medical devices and services warrant health benefits coverage. To aid in this decision-making process, managed care companies turn to technology assessment, a process that differs from the Food and Drug Administration's review of medical devices. Health plans typically use a structured approach to implementing coverage requirements in employer group benefits contracts and use technology assessment to evaluate the scientific evidence of effectiveness to support coverage decisions. Also important is the societal context for decisions regarding coverage for new technologies and the options being considered by policy makers for accountability in technology assessment by private insurers and health plans.


Subject(s)
Insurance Coverage , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Making, Organizational , Equipment and Supplies/economics , Evidence-Based Medicine , Managed Care Programs/economics , Managed Care Programs/organization & administration , Public Policy , Social Responsibility , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
20.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 21(23): 2786-94, 1996 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8979327

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, multicenter study was designed to investigate the efficacy and outcome of spinal cord stimulation using a variety of clinical and psychosocial outcome measures. Data were collected before implantation and at regular intervals after implantation. This report focuses on 70 patients who had undergone 1 year of follow-up treatment at the time of data analysis. OBJECTIVES: To provide a more generalizable assessment of long-term spinal cord stimulation outcome by comparing a variety of pain and functional/quality-of-life measures before and after management. This report details results after 1 year of stimulation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The historically diverse methods, patient selection criteria, and outcome measures reported in the spinal cord stimulation literature have made interpretation and comparison of results difficult. Although short-term outcomes are generally consistent, long-term outcomes of spinal cord stimulation, as determined by prospective studies that assess multidimensional aspects of the pain complaint among a relatively homogeneous population, are not well established. METHODS: Two hundred nineteen patients were entered at six centers throughout the United States. All patients underwent a trial of stimulation before implant of the permanent system. Most were psychologically screened. One hundred eighty-two patients were implanted with a permanent stimulating system. At the time of this report, complete 1-year follow-up data were available on 70 patients, 88% of whom reported pain in the back or lower extremities. Patient evaluation of pain and functional levels was completed before implantation and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after implantation. Complications, medication usage, and work status also were monitored. RESULTS: All pain and quality-of-life measures showed statistically significant improvement during the treatment year. These included the average pain visual analogue scale, the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile, and the Back Depression Inventory. Overall success of the therapy was defined as at least 50% pain relief and patient assessment of the procedure as fully or partially beneficial and worthwhile. Using this definition, spinal cord stimulation successfully managed pain in 55% of patients on whom 1-year follow-up is available. Complications requiring surgical intervention were reported by 17% (12 of 70) of patients. Medication usage and work status were not changed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, multicenter study confirms that spinal cord stimulation can be an effective therapy for management of chronic low back and extremity pain. Significant improvements in many aspects of the pain condition were measured, and complications were minimal.


Subject(s)
Back Pain/drug therapy , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Spinal Cord/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Aged , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Back Pain/complications , Chronic Disease , Disability Evaluation , Extremities , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Narcotics/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Spinal Cord/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Work
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...