Contemporary Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Indigenous Compared with Non-Indigenous Patients: A Northern Saskatchewan Perspective.

BACKGROUND: In patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the impact of efforts leveraged at bridging historical care gaps between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients remains limited. METHODS: For consecutive ACS presentations (STEMI and NSTEMI/UA, respectively) at the Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, we compared between self-identified Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients their demographics, treatments and all-cause mortality (in-hospital and 3-years). We used propensity score-inverse probability weighting to mitigate confounding, and Cox regression models to estimate the adjusted hazard (aHR, 95% confidence intervals) for all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of 3946 ACS patients, 37.2% (n=1468) were STEMI of whom 11.3% (n=166) were Indigenous. Of the NSTEMI/UA (n=2478), 12.6% (n=311) were Indigenous. Overall, Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous patients were likely to be younger, female, have higher risk burden, and lived more remotely; Indigenous STEMI patients triaged to primary PCI had longer first medical contact-to-device times, while Indigenous NSTEMI/UA patients more likely to present with heart failure, cardiac arrest and/or cardiogenic shock. No significant differences were noted for in-hospital mortality (STEMI 8.4% vs 5.7%, p= 0.16; NSTEMI/UA 1.9% vs 1.6%, p=0.68), however, in follow-up, Indigenous STEMI patients associated with a higher all-cause mortality risk (aHR 1.98, 95% CI 1.19, 3.31, p=0.009) with no between-group differences evident for NSTEMI/UA (aHR 1.03, 95% CI 0.63 1.69, p=0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous patients presenting with an ACS had higher cardiovascular risk profiles, and consequently residual mortality risk. Improving primary care and intensifying secondary risk reduction, and particularly so for Indigenous patients, will substantially modify ACS outcomes in Saskatchewan.

Reducing Quantitative Uncertainty Caused by Data Processing in Untargeted Metabolomics.

Processing liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolomics data using computational programs often introduces additional quantitative uncertainty, termed computational variation in a previous work. This work develops a computational solution to automatically recognize metabolic features with computational variation in a metabolomics data set. This tool, AVIR (short for "Accurate eValuation of alIgnment and integRation"), is a support vector machine-based machine learning strategy (https://github.com/HuanLab/AVIR). The rationale is that metabolic features with computational variation have a poor correlation between chromatographic peak area and peak height-based quantifications across the samples in a study. AVIR was trained on a set of 696 manually curated metabolic features and achieved an accuracy of 94% in a 10-fold cross-validation. When tested on various external data sets from public metabolomics repositories, AVIR demonstrated an accuracy range of 84%-97%. Finally, tested on a large-scale metabolomics study, AVIR clearly indicated features with computational variation and thus guided us to manually correct them. Our results show that 75.3% of the samples with computational variation had a relative intensity difference of over 20% after correction. This demonstrates the critical role of AVIR in reducing computational variation to improve quantitative certainty in untargeted metabolomics analysis.

Angiographic characteristics of patients with STEMI and COVID-19: Insights from NACMI registry.

BACKGROUND: To date, there has been no independent core lab angiographic analysis of patients with COVID-19 and STEMI. The study characterized the angiographic parameters of patients with COVID-19 and STEMI. METHODS: Angiograms of patients with COVID-19 and STEMI from the North American COVID-19 Myocardial Infarction (NACMI) Registry were sent to a Core Laboratory in Vancouver, Canada. Culprit lesion(s), Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow, Thrombus Grade Burden (TGB), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcome were assessed. RESULTS: From 234 patients, 74% had one culprit lesion, 14% had multiple culprits and 12% had no culprit identified. Multivessel thrombotic disease and multivessel CAD were found in 27% and 53% of patients, respectively. Stent thrombosis accounted for 12% of the presentations and occurred in 55% of patients with previous coronary stents. Of the 182 who underwent PCI, 60 (33%) had unsuccessful PCI due to post-PCI TIMI flow <3 (43/60), residual high thrombus burden (41/60) and/or thrombus related complications (27/60). In-hospital mortality for successful, partially successful, and unsuccessful PCI was 14%, 13%, and 27%, respectively. Unsuccessful PCI was associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.96; 95% CI: 1.05-3.66, P = .03); in the adjusted model this estimate was attenuated (RR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.65-2.34, P = .51). CONCLUSION: In patients with COVID-19 and STEMI, thrombus burden was pervasive with notable rates of multivessel thrombotic disease and stent thrombosis. Post-PCI, persistent thrombus and sub-optimal TIMI 3 flow rates led to one-third of the PCI's being unsuccessful, which decreased over time but remained an important predictor of in-hospital mortality.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology 2023 Focused Update of the Guidelines for the Use of Antiplatelet Therapy.

Antiplatelet therapy (APT) is the foundation of treatment and prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Selecting the optimal APT strategies to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, while balancing bleeding risk, requires ongoing review of clinical trials. Appended, the focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology guidelines for the use of APT provides recommendations on the following topics: (1) use of acetylsalicylic acid in primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; (2) dual APT (DAPT) duration after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients at high bleeding risk; (3) potent DAPT (P2Y12 inhibitor) choice in patients who present with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and possible DAPT de-escalation strategies after PCI; (4) choice and duration of DAPT in ACS patients who are medically treated without revascularization; (5) pretreatment with DAPT (P2Y12 inhibitor) before elective or nonelective coronary angiography; (6) perioperative and longer-term APT management in patients who require coronary artery bypass grafting surgery; and (7) use of APT in patients with atrial fibrillation who require oral anticoagulation after PCI or medically managed ACS. These recommendations are all on the basis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted as part of the development of these guidelines, provided in the Supplementary Material.

Comparative Analysis of Patients With STEMI and COVID-19 Between Canada and the United States.

Background: Important health care differences exist between the United States (US) and Canada, which may have been exacerbated during the pandemic. We compared clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and COVID-19 (STEMI-COVID) treated in the US and Canada. Methods: The North American COVID-19 Myocardial Infarction registry is a prospective, investigator-initiated study enrolling patients with STEMI with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 in the US and Canada. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. Additionally, we explored associations between vaccination and clinical outcomes. Results: Of 853 patients with STEMI-COVID, 112 (13%) were enrolled in Canada, and compared with the US, patients in Canada were more likely to present with chest pain and less likely to have a history of heart failure, stroke/transient ischemic attack, pulmonary infiltrates or renal failure. In both countries, the primary percutaneous coronary intervention was the dominant reperfusion strategy, with no difference in door-to-balloon times; fibrinolysis was used less frequently in the US than in Canada. The adjusted in-hospital mortality was not different between the 2 countries (relative risk [RR], 1.0; 95% CI, 0.46-2.72; P = 1.0). However, the risk of in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in unvaccinated compared with vaccinated patients with STEMI-COVID (RR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.7-11.53; P = .015). Conclusions: Notable differences in morbidities and reperfusion strategies were evident between patients with STEMI-COVID in the US compared with Canada. No differences were noted for in-hospital mortality. Vaccination, regardless of region, appeared to associate with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality strongly.

Catheter-Induced Postextrasystolic Potentiation in the Assessment of Severity of Low-Gradient Aortic Valve Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Deciphering which patients with low-gradient aortic valve disease have severe stenosis can be difficult. We aimed to correlate the postextrasystolic potentiation (PESP) with dobutamine stress echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography in patients with low-gradient aortic valve stenosis. METHODS: Patients with an aortic valve area ≤1 cm2 and a mean gradient <40 mm Hg were included. Aortic valve stenosis severity was assessed by a core lab with dobutamine stress echocardiography, followed by a multidetector computed tomography aortic valve score if indeterminate. A premature ventricular contraction was induced by intentional catheter contact with the myocardium within the left ventricle. PESP was calculated as a percent change of pre-to-post mean gradient. Multidetector computed tomography was used to measure the aortic valve calcification score, and subsequently, aortic valve calcification density. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (age, 77±10 years; 19 female) were included. Dobutamine stress echocardiography increased mean gradient from baseline of 25±7 mm Hg to 36±11 mm Hg; pre-premature ventricular contraction mean gradient was 25±7 mm Hg and increased to post-premature ventricular contraction mean gradient of 32±10 mm Hg, representing a PESP of 24±11%. A ≥20% in PESP resulted in 100% sensitivity, 77% specificity, 83% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value for diagnosing severe aortic valve stenosis. There was a significant correlation between PESP and projected aortic valve area and aortic valve calcification density (R=-0.64, P=0.0003; R=0.057, P=0.014, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with low-gradient aortic valve stenosis, catheter-induced premature ventricular contractions during cardiac catheterization causing ≥20% PESP has a 100% sensitivity for severe aortic valve stenosis. Validation of this 20% cutoff in larger groups with correlation to clinical end points is required.

A Review of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients with COVID-19.

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a significant increase in worldwide morbidity and mortality. Patients with COVID-19 are at risk for developing a variety of cardiovascular conditions including acute coronary syndromes, stress-induced cardiomyopathy, and myocarditis. Patients with COVID-19 who develop ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are at a higher risk of morbidity and mortality when compared with their age- and sex-matched STEMI patients without COVID-19. We review current knowledge on the pathophysiology of STEMI in patients with COVID-19, clinical presentation, outcomes, and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on overall STEMI care.

The role of the HLA allelic repertoire on the clinical severity of COVID-19 in Canadians, living in the Saskatchewan province.

AIMS: The HLA system has been implicated as an underlying determinant for modulating the immune response to SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we aimed to determine the association of patients' HLA genetic profiles with the disease severity of COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Prospective study was conducted on COVID-19 patients (n = 40) admitted to hospitals in Saskatoon, Canada, between March and December 2020. Next-generation sequencing was performed on the patient samples to obtain high-resolution HLA typing profiles. The statistical association between HLA allelic frequency and disease severity was examined. The disease severity was categorized based on the length of hospital stay and intensive care needs or demise during the hospital stay. RESULTS: HLA allelic frequencies of the high and low-severity cohorts were normalized against corresponding background allelic frequencies. In the high-severity cohort, A*02:06 (11.8-fold), B*51:01 (2.4-fold), B*15:01(3.1-fold), C*01:02 (3.3-fold), DRB1*08:02 (31.2-fold), DQ*06:09 (11-fold), and DPB1*04:02(4-fold) were significantly overrepresented (p < 0.05) making these deleterious alleles. In the low-severity cohort, A*24:02 (2.8-fold), B*35:01 (2.8-fold), DRB1*04:07 (5.3-fold), and DRB1*08:11 (22-fold) were found to be significantly overrepresented (p < 0.05) making these protective alleles. These above alleles interact with NK cell antiviral activity via the killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR). The high-severity cohort had a higher predilection for HLA alleles associated with KIR subgroups; Bw4-80I (1.1-fold), and C1 (1.6-fold) which promotes NK cell inhibition, while the low-severity cohort had a higher predilection for Bw4-80T (1.6-fold), and C2 (1.6-fold) which promote NK cell activation. CONCLUSION: In this study, the HLA allelic repository with the distribution of deleterious and protective alleles was found to correlate with the severity of the clinical course in COVID-19. Moreover, the interaction of specific HLA alleles with the KIR-associated subfamily modulates the NK cell-mediated surveillance of SARS-CoV-2. Both deleterious HLA alleles and inhibitory KIR appear prominently in the severe COVID-19 group focusing on the importance of NK cells in the convalescence of COVID-19.

Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With COVID-19 Presenting With Myocardial Infarction.

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicating COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of cardiogenic shock and mortality. However, little is known about the frequency of use and clinical impact of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in these patients. We sought to define patterns of MCS utilization, patient characteristics, and outcomes in patients with COVID-19 with STEMI. The NACMI (North American COVID-19 Myocardial Infarction) is an ongoing prospective, observational registry of patients with COVID-19 positive (COVID-19+) with STEMI with a contemporary control group of persons under investigation who subsequently tested negative for COVID-19 (COVID-19-). We compared the baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of COVID-19+ and patients with COVID-19- according to the use of MCS. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, stroke, recurrent MI, and repeat unplanned revascularization. A total of 1,379 patients (586 COVID-19+ and 793 COVID-19-) enrolled in the NACMI registry between January 2020 and November 2021 were included in this analysis; overall, MCS use was 12.3% (12.1% [n = 71] COVID-19+/MCS positive [MCS+] vs 12.4% [n = 98] COVID-19-/MCS+). Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The use of percutaneous coronary intervention was similar between the groups (84% vs 78%; p = 0.404). Intra-aortic balloon pump was the most frequently used MCS device in both groups (53% in COVID-19+/MCS+ and 75% in COVID-19-/MCS+). The primary outcome was significantly higher in COVID-19+/MCS+ patients (60% vs 30%; p = 0.001) because of very high in-hospital mortality (59% vs 28%; p = 0.001). In conclusion, patients with COVID-19+ with STEMI requiring MCS have very high in-hospital mortality, likely related to the significantly higher pulmonary involvement compared with patients with COVID-19- with STEMI requiring MCS.

Incidence and Predictors of Adverse Events Among Initially Stable ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Background Cardiac intensive care units were originally created in the prerevascularization era for the early recognition of ventricular arrhythmias following a myocardial infarction. Many patients with stable ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are still routinely triaged to cardiac intensive care units after a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), independent of clinical risk or the provision of critical care therapies. The aim of this study was to determine factors associated with in-hospital adverse events in a hemodynamically stable, postreperfusion population of patients with STEMI. Methods and Results Between April 2012 and November 2019, 2101 consecutive patients with STEMI who received pPCI in the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority were evaluated. Patients were stratified into those with and without subsequent adverse events, which were defined as cardiogenic shock, in-hospital cardiac arrest, stroke, re-infarction, and death. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine predictors of adverse events. After excluding patients presenting with cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, or heart failure, the final analysis cohort comprised 1770 stable patients with STEMI who had received pPCI. A total of 94 (5.3%) patients developed at least one adverse event: cardiogenic shock 55 (3.1%), in-hospital cardiac arrest 42 (2.4%), death 28 (1.6%), stroke 21 (1.2%), and re-infarction 5 (0.3%). Univariable predictors of adverse events were older age, female sex, prior stroke, chronic kidney disease, and atrial fibrillation. There was no significant difference in reperfusion times between those with and without adverse events. Following multivariable adjustment, moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <44 mL/min; 13% of cohort) was associated with adverse events (odds ratio 2.24 [95% CI, 1.12-4.48]) independent of reperfusion time, age, sex, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, and prior myocardial infarction/PCI/coronary artery bypass grafting. Conclusions Only 1 in 20 initially stable patients with STEMI receiving pPCI developed an in-hospital adverse event. Moderate to severe chronic kidney disease independently predicted the risk of future adverse events. These results indicate that the majority of patients with STEMI who receive pPCI may not require routine admission to a cardiac intensive care unit following reperfusion.

Can ED chest pain patients with intermediate HEART scores be managed as outpatients?

PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend hospital admission for patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain and are scored as intermediate risk for adverse outcomes based on the HEART score. While hospital admission for these patients allows for timely investigation and treatment, it is a resource-intensive process. This study examines whether intermediate HEART score patients can be safely managed on an outpatient basis through rapid access chest pain clinics. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included all ED chest pain patients referred to rapid access clinics from January 2018 to April 2020 in Regina and Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. ED physician HEART scores were used in lieu of reviewer HEART scores when available. The primary outcome was the rate of major adverse coronary events (MACE), a composite measure of death, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, coronary angiography, and revascularization at 6 weeks in intermediate-risk patients. Secondary outcomes were the type of MACE, rate of MACE before rapid access clinic appointment and the most predictive component of the HEART score. RESULTS: There were 1989 ED referrals, of which 817 were for intermediate-risk patients. 9.3% of intermediate-risk patients had a MACE at 6 weeks. MACE occurred before rapid access clinic follow-up in 1.1% of intermediate-risk patients, with coronary angiography being the most common MACE. Excluding coronary angiography, the risk of MACE before rapid access clinic follow-up was 0.7% in intermediate-risk patients. Components of the HEART score most predictive of MACE were troponin (OR 11.0, 95% CI: 3.7-32.3) and history (5.3, 95% CI: 2.4-11.8). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that rapid access clinics are likely a safe alternative to admission for intermediate-risk chest pain patients and could reduce costly inpatient admissions for chest pain. With angiography excluded, MACE rates were well below the American College of Emergency Physicians cited 2% threshold.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les directives actuelles recommandent l'admission à l'hôpital des patients qui se présentent aux urgences avec une douleur thoracique et qui sont classés comme présentant un risque intermédiaire d'effets indésirables selon le score HEART. Bien que l'hospitalisation de ces patients permette une investigation et un traitement en temps opportun, il s'agit d'un processus exigeant en ressources. Cette étude examine si les patients ayant un score HEART intermédiaire peuvent être pris en charge en toute sécurité en ambulatoire par des cliniques d'accès rapide aux douleurs thoraciques. MéTHODES: Cette étude observationnelle rétrospective a inclus tous les patients souffrant de douleurs thoraciques aux urgences orientés vers des cliniques d'accès rapide de janvier 2018 à avril 2020 à Regina et Saskatoon, en Saskatchewan. Les scores HEART des médecins des urgences ont été utilisés à la place des scores HEART des examinateurs lorsqu'ils étaient disponibles. Le principal résultat était le taux d'événements coronariens indésirables majeurs (MACE), une mesure composite du décès, du syndrome coronarien aigu, de l'accident vasculaire cérébral, de l'angiographie coronaire et de la revascularisation à 6 semaines chez les patients à risque intermédiaire. Les résultats secondaires étaient le type de MACE, le taux de MACE avant un rendez-vous à la clinique d'accès rapide et la composante la plus prédictive du score HEART. RéSULTATS: Il y a eu 1989 orientations vers les urgences, dont 817 pour des patients à risque intermédiaire. 9,3 % des patients à risque intermédiaire ont subi un MACE à 6 semaines. Un MACE est survenu avant le suivi clinique d'accès rapide chez 1,1 % des patients à risque intermédiaire, la coronarographie étant le MACE le plus fréquent. À l'exclusion de l'angiographie coronarienne, le risque de MACE avant le suivi clinique d'accès rapide était de 0,7 % chez les patients à risque intermédiaire. Les composants du score HEART les plus prédictifs de MACE étaient la troponine (OR 11,0, IC 95 % : 3,7-32,3) et les antécédents (5,3, IC 95 % : 2,4-11,8). CONCLUSION: Cette étude démontre que les cliniques d'accès rapide sont probablement une alternative sûre à l'admission pour les patients souffrant de douleurs thoraciques à risque intermédiaire et pourraient réduire les admissions coûteuses de patients hospitalisés pour des douleurs thoraciques. En excluant l'angiographie, les taux de MACE étaient bien inférieurs au seuil de 2 % cité par l'American College of Emergency Physicians.

North American COVID-19 Myocardial Infarction (NACMI) Risk Score for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality.

Background: In-hospital mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is higher in those with COVID-19 than in those without COVID-19. The factors that predispose to this mortality rate and their relative contribution are poorly understood. This study developed a risk score inclusive of clinical variables to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 and STEMI. Methods: Baseline demographic, clinical, and procedural data from patients in the North American COVID-19 Myocardial Infarction registry were extracted. Univariable logistic regression was performed using candidate predictor variables, and multivariable logistic regression was performed using backward stepwise selection to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Independent predictors were assigned a weighted integer, with the sum of the integers yielding the total risk score for each patient. Results: In-hospital mortality occurred in 118 of 425 (28%) patients. Eight variables present at the time of STEMI diagnosis (respiratory rate of >35 breaths/min, cardiogenic shock, oxygen saturation of <93%, age of >55 â€‹years, infiltrates on chest x-ray, kidney disease, diabetes, and dyspnea) were assigned a weighted integer. In-hospital mortality increased exponentially with increasing integer risk score (Cochran-Armitage χ2, P â€‹< â€‹.001), and the model demonstrated good discriminative power (c-statistic â€‹= â€‹0.81) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow, P â€‹= â€‹.40). The increasing risk score was strongly associated with in-hospital mortality (3.6%-60% mortality for low-risk and very high-risk score categories, respectively). Conclusions: The risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 and STEMI can be accurately predicted and discriminated using readily available clinical information.

A Review of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients with COVID-19.

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a significant increase in worldwide morbidity and mortality. Patients with COVID-19 are at risk for developing a variety of cardiovascular conditions including acute coronary syndromes, stress-induced cardiomyopathy, and myocarditis. Patients with COVID-19 who develop ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are at a higher risk of morbidity and mortality when compared with their age- and sex-matched STEMI patients without COVID-19. We review current knowledge on the pathophysiology of STEMI in patients with COVID-19, clinical presentation, outcomes, and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on overall STEMI care.

Novel multi-marker proteomics in phenotypically matched patients with ST-segment myocardial infarction: association with clinical outcomes.

Early prediction of significant morbidity or mortality in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) represents an unmet clinical need. In phenotypically matched population of 139 STEMI patients (72 cases, 67 controls) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, we explored associations between a 24-h relative change from baseline in the concentration of 91 novel biomarkers and the composite outcome of death, heart failure, or shock within 90 days. Additionally, we used random forest models to predict the 90-day outcomes. After adjustment for false discovery rate, the 90-day composite was significantly associated with concentration changes in 14 biomarkers involved in various pathophysiologic processes including: myocardial fibrosis/remodeling (collagen alpha-1, cathepsin Z, metalloproteinase inhibitor 4, protein tyrosine phosphatase subunits), inflammation, angiogenesis and signaling (interleukin 1 and 2 subunits, growth differentiation factor 15, galectin 4, trefoil factor 3), bone/mineral metabolism (osteoprotegerin, matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase), thrombosis (tissue factor pathway inhibitor) and cholesterol metabolism (LDL-receptor). Random forest models suggested an independent association when inflammatory markers are included in models predicting the outcomes within 90 days. Substantial heterogeneity is apparent in the early proteomic responses among patients with acutely reperfused STEMI patients who develop death, heart failure or shock within 90 days. These findings suggest the need to consider synergistic multi-biomarker strategies for risk stratification and to inform future development of novel post-myocardial infarction therapies.

Ticagrelor or clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy following a pharmacoinvasive strategy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and evaluate outcomes in STEMI patients sustained on clopidogrel compared to those switched to ticagrelor following fibrinolysis. BACKGROUND: World-wide, many STEMI patients cannot achieve timely PCI and therefore require fibrinolysis. Although comparable 30-day and 1-year safety was shown with clopidogrel or ticagrelor in the TREAT study, there is paucity of long-term outcomes in pharmacoinvasive treated STEMI. METHODS: We conducted an observational cohort study evaluating consecutive pharmacoinvasive STEMI patients treated in a network, comparing those switched to ticagrelor to those sustained on clopidogrel. The primary efficacy composite was one-year all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and stroke with major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) as the safety outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression model was used to examine the association between P2Y12 inhibitor and outcomes with inverse probability weighting. RESULTS: Of 1426 pharmacoinvasive STEMI patients, 28% (n = 396) were converted to ticagrelor at a mean of 9.9 h after fibrinolysis with comparable GRACE Risk Scores (median; 158 vs 157, p0.352). The primary composite occurred in 3.5% of ticagrelor and 7.0% of clopidogrel treated patients (p0.014). Following adjustment, ticagrelor was associated with a 54% lower composite outcome (adjusted HR 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.84). Major bleeding 6.3% vs 6.1% (NS) and ICH 0.0% vs 0.2% (NS) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective STEMI cohort, switching to ticagrelor compared with sustaining clopidogrel following fibrinolysis pharmacoinvasive reperfusion reduced recurrent ischemic events at 1-year with no differences in major bleeding or ICH. Aligned with randomized data, these findings provide support to switch pharmaco-invasively treated STEMI patients.

Initial Findings From the North American COVID-19 Myocardial Infarction Registry.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted many aspects of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care, including timely access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). OBJECTIVES: The goal of the NACMI (North American COVID-19 and STEMI) registry is to describe demographic characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients with STEMI. METHODS: A prospective, ongoing observational registry was created under the guidance of 3 cardiology societies. STEMI patients with confirmed COVID+ (group 1) or suspected (person under investigation [PUI]) (group 2) COVID-19 infection were included. A group of age- and sex-matched STEMI patients (matched to COVID+ patients in a 2:1 ratio) treated in the pre-COVID era (2015 to 2019) serves as the control group for comparison of treatment strategies and outcomes (group 3). The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death, stroke, recurrent myocardial infarction, or repeat unplanned revascularization. RESULTS: As of December 6, 2020, 1,185 patients were included in the NACMI registry (230 COVID+ patients, 495 PUIs, and 460 control patients). COVID+ patients were more likely to have minority ethnicity (Hispanic 23%, Black 24%) and had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (46%) (all p < 0.001 relative to PUIs). COVID+ patients were more likely to present with cardiogenic shock (18%) but were less likely to receive invasive angiography (78%) (all p < 0.001 relative to control patients). Among COVID+ patients who received angiography, 71% received PPCI and 20% received medical therapy (both p < 0.001 relative to control patients). The primary outcome occurred in 36% of COVID+ patients, 13% of PUIs, and 5% of control patients (p < 0.001 relative to control patients). CONCLUSIONS: COVID+ patients with STEMI represent a high-risk group of patients with unique demographic and clinical characteristics. PPCI is feasible and remains the predominant reperfusion strategy, supporting current recommendations.

Statins and atherosclerotic cardiovascular outcomes in patients on incident dialysis and with atherosclerotic heart disease.

Statins failed to reduce cardiovascular (CV) events in trials of patients on dialysis. However, trial populations used criteria that often excluded those with atherosclerotic heart disease (ASHD), in whom statins have the greatest benefit, and included outcome composites with high rates of nonatherosclerotic CV events that may not be modified by statins. Here, we study whether statin use associates with lower atherosclerotic CV risk among patients with known ASHD on dialysis, including in those likely to receive a kidney transplant, a group excluded within trials but with lower competing mortality risks. METHODS: Using data from the United States Renal Data System including Medicare claims, we identified adults initiating dialysis with ASHD. We matched statin users 1:1 to statin nonusers with propensity scores incorporating hard matches for age and kidney transplant listing status. Using Cox models, we evaluated associations of statin use with the primary composite of fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke (including within prespecified subgroups of younger age [<50 years] and waitlisting status); secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and the composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke. RESULTS: Of 197,716 patients with ASHD, 47,562 (24%) were consistent statin users from which we created 46,186 matched pairs. Over a median 662 days, statin users had similar risk of fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke overall (hazard ratio [HR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.97-1.02), or in subgroups (age< 50 years [HR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.17]; waitlisted for kidney transplant [HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.02]). Statin use was modestly associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98; E value = 1.21) and, similarly, a modest lower composite risk of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke over the first 2 years (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.88-0.91) but attenuated thereafter (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our large observational analyses are consistent with trials in more selected populations and suggest that statins may not meaningfully reduce atherosclerotic CV events even among incident dialysis patients with established ASHD and those likely to receive kidney transplants.

Antemortem diagnosis of nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis in a patient with previously resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) is a rare manifestation of a number of systemic diseases, which include advanced malignancy and hypercoagulable states. CASE SUMMARY: We present a 67-year-old woman who had presented with chest pain and heart failure. Eight years ago, she had a successful Whipple resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Echocardiography revealed mitral valve vegetations with negative blood cultures. She had multiple infarcts in the kidney, spleen, and brain. She was found to have a mass in the left 8th rib, consistent with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma on biopsy. Ultimately, a diagnosis of NBTE was made after excluding other causes for her presentation. Because of her general poor condition, she expressed the wish for palliative care and later died 28 days after presentation. DISCUSSION: This case illustrates the possibility of NBTE in patients successfully treated for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and highlights the consideration of this relatively rare differential in patients with a previously treated malignancy presenting with heart failure.