Implementation of a Pediatric Population Health Asthma Program in Academic Medical Center-Affiliated Urban and Suburban Practices.

A tiered pediatric Asthma Population Health Management Program (APHMP), based on evidence-based practices, that differentially targets populations for intervention based on rising risk for high utilization and disease complications was implemented at 6 urban and suburban practices affiliated with an academic medical center. In addition to standard pediatric asthma care, APHMP adds regular administration of the asthma control test (ACT), provider education on performance variation, and monitoring through the electronic health record-based asthma registry. As patients' use of acute health care services and complications increases, APHMP integrates multidisciplinary interventions, including an asthma coach who conducts environmental assessments in addition to addressing social needs, into their primary care. A retrospective cohort study method was used to assess population-level effects on asthma event rates and practice- and provider-level variation from 2017 to 2019. Consistent with well-documented health disparities in pediatric asthma, the analysis demonstrated that patients who were male (odds ratio [OR] = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-1.43), 4-8 years old (OR = 4.91, 95% CI = 3.27-7.37), Spanish speaking (OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.54-1.81), from low-income neighborhoods (OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.53-2.46), and with ACT <20 (OR = 2.88, 95% CI = 1.97-4.21) had higher odds of having asthma events. Six percent of patients studied were found to be at risk for high health care utilization and disease complications. Study limitations include the absence of a control group, the mixed model data collection approach, and the effects of seasonal variation on asthma events. Future directions include analyzing disease management program outcomes of incorporating an asthma coach into a patient's primary care team and addressing provider-level variation in asthma event rates.

Bariatric surgery in the treatment of adolescent obesity: current perspectives in the United States.

Introduction: Rates of severe obesity in adolescents have increased at an alarming rate. Unfortunately, there are limited successful treatments for severe obesity in adolescents. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective treatment available for adolescents with Class 2 and above severe obesity and has demonstrated variable degrees of sustained long-term weight loss which leads to resolution of multiple associated conditions and an improved quality of life.Areas covered: We discuss the current landscape of MBS in adolescents and evidence to support its long-term safety and efficacy. A literature search through PubMed, ResearchGate and HOLLIS Harvard Library Online Catalog was performed from the date of inception until 3/15/2021. A combination of the following keywords was used: Pediatric metabolic/bariatric surgery; long term outcomes of Pediatric metabolic/bariatric surgery, perioperative assessment, pediatric metabolic/bariatric surgery barriers; attitudes toward metabolic/bariatric surgery.Expert opinion: MBS is emerging as a safe and effective treatment strategy for adolescents with severe obesity, with recent studies demonstrating durable and sustainable weight loss. There remains an urgent need for longitudinal studies to assess durability of weight loss. Obesity stigma and bias, limited access to tertiary care centers, and skepticism around the treatment of obesity poses a major challenge.

Exploring Pediatric Obesity Training, Perspectives, and Management Patterns Among Pediatric Primary Care Physicians.

OBJECTIVE: Significant variability exists in the amount of formal obesity training obtained by physicians caring for pediatric patients. The study objective was to assess the relationship between formal obesity training and pediatrics physicians' perceptions, practice patterns, overall knowledge, and confidence during management of pediatric obesity. METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed via email from February 2020 through March 2020 at a large academic system. Internal medicine/pediatrics (46 total) and pediatrics (104 total) primary care providers were selected. Data were collected on the total number of obesity-related training hours by quartiles, demographics, physicians' clinical practice patterns, and physicians' knowledge of pediatric obesity management, along with their perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs. RESULTS: A total of 73 survey participants completed the survey: 69% were female, 77% were older than 40 years, and 74% were White. Physicians with the highest training were most likely to feel confident when managing pediatric obesity. However, only 20% of all physicians felt confident providing pre- and post-bariatric surgery care, and just 6% of physicians self-reported achieving management success. CONCLUSIONS: Increased obesity training improves physicians' confidence and leads to familiarity with management guidelines. Formal obesity training should be prioritized during residency and beyond so that physicians who care for pediatric patients are better equipped to offer unbiased and effective care.