Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 15(10): e46478, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37927655

ABSTRACT

Adverse drug reactions or adverse drug events account for a significant proportion of emergency department visits among children and adolescents. Unfortunately, rare reactions to medications may go unnoticed by clinicians due to a lack of reporting to drug surveillance and monitoring programs. We present the case of an 18-year-old male who visited the emergency department on two separate occasions after receiving dupilumab injections for his atopic dermatitis. Ten days prior to his presentation, he was evaluated in the emergency room for the onset of chest pain, five days following his first dupilumab injection. Investigations in the interim revealed no cardiac pathology. He presented with a complaint of severe abdominal pain associated with nausea and vomiting several hours after receiving his second dupilumab injection. Investigations for causes of acute gastrointestinal or anaphylactic reactions only revealed mild leukocytosis and hypokalemia. A definitive diagnosis of hypersensitivity reaction, such as anaphylaxis or serum-sickness-like reaction, could not be made at either emergency visit due to the lack of objective findings and few similar reported cases. However, the timing of each event made an adverse reaction highly suspicious as the inciting factor of this patient's symptoms. He received oral potassium, ketorolac, and ondansetron for headache and ongoing nausea respectively. He was discharged home within a few hours after his symptoms had resolved. The limited reports and evidence of these symptoms being associated with dupilumab injections made it difficult to reach a definitive diagnosis. However, a holistic review of the patient's history, medication list, and contextual factors revealed that a rare adverse drug reaction was a possible inciting factor on each separate occasion. Further research is required to determine the frequency and explore the existence of any causal relationship between dupilumab treatment and chest pain or gastritis in adolescent populations.

2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27468411

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous work from this laboratory has evidenced the biomechanical role of forearm osseoligamentous structures in load transfer of applied forces. It has shown that forces transmitted across the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ) are similar, though not identical, under axial loading conditions. The purpose of the study was to assess the articulating surface areas of the radioulnar joints and the volumes of the forearm bones addressing the hypothesis that there may be anatomic adaptations that reflect the biomechanical function of the integrated forearm unit. METHODS: The articulating surface areas of PRUJ and DRUJ were assessed using a laser scanner in 24 cadaver forearms. The articulating joint surfaces were additionally delineated from standardized photographs assessed by three observers. The surface areas of matched pairs of joints were compared on the null hypothesis that these were the same within a given forearm specimen. An additional 44 pairs of matched forearm bone volumes were measured using water displacement technique and again compared through statistical analysis (paired sample t-test and Bland-Altman analysis). RESULTS: The findings of this study are that the articulating surface areas of the DRUJ and PRUJ as well as the bone volumes are significantly different and, yet, strongly correlated. The paired sample t-test showed a significant difference between the surface areas of the DRUJ and PRUJ (p < 0.05). The PRUJ articulating surface area was marginally larger than the DRUJ with a PRUJ:DRUJ ratio of 1.02. Paired sample t-test showed a significant difference between the two bone volumes (p < 0.01) with a radius to ulna bone volume ratio of 0.81. When the olecranon was disregarded, radius volume was on average of 4% greater than ulna volume. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates and defines the anatomical relationships between the two forearm bones and their articulating joints when matched for specimen. The data obtained are consistent with the theory of integrated forearm function generated from published biomechanical studies.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...