Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux and risk factors for erosive esophagitis in obese patients considered for bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in obese individuals. Prospective studies investigating validated GERD questionnaires and clinical parameters at identifying erosive esophagitis (EE) in this population are limited. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the prevalence of GERD in obese patients considered for bariatric surgery and identify risk and predictive factors for EE. METHODS: Eligible patients completed two validated questionnaires: GERDQ and Nocturnal Symptom Severity Impact (N-GSSIQ) before routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy. RESULTS: 242 consecutive patients were enrolled (130 females; mean age 37.8 ± 11.8 years; mean BMI 40.4 ± 5.3 kg/m2). The overall prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux (GERDQ ≥ 8, EE and/or PPI use) was 62.4%. EE was identified in 82 patients (33.9%) including 13/62 (21.0%) receiving PPIs at baseline. Multivariate logistic regression identified GERDQ ≥ 8 (OR = 6.3, 95%CI 3.0-13.1), hiatal hernia (OR = 4.2, 95%CI 1.6-10.7), abnormal Hill grade (OR = 2.7, 95%CI 1.4-5.4), and tobacco use (OR = 2.5, 95%CI 1.2-4.9) as independent risk factors for EE. A pre-endoscopic composite assessment including GERDQ ≥ 8 and presence of severe nocturnal reflux symptoms had 90% specificity and 20.7% sensitivity in identifying EE (NPV 68.9% and PPV 51.5%). CONCLUSION: GERD is highly prevalent in obese patients. Anthropometric data and GERD questionnaires have limited accuracy at predicting erosive disease. Pre-operative endoscopic assessment in this population appears warranted.

Dexlansoprazole is Effective in Relieving Heartburn during the Fasting Month of Ramadan.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors are effective at reducing heartburn. No studies have evaluated their efficacy in Ramadan. Dexlansoprazole has a unique active formulation independent of time-of-day dosing or food. The aim is to investigate the efficacy of dexlansoprazole 60 mg during Ramadan in patients with symptomatic heartburn. METHODS: Subjects recruited using poster, radio, and SMS advertisements completed a diary using a mobile-friendly application and received daily SMS reminders. Dexlansoprazole was started on day 8 for 3 weeks. No placebo arm was used in this trial. Primary endpoint was relief of heartburn expressed as mean 24-h free heartburn percentage (24FH%) per weekly period. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were enrolled. During week 1, only 1 person (3.1%) was heartburn-free and mean 24FH% was 41.1 ± 24.8%. On dexlansoprazole, mean 24FH% rose to 63.4 ± 23.8 and 81.6 ± 24.5% in weeks 2 and 4, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). Median 24FH% increased from 35.7% in week 1 to 71.4 and 85.7% in weeks 2 and 4, respectively. Mean Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERDQ) scores decreased from 10.0 ± 3.2 in week 1 to 6.53 ± 2.2 in week 2 (p < 0.001) and 5.87 ± 2.1 in week 4 (p < 0.001). Mean heartburn severity score decreased from 2.5 ± 1.0 to 1.7 ± 0.8 (p = 0.001). Early response was higher in patients with GERDQ scores ≥8 (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Dexlansoprazole is effective in the treatment of heartburn during Ramadan. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT03079050.

The Natural History of Incidental Colonic Diverticulosis on Screening Colonoscopy.

Background: The natural history of colonic diverticulosis is unclear. Methods: Patients with incidental diverticulosis identified in a previous prospective cross-sectional screening colonoscopy study were evaluated retrospectively for clinic or hospital visit(s) for diverticular disease (DD= acute diverticulitis or diverticular bleeding) using review of electronic health records and patient phone interview. Results: 826 patients were included in the screening colonoscopy study. Three were excluded for prior DD. In all, 224 patients (27.2%; mean age 62.3 ± 8.2) had incidental diverticulosis distributed in the left colon (67.4%), right colon (5.8%), or both (22.8%). Up-to-date information was available on 194 patients. Of those, 144 (74.2%) could be reached for detailed interview and constituted the study population. Over a mean follow-up of 7.0 ± 1.7 years, DD developed in 6 out of 144 patients (4.2%) (4 acute cases of diverticulitis, 1 probable case of diverticular bleeding, and 1 acute case of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding). Two patients were hospitalized, and none required surgery. The time to event was 5.1 ± 1.6 years and the incidence rate was 5.9 per 1000 patient-years. On multivariate analysis, none of the variables collected at baseline colonoscopy including age, gender, obesity, exercise, fiber intake, alcohol use, constipation, or use of NSAIDs were associated with DD. Conclusion: The natural history of incidental diverticulosis on screening colonoscopy was highly favorable in this well-defined prospectively identified cohort. The common scenario of incidental diverticulosis at screening colonoscopy makes this information clinically relevant and valuable to physicians and patients alike.

Adherence to systemic therapies for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in Lebanon: a physicians' survey from three medical specialties.

BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are chronic conditions that may cause tissue damage and disability, reduced quality of life and increased mortality. Various treatments have been developed for IMIDs, including immune modulators and targeted biologic agents. However, adherence remains suboptimal. METHODS: An adherence survey was used to evaluate physicians' beliefs about adherence to medication in IMID and to evaluate if and how they manage adherence. The survey was distributed to 100 randomly selected physicians from three different specialties. Results were analyzed by four academic experts commissioned to develop an action plan to address practical and perceptual barriers to adherence, integrating it into treatment goals to maximize outcomes in IMID, thereby elevating local standards of care. RESULTS: Eighty-two physicians participated in this study and completed the questionnaire. Most defined adherence as compliance with prescribed treatment. Although the majority of surveyed physicians (74%) did not systematically measure adherence in their practice, 54% identified adherence as a treatment goal of equal or greater importance to therapeutic endpoints. Lack of time and specialized nursing support was reported as an important barrier to measuring adherence. The expert panel identified four key areas for action: 360° education (patient-nurse-physician), patient-physician communication, patient perception and concerns, and market access/cost. An action plan was developed centered on education and awareness, enhanced benefit-risk communication, development of adherence assessment tools and promotion of patient support programs. CONCLUSION: Nonadherence to medication is a commonly underestimated problem with important consequences. A customized target-based strategy to address the root causes of non-adherence is essential in the management of chronic immune-mediated diseases.

A Customized Mobile Application in Colonoscopy Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Adherence with diet and prescribed purgative is essential for proper cleansing with low-volume bowel preparations. The aim of this work was to assess the effect of a customized mobile application (App) on adherence and quality of bowel preparation. METHODS: One hundred and sixty (160) eligible patients scheduled for elective colonoscopy were randomly assigned to paper (control) or App-based instructions. The preparation consisted of low-fiber diet for 2 days, clear fluids for one day and split-dose sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPS). Before colonoscopy, information was collected regarding adherence with, and utility of the provided instructions. The colonoscopists, blinded to assignment, graded bowel preparation using the Aronchick, Ottawa, and Chicago preparation scales. The primary endpoint was adherence with instructions. Quality of preparation was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: No difference in overall adherence or bowel cleanliness was observed between the study arms. Adherence was reported in 82.4% of App vs. 73.4% of controls (P=0.40). An adequate bowel preparation on the Aronchick scale was noted in 77.2 vs. 82.5%, respectively (P=0.68). Mean scores on the Ottawa and Chicago scales were also similar. Gender, age, time of colonoscopy, and BMI did not influence preparation or adherence. Compliance with the clear fluid diet component was noted in 94% of patients with BMI<30 vs. 77% with BMI≥30 (P<0.01). SPS was well tolerated by 81.9% of patients. The App was user-friendly and received higher overall rating in this respect than paper instructions (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: SPS is well tolerated and effective for bowel cleansing regardless of instruction method. Customized smartphone applications are effective, well-accepted and could replace standard paper instructions for bowel preparation.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02410720.

Use of rifaximin in gastrointestinal and liver diseases.

Rifaximin is a broad spectrum oral antibiotic with antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. It is poorly absorbed and thus has a highly favorable safety profile. Rifaximin has been shown to be effective in the treatment of traveler's diarrhea, functional bloating and irritable bowel syndrome, small bowel bacterial overgrowth and in the prevention of recurrent overt hepatic encephalopathy. In addition, there is emerging evidence for a possible beneficial effect of rifaximin in the treatment of uncomplicated diverticular disease and in the prevention of recurrent diverticulitis. The use of rifaximin is associated with a low incidence of development, or persistence of spontaneous bacterial mutants. Moreover, the development of important drug resistance among extra-intestinal flora during rifaximin therapy is unlikely because of minimal systemic absorption and limited cross-resistance of rifaximin with other antimicrobials. This review addresses the current and emerging role of rifaximin in the treatment of gastrointestinal and liver disorders.

Optimizing Colonoscopy Quality: From Bowel Preparation to Surveillance.

OPINION STATEMENT: Colonoscopy is a powerful screening method for colorectal cancer. However, colonoscopy performance is highly variable and quality indicators are needed to ensure delivery of high-quality healthcare. A multi-society task force has recently identified three priority quality indicators in colonoscopy: adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, and adherence to surveillance guidelines. The best-studied quality indicator is the adenoma detection rate, which is inversely correlated to the risk of interval colorectal cancer. Other important quality determinants include colonoscopy withdrawal time and the bowel preparation quality. It is important to note that these quality metrics are interrelated and optimization at every level is necessary for any high-quality colorectal cancer screening and prevention program.