Tubular Adenomas of the Breast Are Cytologically Distinct from Fibroadenomas.

INTRODUCTION: Increasing molecular evidence indicates that tubular adenoma of the breast is distinct from fibroepithelial lesions, leading to its reclassification as an epithelial tumor in the 5th World Health Organization classification of tumors of the breast. However, tubular adenoma remains poorly characterized on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and often not distinguished from fibroadenomas. In this study, the largest cohort, to date, of histologically confirmed aspirates of tubular adenomas were reviewed and compared with aspirates of fibroadenomas. Findings from this study further define the cytological features of tubular adenoma and allow differentiation from fibroadenoma. METHODOLOGY: Aspirates of histologically confirmed tubular adenomas were reviewed for features of the background, myoepithelial, epithelial, and stromal components and then compared to a cohort of aspirates of fibroadenomas. RESULTS: Totally, 43 (tubular adenoma) and 94 (fibroadenoma) aspirates were included. Tubular adenomas displayed moderate epithelial cellularity with high cohesiveness, with stromal fragments containing epithelium. Tubules are more common in tubular adenomas (p = 0.009) and "tubular fragments" (tissue fragments containing multiple tubular structures with/without stroma) is a pathognomonic feature of tubular adenoma (p < 0.001). Calcification and fibrocystic changes were variably seen (4.65-13.5%) but without difference to fibroadenomas (p > 0.05). Cytomorphologically malignant features and mitoses were absent in all aspirates of tubular adenoma. Presence of tubules and stromal fragments were independent factors associated with tubular adenomas, whereas a predominance of large epithelial fragments and naked stromal fragments were associated with fibroadenomas. CONCLUSION: Tubular adenomas are not only histologically and molecularly separate from fibroepithelial lesions but also a distinct entity on FNAC.

Analysis of recurrent molecular alterations in phyllodes tumour of breast: insights into prognosis and pathogenesis.

Phyllodes tumour (PT) of breast is a rare biphasic neoplasm. Recent next generation sequencing analyses had revealed novel genetic alterations in PT but lacked a further characterisation of their relationship to different PT features and outcome. Here, using targeted sequencing, we examined a panel of 90 recurrently altered or cancer related genes in 88 PT samples (including 49 benign, 25 borderline and 14 malignant PT). Twenty-three genes showed alterations in at least 8.0% of cases. Alterations were significantly higher with an increasing grade of PT (p=0.033), particularly for copy number alterations. The top ten alterations were TERT promoter (58.0%), MED12 (53.4%), RARA (22.8%), FLNA (19.3%), SETD2 (15.9%), SYNE1 (18.2%), PCLO (15.9%), KMT2D (14.3%), CDKN2A (15.9%) and DNAH11 (14.8%). Alterations in CDKN2A/B, EGFR, TP53, PIK3CA, PTEN and ARID1B (p≤0.039) were associated with a higher grade. Analysing alterations based on common pathways indicated a significant correlation of cell cycle pathway and epigenetic alterations with a higher PT grade (p=0.036 and 0.075 respectively). Interestingly, recurrences were not correlated with tumour grade, but related to the presence of RARA mutation (p=0.011) and the absence of alterations in epigenetic pathway (p=0.031). Analysis of synchronous pair of PT showed more differences in gene mutations with divergent MED12 mutation. By contrast, the recurrent samples showed similar genetic alterations as the primary tumours. In summary, we characterised genetic alterations in PTs of different grades and confirmed the recurrent alterations observed in earlier studies. In addition, current data implicated the roles of cell cycle, epigenetic and RARA changes in PT recurrence and tumourogenesis.

Combining Analysis of Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL) and PD-L1 Refined the Prognostication of Breast Cancer Subtypes.

BACKGROUND: PD-L1 has been used as a biomarker to select patients for treatment of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we assessed the clinicopathological features of breast cancers that are associated with PD-L1 expression, as well as its relationship with other immune components and its prognostic significance. RESULTS: Totally 1752 cases were included in this cohort. PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating immune cells (PD-L1-IC) expression and in tumor cells (PD-L1-TC) expression were identified in 34.2% and 10.1% of cases, respectively, and they showed a positive correlation with higher tumor grade, morphological apocrine features, presence of necrosis, and higher stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL). PD-L1-IC and PD-L1-TC expression correlated positively with each other, and both of them were negatively associated with estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and positively associated with Ki67, HER2, EGFR, p63, and p-cadherin. In survival analysis, PD-L1-IC expression was associated with better disease-free survival (DFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in HER2-overexpressed (HER2-OE) cancers and high-grade luminal B cancers. In triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) and HER2-OE cancers, compared with sTIL low PD-L1-IC negative cases, sTIL high cases showed significantly better DFS independent of PD-L1-IC status. sTIL low PD-L1-IC positive cases also demonstrated a better DFS in HER2-OE cancers. In high-grade luminal B cancers, sTIL high PD-L1-IC positive cases showed the best BCSS. CONCLUSION: The data suggested that the combining analysis of sTIL and PD-L1-IC expression refined the prognostication of breast cancer subtypes. Cases with high TIL and PD-LI-IC expression appear to be more immune active.

An Evaluation of Clinicopathological Correlation and Outcome of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Subgroups Reclassified According to the Latest ASCO/CAP Guideline.

BACKGROUND: The latest American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline has updated the interpretation of uncommon human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in situ hybridization (ISH) patterns (groups 2-4) with concomitant HER2 immunohistochemistry, leading to changes in the diagnosis of these subgroups. We sought to assess the clinicopathological features and outcomes in these subgroups in detail with our local cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinicopathologic features of groups 2 to 4 were compared to the typical amplified group (group 1: HER2/CEP17 ≥ 2, HER2 ≥ 4) and non-amplified group (group 5: HER2/CEP17 < 2, HER2 < 4). RESULTS: Group 2 (HER2/CEP17 ≥ 2, HER2 < 4) cases showed lower Ki67 expression and grade (P ≤ .002) than group 1 but no differences compared with group 5. Group 4 (HER2/CEP17 < 2, HER2 = 4-6) cases were associated with less necrosis, more estrogen receptor positivity, lower grade, more nodal metastases, and more special histotypes (P ≤ .037) than group 1, but higher grade and more nodal metastases (P ≤ .021) than group 5. Except for presenting as a larger tumor and of special histotypes, group 3 (HER2/CEP17 < 2, HER2 ≥ 6) cases showed no other significant differences from group 1, but were of higher grade and Ki67 level than groups 2, 4, and 5. Group 4, similar to group 5, showed worse survival than group 1 (disease-free survival: log-rank = 5.547, P = .019; overall survival: log-rank = 4.678, P = .031). The rate of relapse was similar in group 4 with and without anti-HER2 therapy, albeit with limited cases. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate more similarities among groups 2, 4, and 5 than between groups 1 and 3, supporting the HER2 categorization in the latest guideline. Additional studies may be warranted to assess the outcomes of these patients with different management approaches.

SETD2 alterations and histone H3K36 trimethylation in phyllodes tumor of breast.

PURPOSE: SETD2 is one of the key epigenetic regulatory genes involved in histone modifications. Its alterations were potentially oncogenic and commonly found in cancers. Interestingly, SETD2 is one of the most frequent mutated genes found exclusively in phyllodes tumor of the breast (PT). However, little has been done to further characterize SETD2 alterations in PT. METHODS: In this study, we examined the alterations of SETD2 gene and protein expression in a large cohort of PTs. Their correlations with SETD2 downstream target, H3K36me3 expression, and clinicopathologic features in PT were also assessed. RESULTS: SETD2 mutation was found in 15.9% of our cases and was mostly predicted to be damaging mutations. Interestingly, SETD2 mutations were associated with lower H3K36me3 expression, particularly those with damaging mutations (p = .041). Neither SETD2 mutations nor H3K36me3 expression was associated with PT grading and other clinicopathological features. By contrast, the SETD2 protein expression cannot reflect its mutation status and showed a different trend of clinicopathological correlations from H3K36me3. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings may suggest a potential involvement of epigenetic regulation via SETD2 alterations and downstream H3K36me3 on PT development. SETD2 mutations may occur early in the pathogenic process of PTs and its loss per se may not be sufficient for progression to malignancy. Exclusive alterations of SETD2 in PT can be used as markers for the diagnosis of fibroepithelial lesions. The association of H3K36me3 with SETD2 mutations may also indicate the value of evaluation of H3K36me3 expression in the diagnosis of fibroepithelial lesions.

INSM1 is a novel prognostic neuroendocrine marker for luminal B breast cancer.

Insulinoma associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a relatively new marker of neuroendocrine differentiation. It has been shown to have a high sensitivity for neuroendocrine tumours arising from different organs. This study evaluated INSM1 as a marker for neuroendocrine differentiation in infiltrating breast cancers (IBC). The expression of INSM1, together with other neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin and CD56) was assessed in a large IBC cohort using tissue microarray by immunohistochemistry. Overall, 13.1%, 4.6%, 7.0% and 6.5% of the cases were positive for synaptophysin, chromogranin, INSM1 and CD56, respectively. INSM1 expression showed similar clinicopathological and biomarker profiles as chromogranin and synaptophysin. They were associated positively with luminal profile (p<0.001) and hormone receptors expression (p≤0.015), but negatively with HER2 (p≤0.044) and high molecular weight cytokeratins (p≤0.047). Using synaptophysin and/or chromogranin to define neuroendocrine differentiation, INSM1 showed a sensitivity of 37.3%, and was more sensitive than chromogranin (33.5%) and CD56 (16.4%) but less than synaptophysin (94.6%). Interestingly, INSM1 expression segregated IBC with neuroendocrine differentiation into different prognostic subgroups, particularly within luminal B subtype. Among the synaptophysin/chromogranin+ luminal B cancers, INSM1 expression was associated with significantly better survival (DFS: χ2=8.009, p=0.004; BCSS: χ2=3.873, p=0.049). Multivariate analysis showed that synaptophysin/chromogranin+ INSM1- status was an independent adverse factor for DFS (HR=2.282, 95%CI=1.196-4.356, p=0.012) in the luminal B subtype. Our data supported the usefulness of INSM1 in detecting neuroendocrine differentiation in IBC. Furthermore, INSM1 expression suggested a favourable prognostic impact; thus, it could be useful for stratifying neuroendocrine tumours with different prognosis.

Combined SOX10 GATA3 is most sensitive in detecting primary and metastatic breast cancers: a comparative study of breast markers in multiple tumors.

PURPOSE: For invasive breast cancer (IBC), high SOX10 expression was reported particularly in TNBC. This raised the possibility that SOX10 may complement other breast markers for determining cancers of breast origin. METHODS: Here, we compared the expression of SOX10 with other breast markers (GATA3, mammaglobin and GCDFP15) and their combined expression in a large cohort of IBC together with nodal metastases. We have also evaluated the expression of GATA3 and SOX10 in a wide spectrum of non-breast carcinomas to assess their value as breast specific markers. RESULTS: Compared with other markers, SOX10 showed lower overall sensitivity (6.5%), but higher sensitivity in TNBC (31.4%) than other breast markers including GATA3 (29.7% for TNBC). Its expression demonstrated the highest concordance between the paired IBC and nodal metastases (96.4%, κ = 0.663) among all the breast markers. More importantly, SOX10 identified many GATA3-negative TNBC, thus the SOX10/GATA3 combination was the most sensitive marker combination for IBC (86.6%). For non-breast carcinoma, a high SOX10/GATA3 expression rate was found in melanoma (77.9%, predominately expressed SOX10), urothelial carcinoma (82.0%, predominately expressed GATA3) and salivary gland tumors (69.4%). Other carcinomas, including cancers from lungs, showed very low expression for the marker combination. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggested that SOX10/GATA3 combination can be used for differentiating metastases of breast and multiple non-breast origins. However, the differentiation with melanoma and urothelial tumors required more careful histologic examination, thorough clinical information and additional site-specific IHC markers. For salivary gland tumors, the overlapping tumor types with IBC renders the differentiation difficult.

The significance of highlighting the oestrogen receptor low category in breast cancer.

The latest ASCO/CAP guideline has recommended to report oestrogen receptor (ER) low cases (ERlo; 1-10%) as "ER low positive category", prompting us to compare the clinicopathologic features, biomarkers, survival and treatment of the ERlo cases with other subgroups (ER negative (ERneg) and ER high (ERhi)). ERlo cases revealed more similar clinicopathologic and biomarker profiles (including younger age, larger tumour, high proliferation, HER2 and basal markers expression) to ERneg than ERhi cancers. The ERlo cases receiving hormonal therapy showed a similarly poor outcome as ERneg cancers. However, majority of ERlo cases were downstaged to stage I in the 8th AJCC pathological prognostic staging, highlighting a risk of potential under treatment. Overall, our data highlighted the differences of ERlo from other ERpos cases and their management should be considered separately.

The Clinical Significance of Neuroendocrine Features in Invasive Breast Carcinomas.

The latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification categorized invasive breast carcinomas (IBCs) with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiations into neuroendocrine neoplasms (including well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor [NET] and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma [NEC]) and IBC no special type with NE features (IBC-NST-NE). However, little is documented of the clinical significance of this classification; also the precise thresholds and choices of NE markers were variable. In the current study, a large cohort of patients with IBC with NE differentiation were morphologically classified based on the WHO criteria and the clinical relevance of expression of different NE markers (synaptophysin [SYN], chromogranin [CG], and CD56) was evaluated. Among 1,372 IBCs, 52 NET (3.8%) and 172 IBC-NST-NE (12.5%) were identified. Compared with the IBC-no NE cases, NET and IBC-NST-NE were similarly associated with positive estrogen receptor (ER) expression and lower grade (p < .001). For patient outcome, IBC-NST-NE, but not NET, demonstrated significantly worse survival than the IBC-no NE cases. Based on high (≥50%) and low (<50%) expression for each NE marker, independent poor disease-free survival for SYNlo CGlo and SYNhi CGlo cancers (IBC-no NE cases as references, hazard ratio [HR], ≤1.429; p ≤ .026) was found. Interestingly, SYN and CG expression correlated with each other and they shared similar clinicopathologic characteristics; but not with with CD56. In addition, CD56-only positive cases were associated with hormone receptors negativity and basal markers positivity (p ≤ .019), and patients' outcome was similar to IBC-no NE cancers. Our findings suggested that NE markers expression may provide information to fine tune treatment strategy. The relevance of CD56 as NE marker requires further studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Invasive breast carcinomas (IBCs) with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation are heterogeneous in clinicopathologic parameters, biomarker expression, and prognosis. However, there are no specific therapies targeting NE differentiation, and all carcinomas with any NE differentiation are treated similarly as other IBCs. The results of this study suggest that stratification based on NE marker expression levels may provide added prognostically pertinent information, aiding better treatment strategy. In addition, CD56-only positive carcinomas showed a different clinicopathologic and biomarker expression profile compared with those with chromogranin and synaptophysin expression. Relevance of CD56 as an NE marker requires further studies.

Co-expression of HLA-I loci improved prognostication in HER2+ breast cancers.

The underlying basis for cancer immune evasion is important for effective immunotherapy and prognosis in breast cancers. Human leucocyte antigens (HLA)-I comprising three classical antigens (HLA-A, -B and -C) is mandatory for anti-tumor immunity. Its loss occurred frequently in many cancers resulting in effective immune evasion. Most studies examined HLA-I as a whole. Alterations in specific locus could have different clinical ramifications. Hence, we evaluated the expression of the three HLA-I loci in a large cohort of breast cancers. Low expression of HLA-A, -B and -C were found in 71.1%, 66.3%, and 60.2% of the cases. Low and high expression in all loci was found in 48.3% and 17.9% of the cases respectively. The remaining showed high expression in one or two loci. Cases with all HLA high expression (all HLA high) was frequent in the ER-HER2- (27.4%) and ER-HER2+ (23.1%) cases and was associated with characteristic pathologic features related to these tumor (higher grade, necrosis, high tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL), pT stage, low hormonal receptor, high basal marker expression) (p ≤ 0.019). Interestingly, in HER2+ cancers, only cases with all HLA high and high TIL showed significantly better survival. In node positive cancers, concordant high HLA expression in primary tumors and nodal metastases was favorable prognostically (DFS: HR = 0.741, p < 0.001; BCSS: HR = 0.699, p = 0.003). The data suggested an important clinical value of a combined analysis on the co-expression HLA-I status in both primary and metastatic tumors. This could be a potential additional key component to be incorporated into TIL evaluation for improved prognostication.

Childhood pneumococcal diseases and serotypes: can vaccines protect?

OBJECTIVES: To describe pneumococcal diseases in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and non-PICU patients. METHODS: The clinical, serotypes, and antibacterial sensitivity patterns of all children admitted to the pediatric wards (including PICU) of a university-affiliated teaching hospital from 2007 through 2009 with pneumococcal isolates were reviewed. RESULTS: Twelve cases of pneumococcal disease in children from 2007 through 2009 were reported. Five patients were admitted to PICU and 7 were general pediatric admissions. Four patients (2 PICU and 2 general pediatric) had received full or partial 7-valent pneumococcal vaccinations. All four patients recovered following systemic antibiotic treatment without sequelae. The serotypes of all PICU and some general pediatric cases were available and included 3, 6B, 19A and 19F. All isolates were sensitive to vancomycin. 50% were intermediate resistant/resistant to penicillin and 17% resistant to cefotaxime. PICU cases required longer total hospital stay (23 days vs 5 days, p=0.013). Three patients were ventilated and one received inotropic support. There was no death in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumococcal disease may develop despite prior vaccination. The expanded coverage of newer polyvalent pneumococcal vaccines might have prevented some, but not all, of these admissions.