ABSTRACT
Background/Objectives: A superinfection occurs when a new, secondary organism colonizes an existing infection. Spine infections are associated with high patient morbidity and sometimes require multiple irrigations and debridements (I&Ds). When multiple I&Ds are required, the risk of complications increases. The purpose of this study was to report our experience with spine superinfections and determine which patients are typically affected. Methods: A retrospective case series of spine superinfections and a retrospective case-control analysis were conducted. Data were collected manually from electronic medical records. Spine I&Ds were identified. Groups were created for patients who had multiple I&Ds for (1) a recurrence of the same causative organism or (2) a superinfection with a novel organism. Preoperative demographic, clinical, and microbiologic data were compared between these two outcomes. A case series of superinfections with descriptive data was constructed. Lastly, two illustrative cases were provided in a narrative format. Results: A total of 92 patients were included in this analysis. Superinfections occurred after 6 out of the 92 (7%) initial I&Ds and were responsible for 6 out of the 24 (25%) repeat I&Ds. The preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) of the patients with a superinfection were significantly lower than those in the control group (p = 0.022 and p = 0.032). Otherwise, the observed differences in the preoperative variables were not statistically different. In the six cases of superinfection, the presence of high-risk comorbidities, a history of substance abuse, or a lack of social support were commonly observed. The superinfecting organisms included Candida, Pseudomonas, Serratia, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Staphylococcus species. Conclusions: Superinfections are a devastating complication requiring reoperation after initial spine I&D. Awareness of the possibility of superinfection and common patient archetypes can be helpful for clinicians and care teams. Future work is needed to examine how to identify, help predict, and prevent spine superinfections.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single-center study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical relevance of the validated intraoperative bleeding severity scale (VIBe) in thoracolumbar spine surgery. METHODS: Adult patients aged 18 through 88 undergoing elective decompression, instrumentation, and fusion of the thoracolumbar spine were prospectively enrolled after informed consent was provided and written consent was obtained. Validated intraoperative bleeding severity scores were recorded intraoperatively. Univariate analysis consisted of Student T-tests, Pearson's χ2 Tests, Fisher's Exact Tests, linear regression, and binary logistic regression. Multivariable regression was conducted to adjust for baseline characteristics and potential confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of N = 121 patients were enrolled and included in the analysis. After adjusting for confounders, VIBe scores were correlated with an increased likelihood of intraoperative blood transfusion (ß = 2.46, P = .012), postoperative blood transfusion (ß = 2.36, P = .015), any transfusion (ß = 2.49, P < .001), total transfusion volume (ß = 180.8, P = .020), and estimated blood loss (EBL) (ß = 409, P < .001). Validated intraoperative bleeding severity scores had no significant association with length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, 30-day emergency department visit, change in pre- to post-op hemoglobin and hematocrit, total drain output, or length of surgery. CONCLUSION: The VIBe scale is associated with perioperative transfusion rates and EBL in patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. Overall, the VIBe scale has clinically relevant meaning in spine surgery, and shows potential utility in clinical research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures remain one of the most prevalent and deadly conditions afflicting those 65 years and older. For other health conditions (e.g. myocardial infarction), hospital location is associated with poorer health outcomes. To our knowledge, no study has investigated the relationship between hip fracture morality rate in the United States between urban and rural hospital settings. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to examine differences in in-hospital mortality between groups treated in rural, urban-teaching, and urban-non-teaching hospitals, as well as public and private hospitals. Mortality rates were also compared for variances between surgical treatment, sex, insurance, patient location, race, and income. Discharge data was collected for 256,240 inpatient stays from the 2012 National Inpatient Sample (NIS), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. RESULTS: Odds of mortality were 14.6% greater in rural hospital hip fracture patients compared to Urban/Non-Teaching centers (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study lend support to necessitate further research investigating prospective barriers to care of those in rural settings. This may point to limitations in resources and trained medical and surgical specialists in rural hospitals and need for continued research to mitigate such findings.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Intracranial epidermoid tumors are slow-growing, histologically benign tumors of epithelial cellular origin that can be symptomatic because of their size and mass effect. Neurosurgical resection, while the treatment of choice, can be quite challenging due to locations where these lesions commonly occur and their association with critical neurovascular structures. As such, subtotal resection (STR) rather than gross-total resection (GTR) can often be performed, rendering residual and recurrent tumor potentially problematic. The authors present a case of a 28-year-old man who underwent STR followed by aggressive repeat resection for regrowth, and they report the results of the largest meta-analysis to date of epidermoid tumors to compare recurrence rates for STR and GTR. METHODS: The authors conducted a systemic review of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Collaboration following the PRISMA guidelines. They then conducted a proportional meta-analysis to compare the pooled recurrence rates between STR and GTR in the included studies. The authors developed fixed- and mixed-effect models to estimate the pooled proportions of recurrence among patients undergoing STR or GTR. They also investigated the relationship between recurrence rate and follow-up time in the previous studies using linear regression and natural cubic spline models. RESULTS: Overall, 27 studies with 691 patients met the inclusion criteria; of these, 293 (42%) underwent STR and 398 (58%) received GTR. The average recurrence rate for all procedures was 11%. The proportional meta-analysis showed that the pooled recurrence rate after STR (21%) was 7 times greater than the rate after GTR (3%). The average recurrence rate for studies with longer follow-up durations (≥ 4.4 years) (17.4%) was significantly higher than the average recurrence rate for studies with shorter follow-up durations (< 4.4 years) (5.7%). The cutoff point of 4.4 years was selected based on the significant relationship between the recurrence rate of both STR and GTR and follow-up durations in the included studies (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: STR is associated with a significantly higher rate of epidermoid tumor recurrence compared to GTR. Attempts at GTR should be made during the initial surgery with efforts to optimize success. Surgical expertise, as well as the use of adjuncts, such as intraoperative MRI and neuromonitoring, may increase the likelihood of completing a safe GTR and decreasing the long-term risk of recurrence. The most common surgical complications were transient cranial nerve palsies, occurring equally in STR and GTR cases when reported. In all postoperative epidermoid tumor cases, but particularly following STR, close follow-up with serial MRI, even years after surgery, is recommended.
