Health care providers' perspectives on the mistreatment towards women during maternity care: Do perceptions of the working environment and empathy level matter?

BACKGROUND: Mistreatment of women in maternity care violates human rights, erodes trust and disrupts the continuity of maternal healthcare services. Investigating Health Care Providers' (HCPs) perspectives is indispensable in uncovering drivers and designing targeted interventions. AIM: To identify the roles of HCPs' perceptions of the working environment and levels of empathy on the mistreatment of women during maternity care. METHODS: We conducted a self-administered survey among 148 maternal HCPs practising in ten health centres and four hospitals in the East Wollega Zone, Western Ethiopia, from June to September 2022. FINDINGS: Most providers reported seeing other HCPs mistreating women (93.2%), while three-fourths (75.7%) admitted it as their actions. Violation of privacy and confidentiality was the most frequently reported category of mistreatment (44.6%), followed by physical abuse (37.1%) and verbal abuse (35.8%). The likelihood of mistreating women was reduced by 65% (AOR=0.35, 95% CI: [0.14, 0.86]) among individuals with positive perceptions of their working environment compared to those with negative perceptions. A unit increase in providers' empathy also led to a five per cent decrease in mistreatment (AOR=0.95, 95% CI: [0.91, 0.98]. CONCLUSIONS: HCPs' perceptions of their working environment and enhanced empathy levels were associated with the reduction of the odds of mistreatment of women. While empathic care should be cultivated as a component of HCPs' competencies, efforts should be made to improve the conditions of the demanding health system to realise a resilient, motivated, competent, and compassionate workforce. The interplay between gender, profession, and mistreatment level requires further investigation.

The mistreatment of women during maternity care and its association with the maternal continuum of care in health facilities.

BACKGROUND: Mistreatment of childbearing women continues despite global attention to respectful care. In Ethiopia, although there have been reports of mistreatment of women during maternity care, the influence of this mistreatment on the continuum of maternity care remains unclear. In this paper, we report the prevalence of mistreatment of women from various dimensions, factors related to mistreatment and also its association to the continuum of maternity care in health facilities. METHODS: We conducted an institution-based cross-sectional survey among women who gave birth within three months before the data collection period in Western Ethiopia. A total of 760 women participated in a survey conducted face-to-face at five health facilities during child immunization visits. Using a validated survey tool, we assessed mistreatment in four categories and employed a mixed-effects logistic regression model to identify its predictors and its association with the continuum of maternity care, presenting results as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Over a third of women (37.4%) experienced interpersonal abuse, 29.9% received substandard care, 50.9% had poor interactions with healthcare providers, and 6.2% faced health system constraints. The odds of mistreatment were higher among women from the lowest economic status, gave birth vaginally and those who encountered complications during pregnancy or birth, while having a companion of choice during maternity care was associated to reduced odds of mistreatment by 42% (AOR = 0.58, 95% CI: [0.42-0.81]). Women who experienced physical abuse, verbal abuse, stigma, or discrimination during maternity care had a significantly reduced likelihood of completing the continuum of care, with their odds decreased by half compared to those who did not face such interpersonal abuse (AOR = 0.49, 95% CI: [0.29-0.83]). CONCLUSIONS: Mistreatment of women was found to be a pervasive problem that extends beyond labour and birth, it negatively affects upon maternal continuum of care. Addressing this issue requires an effort to prevent mistreatment through attitude and value transformation trainings. Such interventions should align with a system level actions, including enforcing respectful care as a competency, enhancing health centre functionality, improving the referral system, and influencing communities to demand respectful care.

Association of continuity of carer and women's experiences of maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Recent research highlights the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternity services, although none to date have analysed the association between continuity of carer and how women felt about the changes to pregnancy care and birth plans. AIM: To describe pregnant women's self-reported changes to their planned pregnancy care and associations between continuity of carer and how women feel about changes to their planned care. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey of pregnant women aged over 18 years in their final trimester of pregnancy in Australia. FINDINGS: 1668 women completed the survey. Most women reported at least one change to pregnancy care and birthing plans. Women receiving full continuity of carer were more likely to rate the changes to care as neutral/positive (p<.001) when compared with women who received partial or no continuity. DISCUSSION: Pregnant women experienced many changes to their planned pregnancy and birth care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Women who received full continuity of carer experienced fewer changes to care and were more likely to feel neutral/positive about the changes than women who did not receive full continuity of carer.

The roles of multi-component interventions in reducing mistreatment of women and enhancing respectful maternity care: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Despite recognition of the adverse impacts of the mistreatment of women during pregnancy, labour and birth, there remains limited evidence on interventions that could reduce mistreatment and build a culture of respectful maternity care (RMC) in health facilities. The sustainability of effective individual interventions and their adaptability to various global contexts remain uncertain. In this systematic review, we aimed to synthesise the best available evidence that has been shown to be effective in reducing the mistreatment of women and/or enhancing RMC during women's maternity care in health facilities. METHODS: We searched the online databases PubMed, CINAHL, EBSCO Nursing/Academic Edition, Embase, African Journals Online (AJOL), Scopus, Web of Science, and grey literature using predetermined search strategies. We included cluster randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and pre-and-post observational studies and appraised them using JBI critical appraisal checklists. The findings were synthesised narratively without conducting a meta-analysis. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria. RESULTS: From the 1493 identified records, 11 studies from six sub-Sahara African countries and one study from India were included: three cluster RCTs and nine pre- and post-studies. We identified diverse interventions implemented via various approaches including individual health care providers, health systems, and policy amendments. Moderate certainty evidence from two cluster RCTs and four pre- and post-studies suggests that multi-component interventions can reduce the odds of mistreatment that women may experience in health facilities, with odds of reduction ranging from 18 per cent to 66 per cent. Similarly, women's perceptions of maternity care as respectful increased in moderate certainty evidence from two cluster RCTs and five pre- and post-studies with reported increases ranging from 5 per cent to 50 per cent. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-component interventions that address attitudes and behaviors of health care providers, motivate staff, engage the local community, and alleviate health facility and system constraints have been found to effectively reduce mistreatment of women and/or increase respectful maternity care. Such interventions which go beyond a single focus like staff training appear to be more likely to bring about change. Therefore, future interventions should consider diverse approaches that incorporate these components to improve maternal care.

Perinatal mental healthcare: Developing skills in midwifery students.

Midwives have a pivotal role in screening for risk factors for mental illness and psychosocial vulnerabilities in women during the perinatal period. They also have a key responsibility to provide women with the appropriate resources to support their mental wellbeing. Midwives can lack confidence and/or feelings of competence regarding these skills. Care of women in the context of their perinatal mental health is a core midwifery skill that deserves practical learning during pre-registration education, just as the more 'hands on' skills such as abdominal palpation, labour and birth support or newborn examination. However, there is limited opportunity for students to gain clinical placement experiences that are specific to perinatal mental health (PMH). This discussion paper describes an innovative teaching and learning project that aimed to improve confidence in students' ability to conduct screening, support, and referral of women experiencing mental ill health. The project involved the development of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and audio visual resources to support learning and teaching and clinical placement. Feedback was collected to inform the refinement of the first OSCE, and to assist in the design of the audio visual resources that are now displayed publicly on the Australian College of Midwives website at https://www.midwives.org.au/Web/Web/Professional-Development/Resources.aspx?hkey=12c2360e-d8b9-4286-8d0a-50aeaeca9702.

Midwifery continuity of care for women with complex pregnancies in Australia: An integrative review.

BACKGROUND: All women require access to quality maternity care. Continuity of midwifery care can enhance women's experiences of childbearing and is associated with positive outcomes for women and infants. Much research on these models has been conducted with women with uncomplicated pregnancies; less is known about outcomes for women with complexities. AIM: To explore the outcomes and experiences for women with complex pregnancies receiving midwifery continuity of care in Australia. METHODS: This integrative review used Whittemore and Knafl's approach. Authors searched five electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and MAG Online) and assessed the quality of relevant studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) appraisal tools. FINDINGS: Fourteen studies including women with different levels of obstetric risk were identified. However, only three reported outcomes separately for women categorised as either moderate or high risk. Perinatal outcomes reported included mode of birth, intervention rates, blood loss, perineal trauma, preterm birth, admission to special care and breastfeeding rates. Findings were synthesised into three themes: 'Contributing to safe processes and outcomes', 'Building relational trust', and 'Collaborating and communicating'. This review demonstrated that women with complexities in midwifery continuity of care models had positive experiences and outcomes, consistent with findings about low risk women. DISCUSSION: The nascency of the research on midwifery continuity of care for women with complex pregnancies in Australia is limited, reflecting the relative dearth of these models in practice. CONCLUSION: Despite favourable findings, further research on outcomes for women of all risk is needed to support the expansion of midwifery continuity of care.

A qualitative study of early career Australian midwives' encounters with perinatal grief, loss and trauma.

PROBLEM: The health of women is dependent on midwifery workforce stability. Retaining new midwives is paramount, however without support, the early career can be a vulnerable time for midwives. BACKGROUND: Midwives care for women who experience poor perinatal outcomes like stillbirth and neonatal death. Midwifery care in these sentinel events is complex. There is limited understanding of early career midwives' experiences within these encounters. AIM: To understand the experiences of Australian early career midwives' clinical encounters with perinatal grief, loss and trauma. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive/exploratory study using in-depth interviews. FINDINGS: Four themes were identified from interview data: (1) all eyes on the skills; (2) support is of the essence; (3) enduring an emotional toll; (4) at all times, the woman. Most participants had minimal exposure to perinatal loss as a student. As a result, most felt unskilled and unprepared for this as a new midwife. DISCUSSION: Types and degrees of support varied in these encounters. Early career midwives who were well supported reflected positively on working with grief and loss. In contrast, inadequate or absent support had detrimental effects on participant wellbeing. Poorly supported encounters with death (intrapartum fetal, early neonatal, and maternal) in the early career period were significantly distressful, giving rise to mental and emotional distress. CONCLUSION: Pre-registration perinatal loss skill development and supported experiences are necessary for preparedness. Continued education, formalised debriefing and mentoring, institutional philosophies which promote collegial ethics of care, and the expansion of continuity of midwifery care models will improve new midwives' experiences.

Midwifery pre-registration education and mid-career workforce participation and experiences.

BACKGROUND: Midwives in Australia are educated through a range of routes providing flexible ways to become a midwife. Little is known about whether the route to registration impacts on mid-career experiences, in particular, whether the pathway (post-nursing pathway compared with 'direct-entry') makes any difference. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore the midwifery workforce experiences and participation in graduates six to seven years after completing either a post-nursing Graduate Diploma in Midwifery (GradDip) or an undergraduate degree, the Bachelor of Midwifery (BMid), from one university in New South Wales, Australia. METHODS: Data were collected from mid-career midwives having graduated from one NSW university from 2007-2008 using a survey. The survey included validated workforce participation instruments - the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the Practice Environment Scale-Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) and the Perceptions of Empowerment in Midwifery Scale (PEMS). RESULTS: There were 75 respondents: 40% (n=30) Bachelor of Midwifery and 60% (n=45) GradDip graduates. The age range was 27-56 years old (mean age=36 years) Bachelor of Midwifery graduates being on average 7.6 years older than Graduate Diploma in Midwifery graduates (40 vs 33 years; p<0.01). Almost 80% (59), were currently working in midwifery. Nine of the 12 not working in midwifery (75%) planned to return. There were no differences in workforce participation measures between the two educational pathways. Working in a continuity of care model was protective in regards to remaining in the profession. CONCLUSION: Most mid-career graduates were still working in midwifery. There were no differences between graduates from the two pathways in relation to burnout, practice experiences or perceptions of empowerment.

Students' perceptions of the follow-through experience in 3 year bachelor of midwifery programmes in Australia.

BACKGROUND: providing opportunities for students to participate in midwifery continuity of care experiences is a challenge in many midwifery education programmes. The 'follow-through experience' was a deliberate strategy introduced into midwifery education programmes in Australia to ensure that students experienced midwifery continuity of care. The follow through experience provides an opportunity for midwifery students to follow a pre-determined number of women through pregnancy, labour and birth and into the early parenting period. AIM: the aim of this study was to explore the follow-through experience in the 3 year Bachelor of Midwifery (direct entry) in Australia to better understand its impact on midwifery students and to identify the learning that is associated with this experience. METHODS: a qualitative methodology was used. Data were collected from former and current Bachelor of Midwifery students through a survey and telephone interviews. Students from all 3-year pre-registration Bachelor of Midwifery programmes in Australia were invited to participate. A thematic analysis was undertaken. Constructivist learning theories were used to identify whether learning occurred in the context of the follow-through experience. FINDINGS: students do learn from their engagement in midwifery continuity of care experiences. Learning was characterised by the primacy of the relationship with the women. Students also identified the challenges they faced which included recruitment of women and finding the time to fully engage with the follow-through experience. Difficulties were identified around the different requirements of the follow-through experience, the lack of support at times for students and the incongruence with the existing maternity system. These issues impacted on students' ability to engage in and maximise their learning. CONCLUSIONS: the follow-through experience is an innovative midwifery education strategy that facilitates learning for midwifery students. Challenges need to be addressed at a systematic level and new strategies developed to support the learning opportunities presented by the follow-through experience.

Assisting women to make informed choices about screening for Group B Streptococcus in pregnancy: a critical review of the evidence.

The approach to the prevention of early onset GBS disease in the newborn varies considerably from country to country. The Centre for Disease Control in the United States advocates universal culture based screening with the administration of intra-partum antibiotics, usually benzylpenicillin or ampicillin, to women who are colonised with GBS. National groups in the UK and New Zealand advocate a risk-based approach where intra-partum antibiotics are given to women with identified risk factors. The Canadian Taskforce on preventive health care has identified a third approach; where intra-partum antibiotics are given to women with a positive GBS culture and an identified risk factor. There are no national guidelines or consensus in Australia. The aim of this paper is to explore the evidence for screening and intrapartum prophylaxis for GBS. The three main methods of detection and management of GBS in pregnancy are described and the implications for women and midwifery practice are addressed. It is hoped that this discussion will provide women, midwives and other clinicians with a summary of the evidence, risks and benefits to enable informed decision making.

The 'follow-through' experience in three-year Bachelor of Midwifery programs in Australia: a survey of students.

INTRODUCTION: The follow-through experience in Australian midwifery education is a strategy that requires midwifery students to 'follow' a number of women through pregnancy, labour and birth and into the parenting period. BACKGROUND: The experience was introduced by the Australian College of Midwives as part of national standards for the three-year Bachelor of Midwifery programs. Anecdotally, the introduction caused considerable debate. A criticism was that these experiences were incorporated with little evidence of their value. METHODS: An online survey was undertaken to explore the follow-through experience from the perspectives of current and former students. There were 101 respondents, 93 current students with eight recent graduates. RESULTS: Participants were positive about developing relationships with women. They also identified aspects of the follow-through experience that were challenging. Support to assist with the experience was often lacking and the documentation required varied. Despite these difficulties, 75% felt it should be mandatory as it facilitated positive learning experiences. DISCUSSION: The follow-through experience ensured that students were exposed to midwifery continuity of care. The development of relationships with women was an important aspect of learning. CONCLUSION: Despite these challenges, there were significant learning opportunities. Future work and research needs to ensure than an integrated approach is taken to enhance learning.

A double-blind randomised controlled trial of 25% oral glucose for pain relief in 2-month old infants undergoing immunisation.

BACKGROUND: Infant immunisation is the most commonly performed health procedure in developed countries. Associated pain may be harmful because we do not know what painful experiences the infant has already had and whether it might contribute to a cumulative pain experience. Healthy infants undergo immunisation with minimal pain relief. However, immunisation pain can be managed using oral sweet solutions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of 25% oral glucose solution in reducing immunisation pain in 2-month old infants. TRIAL DESIGN AND METHODS: A double-blind, randomised controlled trial conducted in Jordan. A total of 120 healthy full-term infants who met the eligibility criteria and were attending immunisation clinics for routine 2-month immunisation were randomised to receive either 2 mL of 25% oral glucose solution immediately prior to their immunisation or 2 mL of oral sterile water. Researchers, nurses and parents were blind to the solution. Primary outcome was behavioural pain measured using the Modified Behavioural Pain Scale (MBPS). Secondary outcomes were crying time and duration of full-lung cry. Crying was registered from onset of the immunisation injection and for up to 120 s after completion of the injection procedure. RESULTS: Infants in the intervention group experienced statistically and clinically significant reduction in behavioural pain responses (p<0.001), and spent less time crying up to 2 min after the procedure (mean difference 38 vs. 77.9s). CONCLUSION: A 2 mL oral dose of 25% glucose given immediately before an immunisation procedure reduces pain in 2-month old infants.

Examining the content validity of the birthing unit design spatial evaluation tool within a woman-centered framework.

INTRODUCTION: The environment for birth influences women in labor. Optimal birthing environments have the potential to facilitate normal labor and birth. The measurement of optimal birth units is currently not possible because there are no tools. An audit tool, the Birth Unit Design Spatial Evaluation Tool (BUDSET), was developed to assess the optimality of birthing environments. The BUDSET is based on 4 domains (fear cascade, facility, aesthetics, support), each comprising design principles that are further differentiated into specific assessable design items. In the process of developing measurement tools, content validity must be established. The aim of this study was to establish the content validity of the BUDSET from the perspective of women and midwives. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods study with a survey assessing agreement with BUDSET items and in-depth interviews. Survey results were analyzed using an item-level content validity index and a survey-level validity index. Interview data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach. The study was conducted in 2 locations-a major maternity hospital and a midwifery research center, both in Australia. Study participants were 10 women and 2 midwifery academics. RESULTS: The survey revealed that content-related validity varied according to the BUDSET domain, with the domains of facility and support established as content valid by most participants. The domains of the fear cascade and aesthetic were less strong, particularly among pregnant women. Interview data analysis provided content validity evidence of both the fear cascade and aesthetic domains. A further 4 subthemes of fear cascade also were identified: foreign space, medical-hospital-emergency, being sterile/clinical, and protecting the woman from the environment. Content validity evidence for facility and support domains also was established. DISCUSSION: This study has established that the BUDSET is content valid for assessing the optimality of birthing environments. Some further refinement of the tool is now possible.