Sagittal Angulation and the Treatment of Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures: Time to Update our Classification Systems.

OBJECTIVES: Inconsistent outcomes have been reported for percutaneous fixation of Garden I/II femoral neck fractures in geriatric patients. It was hypothesized that accounting for variable follow-up would better estimate the failure rate of percutaneous fixation with and without significant sagittal angulation. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Single academic healthcare system. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients ≥50 years of age treated with percutaneous screw fixation of Garden I/II (OTA/AO B1.1/B1.2) femoral neck fractures from 2010 to 2020 were identified. Pathologic fractures and open approaches were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Sagittal angulation was measured using a previously described method. 11 Treatment failure was defined as early fixation failure (within 6 weeks), nonunion, and/or avascular necrosis. Potential associations between treatment failure and patient, injury, and treatment variables were assessed. Cox proportional hazard analysis accounted for variable follow-up when assessing for event-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 240 fractures that met inclusion criteria, there were 20 treatment failures (8%) and 33 fractures with sagittal angulation ≥20 degrees on lateral radiographs (14%). Failure-free survival at 2 years was 91% for patients with <20 degrees of posterior angulation and 52% for patients with ≥20 degrees of posterior angulation ( P < 0.0001). The hazard ratio, which incorporates variable follow-up, for failure with ≥20 degrees of posterior angulation was 6.36 ( P < 0.0001). No other factors were associated with treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: Significant posterior angulation (≥20 degrees) of Garden I/II femoral neck fractures is associated with a high failure rate after screw fixation. The authors suggest characterizing fractures with ≥20 degrees of sagittal angulation as Garden III fractures to better support surgical decision making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Immediate Fixation of Acetabular Fractures Through an Anterior Approach Does Not Increase Morbidity or Mortality.

INTRODUCTION: Acetabular fractures requiring an anterior approach have historically been delayed, allowing a stable clot to form before creating large surgical exposures. The purpose of this study was to determine whether immediate fixation of acetabular fractures within 24 hours using an anterior approach demonstrates notable difference in blood loss, length of stay (LOS), complications, or mortality compared with acetabular fractures treated after 24 hours. METHODS: Ninety-three patients were optimized for surgery within 24 hours of injury. Thirty-two patients underwent fixation within 24 hours using an anterior approach to the acetabulum. Demographics, hours from injury to operating room, fracture classification, embolization, surgical approach, intraoperative cell salvage use, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, Injury Severity Score, and Abbreviated Chest Injury Score were recorded. Estimated blood loss, transfusions, intensive care unit stay, total hospital LOS, complications, and mortality rates were compared. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in fracture classification, blood loss, or intraoperative transfusions between the immediate and delayed fixation groups. Six patients in the delayed group (9.8%) returned to the operating room for a complication compared with one patient (3.1%) in the immediate group ( P = 0.42). Three patients in the delayed group (4.9%) developed a surgical site infection compared with none (0%) in the immediate group ( P = 0.55). The immediate group had an average LOS of 7 days compared with 11 days in the delayed fixation group ( P = 0.01). No notable differences were observed in 30- or 90-day mortality rates. DISCUSSION: Medically optimized patients with acetabular fractures who undergo immediate fixation through an anterior approach do not seem to have an associated increase in blood loss, transfusions, or mortality. Prompt surgical management may also be associated with a shorter preoperative and postoperative LOS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level III.

C-Reactive Protein Level at Time of Discharge Is Not Predictive of Risk of Reoperation or Readmission in Children With Septic Arthritis.

Purpose: C-reactive protein (CRP) level is used at our tertiary pediatric hospital in the diagnosis, management, and discharge evaluation of patients with septic arthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a discharge criterion of CRP < 2.0 mg/dL for patients with septic arthritis in preventing reoperation and readmission. We also aimed to identify other risk factors of treatment failure. Methods: Patients diagnosed with septic arthritis between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017 were identified with ICD 9/10 and related CPT codes. Systematic chart reviews were performed to obtain demographic data, infection characteristics, and treatment details. Bivariate tests of associations between potential risk factors and readmission and reoperation were performed. Quantitative variables were analyzed using Mann-Whitney tests and categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square tests. Results: One hundred and eighty-three children with septic arthritis were included in the study. Seven (3.8%) were readmitted after hospital discharge for further management, including six who required reoperation. Mean CRP at discharge for single-admission patients was 1.71 mg/dL (± 1.07) and 1.96 mg/dL (± 1.19) for the readmission group (p = 0.664). Forty-eight children (25.9%) had CRP values greater than the recommended 2.0 mg/dL at discharge. Only three of these patients (6.2%) were later readmitted. The only common variable of the readmitted children was an antibiotic-resistant or atypical causative bacteria. Conclusions: CRP levels are useful in monitoring treatment efficacy of septic arthritis in children but are not reliable as a discharge criterion to prevent readmission or reoperation. We recommend determining discharge readiness on the basis of clinical improvement and down-trending CRP values. There was a higher risk of readmission in children with an antibiotic-resistant or atypical causative bacteria. Close monitoring of these patients and those with negative cultures at time of discharge is suggested to identify signs of persistent infection. Level of evidence: III, retrospective cohort study.