Impact of index admission cholecystectomy vs interval cholecystectomy on readmission rate in acute cholangitis: National Readmission Database survey.

BACKGROUND: Elective cholecystectomy (CCY) is recommended for patients with gallstone-related acute cholangitis (AC) following endoscopic decompression to prevent recurrent biliary events. However, the optimal timing and implications of CCY remain unclear. AIM: To examine the impact of same-admission CCY compared to interval CCY on patients with gallstone-related AC using the National Readmission Database (NRD). METHODS: We queried the NRD to identify all gallstone-related AC hospitalizations in adult patients with and without the same admission CCY between 2016 and 2020. Our primary outcome was all-cause 30-d readmission rates, and secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization cost. RESULTS: Among the 124964 gallstone-related AC hospitalizations, only 14.67% underwent the same admission CCY. The all-cause 30-d readmissions in the same admission CCY group were almost half that of the non-CCY group (5.56% vs 11.50%). Patients in the same admission CCY group had a longer mean LOS and higher hospitalization costs attributable to surgery. Although the most common reason for readmission was sepsis in both groups, the second most common reason was AC in the interval CCY group. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that patients with gallstone-related AC who do not undergo the same admission CCY have twice the risk of readmission compared to those who undergo CCY during the same admission. These readmissions can potentially be prevented by performing same-admission CCY in appropriate patients, which may reduce subsequent hospitalization costs secondary to readmissions.

Impact of interhospital transfer status on outcomes of variceal and nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: insights from the National Inpatient Sample analysis, 2017 to 2020.

Background: Variceal and nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (VUGIB and NVUGIB, respectively) require prompt intervention. Existing studies offer limited insight into the impact of interhospital transfers on patients with VUGIB and NVUGIB. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using the US National Inpatient Sample database from 2017 to 2020. The outcomes included in-hospital mortality, incidence of complications, procedural performance, and resource utilization. Results: A total of 28,275 VUGIB and 781,370 NVUGIB adult patients were included. Transferred VUGIB and NVUGIB patients, when compared to nontransferred ones, demonstrated higher inpatient mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.49 and 1.86, P < 0.05). Patients with VUGIB and NVUGIB had a higher likelihood of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (AOR 3.79 and 1.76, respectively, P = 0.01), vasopressor requirement (AOR 2.13 and 2.37, respectively, P < 0.01), need for mechanical ventilation (AOR 1.73 and 2.02, respectively, P < 0.01), and intensive care unit admission (AOR 1.76 and 2.01, respectively, P < 0.01). Compared to their nontransferred counterparts, transferred VUGIB patients had a higher rate of undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (AOR 3.26, 95% CI 1.92-5.54, P < 0.01), while transferred NVUGIB patients had a higher rate of interventional radiology-guided embolization (AOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.73-2.34, P < 0.01) and endoscopic hemostasis (AOR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Interhospital transfer is associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher resource utilization for VUGIB and NVUGIB patients.

Early palliative care referral may improve end-of-life care in end-stage liver disease patients: A retrospective analysis from a non-transplant center.

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) who are not transplant candidates often have a trajectory of rapid decline and death similar to patients with stage IV cancer. Palliative care (PC) services have been shown to be underutilized for such patients. Most studies examining the role of PC in ESLD have been done at transplant centers. Thus, determining the utilization and benefit of PC at a non-transplant tertiary center may help establish a standard of care in the management of patients with ESLD not eligible for transplant. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult (>18 years) patients with ESLD admitted to Rochester Regional Health (RRH) system hospitals from 2012 to 2021. Patients were divided into groups based on the presence or absence of PC involvement. Baseline characteristics were recorded. The impact of PC was assessed by comparing the number of hospitalizations before and after the involvement of PC, comparing code status changes, health care proxy (HCP) assignments, Aspira catheter placements, and frequency of repeated paracentesis. RESULTS: In our analysis of 576 patients, 41.1% (237 patients) received a PC consult (PC group), while 58.9% (339 patients) did not (no-PC group). Baseline characteristics were comparable. However, their mean number of admissions significantly decreased (15.66 vs. 3.49, p < 0.001) after PC involvement. Full code status was more prevalent in the no-PC group (67.8% vs. 18.6%, p < 0.001), while comfort care code status was more common in the PC group (59.9% vs. 20.6%, p < 0.001). Changes in code status were significantly higher in the PC group (77.6% vs. 29.2%, p < 0.001). The PC group had a significantly higher mortality rate (83.1% vs. 46.4%, p < 0.01). Patients in the PC group had a higher likelihood of having an assigned HCP (63.7% vs. 37.5%, p < 0.001). PC referral was associated with more frequent use of an Aspira catheter (5.9% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001) and more frequent paracentesis (30.8% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study provides compelling evidence of the diverse advantages of palliative care for patients with end-stage liver disease, including reduced admissions, improved goals of care, code status modifications, enhanced healthcare proxy assignments, and targeted interventions. These findings highlight the potential significance of early integration of palliative care in the disease trajectory to provide comprehensive, patient-centered care that addresses the unique needs and preferences of individuals with advanced liver disease.

Bullous herpes zoster masquerading as a bullous pemphigoid flare: A case report.

Herpes zoster (HZ) results from the reactivation of dormant varicella zoster virus (VZV) in the posterior dorsal root ganglia manifesting as painful vesicles along the dermatomal distribution as shingles. The risk of reactivation is higher in immunocompromised patients. Herpes zoster lesions can have varied presentations including bullous forms, may induce BP flare, may co-exist in the same lesions, and should be included in the list of differentials for BP flares not responding to the standard of care. Here, we describe a case of a 74-year-old female with a history of recurrent bullous pemphigoid (BP) flares, who was on mycophenolate mofetil, and presented with skin lesions on her right thigh which were typical for her BP flares. Unlike prior flares, the lesions did not respond to prednisone therapy. Her hospitalization course was complicated by encephalopathy. Intravenous acyclovir was started empirically. Viral cultures and polymerase chain reaction from the lesions came back positive for VZV, but the patient succumbed to her illness shortly afterward.

Shocked to death: a case report of cardiogenic shock and death following electrocardioversion for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is prevalent, especially in patients with heart failure. Their prevalence increases with age and both conditions are interrelated. Electrocardioversion (ECV) is considered a safe and effective procedure and is among one of the recommended therapies to terminate AF back to normal sinus rhythm. Our study highlights one of the rare complications following ECV. A 71-year-old female with a history of atrial fibrillation underwent electrocardioversion and developed sudden onset of ventricular stunning resulting in refractory cardiogenic shock. She was treated with mechanical cardiac support including IABP and Impella. Both provided minimal support then rapid clinical deterioration happened leading to imminent death. CONCLUSION: Patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure treated with electrocardioversion might develop refractory cardiogenic shock and death as a complication of this procedure.

Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Supported with Left Ventricular Assist Devices: The Journey from Bridging to Destination.

End-stage heart failure is a prevalent and fatal cardiovascular disease. Almost 1 in 4 cases of mortality in the United States is attributed to heart failure. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have emerged as a safe destination therapy or bridge to transplant. Despite remarkable results, LVAD is associated with significant adverse events, such as gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). In this review, we aimed to understand the incidence and prevalence, pathophysiologic mechanisms, predictors, diagnostic mechanisms, management, and preventative measures of GIB in patients with an LVAD. GIB is a common adverse event in patients with an LVAD with an incidence of 15% to 25%. The exact pathogenesis of GIB is poorly understood. However, different mechanisms of bleeding have been described, such as arteriovenous malformations, acquired von Willebrand syndrome, coagulopathy, and treatment with antithrombotic therapy. Upper GIB is the most common site of GIB in patients with an LVAD. The management of GIB in patients with LVAD includes ensuring hemodynamic stability, holding or reversing antithrombotic therapy, and investigating and controlling the source of GIB through diagnostic and interventional endoscopic and radiologic means. Prophylactic medication use (e.g., danazol, octreotide, and bevacizumab) can decrease the risk of GIB in patients with an LVAD by decreasing arteriovenous malformations. Despite that the overall risk of GIB has decreased with new advancements in LVAD technology, further studies are needed regarding predictors, risk stratification, and optimal antithrombotic therapy to minimize the morbidity and mortality in patients with an LVAD. In conclusion, prompt diagnosis and management in a multidisciplinary team approach are crucial and lifesaving in such a life-threatening condition.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide analysis.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare but life-threatening immune dysregulation disease. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can become profoundly immunocompromised due to immunosuppressive therapy, hence increasing the risk of viral infections that can trigger HLH. However, data on the association between IBD and HLH remains limited. We used data from the National Inpatient Sample (2012-2019) utilizing International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 or ICD-10 codes to identify individuals with IBD, either Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC), and HLH. The primary outcome was to compare the prevalence of HLH among patients with IBD with those without IBD. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, mean hospital length of stay, and description of HLH-associated triggers in IBD patients. A total of 513,322 hospitalizations included a diagnosis of IBD, 188,297 had UC and 325,025 had CD. Compared to the general population, patients with IBD were older (median age of 52 vs. 49 years, p < 0.05), more likely to be male, and of Asian/Pacific Islander descent, and had a higher median household income. There was also a higher prevalence of liver disease, autoimmune diseases, tobacco abuse, and hypothyroidism (all had p-value of < 0.001) in IBD patients. There were 94 hospitalizations identified with a diagnosis of HLH in IBD patients. Compared to patients without IBD, patients with IBD had increased odds of developing HLH (0.02% vs 0.01%, p-value < 0.001). After adjusting for various demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, and HLH-related conditions, IBD was an independent predictor for developing HLH (adjusted OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.847-2.866, p-value of < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between CD and UC in the odds of developing HLH. Compared to IBD patients without HLH, patients with IBD and HLH had a lower mean age at diagnosis (38 vs 52, p-value of < 0.001), higher in-hospital mortality (14.9% vs 1.5%, p-value of < 0.001), and longer mean hospital length of stay (days) (17 vs 5.4, p-value of < 0.001). Prevalence of different HLH-associated illnesses was identified in HLH patient's discharge data. Lymphoma was the most common associated malignancy (18.1%) and cytomegalovirus infection was the most common associated infection (16.0%). Our population-based study suggests that IBD is independently associated with developing HLH. Early recognition of IBD patients presenting with features suggestive of HLH is warranted to aide early diagnosis and aggressive treatment.

Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair and Surgical Tricuspid Valve Repair in Patients With Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation; A Population Based Study.

Data on clinical outcomes of transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) compared with surgical tricuspid valve repair (STVR) in patients with tricuspid valve regurgitation (TVR) remains limited. Data from the national inpatient sample (2016-2020) and propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis was utilized to determine adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of inpatient mortality and major clinical outcomes of TTVR compated with STVR in patients with TVR. A total of 37,115 patients with TVR were included: 1830 (4.9%) and 35,285 (95.1%) underwent TTVR and STVR, respectively. After PSM, there was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics and medical comorbidities between both groups. Compared with STVR, TTVR was associated with lower inpatient mortality (aOR 0.43 [0.31-0.59], P < 0.01), cardiovascular complications (aOR 0.47 [0.3-0.45], P < 0.01), hemodynamic complications (aOR 0.47 [0.4-0.55], P < 0.01), infectious complications (aOR 0.44 [0.34-0.57], P < 0.01), renal complications (aOR 0.56 [0.45-0.64], P < 0.01), and need for blood transfusion. There was no statistically significant difference in odds of major bleeding events (aOR 0.92 [0.64-1.45], P 0.84). Also, TTVR was associated with less mean length of stay (7 days vs 15 days, P < 0.01) and less cost of hospitalization ($59,921 vs $89,618) compared with STVR. There was an increase in the utility of TTVR associated with a decrease in the utility of STVR from 2016 to 2020 (P < 0.01). Our study showed that compared with STVR, TTVR was associated with lower inpatient mortality and clinical events. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to investigate the difference in outcomes between both procedures.

Safety and efficacy of over-the-scope clips versus standard therapy for high-risk nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Upper GI bleeding (UGIB) is a common condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic hemostasis remains the mainstay of therapy and is mainly aimed at effective hemostasis and prevention of rebleeding. Lesions with high-risk stigmata can have rebleeding rates of as high as 26.3%. Rebleeding is associated with increased mortality and reduced success rates of endoscopic retreatment. The over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) is a device with widespread endoscopic indications including hemostasis for nonvariceal UGIB (NVUGIB). The current study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing OTSCs versus standard therapy (STD) for NVUGIB. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched through April 2022 for studies comparing OTSCs and STD for NVUGIBs. Primary outcomes were clinical success rates, rebleeding rates, and procedure times, and secondary outcomes were mortality rates and length of hospitalization. Meta-analysis was performed to determine pooled odds ratios to compare outcomes between the OTSC and STD groups. RESULTS: Ten studies, including 4 randomized controlled trials, with 914 patients were included in the final analysis. Of patients with NVUGIB, 431 were treated with OTSCs and 483 with STD. Patients treated with OTSCs had an overall lower risk of 7-day (risk ratio [RR], .41; 95% confidence interval [CI], .24-.68; I2 = 0%) and 30-day rebleeding (RR, .46; 95% CI, .31-.65; I2 = 0%). Clinical success rates were higher with OTSCs compared with STD (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.06-1.75). Mean procedure time was shorter in the OTSC group by 6.62 minutes (95% CI, 2.58-10.67) versus the STD group (I2 = 84%). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of mortality between the OTSC and STD groups (RR, .55; 95% CI, .24-1.24; I2 = 0%). Length of hospitalization was comparable between both groups, with a pooled mean difference for OTSCs versus STD of .87 days (95% CI, -1.62 to 3.36 days; I2 = 71%). CONCLUSIONS: Although our study was limited to high-risk NVUGIB, our analysis showed that hemostasis with OTSCs is associated with a lower 7-day and 30-day rebleeding rates, higher clinical success rates, and shorter procedure time with similar mortality rates and length of hospital stay as compared with STD.