Small fraction of testicular cancer cases may be causatively related to CHEK2 inactivating germ-line mutations: evidence for somatic loss of the remaining CHEK2 allele in the tumor tissue.

A recent study suggested a role of CHEK2 loss-of-function germ-line pathogenic variants in the predisposition to testicular cancer (TC) (AlDubayan et al. JAMA Oncol 5:514-522, 2019). We attempted to validate this finding relying on the high population frequency of recurrent CHEK2 pathogenic variants in Slavic populations. CHEK2 pathogenic alleles (c.1100delC (p.Thr367Metfs); del5395 [del ex9-10]; IVS2 + 1G > A [c.444 + 1G > A]) were detected in 7/280 (2.5%) TC patients vs. 3/424 (0.7%) healthy men and 6/1007 (0.6%) healthy women [OR 4.0 (95% CI 1.5-11), p = 0.009 for pooled control groups]. Somatic CHEK2 loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) was detected in 4 out of 6 tumors available for analysis; strikingly all these instances of LOH involved inactivation of the wild-type allele. The CHEK2 c.470T > C (p.Ile157Thr) variant was detected in 21/280 (7.5%) affected vs. 22/424 (5.2%) non-affected men [OR 1.5 (95% CI 0.8-2.7), p = 0.3]. Somatic CHEK2 LOH was revealed only in 6 out of 21 tumors obtained from CHEK2 c.470T > C (p.Ile157Thr) carriers, with the C-allele lost in two cases and T-allele deleted in four tumors. The results of comparison of allele frequencies in TC patients versus population controls coupled with the data on CHEK2 LOH status in tumor tissues support the association of CHEK2 pathogenic variants with TC risk.

Gene rearrangements in consecutive series of pediatric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are exceptionally rare neoplasms, which are often driven by rearranged tyrosine kinases. METHODS: This study considered 33 consecutive patients with IMT (median age, 6.6; age range, 0.6-15.8 years). RNA and cDNA were successfully obtained in 29 cases. The molecular analysis included sequential tests for 5'/3'-end unbalanced gene expression, variant-specific PCR, and next-generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: 5'/3'-end unbalanced ALK expression was revealed in 15/29 (52%) IMTs. Strikingly, all these tumors demonstrated high amount of ALK protein detected by immunohistochemistry. Variant-specific PCR was capable of identifying the type of ALK rearrangement in 11/15 IMTs with 5'/3'-end unbalanced ALK expression. The remaining four tumors were analyzed by NGS; two known and two novel (CLTC-ins6del84-ALK and EEF1G-ALK) ALK rearrangements were detected. Five IMTs demonstrated 5'/3'-end unbalanced ROS1 expression, and all these tumors carried TFG-ROS1 fusion. Nine tumors, which were negative for 5'/3'-end unbalanced ALK/ROS1 expression, were subjected to further analysis. Variant-specific PCR revealed two additional tumors with gene rearrangements (TFG-ROS1 and ETV6-NTRK3). The remaining seven IMTs were tested by NGS; single instances of TFG-ROS1 and novel SRF-PDGFRb translocations were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-four of 29 IMTs (83%) were shown to have druggable rearrangements involving tyrosine kinases, 20 of these 24 gene fusions were detectable by simple and inexpensive PCR assay, which is based on the detection 5'/3'-end unbalanced gene expression.

First-Line Cetuximab Monotherapy in KRAS/NRAS/BRAF Mutation-Negative Colorectal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) are sensitive to treatment by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies only if they do not carry activating mutations in down-stream EGFR targets (KRAS/NRAS/BRAF). Most clinical trials for chemo-naive CRC patients involved combination of targeted agents and chemotherapy, while single-agent cetuximab or panitumumab studies included either heavily pretreated patients or subjects who were not selected on the basis of molecular tests. We hypothesized that anti-EGFR therapy would have significant efficacy in chemo-naive patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation-negative CRC. METHODS: Nineteen patients were prospectively included in the study. RESULTS: Two (11%) patients experienced partial response (PR) and 11 (58%) subjects showed stable disease (SD). Median time to progression approached 6.1 months (range 1.6-15.0 months). Cetuximab efficacy did not correlate with RNA expression of EGFR and insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2). Only one tumor carried PIK3CA mutation, and this CRC responded to cetuximab. Exome analysis of patients with progressive disease (PD) revealed 1 CRC with high-level microsatellite instability and 1 instance of HER2 oncogene amplification; 3 of 4 remaining patients with PD had allergic reactions to cetuximab, while none of the subjects with PR or SD had this complication. Comparison with 19 retrospective KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation-negative patients receiving first-line fluoropyrimidines revealed no advantages or disadvantages of cetuximab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab demonstrates only modest efficacy when given as a first-line monotherapy to KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation-negative CRC patients. It is of question, why meticulous patient selection, which was undertaken in the current study, did not result in the improvement of outcomes of single-agent cetuximab treatment.

Survival Outcomes in EGFR Mutation-Positive Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Gefitinib until or beyond Progression.

BACKGROUND: Discontinuation of gefitinib treatment is often accompanied by a disease flare. Some studies have demonstrated a benefit of the use of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) beyond progression; however, long-term results of these investigations remain limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We observed 70 patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFR-M+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving single-agent gefitinib in a routine clinical setting; 56 patients were experiencing RECIST progression at the time of the analysis. RESULTS: There was a significant increase (p = 0.00001) in overall survival (OS) in patients continuing on gefitinib beyond progression (n = 21; median duration of continued gefitinib use: 4.2 months; median OS: not reached; expected OS: 29.7 months) as compared to those who stopped gefitinib treatment upon disease progression (n = 35; median OS: 14.0 months). The association between extended gefitinib use and improved OS remained true in multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio = 4.49, 95% confidence interval 1.25-16.09; p = 0.021). Patient selection bias constitutes an essential limitation of this clinical observational study, given that patients with a more favorable disease course and/or high initial tumor sensitivity to TKI treatment were more likely to be considered for prolonged gefitinib use. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that continued administration of gefitinib beyond progression is a viable treatment option for some patients with EGFR-M+ NSCLC, in particular those who cannot be rescued by novel EGFR mutation-specific inhibitors such as osimertinib.

Evidence for angiogenesis-independent contribution of VEGFR1 (FLT1) in gastric cancer recurrence.

Angiogenesis plays an important role in cancer progression and involves activation of multiple signaling cascades. This study investigated the relationships between microvessel density, expression of VEGF and VEGFR1 (FLT1), and gastric cancer (GC) recurrence. Twenty-nine surgically treated GC cases with similar initial clinical presentation were selected for the study; 11 of these cases recurred within 3 years, while the remaining 18 did not. Microvessel density correlated with VEGF mRNA content, but neither of these parameters was associated with the disease outcome. When tumors were ranked according to the level of expression of angiogenic molecules, 9 out of 10 cases with the highest VEGFR1 expression belonged to the recurrence group, while none of the 10 GC with the lowest content of VEGFR1 mRNA had the disease relapse (p = 0.000). VEGFR1 expression did not show even a trend to correlation with the level of cancer tissue vascularization. Immunofluorescent staining by anti-VEGFR1 antibody revealed VEGFR1 expression in tumor cells but not in other cell types. Our data provide indirect support to the evidence for a non-angiogenic contribution of VEGFR1 in cancer pathogenesis.