Colorectal cancer in young patients: is it a distinct clinical entity?

BACKGROUND: The incidence of colorectal cancer in young patients is increasing. It remains unclear if the disease has unique features in this age group. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study which included patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer at age ≤40 years in 1997-2013 matched 1:2 by year of diagnosis with consecutive colorectal cancer patients diagnosed at age >50 years during the same period. Patients aged 41-50 years were not included in the study, to accentuate potential age-related differences. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, and outcome were compared between groups. RESULTS: The cohort included 330 patients, followed for a median time of 65.9 months (range 4.7-211). Several significant differences were noted. The younger group had a different ethnic composition. They had higher rates of family history of colorectal cancer (p = 0.003), hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes (p < 0.0001), and inflammatory bowel disease (p = 0.007), and a lower rate of polyps (p < 0.0001). They were more likely to present with stage III or IV disease (p = 0.001), angiolymphatic invasion, signet cell ring adenocarcinoma, and rectal tumors (p = 0.02). Younger patients more frequently received treatment. Young patients had a worse estimated 5-year disease-free survival rate (57.6  vs. 70 %, p = 0.039), but this did not retain significance when analyzed by stage (p = 0.092). Estimated 5-year overall survival rates were 59.1 and 62.1 % in the younger and the control group, respectively (p = 0.565). CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal cancer among young patients may constitute a distinct clinical entity. Further research is needed to validate our findings and define the optimal approach in this population.

The effect of sitagliptin versus glibenclamide on arterial stiffness, blood pressure, lipids, and inflammation in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

AIM: This study evaluated the effect of sitagliptin versus glibenclamide on arterial stiffness, blood pressure, lipid profile, oxidative stress, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty diabetes patients, inadequately controlled on metformin, were randomly assigned to either sitagliptin (100 mg/day) or glibenclamide (5 mg/day) for 3 months. Following a 1-month washout period, a crossover switch from glibenclamide to sitagliptin and vice versa was performed for an additional 3 months. Arterial stiffness, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, lipids, hsCRP, glycated hemoglobin, fasting glucose, STAT-8-isoprostane (a measure of oxidative stress), body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference were measured at baseline and at 3 months with each of the study drugs. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients completed the study. Glibenclamide had a better glucose-lowering effect than sitagliptin, but this was associated with more hypoglycemic events. BMI increased following glibenclamide treatment, whereas sitagliptin proved weight-neutral. Mean BMI gain was +0.5±1.0 kg/m(2) for glibenclamide versus -0.01±0.9 kg/m(2) for sitagliptin (P<0.001). Triglyceride levels significantly dropped following sitagliptin, although they remained unaltered after glibenclamide treatment. Mean triglyceride decrease was -18.4±45 mg/mL after sitagliptin but -0.2±57 mg/dL following glibenclamide treatment (P=0.018). There was no change in low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, arterial stiffness, blood pressure monitoring, hsCRP, or STAT-8-isoprostane with each of the study drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Sitagliptin, but not glibenclamide, demonstrated a significant beneficial effect on BMI and triglyceride levels. However, arterial stiffness, blood pressure, oxidative stress, and inflammatory status were not significantly affected by adding sitagliptin or glibenclamide to metformin-treated type 2 diabetes patients.