Selecting oversized donor cardiac allografts for patients with pulmonary hypertension may be unnecessary.

INTRODUCTION: There is a tendency to favor oversized donor hearts for heart transplant candidates affected by mild to moderate pulmonary hypertension (PHTN). We hypothesize that both undersized and oversized donor hearts fare equally well in this setting. METHODS: A total of 107 cases from 2003 to 2008 were retrospectively reviewed and subsequently divided into those receiving organs from undersized donors (group 1: donor weight/recipient weight ≤ 0.90, n = 37) and oversized donors (group 2: donor weight/recipient weight ≥ 1.2, n = 70). PHTN was identified in the perioperative period in those patients with systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) ≥ 40 mm Hg. Endpoints of mortality and hemodynamic data were investigated. RESULTS: Of 107 patients, 37 received undersized donor allografts, with a mean donor-to-recipient weight ratio of 0.8, and 70 received oversized donors allografts, with a mean donor-to-recipient ratio of 1.4. Perioperative PAH was diagnosed in 20 of the 37 (54%) patients from the undersized group (mean SPAP = 45.9 mm Hg) and 41 of 70 (59%) patients from the oversized group (mean SPAP = 46.5 mm Hg). There was no significant difference in right ventricular function at 1 week, 1 month, or 6 months. Left ventricular function was similar between both groups at 6 months (P = .22). The mean SPAP in the undersized group was 45.9, 33.4, 31.8, and 23.1 mm Hg at the perioperative, 1 week, 1 month, and 6 month time points, respectively. Corresponding mean SPAP for the oversized group was 46.5, 35.0, 29.4, and 26.1 mm Hg. The 1 month, 1 year, and 3 year survivals were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oversized and undersized donor hearts fared equally well in the setting of mild to moderate perioperative PAH. This in addition to the propensity for resolution of pulmonary hypertension over time suggests that the current practice of favoring oversized donor hearts for patients with pre-transplantation PAH may be unwarranted.

Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a 10-year experience.

AIM: Data on the impact of minimally invasive approach on clinical outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) are limited and somewhat controversial. The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing MIAVR and conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR) in a large cohort of patients operated over a decade. METHODS: The study population consisted of 466 consecutive patients undergoing isolated AVR between 1995 and 2005. Outcomes of 164 patients undergoing MIAVR were compared to 302 patients undergoing CAVR. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: Operative mortality and major complication rates were similar among the groups. Univariate analysis revealed that MIAVR was associated with reduced incidence of allogeneic blood transfusions (31% vs. 41%, P=0.03) and a shorter hospital stay (5+/-2 vs. 7+/-5 days, P<0.0001). In multivariable analysis, predictors for blood transfusions were age (OR=2.15), non elective operation (OR=1.36), female gender (OR=1.13), prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR=1.12) and CAVR (OR=2.57). Predictors of prolonged hospital stay were peripheral vascular disease (OR=4.83), diabetes mellitus (OR=3.2), aortic cross clamp time (OR=1.17), and CAVR (OR=4.46). CONCLUSION: MIAVR is a safe and effective procedure resulting in significant reduction of allogeneic blood transfusions and a shorter length of hospital stay.

Robotic assisted thoracic surgery for resection of an esophageal cyst.

Many centers around the world are now developing robotic surgical programs. The benefit of robotics, particularly in those centers where there is already expertise with minimally invasive surgical techniques, is unclear. We present the case of a 58-year-old man presenting with an esophageal cyst. This was removed using a robotic assisted, VATS (video assisted thoracic surgery) approach. The technical details of the procedure are described. Additionally, a discussion of the relative merits of using a robotic rather than a standard minimally invasive approach is discussed. In a procedure such as the case described, the critical parts of the procedure are focused within a small operative field. We believe that the articulating instrumentation and the 3-dimensional magnified view provided by the robot offers significant advantages over a standard VATS approach.

Predictors of operative time in multicenter port-access valve registry: institutional differences in learning.

BACKGROUND: The predictors of operative time and the effects of learning in isolated valve operations using port-access techniques have not been defined. METHODS: Analysis of covariance was used to examine the determinants of procedure time, pump time, and aortic clamp time. In the largest prospective, registry of patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR, N=199), mitral repair (MVP, N=307), or mitral replacement (MVR, N=232) using port-access techniques 1997-1999 at 27 institutions. RESULTS: Institutional case volume ranged from one to 214 (median 6). Operative time was longer in redo procedures (5.3 +/- 1.6 vs. 4.4 +/- 1.3 hr, p = 0.0001), longer with MVP or MVR vs. AVR (4.8 +/- 1.2 vs. 5.0 +/- 1.5 vs. 3.8 +/- 1.2 hr, p = 0.0001), and decreased with case number (mean decrease 1.00 +/- 0.19 min/case, p = 0.04). Operative time also varied between institutions (p = 0.001). Rate of learning (decrease in time per case) varied significantly between institutions only for MVP (p = 0.03). Similar analysis showed that pump time and clamp times did not significantly change over time (p > 0.17) but varied significantly between institutions. Institutional volume did not affect operative, pump, or clamp times or rate of learning (decrease in operative time/case). CONCLUSIONS: These prospective registry data demonstrate that, for port-access valve procedures, procedure times continue to improve (learning) even after 100 cases. Procedure time and learning are affected by institutional differences and by the type of procedure, but are little affected by institutional volume. This data provides a model to understand learning of new surgical procedures, and this data suggests that port-access valve procedures can be mastered by a variety of institutions.

Early discharge after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: are patients really going home earlier?

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine whether early discharge after coronary artery bypass grafting allows patients to return home earlier or merely increases the use of outpatient nursing and inpatient rehabilitation services. METHODS: Patterns of discharge were analyzed in 407 patients undergoing bypass grafting in 1990, when there were no early extubations or fast track protocols, and compared with 379 patients in 1998, when these protocols were used. RESULTS: Patients in 1998 had a higher prevalence of class IV angina (35.3% vs 22.8%; P =.006), urgent/emergency surgery (58.3% vs 44.9%; P =.015), and lower ejection fractions (48.9% +/- 16.4% vs 52.9% +/- 13.5%; P =.0002). Despite these increased risk factors, 1998 patients spent less time receiving ventilatory support (10.2 +/- 9.2 vs 26.7 +/- 15.7 hours; P <.001) and had a shorter length of stay (5.4 +/- 2.5 vs 9.2 +/- 4.3 days; P <.001). However, fewer 1998 patients were discharged home (56.7% vs 97.0%; P <.0001). A higher percentage of 1998 patients (43.3% vs 2.9%; P <.00001) were discharged to extended care facilities where their average length of stay was 10.6 +/- 15.1 days. Readmission to the Boston Medical Center was also more common in 1998 patients (5.3% vs 0.5%; P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Early extubation and fast track protocols have resulted in earlier discharge from acute care facilities. However, the anticipated earlier return to home has been offset by the increased use of outpatient nursing services, discharges to extended care facilities, and hospital readmissions.

Nitroglycerin is preferable to diltiazem for prevention of coronary bypass conduit spasm.

BACKGROUND: Diltiazem is widely used to prevent radial artery spasm after coronary bypass grafting (CABG). However, recent in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that nitroglycerin is a superior conduit vasodilator compared to diltiazem. A clinical comparison of these agents in patients undergoing CABG has not been previously performed. METHODS: One hundred sixty-one consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG with the radial artery were prospectively randomized to 24-hour intravenous infusion of nitroglycerin or diltiazem followed by 6-month treatment with a daily dose of isosorbide mononitrate (n = 84) or diltiazem CD (n = 77). Analyses were performed on "intention-to-treat" basis. RESULTS: Crossovers because of low cardiac output, complete heart block, or sinus bradycardia occurred in 5 patients in the diltiazem group and none in the nitroglycerin group (p = 0.05). Operative mortality (nitroglycerin, 1.2% versus diltiazem, 1.3%), major morbidity (14% versus 16%), perioperative myocardial infarction (1.2% versus 0%), peak serum creatinine phosphokinase MB fraction levels (27 versus 21 U), intensive care unit stay (34+/-19 versus 38+/-30 hours) and total hospital length of stay (4.7+/-1.4 versus 4.7+/-1.3 days) were similar (p = not significant for all). Cardiac pacing was required more often in the diltiazem group (28% versus 13%, p = 0.01). Follow-up longer than 2 months was available in 145 patients (90%). Follow-up mortality (nitroglycerin, 1.2%; diltiazem, 1.3%), myocardial infarction (6%, versus 5%), and reintervention (8% versus 6%) rates and average angina class (1.3+/-0.7 versus 1.1+/-0.4) were similar (p = not significant for all). Thallium stress test obtained in 117 patients showed abnormal perfusion in the radial artery territory in only 4 patients (3%), 2 in each group (p = not significant). Treatment with diltiazem was more costly ($16,340 versus $1,096). CONCLUSIONS: Nitroglycerin is preferable to diltiazem for prevention of conduit spasm. Nitroglycerin is safe, effective, better tolerated, and less costly than diltiazem, and therefore, should be the agent of choice.

Long-term clinical outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Registry: comparison with the randomized trial. BARI Investigators.

BACKGROUND: The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) included 4039 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease; 1829 consented to randomization, and 2010 did not but were followed up in a registry. Thus, we can evaluate the outcome of physician-guided versus random assignment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the baseline features and outcomes for PTCA and CABG in the overall registry and its predesignated subgroups. We assessed the impact of treatment by choice versus random assignment by comparing the results in the registry with those of the randomized trial. Statistical adjustments for differences in baseline characteristics were made. Within the registry, nearly twice as many patients were selected for PTCA (1189) as CABG (625); mortality at 7 years was similar for PTCA (13.9%) and CABG (14.2%) (P=0.66) before and after adjustment for baseline differences between patients selected for PTCA versus CABG (adjusted RR, 1.02; P=0.86). In contrast to the randomized trial, the 7-year mortality rate of treated diabetics in the registry was equally high (26%) with PTCA or CABG. Seven-year mortality was higher for patients undergoing PTCA in the randomized trial than in the registry (19.1% versus 13.9%, P<0.01) but not for those undergoing CABG (15.6% versus 14.2%, P=0.57). The adjusted relative mortality risk for PTCA in the randomized versus registry population was 1.17 (P=0.16). CONCLUSIONS: BARI physicians were able to select PTCA rather than CABG for 65% of registry patients who underwent revascularization without compromising long-term survival either in the overall population or in treated diabetics.

Technique for routine use of heparin bonded circuits with a reduced anticoagulation protocol.

The use of heparin-bonded cardiopulmonary bypass circuits (HBCs) with reduced anticoagulation protocol during cardiac surgery attenuates some of the adverse pathophysiologic responses to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The strategies of how to maximize improvements in clinical outcomes using this technique are still debated. This article describes in detail a comprehensive approach to strategies developed at Boston Medical Center and the West Roxbury Veteran Affairs Medical Center in over 4000 cases in which HBC with a reduced anticoagulation protocol is used routinely. Important elements of this technique include elimination of cardiotomy reservoir during coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), autologous blood priming, normothermic CPB, and precise heparin and protamine titration. Adaptation and variation in this technique to specific clinical situations is also highlighted.

Heparin-bonded cardiopulmonary bypass circuits reduce bleeding and transfusion requirements in proximal aortic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Methods to improve hemostasis in aortic surgery continue to evolve. Use of heparin-bonded cardiopulmonary bypass circuits (HBC) has been shown previously to effectively reduce bleeding and improve outcomes in coronary and valve operations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of HBC on bleeding and transfusion requirements in proximal aortic surgery. METHODS: Data on 140 consecutive patients undergoing 144 operations of the proximal aorta were collected. Between July 1987 and July 1994, conventional cardiopulmonary bypass circuits (CONV) were used (n = 53). In July 1994, we switched to "tip-to-tip" HBC (n = 91). This study compared clinical outcomes and transfusion requirements between these two groups. RESULTS: Indications for surgery, baseline characteristics, and operative profile of the study groups were similar. Overall operative mortality and reoperation for bleeding were 9% and 13%, respectively. Compared with CONV, use of HBC was associated with decreased mortality (3% vs 18%, p = 0.004), reoperation for bleeding (7% vs 24%, p = 0.005), and hospital length of hospital stay (10 +/- 11 vs 20 +/- 30 days, p = 0.002). Although the incidence of allogeneic blood transfusion was similar (HBC 75% vs CONV 87%, p = 0.12), the magnitude of blood products utilization was much lower in the HBC group (total blood products per patient: 24 +/- 29 vs 49 +/- 47 donor units, p = 0.0002). In the multivariate analyses, use of HBC was identified as an independent predictor of reduced mortality, morbidity, and reduced magnitude of allogeneic blood transfusions. CONCLUSION: Use of HBC in proximal aortic surgery resulted in reduced bleeding and blood transfusion, improving clinical outcomes. Undoubtedly, multiple factors account for the overall improved results. However, use of HBC is an important component of an overall blood conservation strategy.

Favorable impact of stents after emergent coronary artery bypass for failed angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to determine the impact of the use and availability of coronary stents on outcomes in patients requiring emergent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery following a failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups based on the year of their CABG for a failed PTCA and the availability of stents: group 1, 1992 to 1994, stents not available (n = 34); and group 2, 1995 to 1997, stents available (n = 26). RESULTS: CABG patients in the group where stents were not available were more likely to have had an abrupt coronary occlusion (26 of 34 versus 3 of 26; p < 0.0001) and less likely to have had a dissection (8 of 34 versus 23 of 26; p < 0.0001) as their indication for emergent CABG. Patients in the stent era had a lower incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (5 of 26 versus 17 of 34; p < 0.01) and a decreased mortality rate (0 of 26 versus 6 of 34; p < 0.03). In the 9 patients where stents were employed, patency of the lumen was restored in 8 patients and there was only 1 myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Stents have had a favorable impact on patients requiring an emergent CABG following a failed PTCA.

Accelerated allograft degeneration after aortic valve endocarditis.

Early calcification of aortic allografts is usually seen in children less than 3 years of age. We describe a case of a 22-year-old intravenous drug user who developed calcific aortic valve stenosis less than 3 years after an allograft root replacement for endocarditis.

Enhanced nitric oxide-mediated vascular relaxation in radial artery compared with internal mammary artery or saphenous vein.

BACKGROUND: The superior long-term patency of internal mammary artery coronary bypass grafts compared with venous grafts has been attributed in part to increased endothelium-derived nitric oxide (. NO) production. Interest in the radial artery as an alternative bypass conduit has recently been revived; however, its biological characteristics remain incompletely defined. The purpose of this study was to compare the.NO-mediated vasomotor properties of the radial artery to those of the internal mammary artery and saphenous vein. METHODS AND RESULTS: Matched segments of radial artery, internal mammary artery, and saphenous vein (n=24 patients) were examined by use of organ-chamber methodology. Endothelium-dependent and -independent vasomotor responses were assessed by dose-response curves to acetylcholine, N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), 8-bromo-cyclic 3',5'-guanosine monophosphate (8-bromo-cGMP), and nitroglycerin. Maximum.NO-mediated radial artery relaxation in response to acetylcholine (86+/-10%) was significantly greater than internal mammary artery (56+/-9%) or saphenous vein (11+/-5%, both P<0.0001). Similarly, acetylcholine-stimulated cGMP accumulation in radial artery (9.1+/-1.7 pmol/mg protein) was also greater than internal mammary artery (6.2+/-0.3 pmol/mg protein) or saphenous vein (1.4+/-0.2 pmol/mg protein, both P<0.05). Estimated basal endothelial.NO production, assayed as the percent maximum contraction in response to L-NAME, was greater in radial artery (39+/-5%) than internal mammary artery (23+/-6%) or saphenous vein (5+/-2%, both P<0.05). Maximum relaxation of all vessels to nitroglycerin was similar, although the sensitivity of radial artery to nitroglycerin was greater (EC(50)=33+/-7 nmol/L) than the internal mammary artery (203+/-32 nmol/L) or saphenous vein (97+/-12 nmol/L, both P<0.05). Vascular cGMP in response to 0.1 micromol/L nitroglycerin was significantly higher in the radial artery (8.3+/-1. 4 pmol/mg protein) compared with the internal mammary artery (3. 5+/-1.3 pmol/mg protein) or saphenous vein (1.4+/-0.3 pmol/mg protein, both P<0.0001). Relaxation to 8-bromo-cGMP was identical for all 3 conduits. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that. NO-dependent relaxation of radial artery is greater than that of internal mammary artery or saphenous vein. This difference is related to endothelial production of.NO and/or vessel sensitivity to. NO. Such favorable physiological characteristics of radial artery could conceivably contribute to improved long-term patency of this conduit compared with saphenous vein.

Immediate effect of aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis on left ventricular diastolic chamber stiffness.

Diastolic dysfunction is common after coronary artery bypass surgery, and we hypothesized that left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy associated with aortic stenosis may lead to worsening LV diastolic function after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Transesophageal echocardiographic LV images and simultaneous pulmonary arterial wedge pressures were used to define the LV diastolic pressure cross-sectional area relation before and immediately after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in 14 patients. In all patients, LV diastolic chamber stiffness increased, as evidenced by a leftward shift in the LV diastolic pressure cross-sectional area relation. At comparable LV filling (pulmonary arterial wedge) pressures the mean LV end-diastolic cross-sectional area preoperatively was 17.9 +/- 1.7 cm2, but decreased by 32% after aortic valve replacement to 12.1 +/- 1.2 cm2 (p = 0.0001). In conclusion, after aortic valve replacement, diastolic chamber stiffness increased in all patients.

Prolongation of rat skin and cardiac allograft survival by low molecular weight heparin.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported that very low doses of low molecular weight heparin compounds (LMWH) inhibit a variety of T-cell-mediated reactions by down-regulation of TNF-alpha production. This study tested the efficacy of LMWH in organ transplantation. METHODS: Skin and heterotopic heart transplantations were performed between recipient Wistar rats and donor BN rats. Two doses of LMWH were given sc, 1 and 20 micrograms, each in three protocols, with day of grafting as Day 0: (A) Daily: -1, 0, 1 ellipsis, (B) Late Weekly: -1, 6, 13 ellipsis, and (C) Early Weekly: -7, 0, 7 ellipsis. Doses and schedules were selected based on efficacy in autoimmune models. Skin graft rejection was defined by complete separation of the graft, and heart transplant rejection was defined as cessation of heartbeat. RESULTS: Treatment with 1 microgram (26.8 +/- 2.0 days) and 20 micrograms (24.5 +/- 2.3 days) of LMWH using the Early Weekly protocol significantly prolonged skin allograft survival compared to controls (17.8 +/- 4.4 days), P < 0.001 for both, whereas other protocols did not. Compared to controls (8.3 +/- 1.4 days), treatment with both 1 and 20 micrograms of LMWH using all three protocols significantly prolonged cardiac allograft survival. The efficacy, however, varied considerably. Increase in graft survival ranged from 18% (1 microgram, Daily, 9.8 +/- 0.7 days, P = 0.02) to more than twofold (20 micrograms, Early Weekly, 20.8 +/- 5.5 days, P < 0.001) according to the dose and schedule of LMWH. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with very low doses of nonanticoagulant LMWH preparations having anti-TNF-alpha activity significantly prolongs rat skin and cardiac allograft survival in a dose- and schedule-dependent manner.

Improved clinical outcomes after operation of the proximal aorta: a 10-year experience.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the impact of recent advances (particularly noninvasive diagnosis, retrograde cerebral perfusion, heparin-bonded circuits, and use of collagen-impregnated grafts and antifibrinolytic agents) on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing proximal aortic operations. METHODS: One hundred eight consecutive patients undergoing 111 proximal aortic operations over 10 years were studied. The cohort was divided into two groups: early, 1987 to 1993 and late, 1994 to 1997. RESULTS: Baseline patients profiles, indications for operation (aneurysm, 66 patients; dissection, 45 patients), priority of the operation, and surgical procedures were comparable for both groups. Mortality and morbidity for the entire cohort were 13.5% (15 of 111) and 66% (73 of 111), respectively. Compared with the early group, the late group was characterized by significantly higher use of noninvasive diagnostic modalities (69% versus 10%), exclusive use of heparin-bonded circuits and collagen-impregnated grafts (100% versus 0% for both), use of antifibrinolytic agents (79% versus 8%), and the introduction of retrograde cerebral perfusion (43% versus 0%) (p<0.00001 for all). These changes in practice were associated with a substantial decrease in operative mortality (26% [13 of 49] versus 3% [2 of 62], p = 0.001), overall morbidity (77% [38 of 49] versus 56% [35 of 62], p = 0.02), blood transfusions (55.6+/-48 donor units versus 29.3+/-35 donor units, p = 0.003), and a shorter hospital stay (21.6+/-31 days versus 12.1+/-15 days, p = 0.07). Average long-term follow-up for 99% (107 of 108) of patients was 29.6+/-30 months (1 to 120 months). Ten-year actuarial survival was 57.3%+/-8% with 93% being in New York Heart Association functional class I or II. CONCLUSIONS: Recent advances, particularly noninvasive diagnosis and improved operative management, have led to a substantial reduction in mortality and morbidity after proximal aortic operation. Improved short- and long-term outcomes were achieved both in acute dissection and aneurysm procedures, although patients remain at risk for long-term distal aortic complications.

Effect of gender on postoperative outcomes and hospital stays after coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Compared to men, women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting appear to have a higher morbidity and mortality, particularly in the perioperative period. This study was designed to answer the questions of whether such differences in clinical outcomes between men and women still exist with improvements in surgical techniques and determine whether it is gender or associated comorbid conditions in women that lead to higher morbidity. METHODS: An analysis of a single center's contemporary experience (1994 to 1997) of 1,743 consecutive patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting was performed. Only reoperations were excluded. Data were collected prospectively and presented as mean +/- standard deviation (p<0.05). RESULTS: Women represented 30.0% of patients. Compared with men, women were older (68.4 versus 63.8 years; p<0.05), and had more urgent surgical interventions (70.0% versus 56.7%; p<0.05), a higher incidence of diabetes (42.1% versus 26.7%; p<0.05), hypertension (82.0% versus 73.9%; p<0.05), lower body surface area (1.73+/-0.18 m2 versus 2.03+/-0.19 m2; p<0.05), and hematocrit (31.7%+/-3.9% versus 36.2%+/-3.9%; p<0.05). Ejection fraction, incidence of previous myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, left main (LM) disease, renal insufficiency, extent of coronary disease, and preoperative intraaortic balloon pump were similar. Women received fewer arterial grafts (91.0% versus 95.5%; p<0.05) and distal anastomoses (3.31+/-0.88 versus 3.49+/-0.94 p<0.05). Despite these differences, there were no statistical differences in the incidence of postoperative death (1.5% versus 1.0%), myocardial infarction (0.6% versus 0.6%), or cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack (1.1% versus 0.4%) between men and women. Women had a higher inotropic support (10.2% versus 4.4%; p<0.05) and longer hospital stays (7.3+/-5.7 days versus 6.3+/-4.2 days; p<0.05). Using multivariate analysis, female gender was not an independent predictor of death or postoperative complications but was a predictor of length of hospital stay, use of arterial grafts, and extent of coronary revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: After accounting for differences in their risk variables, the incidences of death, perioperative myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident/ transient ischemic attack after coronary artery bypass grafting in women and men were not statistically significant. Perioperative complications are related to comorbid risk factors but not to female gender itself. Further studies are warranted.

Nitroglycerin is superior to diltiazem as a coronary bypass conduit vasodilator.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports of improved radial artery patency have been attributed, in part, to routine use of diltiazem to prevent vasospasm. However, diltiazem is costly, and its use may be associated with negative inotropic and chronotropic side effects. This study compares the vasodilatory properties of diltiazem to those of nitroglycerin. METHODS: In vitro, with the use of organ chambers, the vasodilatory properties of diltiazem and nitroglycerin were compared in matched segments of radial artery, internal thoracic artery, and saphenous vein that were harvested from the same patients (n = 11). The vasodilatory response of the radial artery to intravenous diltiazem or nitroglycerin was compared in vivo (n = 10) with the use of ultrasonographic measurements of radial artery diameter. RESULTS: The maximum relaxation of radial artery (100% +/- 4%), internal thoracic artery (96% +/- 4%), and saphenous vein (100% +/- 3%) to nitroglycerin were significantly greater than the response to diltiazem (33% +/- 6%, 22% +/- 7%, and 34% +/- 5%, respectively; P <.001). The thromboxane mimetic, U46619, induced radial artery spasm with a median effective concentration of 3.7 +/- 0.8 nmol/L. Physiologic concentrations of nitroglycerin (0.1+/- micromol/L) significantly inhibited the radial artery response to U46619 (median effective concentration, 6.2 +/- 1.1 nmol/L; P =.046), whereas diltiazem (1 micromol/L) did not (median effective concentration, 3.7 +/- 0.8 nmol/L; P =.64). In vivo, nitroglycerin increased radial artery diameter 22% +/- 3%, which was significantly greater than diltiazem (3% +/- 0.5%; P =.001). CONCLUSION: Nitroglycerin is a superior conduit vasodilator and is more effective in preventing graft spasm than diltiazem. Nitroglycerin should be strongly considered as the drug of choice to prevent conduit spasm after coronary bypass grafting.