Target Delineation in Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer After Flap Reconstruction.

Delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV) after resection of head and neck cancer can be challenging, especially after flap reconstruction. The main area of contention is whether the entire flap should be included in the CTV. Several case series have reported marginal misses and intraflap failures when the entire flap was not routinely included in the CTV. On the other hand, available data have not convincingly demonstrated a detriment to long-term outcomes using intensity modulated radiotherapy after flap reconstruction. On the contrary, postoperative radiation can facilitate epilation and mucosalization of the flap tissue, reduce flap bulk, and improve long-term esthetic and functional outcomes. Therefore, our standard practice is to include the entire flap in the CTV. In certain scenarios, we may allow for a lower dose to part of flap distant from the resection bed than the flap-tumor bed junction, where recurrences are most likely. We provide three case vignettes describing such scenarios where sparing part of the flap, and more importantly, the nearby uninvolved native tissue, from high-dose radiation may be justified.

International guidelines for intratumoral and intranodal injection of NBTXR3 nanoparticles in head and neck cancers.

BACKGROUND: An international multidisciplinary panel of experts aimed to provide consensus guidelines describing the optimal intratumoral and intranodal injection of NBTXR3 hafnium oxide nanoparticles in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and cervical lymph nodes and to review data concerning safety, feasibility, and procedural aspects of administration. METHODS: The Delphi method was used to determine consensus. A 4-member steering committee and a 10-member monitoring committee wrote and revised the guidelines, divided into eight sections. An independent 3-member reading committee reviewed the recommendations. RESULTS: After two rounds of voting, strong consensus was obtained on all recommendations. Intratumoral and intranodal injection was deemed feasible. NBTXR3 volume calculation, choice of patients, preparation and injection procedure, potential side effects, post injection, and post treatment follow-up were described in detail. CONCLUSIONS: Best practices for the injection of NBTXR3 were defined, thus enabling international standardization of intratumoral nanoparticle injection.

Long-Term Outcomes After Abdominal Radiation for Wilms Tumor: A 20-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: As radiation therapy (RT) for Wilms tumor (WT) evolves with more conformal techniques, it is necessary to evaluate patterns of failure and toxicity. We sought to determine the rate of local failure (LF) after abdominal RT in WT, specifically focusing on those with contained rupture treated with whole abdominal and pelvic RT (WAPRT) vs flank RT. Secondary objectives were to determine overall survival (OS), distant failure (DF), and late toxicities. METHODS: A single institution retrospective study of 54 pediatric patients with WT treated with abdominal RT between May 2000 and October 2022. LF and DF were calculated through cumulative incidence function and OS by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The median age was 4.5 years and the median follow-up was 6 years. Most patients (91%) had favorable histology. Only 1 patient experienced LF, 15 months from completion of RT (cumulative incidence 2% at 5 y). All patients who received unilateral flank radiation for contained rupture/spillage (n=13) experienced long-lasting intra-abdominal tumor control. A total of 5 patients experienced a DF at a median of 7 months, all in the lung. No patient relapsed in the lungs after upfront whole lung irradiation (n=16). OS was 96% at 5 years. Among 28 patients who followed through puberty, 4 female patients with prior WAPRT experienced hormonal irregularities/infertility. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral flank radiation may be a viable alternative to WAPRT for contained rupture/spillage and should be further explored prospectively. Our results may also be utilized in the future for outcome and toxicity comparison as conformal radiation techniques evolve.

Factors associated with radiation necrosis and intracranial control in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and stereotactic radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Emerging data suggest immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or radiotherapy (SRT) may work synergistically, potentially increasing both efficacy and toxicity. This manuscript characterizes factors associated with intracranial control and radiation necrosis in this group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients had non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or melanoma and were treated from 2013 to 2021 at two institutions with ICI and SRS/SRT. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to analyze factors associated with local failure (LF) and grade 2+ (G2 + ) radiation necrosis. RESULTS: There were 179 patients with 549 metastases. The median follow up from SRS/SRT was 14.7 months and the median tumor size was 7 mm (46 tumors ≥ 20 mm). Rates of LF and G2 + radiation necrosis per metastasis were 5.8% (32/549) and 6.9% (38/549), respectively. LF rates for ICI +/- 1 month from time of radiation versus not were 3% (8/264) and 8% (24/285) (p = 0.01), respectively. G2 + radiation necrosis rates for PD-L1 ≥ 50% versus < 50% were 17% (11/65) and 3% (5/203) (p=<0.001), respectively. PD-L1 ≥ 50% remained significantly associated with G2 + radiation necrosis on multivariate analysis (p = 0.03). Rates of intracranial failure were 54% (80/147) and 17% (4/23) (p = 0.001) for those without and with G2 + radiation necrosis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 expression (≥50%) may be associated with higher rates of G2 + radiation necrosis, and there may be improved intracranial control following the development of radiation necrosis. Administration of ICIs with SRS/SRT is overall safe, and there may be some local control benefit to delivering these concurrently.

Time to treatment patterns of head and neck cancer patients before and during the Covid-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: The delivery of healthcare has changed significantly over the past decades. This study analyzes the clinicodemographic factors and treatment patterns of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients between 2004 and 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of HNSCC patients from the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2020. RESULTS: A total of 164,290 patients were included. Increased times from diagnosis to definitive surgery (TTS) were seen across all facility types (academic centers, AC; non-academic centers, NAC) between 2004 and 2019, with NAC affected more. TTS < 15 days (RR = 1.05, 95%CI:1.05-1.09) and > 75 days (1.07, 95%CI:1.05-1.09) were associated with increased mortality risk. This association was more prominent among HPV + HNSCC (RR = 1.45; 95%CI:1.18-1.78). Treatment in AC was associated with a decreased mortality risk (RR = 0.94, 95%CI:0.93-0.95). Despite the universal increase in wait times from 2004 to 2019, short-term mortality was significantly decreased from 2016 to 2019, relative to 2004-2007 (3-month mortality: RR = 0.77, 95%CI:0.70-0.85; 12-month mortality: RR = 0.80, 95%CI:0.77-0.84). Wait times decreased in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: TTS increased between 2004 and 2019, with NAC affected more. However, despite longer wait times, short-term survival increased significantly. Very short (<15 days) and very long (>75 days) TTS were associated with increased mortality risk. Patients with HPV + HNSCC have the highest increase among those treated > 75 days from diagnosis. Treatment at AC was associated with improved survival, which could be explained by the presence of multidisciplinary teams and subspecialists that may be less available at NAC. The 2021 NCDB data are required for a comprehensive analysis of wait times in 2020.

Retinopathy, Optic Neuropathy, and Cataract in Childhood Cancer Survivors Treated With Radiation Therapy: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review.

PURPOSE: Few reports describe the risks of late ocular toxicities after radiation therapy (RT) for childhood cancers despite their effect on quality of life. The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) ocular task force aims to quantify the radiation dose dependence of select late ocular adverse effects. Here, we report results concerning retinopathy, optic neuropathy, and cataract in childhood cancer survivors who received cranial RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases for peer-reviewed studies published from 1980 to 2021 related to childhood cancer, RT, and ocular endpoints including dry eye, keratitis/corneal injury, conjunctival injury, cataract, retinopathy, and optic neuropathy. This initial search yielded abstracts for 2947 references, 269 of which were selected as potentially having useful outcomes and RT data. Data permitting, treatment and outcome data were used to generate normal tissue complication probability models. RESULTS: We identified sufficient RT data to generate normal tissue complication probability models for 3 endpoints: retinopathy, optic neuropathy, and cataract formation. Based on limited data, the model for development of retinopathy suggests 5% and 50% risk of toxicity at 42 and 62 Gy, respectively. The model for development of optic neuropathy suggests 5% and 50% risk of toxicity at 57 and 64 Gy, respectively. More extensive data were available to evaluate the risk of cataract, separated into self-reported versus ophthalmologist-diagnosed cataract. The models suggest 5% and 50% risk of self-reported cataract at 12 and >40 Gy, respectively, and 50% risk of ophthalmologist-diagnosed cataract at 9 Gy (>5% long-term risk at 0 Gy in patients treated with chemotherapy only). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation dose effects in the eye are inadequately studied in the pediatric population. Based on limited published data, this PENTEC comprehensive review establishes relationships between RT dose and subsequent risks of retinopathy, optic neuropathy, and cataract formation.

A phase 2 study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus durvalumab in resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) are treated with surgery followed by adjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy or definitive chemoradiation, but recurrence rates are high. Immune checkpoint blockade improves survival in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC; however, the role of chemo-immunotherapy in the curative setting is not established. METHODS: This phase 2, single-arm, multicenter study evaluated neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel, and durvalumab in patients with resectable locally advanced HNSCC. The primary end point was a hypothesized pathologic complete response rate of 50%. After chemo-immunotherapy and surgical resection, patients received study-defined, pathologic risk adapted adjuvant therapy consisting of either durvalumab alone (low risk), involved field radiation plus weekly cisplatin and durvalumab (intermediate risk), or standard chemoradiation plus durvalumab (high risk). RESULTS: Between December 2017 and November 2021, 39 subjects were enrolled at three centers. Oral cavity was the most common primary site (69%). A total of 35 of 39 subjects underwent planned surgical resection; one subject had a delay in surgery due to treatment-related toxicity. The most common treatment-related adverse events were cytopenias, fatigue, and nausea. Post treatment imaging demonstrated an objective response rate of 57%. Pathologic complete response and major pathologic response were achieved in 29% and 49% of subjects who underwent planned surgery, respectively. The 1-year progression-free survival was 83.8% (95% confidence interval, 67.4%-92.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel, and durvalumab before surgical resection of HNSCC were safe and feasible. Although the primary end point was not met, encouraging rates of pathologic complete response and clinical to pathologic downstaging were observed.

Associations With Virtual Visit Use Among Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to test for patient characteristics associated with virtual versus office visits among radiation oncology patients. Methods and Materials: Using the electronic health record, we extracted encounter data and corresponding patient information for the 6 months before and 6 months of COVID-19-enabled virtual visits (October 1, 2019, to March 22, 2020 vs March 23, 2020, to September 1, 2020) at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center. Encounters during COVID-19 were categorized as in-person or virtual visits. We compared patient demographic variables including race, age, sex, marital status, preferred language, insurance status, and tumor type during the pre-COVID-19 period as a baseline versus during the COVID-19 period. Multivariable analyses examined associations between these variables and virtual visit use. Results: We analyzed 4974 total encounters (2287 before COVID-19 and 2687 during COVID-19) for 3960 unique patients. All (100%) pre-COVID-19 encounters were in-person. During COVID-19, 21% of encounters were via virtual visits. There were no differences identified in pre- versus during-COVID-19 patient characteristics. However, we found significant differences in patient characteristics for in-person versus virtual encounters during COVID-19. On multivariable analysis, virtual visit use was less common among patients who were Black versus White (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.99; P = .044) and not married versus married (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; P = .037). Patients with head and neck (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.97; P = .034), breast (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.21-0.62; P ≤ .001), gastrointestinal/abdominal (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15-0.63; P = .001), or hematologic malignancy (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04-0.95; P = .043) diagnoses were less likely to be scheduled for virtual visits relative to patients with genitourinary malignancy. No Spanish-speaking patients engaged in a virtual visit. We did not identify differences in the insurance status or sex of patients scheduled for virtual visits. Conclusions: We found significant differences in virtual visit use by patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Further investigation into implications of differential virtual visit use including social and structural determinants and subsequent clinical outcomes is indicated.

Feasibility of the Audio-Visual Assisted Therapeutic Ambience in Radiotherapy (AVATAR) System for Anesthesia Avoidance in Pediatric Patients: A Multicenter Trial.

PURPOSE: The Audio-Visual Assisted Therapeutic Ambience in Radiotherapy (AVATAR) system was the first published radiation therapy (RT)-compatible system to reduce the need for pediatric anesthesia through video-based distraction. We evaluated the feasibility of AVATAR implementation and effects on anesthesia use, quality of life, and anxiety in a multicenter pediatric trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pediatric patients 3 to 10 years of age preparing to undergo RT at 10 institutions were prospectively enrolled. Children able to undergo at least 1 fraction of RT using AVATAR without anesthesia were considered successful (S). Patients requiring anesthesia for their entire treatment course were nonsuccessful (NS). The PedsQL3.0 Cancer Module (PedsQL) survey assessed quality of life and was administered to the patient and guardian at RT simulation, midway through RT, and at final treatment. The modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS) assessed anxiety and was performed at the same 3 time points. Success was evaluated using the χ2 test. PedsQL and mYPAS scores were assessed using mixed effects models with time points evaluated as fixed effects and a random intercept on the subject. RESULTS: Eighty-one children were included; median age was 7 years. AVATAR was successful at all 10 institutions and with photon and proton RT. There were 63 (78%) S patients; anesthesia was avoided for a median of 20 fractions per patient. Success differed by age (P = .04) and private versus public insurance (P < .001). Both patient (P = .008) and parent (P = .006) PedsQL scores significantly improved over the course of RT for patients aged 5 to 7. Anxiety in the treatment room decreased for both S and NS patients over RT course (P < .001), by age (P < .001), and by S versus NS patients (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this 10-center prospective trial, anesthesia avoidance with AVATAR was 78% in children aged 3 to 10 years, higher than among age-matched historical controls (49%; P < .001). AVATAR implementation is feasible across multiple institutions and should be further studied and made available to patients who may benefit from video-based distraction.

Diagnostic accuracy of FNA to determine HPV status in HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Accurate diagnosis of human papillomavirus (HPV) status in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) affects prognosis and can alter the treatment plan. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FNA biopsies to determine malignancy and HPV status in OPSCC at our institution. METHODS: Pathology samples from consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed HPV-associated OPSCC who underwent FNA of a cervical lymph node during initial diagnostic work-up were retrospectively analyzed between November 2015 and August 2021. RESULTS: Initial FNA was diagnostic for malignancy in 109/148 (73.6%) patients and non-diagnostic in 39/148 (26.4%). P16 staining of FNAs positive for malignancy showed: 54/109 (49.5%) p16 positive, 6/109 (5.5%) p16 negative, 49/109 (45.0%) p16 indeterminate. In patients with an initial non-diagnostic sampling or p16 indeterminate, repeat FNA was performed in 30/88 (34.1%) patients. Of the 30 repeat FNAs: 23/30 (76.7%) were diagnostic of malignancy and 7/30 (23.3%) remained non-diagnostic for malignancy. Of the 23 repeat FNAs diagnostic of malignancy: 16/23 (69.6%) were p16 positive and 7/23 (30.4%) were p16 indeterminate. In summary, 88/148 (59.5%) initial FNAs and 14/30 (46.7%) of repeat FNAs were non-diagnostic of malignancy or p16 indeterminate. Final yield of FNA biopsies (initial and first repeat FNA) to diagnose malignancy and p16 status was 70/148 (47.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Fine needle aspirations of lymph nodes in patients with HPV-associated OPSCC are frequently non-diagnostic for malignancy or indeterminate for p16 status, requiring repeat FNA or biopsy of the primary site. This can potentially cause treatment delay and increase morbidity and cost to the patient.

Impact of Oral Cavity Dosimetry on Patient Reported Xerostomia and Dysgeusia in the Setting of Deintensified Chemoradiotherapy.

Purpose: To determine the relationship between mean oral cavity (OC) dose (treated as a singular organ at risk) to patient reported xerostomia and dysgeusia. In addition, we will examine the relationship between oral cavity substructure doses to patient reported xerostomia and dysgeusia. All patients were treated in the setting of deintensification (60 Gy). Methods and Materials: In the study, 184 and 177 prospectively enrolled patients for de-escalated chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer submitted PROs at 6 and 12 months, respectively using Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events questionnaire. Patient's OC consisting of the following substructures were segmented: oral tongue, base of tongue, floor of mouth, hard and soft palate, cheek mucosa, and upper and lower lip mucosa. Ordinal logistic regression (no/mild vs moderate vs severe/very severe symptoms) was used to compare organs at risk dosimetry to patient reported xerostomia and dysgeusia at 6 and 12 months. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression models were generated. Results: Mean dose to the contralateral parotid (P = .04), OC (P = .04), and baseline patient reported xerostomia (P = .009) were significantly associated with xerostomia severity at 6 months. Only baseline xerostomia (P = .02) and mean dose to the contralateral submandibular gland (P = .0001) were significantly associated with xerostomia severity at 12 months. The only significant factor related to dysgeusia at either time point was mean dose to the OC at 12 months (P = .009). On examining substructures, the mean dose to the floor of mouth was implicated for the dose relationship to 6-month xerostomia (P = .04), and the oral tongue was found to be implicated for the relationship for 12-month dysgeusia (P = .04). Conclusions: The mean dose to the OC was found to relate to xerostomia symptoms at 6 months post-CRT and dysgeusia symptoms at 12 months post-CRT. The mean dose to the floor of mouth and oral tongue appeared to drive this relationship for xerostomia and dysgeusia symptoms, respectively. This work suggests the floor of mouth and oral tongue should be prioritized during planning over the rest of the OC. The effect of OC dose relative to other salivary structures for xerostomia appeared to depend on time post-CRT.

Prospective assessment of sparing the parotid ducts via MRI sialography for reducing patient reported xerostomia.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of prospectively sparing the parotid ducts via MRI sialography on patient reported xerostomia for those receiving definitive radiotherapy (RT) for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-eight patients with oropharynx cancer to be treated with definitive RT underwent pre-treatment MRI sialograms to localize their parotid ducts. The parotid ducts were maximally spared during treatment planning. Patients reported symptoms (PRO-CTCAE and QLQ-H&N35) were collected at 6 and 12 months post-RT and compared to a historical cohort who underwent conventional parotid gland mean dose sparing. Regression models were generated using parotid and submandibular gland doses with and without incorporating the dose to the parotid ducts to determine the impact of parotid duct dose on patient reported xerostomia. RESULTS: At 6 months post-RT, 12/26 (46%) patients reported ≥moderate xerostomia when undergoing parotid ductal sparing compared to 43/61 (70%) in the historical cohort (p = 0.03). At 12 months post-RT, 8/22 (36%) patients reported ≥moderate xerostomia when undergoing parotid ductal sparing compared to 34/68(50%) in the historical cohort (p = 0.08). Using nested logistic regression models, the mean parotid duct dose was found to significantly relate to patient reported xerostomia severity at 6 months post-RT (p = 0.04) and trended towards statistical significance at 12 months post-RT (p = 0.09). At both 6 and 12 months post-RT, the addition of mean parotid duct dose significantly improved model fit (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MRI sialography guided parotid duct sparing appears to reduce the rates of patient-reported xerostomia. Further, logistic regression analysis found parotid duct dose to be significantly associated with patient reported xerostomia. A significant improvement in model fit was observed when adding mean parotid duct dose compared to models that only contain mean parotid gland dose and mean contralateral submandibular gland dose.

Nanoparticle therapy for head and neck cancers.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current review focuses on the therapeutic use of nanoparticles in head and neck cancer (HNC), highlighting nanoparticles at the most advanced clinical development stages. RECENT FINDINGS: Literature review covers the three main approaches for therapeutic use of nanoparticles in HNC: first, enhancing radiotherapy effect; second, performing targeted delivery of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or genome editing molecules; third, photothermal therapy. SUMMARY: Nanoparticles are spherical nanoscale objects that have application in cancer therapies. Nanoparticles have diverse and often composite structure composition to ensure their function, increase their bioavailability in tumor tissues, and decrease off-target effects, sometimes by means of activating internal or external stimuli. Hafnium oxide nanoparticles are being tested in phase I to III trials for radiotherapy enhancement. Nanoparticle-based delivery of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and of the immune activator CpG-A DNA is being evaluated in phase II trials. No nanoparticle is currently approved for HNC treatment.

Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Survival Outcomes Following Induction Chemotherapy vs Standard of Care Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare oncologic outcomes in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) treated with standard of care (SOC) definitive therapy, consisting of surgery or chemoradiotherapy, vs induction therapy followed by definitive therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Academic tertiary care hospital. METHODS: The medical records of patients with biopsy-proven SNSCC treated between 2000 and 2020 were reviewed for demographics, tumor characteristics, staging, treatment details, and oncologic outcomes. Patients were matched 1-to-1 by age, sex, and cancer stage according to treatment received. Time-to-event analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The analysis included 26 patients with locally advanced SNSCC who received either induction therapy (n = 13) or SOC (n = 13). Baseline demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and median follow-up time were well balanced. Weekly cetuximab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel were the most common induction regimen utilized. Tolerance and safety to induction were excellent. Objective responses were observed in 11 of 13 patients receiving induction. No difference in disease-free survival was found between the induction and SOC groups at 1 or 3 years. However, when compared with SOC, induction therapy resulted in significant improvement in overall survival at 2 years (100% vs 65.3%, P = .043) and 3 years (100% vs 48.4%, P = .016) following completion of definitive therapy. Two patients in the SOC group developed metastatic disease, as compared with none in the induction group. CONCLUSIONS: Induction therapy was safe and effective. When compared with SOC, induction therapy improved 3-year overall survival.

The Evolving Role of Radiotherapy for Pediatric Cancers With Advancements in Molecular Tumor Characterization and Targeted Therapies.

Ongoing rapid advances in molecular diagnostics, precision imaging, and development of targeted therapies have resulted in a constantly evolving landscape for treatment of pediatric cancers. Radiotherapy remains a critical element of the therapeutic toolbox, and its role in the era of precision medicine continues to adapt and undergo re-evaluation. Here, we review emerging strategies for combining radiotherapy with novel targeted systemic therapies (for example, for pediatric gliomas or soft tissue sarcomas), modifying use or intensity of radiotherapy when appropriate via molecular diagnostics that allow better characterization and individualization of each patient's treatments (for example, de-intensification of radiotherapy in WNT subgroup medulloblastoma), as well as exploring more effective targeted systemic therapies that may allow omission or delay of radiotherapy. Many of these strategies are still under investigation but highlight the importance of continued pre-clinical and clinical studies evaluating the role of radiotherapy in this era of precision oncology.

Prognostic and Predictive Clinical and Biological Factors in HPV Malignancies.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes the majority of oropharyngeal, cervical, and anal cancers, among others. These HPV-associated cancers cause substantial morbidity and mortality despite ongoing vaccination efforts. Aside from the earliest stage tumors, chemoradiation is used to treat most HPV-associated cancers across disease sites. Response rates are variable, and opportunities to improve oncologic control and reduce toxicity remain. HPV malignancies share multiple commonalities in oncogenesis and tumor biology that may inform personalized methods of screening, diagnosis, treatment and surveillance. In this review we discuss the current literature and identify promising molecular targets, prognostic and predictive clinical factors and biomarkers in HPV-associated oropharyngeal, cervical and anal cancer.

A case of metastatic NUT carcinoma with prolonged response on gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: NUT carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy characterized by translocations in the NUTM1 gene. There are currently no consensus treatment recommendations for NUT carcinomas. METHODS: Here, we describe the case of a previously healthy male diagnosed with NUT carcinoma after presenting with sinus pressure, found to have a sinonasal mass and distant metastatic disease in the lungs. While pathologic evaluation and immunohistochemistry were consistent with NUT carcinoma, initial genomic profiling did not demonstrate a NUTM1 translocation. RESULTS: Whole transcriptomic RNA sequencing of the tumor revealed a YAP1-NUTM1 fusion. Based on an in vitro drug sensitivity screen, the patient was treated with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, achieving a partial response that persisted for 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Unbiased transcriptomic sequencing may identify previously uncharacterized NUTM1 fusion partners. Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel is a well-tolerated combination chemotherapy regimen and could offer a novel treatment approach for NUT carcinoma.

Phase 1 trial of adavosertib (AZD1775) in combination with concurrent radiation and cisplatin for intermediate-risk and high-risk head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Adavosertib (AZD1775) is an inhibitor of the Wee1 kinase. The authors conducted a phase 1b trial to evaluate the safety of adavosertib in combination with definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed, intermediate-risk/high-risk, locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: Twelve patients with intermediate-risk/high-risk HNSCC were enrolled, including those with p16-negative tumors of the oropharynx, p16-positive tumors of the oropharynx with ≥10 tobacco pack-years, and tumors of the larynx/hypopharynx regardless of p16 status. All patients were treated with an 8-week course of concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy at 70 grays (Gy) (2 Gy daily in weeks 1-7), cisplatin 30 mg/m2 weekly (in weeks 1-7), and adavosertib (twice daily on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday of weeks 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase 2 dose of adavosertib given concurrently with radiation and cisplatin. Secondary objectives were to determine the 12-week objective response rate and progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Three patients (25%) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity, including febrile neutropenia (n = 2) and grade 4 thromboembolism (n = 1). Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred with adavosertib at 150 mg. The median follow-up was 14.7 months. The 12-week posttreatment objective response rate determined by positron emission tomography/computed tomography was 100%. The 1-year progression-free and overall survival rates were both 90%. The maximum tolerated dose of adavosertib was 100 mg. CONCLUSIONS: Adavosertib 100 mg (twice daily on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday of weeks 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8), in combination with 70 Gy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 , is the recommended phase 2 dose for patients with HNSCC.

The addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant radiation is associated with inferior survival outcomes in intermediate-risk HPV-negative HNSCC.

BACKGROUND: Only high-risk tumors with extranodal extension (ENE) and/or positive surgical margins (PSM) benefit from adjuvant therapy (AT) with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) compared to radiation therapy (RT) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Optimal treatment for intermediate-risk tumors remains controversial. We categorized patients based on their surgical pathologic risk factors and described AT treatment patterns and associated survival outcomes. METHODS: Patients were identified from CHANCE, a population-based study, and risk was classified based on surgical pathology review. High-risk patients (n = 204) required ENE and/or PSM. Intermediate-risk (n = 186) patients had pathological T3/T4 disease, perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), or positive lymph nodes without ENE. Low-risk patients (n = 226) had none of these features. RESULTS: We identified 616 HPV-negative HNSCC patients who received primary surgical resection with neck dissection. High-risk patients receiving AT had favorable OS (HR 0.50, p = 0.013) which was significantly improved with the addition of chemotherapy compared to RT alone (HR 0.47, p = 0.021). When stratified by node status, the survival benefit of AT in high-risk patients persisted only among those who were node-positive (HR: 0.17, p < 0.0005). On the contrary, intermediate-risk patients did not benefit from AT (HR: 1.26, p = 0.380) and the addition of chemotherapy was associated with significantly worse OS compared to RT (HR: 1.76, p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: In high-risk patients, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy improved OS compared to RT alone. The greatest benefit was in node-positive cases. In intermediate-risk patients, the addition of chemotherapy to RT increased mortality risk and therefore should only be used cautiously in these patients.