Comparison of Interstitial Lung Disease Between Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies Positive and Negative Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Positive antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) may occur in the setting of interstitial lung disease (ILD), with or without ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). We aim to compare the characteristics and clinical course of patients with ILD and positive ANCA (ANCA-ILD) to those with negative ANCA. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study from 2018 to 2021. All patients with ILD and ANCA testing were included. Patient characteristics (symptoms, dyspnea scale, and systemic AAV), test results (pulmonary high-resolution computed tomography and pulmonary function tests), and adverse events were collected from electronic medical records. Descriptive statistics and the Fisher exact test were used to compare the outcomes of patients with ANCA-ILD to those with ILD and negative ANCA. RESULTS: A total of 265 patients with ILD were included. The mean follow-up duration was 69.3 months, 26 patients (9.8%) were ANCA positive, and 69.2% of those with ANCA-ILD had another autoantibody. AAV occurred in 17 patients (65.4%) with ANCA-ILD. In 29.4% of patients, AAV developed following ILD diagnosis. Usual interstitial pneumonia was the most common radiologic pattern in patients with ANCA-ILD. There was no association between ANCA status and the evolution of dyspnea, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, and lung imaging. Forced vital capacity improved over time in 42% of patients with ANCA-ILD and in 17% of patients with negative ANCA (P = 0.006). Hospitalization occurred in 46.2% of patients with ANCA-ILD and in 21.8% of patients with negative ANCA (P = 0.006). Both groups had similar mortality rates. CONCLUSION: Routine ANCA testing should be considered in patients with ILD. Patients with ANCA-ILD are at risk for AAV. More research is required to better understand and manage patients with ANCA-ILD.

Adherence to Cardiovascular Prevention Guidelines in an Academic Centre.

Background: Adherence to guidelines is associated with better patient outcomes. Although studies show suboptimal adherence to cardiovascular prevention guidelines among general practitioners, adherence among specialist physicians is understudied. The aim of this analysis was to identify practice gaps among cardiologists in a tertiary academic centre. Methods: We retrospectively audited cardiology outpatient clinic notes taken at the Cardiology Clinic at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), from the period January 1, 2019 to February 28, 2019. Data were abstracted from hospital medical records. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of adherence to cardiovascular prevention guidelines. We compared the chart-documented practice at our centre to the Canadian hypertension, lipid, diabetes, antiplatelet, and heart failure guidelines in effect at the time of the audit. We also collected information regarding discussions of smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and diet. Results: A total of 2503 patients were included, with a mean age of 65.6 ± 14.5 years. Dyslipidemia occurred in 63% of patients, hypertension in 55%, and coronary artery disease in 41%. Optimal low-density lipoprotein control was documented as having been achieved in just 39% of cases. Blood pressure control was adequate for 65% of patients, and glycemic control was achieved in 47% of patients with diabetes. Heart failure treatment was optimal in 34% of patients. Nearly all patients with coronary artery disease (95%) had appropriate antithrombotic therapy. The incidence of discussion of nonpharmacologic interventions varied, ranging from 91% (smoking) to 16% (diet). Conclusions: Primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events was found to be suboptimal in an academic tertiary-care outpatient cardiology clinic and may be representative of similar shortcomings nationwide. Strategies to ensure guideline adherence are needed.

Contexte: Le respect des lignes directrices est associé à de meilleurs résultats pour les patients. Bien que les études montrent que les omnipraticiens adhèrent de façon sous-optimale aux lignes directrices en matière de prévention des événements cardiovasculaires, l'observance chez les médecins spécialistes n'a pas été assez étudiée. Notre analyse a pour objectif de déceler les lacunes dans la pratique des cardiologues exerçant dans des centres universitaires de soins tertiaires. Méthodologie: Nous avons examiné de manière rétrospective les notes cliniques consignées au dossier des patients du Centre cardiovasculaire du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) et résumé les données issues des consultations ayant eu lieu du 1er janvier au 28 février 2019. Le principal résultat d'intérêt était le taux d'adhésion aux lignes directrices en matière de prévention des événements cardiovasculaires. Nous avons comparé les pratiques enregistrées dans les dossiers de notre centre aux lignes directrices canadiennes sur la prise en charge de l'hypertension, de la lipidémie, du diabète, du traitement antiplaquettaire et de l'insuffisance cardiaque en place au moment de l'évaluation. Nous avons aussi recueilli de l'information sur les discussions entourant le tabagisme, la consommation d'alcool, l'activité physique et l'alimentation. Résultats: Les données de 2 503 patients, âgés en moyenne de 65,6 ± 14,5 ans, ont été retenues. De ces patients, 63 % présentaient une dyslipidémie, 55 %, une hypertension et 41 %, une maladie coronarienne. Le taux de lipoprotéines de basse densité n'était maîtrisé de façon optimale que dans 39 % des cas. La normalisation de la pression artérielle était adéquate chez 65 % des patients, et 47 % des patients diabétiques atteignaient les cibles glycémiques. L'insuffisance cardiaque était optimalement traitée chez 34 % des patients. Presque tous les patients atteints de maladie coronarienne (95 %) recevaient un traitement antithrombotique approprié. La fréquence des discussions sur les interventions non pharmacologiques variait, allant de 91 % dans le cas du tabagisme à 16 % dans celui de l'alimentation. Conclusions: La prévention primaire et secondaire des événements cardiovasculaires s'est révélée sous-optimale dans une clinique externe de cardiologie d'un hôpital universitaire et pourrait être représentative de lacunes similaires dans l'ensemble du pays. Des stratégies visant à assurer le respect des lignes directrices sont nécessaires.

High Frequency of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Canadians Immunized for Influenza: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

We assessed the frequency and correlates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy before Canada's vaccine rollout. A cross-sectional vaccine hesitancy survey was completed by consecutive patients/family members/staff who received the influenza vaccine at McGill University affiliated hospitals. Based on the self-reported likelihood of receiving a future vaccine (scale 0-10), the following three groups were defined: non-hesitant (score 10), mildly hesitant (7.1-9.9), and significantly hesitant (0-7). Factors associated with vaccine hesitancy were assessed with multivariate logistic regression analyses and binomial logistic regression machine learning modelling. The survey was completed by 1793 people. Thirty-seven percent of participants (n = 669) were hesitant (mildly: 315 (17.6%); significantly: 354 (19.7%)). Lower education levels, opposition and uncertainty about vaccines being mandatory, feelings of not receiving enough information about COVID-19 prevention, perceived social pressure to get a future vaccine, vaccine safety concerns, uncertainty regarding the vaccine risk-benefit ratio, and distrust towards pharmaceutical companies were factors associated with vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine safety concerns and opposition to mandatory vaccinations were the strongest correlates of vaccine hesitancy in both the logistic regressions and the machine learning model. In conclusion, in this study, over a third of people immunized for influenza before the COVID-19 vaccine rollout expressed some degree of vaccine hesitancy. Effectively addressing COVID-19 vaccine safety concerns may enhance vaccine uptake.

Maternal anxiety, depression and vascular function during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to clarify whether type and timing of mental health symptoms in early pregnancy distinctly contribute to maternal-fetal vascular function, independent from the psychotropic medications given to treat these conditions. METHODS: Data from a prospective cohort study (n = 1678) were used to test whether self-reported fears about giving birth and depressive symptoms prior to 16 weeks of gestation were associated with vascular outcomes predictive of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) i.e., systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP); uterine artery pulsatility index (UAPI); umbilical artery resistance index (UmbARI); and urine protein creatinine ratio. Multiple linear regressions models and mediation models were used to test for associations between predictors and outcomes, controlling for previously identified risk factors for vascular dysfunction such as maternal age and history of infertility. RESULTS: Fears about giving birth in early pregnancy were inversely associated with UmbARI (ß = -0.33, p = 0.03, df = 51) mid- to late-pregnancy (≥20 weeks). Depressive symptoms in early pregnancy were also inversely associated with maternal systolic BP (ß = -0.13, p = 0.01, df = 387) and diastolic BP (ß = -0.10, p = 0.04, df = 387) during the first trimester. CONCLUSIONS: While fears about giving birth in early pregnancy were associated with lower vascular resistance in the fetal-placental unit, early depressive symptoms were associated with lower maternal vascular tone. At the very least, our results support the notion that early maternal psychological distress is unlikely to account for the development of HDP later during pregnancy and provide preliminary evidence to support distinct roles of pregnancy-related anxiety and depressive symptoms in maternal-fetal vascular function.