Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23521032

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: New photoscreening models promise to detect amblyopia risk factors early in hopes of reducing permanent pediatric monocular and binocular vision impairment. The 3 commercially available interpreted photoscreeners had not yet been compared. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational screening study following AAPOS guidelines on pediatric patients with and without developmental delays. 270 patients in a pediatric eye practice aged 4.7 +/- 4 years with 7% special needs. From December 2011 through March 2012, the Plusoptix, the iScreen, and the Pediavision SPOT were applied before confirmatory exam in a clinical pediatric eye practice. RESULTS: The inconclusive rate ranged from 1-4% (iScreen) to 12% (Plusoptix). Sensitivity ranged from 72% (iScreen) to 84% (Plusoptix) and specificity ranged from 68% (SPOT) to 94% (Plusoptix). The iScreen can provide results in 99% of high risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort with high pre-screening prevalence, the 2011 photoscreeners had favorable validation that is expected to improve with further clinical study. Pediatricians have practical technology with a recognized procedure code to assist in amblyopia reduction.


Subject(s)
Refractive Errors , Vision Screening , Amblyopia/diagnosis , Child , Humans , Infant , Prospective Studies , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23234483

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The positive predictive value (PPV) of conventional preschool acuity screening is about 50% whereas previous Polaroid photoscreening with experienced interpretation can achieve PPV greater than 85%. The Plusoptix photoscreener has immediate computer interpretation and a CPT code available to pediatricians. METHODS: Two Plusoptix SO9 were used in two pediatric group practices with previously validated refractive criteria and new manufacturer's binocular alignment criteria. CPT billing was monitored. Referred patients had prior gold-standard AAPOS examinations. RESULTS: 12% of 675 photoscreened preschoolers were referred. Of the 39 with AAPOS gold-standard exams, the PPV from strabismus referrals was 17%, while 26 of 27 refractive referrals had true amblyopia risk factors (PPV 96%). Screening CPT code 99174 reimbursement rose from zero to half of insurers in 15 months. CONCLUSION: Plusoptix photoscreening is valid after adjusting the binocular alignment criteria. Such photoscreening should be employed by pediatric practices to detect and ultimately to reduce amblyopia vision impairment in children.


Subject(s)
Refractive Errors , Vision Screening , Amblyopia/diagnosis , Humans , Infant , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...