Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 149(7): 3925-3935, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36030285

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several articles have shown that birth weight is associated with the risk of many types of cancers. However, the results are inconsistent, and whether the relationship has a causal effect remains unknown. METHODS: We searched the PubMed and Embase libraries up to March 2021 and selected observational studies reporting the relationship between birth weight and adult-onset cancer risk. Dose-response meta-analysis and two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis were used to estimate the effect. RESULT: In our dose-response meta-analysis, six cancers from 46 studies were found to have significant associations with birth weight. (Ovarian cancer: RR: 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.44; breast cancer: RR: 1.12, 95% CI 1.08-1.16; colorectal cancer: RR: 1.20, 95% CI 1.01-1.43; endometrial cancer: RR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.93; prostate cancer: RR: 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.61; testicular cancer: RR: 1.21, 95% CI 1.03-1.43). As birth weight increased, the slope of the dose-response curve of breast cancer increased continuously, and the curve of testicular cancer was U-shaped. In the MR study, seven cancers were included. Only invasive mucinous ovarian cancer was found to have a causal effect on birth weight (OR: 0.62; 95% CI 0.39-0.97), while other cancers did not. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that birth weight are unlikely to have a casual effect on risk of cancers via the MR analysis, although the dose-response meta-analysis shows that there is a nonlinear relationship between birth weight and breast cancer and testicular cancer. More relevant researches are needed to further investigate their effect.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Ovarian Neoplasms , Testicular Neoplasms , Male , Adult , Female , Humans , Birth Weight , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Genome-Wide Association Study , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
2.
Sleep Breath ; 27(3): 843-852, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36129602

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We aimed to study the effect of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on cancer risk. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for relevant studies. The qualities of included studies were assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed. We also conducted subgroup analyses stratified by gender, severity of OSA, study design, and cancer type. RESULTS: After literatures search, 18 studies were included in the present study. In the unadjusted analysis, we discovered an increased cancer risk in patients with OSA with a pooled relative risk (RR) in the OSA group of 1.49 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32-1.69, I2 = 32%, P = 0.15). In adjusted analysis, OSA correlated with cancer risk (RR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.18-1.56, I2 = 54%, P < 0.01). In subgroup stratified by gender and OSA severity, OSA statistically with cancer risk in females (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.06-1.51) and moderate to severe OSA groups (RR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.64; 4.19). In subgroup stratified by study design, a trend toward statistically significant differences was observed in prospective studies (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.99-1.48) and cross-sectional studies (RR: 1.81, 95% CI: 0.96-3.41). Patients with OSA in the retrospective study group had a statistically higher chance of developing cancer (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.11-1.79). When stratified by cancer group, statistically significant differences was observed in many types of cancer (breast cancer: RR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.03-1.70; central nervous system cancer: RR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.06-2.75; kidney cancer: RR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.20-2.74; liver cancer: RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.10-1.29; and pancreatic cancer: RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.14-1.33). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that obstructive sleep apnea may increase risk of cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Female , Humans , Risk , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology
3.
AMB Express ; 12(1): 16, 2022 Feb 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35147799

ABSTRACT

Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) is commonly present in human reproductive tract, which frequently leads to genital tract infection. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop a rapid detection method for UU. In our study, a real-time fluorescence loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay was developed and evaluated for the detection of UU. Two primers were specifically designed based on the highly conserved regions of ureaseB genes. The reaction was carried out for 60 min in a constant temperature system using Bst DNA polymerase, and the process was monitored by real-time fluorescence signal, while polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed simultaneously. In real-time fluorescence LAMP reaction system, positive result was only obtained for UU among 9 bacterial strains, with detection sensitivity of 42 pg/µL (4.2 × 105 CFU/mL), and all 16 clinical samples of UU could be detected. In conclusion, real-time fluorescence LAMP is a simple, sensitive, specific and effective method compared with conventional PCR, which shows great promise in the rapid detection of UU.

4.
Front Immunol ; 12: 722004, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34630395

ABSTRACT

Sepsis, an infection-induced systemic inflammatory disorder, is often accompanied by multiple organ dysfunction syndromes with high incidence and mortality rates, and those who survive are often left with long-term sequelae, bringing great burden to social economy. Therefore, novel approaches to solve this puzzle are urgently needed. Previous studies revealed that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have exerted significant influences on the process of sepsis. The aim of this review is to summarize our understanding of lncRNAs as potential sepsis-related diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets, and provide new insights into the diagnosis and treatment for sepsis. In this study, we also introduced the current diagnostic markers of sepsis and discussed their limitations, while review the research advances in lncRNAs as promising biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis. Furthermore, the roles of lncRNAs in sepsis-induced organ dysfunction were illustrated in terms of different organ systems. Nevertheless, further studies should be carried out to elucidate underlying molecular mechanisms and pathological process of sepsis.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , RNA, Long Noncoding/genetics , Sepsis/etiology , Animals , Disease Management , Disease Susceptibility , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Organ Specificity , Prognosis , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/metabolism , Sepsis/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...