Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 35, 2024 Jan 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38229048

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) constitutes a major global health problem, of which remnant gastric cancer (RGC) occurs less frequently. The rate of RGCs after gastrectomy for GC is increasing recently due to improved survival and screening, however, their incidence and risk have not been reported in the U.S. POPULATION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and elevated risk of RGC after GC gastrectomy in this population, and to identify the risk factors. METHODS: Patients underwent gastrectomy for first primary GC in 2000-2015 and those who developed RGC were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Fine-Gray regression was used to estimate the cumulative incidence and to identify risk factors. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated by Poisson regression to compare the risk with the general population. RESULTS: Among 21,566 patients included in the cohort, 227 developed RGC. The 20-year cumulative incidence of RGC was 1.88%. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age, invasion depth, male sex, marital status, and lower income are independent risk factors for RGC development. SIR was 7.70 overall and > 4.5 in each stratum. CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative incidence and risk for RGCs increased continuously in patients underwent GC gastrectomy. Close and lifelong endoscopy surveillance should be recommended for patients who received GC gastrectomy, especially those with high-risk factors.


Subject(s)
Gastric Stump , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Incidence , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Gastrectomy/methods
2.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 38(1): 253, 2023 Oct 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37855869

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Survival after local resection (LR) versus radical resection (RR) has been revealed comparable for patients with rectal and duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but is unknown for jejunoileal (JI) GISTs. This study aimed to compare the long-term survival between patients with JI GISTs who underwent LR and RR, and to find out the prognostic factors for JI GISTs. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with JI GISTs in 1975-2019 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and grouped according to surgical modality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the LR and RR groups. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared in the full and matched cohorts using Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis. Subgroup sensitivity analyses were also performed. Risk factors associated with DSS were analyzed in multivariate Cox analysis following model selection. RESULTS: 1107 patients diagnosed with JI GISTs were included in the study cohort. After PSM, OS and DSS were comparable in LR and RR groups. Consistently, the two groups had similar DSS in all subgroup analyses. Moreover, multivariate Cox analysis identified lymphadenectomy, older age, larger tumor size, distant metastasis, high and unknown mitotic rate, but not LR, as independent prognostic risk factors for JI GISTs. CONCLUSIONS: We conducted the first population-based comparison between the effect of different surgical modes on survival for patients with JI GISTs. LR can be carried out safely without compromising oncological outcome, and should be considered as a treatment option in selected patients with JI GISTs.


Subject(s)
Duodenal Neoplasms , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , Humans , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/surgery , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Duodenal Neoplasms/pathology , Duodenal Neoplasms/surgery , Propensity Score , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis
3.
BMC Surg ; 22(1): 214, 2022 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35658940

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) is defined as acute intestinal ischemia because of decreased blood flow in mesenteric vessels. Only a few cases of NOMI that occur secondary to aortic dissection (AD) have been reported, resulting in the lack of sufficient knowledge of diagnosis and treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: We aimed to report a case of NOMI caused by type B Aortic Dissection. A 26-year-old male patient was transferred to our hospital with the diagnose of NOMI and aortic dissection in April 2018. The abdominal computed tomography (CT) assists the diagnosis of paralytic intestinal obstruction, intestinal wall pneumatosis, and perforation. Emergency laparotomy revealed that the bowel wall supplied by the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) was pale with the palpable but weak pulsation of the parietal artery. The small intestine was extremely dilated with a paper-thin, fragile wall that was ruptured easily and could not be sutured. In this case, extensive resection and segmental drainage were done. Postoperatively, the digestive tract was reconstructed. However, the patient suffered from iron deficiency anemia and short bowel syndrome eight months later, and unfortunately died from long-term complications. CONCLUSION: Aortic dissection leads to continuous decrease in blood pressure and blood flow to the SMA, considering as a predisposing factor for NOMI. During the treatment, extensive resection and segmental drainage are the optimal surgical strategy, which can make benefit in emergencies especially.


Subject(s)
Aortic Dissection , Mesenteric Ischemia , Adult , Aortic Dissection/diagnosis , Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Intestine, Small/surgery , Intestines , Ischemia/etiology , Ischemia/surgery , Male , Mesenteric Artery, Superior/diagnostic imaging , Mesenteric Artery, Superior/surgery , Mesenteric Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Mesenteric Ischemia/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...