Comparative efficacy and safety of the fixed versus unfixed combination of latanoprost and timolol in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

BACKGROUND: A noninferiority trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a single evening dose of fixed-combination latanoprost 50 µg/mL and timolol 0.5 mg/mL (Xalacom®; LTFC), in Chinese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OH) who were insufficiently controlled on ß-blocker monotherapy or ß-blocker-based dual therapy. METHODS: This 8-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, noninferiority study compared once-daily evening dosing of LTFC with the unfixed combination of latanoprost, one drop in the evening, and timolol, one drop in the morning (LTuFC). The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change from baseline to week 8 in diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP; mean of 8 AM, 10 AM, 2 PM, 4 PM IOPs). LTFC was considered noninferior to LTuFC if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference was < 1.5 mmHg (analysis of covariance). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar for LTFC (N = 125; POAG, 70%; mean IOP, 25.8 mmHg) and LTuFC (N = 125; POAG, 69%; mean IOP, 26.0 mmHg). Mean diurnal IOP changes from baseline to week 8 were -8.6 mmHg with LTFC and -8.9 mmHg with LTuFC (between-treatment difference: 0.3 mmHg; 95%-CI, -0.3 to 1.0). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: A single evening dose of LTFC was at least as effective as the unfixed combination of latanoprost in the PM and timolol in the AM in reducing IOP in Chinese subjects with POAG or OH whose IOP was insufficiently reduced with ß-blocker monotherapy or ß-blocker-based dual therapy. LTFC is an effective and well tolerated once-daily treatment for POAG and OH.

Practical method to calculate post-LASIK corneal power: the Actual K(a+p) method.

AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of a practical method (the Actual K(a+p) method) of corneal power measurement for post-LASIK eyes undergoing cataract surgery. METHODS: Ten eyes of 7 patients (4 male, 3 female, average age 50.10±4.01 years, with -11.01±3.55D mean refraction before LASIK), underwent post-LASIK phaco+IOL cataract surgery. We used the posterior corneal curvature as measured by the Pentacam in a method we named Actual K(a+p) to calculate the post-LASIK corneal power for IOL calculation. The refractive outcomes after cataract surgery were evaluated. The Actual K(a+p) was compared with the back- calculated corneal power (BCK), which was thought to be the benchmark of true corneal power. The corneal power estimated by other published methods, including Maloney, Shammas, Koch-Maloney, Savini, and McCulley, together with the true net power and equivalent K reading (EKR) as found by the Pentacam were also compared with the BCK. RESULTS: All eyes achieved satisfied refractive status after cataract surgery. The difference between the postoperative refraction and the target refraction was 0.04±0.40D, range from -0.63D and +0.85D. Among all the methods we studied, although the Bonferroni multiple comparison tests did not detect significant differences between any two of them, the Actual K(a+p) yielded the highest agreement with the BCK, with 80% of the eyes falling within ±0.5D and 100% within ±1.0D from the BCK values. CONCLUSION: The Actual K(a+p) method can provide encour- aging results in post-LASIK eyes undergoing cataract surgery.

[The accuracy of posterior curvature method in corneal power calculation after LASIK surgery].

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the accuracy of posterior curvature method in corneal power calculation after LASIK surgery. METHODS: Corneal power calculation in 11 eyes that underwent Intraocular Lens (IOL) implantation after LASIK surgery (10 cases of Phaco + IOL, 1 case of IOL displacement), all of which used posterior curvature method, was analyzed retrospectively. The differences between post-operative stable refraction and target refraction were calculated, the actual corneal powers were deduced, and the expected refractive errors using other corneal power evaluation methods (auto-keratometry, corneal topography, spherical equivalent method, anterior curvature method, Equivalent K Reading method provided by Pentacam) were analyzed. In addition, refraction of 23 eyes underwent LASIK surgery were done on their 6 months follow-up. The theoretical corneal powers were deduced by subtracting the change of refraction before and after LASIK surgery from the pre-operative corneal powers. The differences between calculated corneal powers using posterior curvature method and the theoretical corneal powers were analyzed, and were compared with other corneal power evaluation methods. RESULTS: The mean uncorrected post-operative visual acuity of IOL implantation eyes using posterior curvature method was 0.8 +/- 0.2, with mean absolute refractive error from target of (0.36 +/- 0.36) D (-0.63 to +0.85 D). The ratio of eyes with absolute error within 0.25 D, 0.50 D, and 1.00 D was 55%, 73%, and 91% respectively. This result was significantly lower than that of the auto-keratometry (2.50 +/- 1.08) D, corneal topography (1.90 +/- 0.88) D, and those obtained from spherical equivalent method (2.09 +/- 1.62) D (P < 0.01) or anterior curvature method (1.45 +/- 1.10) D (P < 0.05). It also showed less bias (-1.13 to 0.85 D) when compared to the Equivalent K Reading (-1.10 to 1.80 D), but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). For the 23 post LASIK eyes, the absolute difference between the corrected corneal power using posterior curvature method and theoretical power was (0.67 +/- 0.45) D, also showed least bias compared with other methods. CONCLUSION: It is a practical and accurate way to calculate the corneal power after LASIK surgery using posterior curvature method.