ABSTRACT
Background: Distinguishing between prostatic cancer (PCa) and chronic prostatitis (CP) is sometimes challenging, and Gleason grading is strongly associated with prognosis in PCa. The continuous-time random-walk diffusion (CTRW) model has shown potential in distinguishing between PCa and CP as well as predicting Gleason grading. Purpose: This study aimed to quantify the CTRW parameters (α, ß & Dm) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of PCa and CP tissues; and then assess the diagnostic value of CTRW and ADC parameters in differentiating CP from PCa and low-grade PCa from high-grade PCa lesions. Study type: Retrospective (retrospective analysis using prospective designed data). Population: Thirty-one PCa patients undergoing prostatectomy (mean age 74 years, range 64-91 years), and thirty CP patients undergoing prostate needle biopsies (mean age 68 years, range 46-79 years). Field strength/Sequence: MRI scans on a 3.0T scanner (uMR790, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China). DWI were acquired with 12 b-values (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 500, 800, 1200, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000 s/mm2). Assessment: CTRW parameters and ADC were quantified in PCa and CP lesions. Statistical tests: The Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the differences in CTRW parameters and ADC between PCa and CP, high-grade PCa, and low-grade PCa. Spearman's correlation of the pathologic grading group (GG) with CTRW parameters and ADC was evaluated. The usefulness of CTRW parameters, ADC, and their combinations (Dm, α and ß; Dm, α, ß, and ADC) to differentiate PCa from CP and high-grade PCa from low-grade PCa was determined by logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Delong test was used to compare the differences among AUCs. Results: Significant differences were found for the CTRW parameters (α, Dm) between CP and PCa (all P<0.001), high-grade PCa, and low-grade PCa (α:P=0.024, Dm:P=0.021). GG is correlated with certain CTRW parameters and ADC(α:P<0.001,r=-0.795; Dm:P<0.001,r=-0.762;ADC:P<0.001,r=-0.790). Moreover, CTRW parameters (α, ß, Dm) combined with ADC showed the best diagnostic efficacy for distinguishing between PCa and CP as well as predicting Gleason grading. The differences among AUCs of ADC, CTRW parameters and their combinations were not statistically significant (P=0.051-0.526). Conclusion: CTRW parameters α and Dm, as well as their combination were beneficial to distinguish between CA and PCa, low-grade PCa and high-grade PCa lesions, and CTRW parameters and ADC had comparable diagnostic performance.
ABSTRACT
Astrocyte elevated gene-1 (AEG-1) is an important oncogene that overexpresses in gliomas and plays a vital role in their occurrence and progression. However, few reports have shown which biomarkers could reflect the level of AEG-1 expression in vivo so far. In recent years, intracellular metabolites monitored by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) as non-invasive imaging biomarkers have been applied to the precise diagnosis and therapy feedback of gliomas. Therefore, understanding the correlation between 1H MRS metabolites and AEG-1 gene expression in U251 cells may help to identify relevant biomarkers. This study constructed three monoclonal AEG-1-knockout U251 cell lines using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) /Cas9 technique and evaluated the biological behaviors and metabolite ratios of these cell lines. With the decline in AEG-1 expression, the apoptosis rate of the AEG-1-knockout cell lines increased. At the same time, the metastatic capacities decreased, and the relative contents of total choline (tCho) and lactate (Lac) were also reduced. In conclusion, deviations in AEG-1 expression influence the apoptosis rate and metastasis capacity of U251 cells, which the 1H MRS metabolite ratio could monitor. The tCho/creatinine(Cr) and Lac/Cr ratios positively correlated with the AEG-1 expression and malignant cell behavior. This study may provide potential biomarkers for accurate preoperative diagnosis and future AEG-1-targeting treatment evaluation of gliomas in vivo.
