Physical limits of flight performance in the heaviest soaring bird.

Flight costs are predicted to vary with environmental conditions, and this should ultimately determine the movement capacity and distributions of large soaring birds. Despite this, little is known about how flight effort varies with environmental parameters. We deployed bio-logging devices on the world's heaviest soaring bird, the Andean condor (Vultur gryphus), to assess the extent to which these birds can operate without resorting to powered flight. Our records of individual wingbeats in >216 h of flight show that condors can sustain soaring across a wide range of wind and thermal conditions, flapping for only 1% of their flight time. This is among the very lowest estimated movement costs in vertebrates. One bird even flew for >5 h without flapping, covering ∼172 km. Overall, > 75% of flapping flight was associated with takeoffs. Movement between weak thermal updrafts at the start of the day also imposed a metabolic cost, with birds flapping toward the end of glides to reach ephemeral thermal updrafts. Nonetheless, the investment required was still remarkably low, and even in winter conditions with weak thermals, condors are only predicted to flap for ∼2 s per kilometer. Therefore, the overall flight effort in the largest soaring birds appears to be constrained by the requirements for takeoff.

Turn costs change the value of animal search paths.

The tortuosity of the track taken by an animal searching for food profoundly affects search efficiency, which should be optimised to maximise net energy gain. Models examining this generally describe movement as a series of straight steps interspaced by turns, and implicitly assume no turn costs. We used both empirical- and modelling-based approaches to show that the energetic costs for turns in both terrestrial and aerial locomotion are substantial, which calls into question the value of conventional movement models such as correlated random walk or Lévy walk for assessing optimum path types. We show how, because straight-line travel is energetically most efficient, search strategies should favour constrained turn angles, with uninformed foragers continuing in straight lines unless the potential benefits of turning offset the cost.

The relationship between oxygen consumption and body acceleration in a range of species.

The ability to measure the energy expenditure of free-ranging animals is of great importance but the techniques available each have their limitations. Recently, as an alternative to more established techniques, an integrated measure of body acceleration termed overall dynamic body acceleration (ODBA) has been used as a calibrated proxy for rate of oxygen consumption (V(O(2))) and hence metabolic rate. The present study tested the potential of this technique, firstly by expanding the range of species for which the V(O(2))-ODBA relationship has been defined and secondly by undertaking a validation exercise to explore the accuracy of predictions made using ODBA. V(O(2))-ODBA relationships during terrestrial locomotion were established for several bipedal and quadrupedal endotherms and compiled with similar relationships previously determined in other species. A model incorporating all of these species showed that ODBA is an excellent predictor of V(O(2)) but there is variation in the V(O(2))-ODBA relationship between species, and further variation within some species. Including measurements such as body mass and structural size in prediction equations might further improve the predictive power of the 'ODBA technique' and eliminate species-specific differences. In the validation exercise, estimate errors were calculated for the species-specific predictive equations. The use of ODBA to estimate V(O(2)) was valid across all species examined and may show a greater potential for estimating energy expenditure for individual animals than other techniques.