Changes in Metabolic Parameters of Hemoglobin A1c, Weight, and Blood Pressure During and After COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Orders.

BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a "state of emergency" was declared in North Carolina on March 10, 2020. Subsequent "stay-at-home" (SAH) orders restricted activities including use of fitness facilities, and teleworking was encouraged. This study investigates metabolic effects of these changes in activity level. METHODS: This retrospective prepost study included adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), weight, and blood pressure (BP) measurements for 3 time periods: 3/10/2019-9/9/2019 ("pre-SAH"), 3/10/2020-9/9/2020 ("during SAH"), and 3/10/2021-9/9/2021 ("post-SAH"). The primary outcome was change in HbA1c pre-SAH to during SAH and during SAH to post-SAH. Secondary outcomes were changes in weight, systolic BP (SBP), and diastolic BP (DBP) over the same periods. Exploratory outcomes included health care utilization. Paired t test compared outcomes between time periods using Bonferroni-adjusted α of 0.025 for significance. RESULTS: Analysis included 301 participants with an average age of 69.8 years. HbA1c, SBP, and DBP trended up from pre-SAH to during SAH and then decreased post-SAH with a significant change only for DBP from during SAH to post-SAH (74.2 mmHg to 73.6 mmHg, P < .001). Weight trended down across the 3 study periods. In-office visits significantly decreased from pre-SAH to during SAH, and telehealth visits significantly decreased from during SAH to post-SAH (both P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of DBP, findings reveal consistency in HbA1c, weight, and BP across time periods before, during, and after COVID-19 SAH orders in North Carolina.

Use of Cardioprotective Antidiabetic Medications in Adults With and Without Cardiovascular Disease, 2015 to March 2020.

BACKGROUND: Certain glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1) agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-inhibitors) can reduce cardiovascular risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, these medications can be expensive, potentially limiting their use. Objectives: The primary objective was to characterize the use of cardioprotective GLP-1 agonists and SGLT2-inhibitors among adults with diabetes with and without CVD. The secondary objective was to investigate the association of socioeconomic factors and health care utilization with the use of these medications. METHODS: Adults aged ≥20 years old with self-reported diabetes, A1c ≥6.5%, or fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL were identified using the 2015 to March 2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The primary outcome was the use of cardioprotective GLP-1 agonists or SGLT2-inhibitors compared in individuals with and without CVD. Secondary analyses included identification of socioeconomic factors and health care utilization associated with the use of cardioprotective antidiabetic medications, stratified by CVD status. Weighted analyses were conducted to account for the complex survey design. RESULTS: Use of cardioprotective antidiabetic medications was higher in adults with CVD compared to those without CVD (7.8% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.02), which was driven by the use of cardioprotective SGLT2-inhibitors (4.6% versus 1.9%, P = 0.002). Lower income level and less frequent health care visits within the past year were associated with lower likelihood of using these medications. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Despite preferential use in individuals with diabetes and CVD, the prevalence of cardioprotective antidiabetic medication use remains relatively low. Disparities in use appear to exist based on income level and health care utilization.

Prevalence, characteristics, and health-related quality of life of continuous glucose monitoring use according to the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2014-2020.

BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can improve behavioral and clinical outcomes. The use of CGM in real-world practice appears to be increasing. However, actual prevalence and characteristics of using CGM in real-world practice are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of CGM use by American adults with diabetes mellitus and differences in demographics and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between users of CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). METHODS: This serial cross-sectional study using 2014-2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data included nonpregnant adults with self-reported diabetes using CGM or 4-15 times daily SMBG. Outcomes were prevalence of CGM use, demographics, and the 4-item Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HRQOL (CDC HRQOL-4). Unadjusted analysis was performed using univariable regression, and adjusted analysis was performed using nearest neighbor matching to compare CDC HRQOL-4 between SMBG and CGM groups in SAS Studio version 5.2. RESULTS: Among 12,053 included respondents, 231 (1.9%) reported using CGM, and prevalence increased from 0.4% in 2014 to 4.1% in 2020. Compared with SMBG users, CGM users were more likely to be younger (50.3 years vs 56.1 years; P < 0.001), employed (59.6% vs 30.6%; P = 0.001), earn at least $75,000/year (48.5% vs 22.0%, P < 0.001), have insurance coverage (99.7% vs 95.4%; P = 0.005), and report fewer comorbidities (history of myocardial infarction, stroke, arthritis, depressive disorder, and kidney disease; all P < 0.05). After nearest neighbor matching, diabetes management-related characteristics were shown to have statistically significant differences between CGM and SMBG users including: age at diabetes diagnosis (30.6 vs 35.6 years; P = 0.005), not seeing a doctor because of cost concern (2.6% vs 7.8%; P = 0.011), checking hemoglobin A1c biannually (91.3% vs 86.6%; P = 0.047), performing daily foot self-examination (58.9% vs 69.6%; P = 0.028), receiving foot examination by a health care professional annually (87.9% vs 93.5%; P = 0.048), and receiving a shingles vaccine in the past (16.5% vs 10.1%; P = 0.024). CDC HRQOL-4 were shown to be similar between the 2 groups across the 4 domains (general health, physical, mental, and combined physical and mental health). CONCLUSIONS: An increased trend in CGM use was observed from 2014 to 2020. Economic factors were associated with CGM use over SMBG, and CGM use did not show a difference in HRQOL measured across the 4 domains.

Association between mental health and self-care behavior among older adults with diabetes according to Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2019.

AIM: To assess the association of mental health burden with diabetes-related self-care behaviors and healthcare utilization among older adults. METHOD: This cross-sectional 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) study included ≥ 65 years old adults with self-reported diabetes. Three groups were used based on the number of days in the past month affected by mental health: 0 days (no burden), 1-13 days (occasional burden), and 14-30 days (frequent burden). Primary outcome was performing ≥ 3 of 5 diabetes-related self-care behaviors. Secondary outcome was performing ≥ 3 of 5 healthcare utilization behaviors. Multivariable logistic regression was used in Stata/SE 15.1. RESULTS: Of 14,217 included individuals, 10.2 % reported frequent mental health burden. Compared to 'no burden', 'occasional' and 'frequent burden' groups included more female, obese, not married persons with younger age of diabetes diagnosis, and reported more comorbidities, insulin use, cost-related barriers to see doctors, and diabetes-related eye issues (p < 0.05). 'Occasional/frequent burden' groups reported less self-care and healthcare utilization behaviors, except 30 % higher healthcare utilization was observed in the 'occasional burden' group compared to no burden (aOR 1.30, 95 %CI 1.08-1.58, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, mental health burden was associated with reduced participation in diabetes-related self-care and healthcare utilization behaviors in a stepwise manner, except occasional burden was associated with higher healthcare utilization.

Tirzepatide, the Newest Medication for Type 2 Diabetes: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Clinical Practice.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article was to review pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of tirzepatide, a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through September 7, 2022, using the keyword "tirzepatide." STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Clinical trials with available results were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seven published phase 3, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group trials investigated efficacy and safety of tirzepatide versus placebo, semaglutide, insulin degludec, and insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment. Studies included adults with uncontrolled T2DM and body mass index above 23 or 25 kg/m2. Hemoglobin A1c reduction from baseline was greater with tirzepatide across all studies with absolute reductions up to 3.02% and relative reductions ranging 0.44% (vs semaglutide) to 2.11% (vs placebo). Weight loss was significant. Incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects (AE) was similar to semaglutide, and major cardiovascular events was similar to insulin glargine. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Studies demonstrated greater A1c lowering and weight reduction versus placebo and active comparators with AE similar to semaglutide, suggesting tirzepatide will be a valuable addition to the growing list of antidiabetic medications. Although tirzepatide's effects on major cardiovascular events was not increased when compared with insulin glargine, further evidence is needed to assess long-term implications on cardiovascular outcomes compared with agents with proven cardiovascular benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Tirzepatide has the potential to significantly impact the clinical management of T2DM, and results of ongoing clinical trials will help to fully determine its place in therapy.

Transition from in-person to telehealth standardized patient encounters: A retrospective analysis of 18 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many pedagogical activities shifted from in-person to virtual modalities, including standardized patient (SP) encounters. While many academic institutions may not have previously been conducting SP encounters virtually, this change provided student pharmacists with new opportunities to learn and practice telehealth techniques, which are important with the continuously evolving healthcare landscape. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed pharmacy student performance on and perceptions of SP cases in fall 2019 (in-person) and fall 2020 (telehealth) semesters. The primary objective was to compare average total scores on SP cases from fall 2019 (in-person) and fall 2020 (telehealth) for first-, second-, and third-year pharmacy students (P1, P2, and P3, respectively). Secondary objectives were to compare average scores from case-specific and relationship and communication (R&C) checklists, as well as to describe student perceptions of the pedagogy. RESULTS: Total scores on SP cases decreased from in-person to telehealth for the average of all P1 SP cases, but not for P2 or P3 cases. Case-specific scores did not change, but R&C scores decreased significantly across all three years. Student survey data revealed difficulty with communicating effectively and building rapport via telehealth. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, student performance on in-person vs. telehealth SP encounters was similar, though P1 students performed more poorly on SP cases conducted via telehealth compared to P2 or P3 students. Thus, faculty could consider focusing on in-person encounters for early learners before introducing virtual encounters. This study also highlights the difficulty in establishing rapport when communicating with patients via telehealth.

Design and development of a continuous glucose monitoring educational module for students and practicing pharmacists.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate a 2-week, hands-on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) module on third-year pharmacy students' and practicing pharmacists' knowledge and confidence. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center study. Week 1 included a CGM lecture and sensor placement. Participants then wore a CGM device for 1 week. Week 2 included reviewing CGM reports and patient cases, examining participants' reports, and discussing experiences. Pre-, immediate post-, and long-term post-surveys were administered to assess CGM-related knowledge, confidence, and clinical use. Immediate and long-term change in knowledge and confidence were assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Pre- and immediate post-surveys were completed by 36 students and five pharmacists. Student CGM knowledge improved significantly. Students reported improved confidence for all CGM-specific tasks. Results from the pharmacist participants showed similar trends. Student confidence was maintained long-term, while knowledge trended downward. All participants stated they would recommend the activity. CONCLUSIONS: Students and pharmacists demonstrated improved knowledge and confidence following this 2-week, hands-on CGM module. A hands-on CGM pedagogy is effective at increasing knowledge and confidence regarding this technology.

High-Dose Once-Weekly Semaglutide: A New Option for Obesity Management.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of high-dose once-weekly semaglutide for chronic weight management. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched (inception to September 8, 2021) using keywords "semaglutide" and "obesity," "weight," "high dose," "high-dose," or "2.4." STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Clinical trials with published results were included. Publications studying the oral or <2.4 mg formulation of semaglutide were excluded. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trials demonstrated efficacy of high-dose once-weekly semaglutide compared with placebo for weight loss. Study populations included patients with overweight or obesity (STEP 1, STEP 3, and STEP 4) or patients with diabetes and with overweight or obesity (STEP 2). Lifestyle interventions for diet and exercise were included for all participants. Weight loss from baseline was significant for all studies, and secondary outcomes demonstrated cardiometabolic improvements including waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, and lipid profiles. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were common, but the medication was otherwise well tolerated. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: High-dose semaglutide offers significant weight-lowering potential and favorable effects on cardiometabolic risk factors and glycemic indices. Clinicians and patients should consider the route and frequency of administration, adverse effect profile, and cost when choosing an antiobesity medication. The importance of concomitant lifestyle interventions should be emphasized. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose once-weekly semaglutide can significantly reduce weight, and although gastrointestinal adverse effects were common, it is generally well tolerated.

Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on appetite markers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Glycosuria induced by sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors leads to weight loss and improved diabetes control, but a significant disparity exists between observed and expected weight loss with these medications, hindering clinical effects. This study investigated whether this discrepancy could be explained by compensatory increases in appetite and associated alterations in appetite-regulating hormones. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective single-center observational pilot study. Adults 18-70 years old newly prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor through usual care were invited to participate. Fasting and postprandial appetite was assessed immediately before, 1 week after, and 12 weeks after SGLT2 inhibitor initiation. Serum samples were collected at corresponding time points to measure ghrelin, leptin, and peptide tyrosine-tyrosine (PYY). Seven patients were included. At 1 and 12 weeks after SGLT2 inhibitor initiation, self-reported appetite did not change significantly and trended toward a decrease in appetite. There were no significant differences in fasting or postprandial ghrelin, leptin, or PYY. CONCLUSION: Results suggest the discrepancy between expected and observed weight loss with SGLT2 inhibitors cannot be explained by increases in appetite or changes in appetite-regulating hormones. Further studies are needed to investigate alternative metabolic compensatory mechanisms to optimize weight loss with SGLT2 inhibitor use.

The Authors Respond.

DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Effect of Pharmacist-Driven Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Uncontrolled Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes requires close monitoring to achieve optimal outcomes and avoid adverse effects. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is one approach to measuring glycemia and has become more widespread with recent advances in technology; however, ideal implementation of CGM into clinical practice is unknown. CGM can be categorized as personal CGM, which can be for at-home use to replace self-monitoring of blood glucose, or professional CGM (proCGM), which is used intermittently under the direction of a health care professional. The expanding role of the clinical pharmacist allows pharmacists to be at the forefront of implementing proCGM technology, but literature on the effect of pharmacist-driven proCGM is lacking. Pharmacists and physicians within 1 physician-owned clinic used proCGM technology differently. Pharmacists conducted 1 or 2 office visits to interpret data and make interventions, while physicians interpreted data 1 time and relayed interventions via phone. OBJECTIVES: To (a) compare the change in hemoglobin A1c from baseline to 6 months between the different methods of proCGM implementation, and (b) describe and compare the clinical interventions made as a result of the different methods of proCGM implementation. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, adults identified in the electronic medical record via Current Procedural Terminology code 95250 or 95251 undergoing proCGM with CGM data interpreted and baseline A1c ≥ 7% were included. Patients with additional CGM use within the 6-month follow-up period were excluded. Data collection included demographics, A1c at baseline and during the 6-month follow-up period, and CGM-associated interventions. Patients were categorized as undergoing 1 pharmacist-driven encounter (RPh1), 2 pharmacist-driven encounters (RPh2), or 1 physician-driven encounter (MD1) for proCGM implementation. Combined RPh1 and RPh2 (cRPh) data were also used for analysis. The primary outcome was change in A1c from baseline to 6 months, which was evaluated by analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Of 378 patient charts reviewed, 315 instances of proCGM implementation met inclusion criteria (58 RPh1, 35 RPh2, 222 MD1), and 253 had post-implementation A1c data for analysis of the primary outcome (52 RPh1, 30 RPh2, 171 MD1). Baseline A1c was 8.4%, 8.8%, and 9.1% with mean reduction from baseline to 6 months of 1.0%, 1.3%, and 0.6%, respectively. cRPh patients experienced a greater mean reduction in A1c compared with MD1 (P = 0.002). RPh2 patients had a statistically significant reduction compared with MD1 (P = 0.005), but RPh1 patients did not (P = 0.054). The number of CGM-associated pharmacological interventions was 1.33 for RPh1 patients, 1.63 for RPh2 at the first encounter and 1.34 at the second, and 1.17 for MD1. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist-driven implementation of proCGM was associated with greater A1c reductions and more pharmacological interventions versus physician-driven implementation. This study demonstrated improved clinical outcomes with pharmacists providing direct patient care through implementation of new diabetes technology. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors have nothing to disclose. Preliminary results of this work were presented at the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Virtual Poster Symposium, May 28-29, 2019. The abstract was not peer-reviewed because of enrollment in the Mentored Research Investigator Training (MeRIT) program. Final peer-reviewed results were presented at the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Annual Meeting; October 26-29, 2019; New York, NY.

Implementation and impact of a chronic kidney disease elective for second-year pharmacy students.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pharmacists can make a great impact on the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is a highly prevalent and costly disorder. This article describes the implementation and impact of a CKD elective course for second-year pharmacy students, which aimed to expose students to CKD and enhance their ability to care for these patients. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Topics associated with CKD were covered in a fifteen-week, three credit hour course. Various active-learning techniques were utilized, including student presentations of pharmacotherapy and primary literature, team-based learning though patient case discussions, and interactions with standardized and actual patients. Surveys designed to assess students' career goals and level of confidence with assessing primary literature, delivering presentations to peers, working as members of a team, and communicating with patients were administered at the beginning and end of the course. FINDINGS: Twenty-three students (100%) participated in the initial survey, and nineteen (86.4%) participated in the final survey. Students gave more positive responses on the final survey that they were considering a career in ambulatory care (P=0.03), planning to pursue a career in ambulatory care (P=0.02), considering a career in kidney disease management (P=0.02), and planning to pursue a career in kidney disease management (P=0.0498). Students also felt more confident in their ability to assess primary literature (P=0.005) and deliver presentations to their peers (P=0.02). SUMMARY: Courses such as this can expose students to new and unique career paths and help them develop key skills to promote a successful and fulfilling pharmacy career.

Patient Satisfaction with Medicare Annual Wellness Visits Administered by a Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner.

BACKGROUND: In accordance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Medicare provides coverage for annual wellness visits (AWVs) to eligible beneficiaries, which focus on preventative services, furnish personalized preventative health plans, and direct appropriate referrals. These visits may be conducted by a physician or another licensed practitioner working under the direct supervision of a physician. In North Carolina, pharmacists licensed as clinical pharmacist practitioners (CPPs) may perform and bill for AWVs, but there are limited data on patient satisfaction with pharmacists serving in this advanced role. OBJECTIVES: To (a) investigate patient satisfaction with and perception of an initial Medicare AWV administered by a CPP in an academic internal medicine clinic and (b) examine the relationship between patient satisfaction and the number of interventions or referrals made during an AWV. METHODS: All established patients of an academic internal medicine clinic aged 66 years and older were eligible for AWVs with a CPP, and those completing an AWV with a CPP were eligible for inclusion in this study. Patient satisfaction with the CPP and AWV was assessed by a telephone satisfaction questionnaire administered after the visit by a pharmacy student not affiliated with the clinic. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were included in this study. Patients rated their satisfaction with the CPP at a mean of 4.7 and with the visit at a mean of 4.6 on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 was "very dissatisfied" and 5 was "very satisfied." Using a Likert scale of 1 to 5, where 1 was "strongly disagree" and 5 was "strongly agree," patients responded with a mean of 4.4 that they were comfortable discussing their health information with a CPP and a mean of 4.1 that they were just as comfortable discussing their health information for this visit with a CPP as with their primary care physician. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients were very satisfied with the CPP and AWVs and felt comfortable with CPPs as the providers of this service. As such, this study demonstrates that through Medicare AWVs, pharmacists can provide direct patient care and contribute to team-based initiatives. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study, and the authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Study concept and design were contributed by Cavanaugh and Shilliday, along with Sherrill. The data were collected by Sherrill and Shilliday and interpreted by Sherrill, Cavanaugh, and Shilliday. The manuscript was written and revised by Sherrill, Cavanaugh, and Shilliday. This work was presented at the ASHP Annual Meeting in Las Vegas, Nevada, on December 3, 2012.

Maintenance of Clinical Endpoints After Discharge from a Pharmacist-Managed Risk Reduction Clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension are complex chronic disease states that often require close monitoring and frequent follow-up to achieve and maintain therapeutic control as determined by hemoglobin A1c (A1c), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and blood pressure (BP). At the Charles George Veterans Affairs Medical Center (CGVAMC), physicians may refer their patients to the on-site pharmacist-managed Risk Reduction Clinic (RRC). Patients are discharged from the RRC once patient-specific therapeutic goals have been met for diabetes, dyslipidemia, and/or hypertension. This study investigated the change in A1c, LDL, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) after discharge from the CGVAMC RRC. OBJECTIVES: To investigate (a) how clinical endpoints for diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension change after discharge from the pharmacist-managed RRC at the CGVAMC; (b) the factors associated with worsening of monitoring parameters; and (c) the frequency of reconsultation to the RRC. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective quality management study, patients were included if they had a completed consultation to the CGVAMC RRC between August 11, 2008, and January 1, 2011, for the management of type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and/or hypertension. Patients were included if they were discharged from the RRC prior to October 1, 2011, due to goal attainment. Furthermore, it was required that patients have A1c, LDL, and SBP measurements, as applicable based on diagnoses, at least yearly during the first 2 years following discharge. Patients were excluded if they were discharged for any reason other than goal attainment or if they were followed by a specialty clinic related to the RRC, including the Diabetes PharmD, Diabetes MD, MIDAS (group diabetes), or MAGIC (group dyslipidemia) clinics. Data collection included patient demographics; date of and indication for consultation to the RRC; date of first RRC visit; date of discharge from the RRC; number of visits to the RRC; A1c, LDL, SBP, and weight at consultation to the RRC, at discharge, and during the 2 years following discharge from the RRC; and date of and indication for reconsultation to the RRC, as applicable. Two-tailed paired t-tests were used to compare A1c, LDL, and SBP at discharge from the RRC to A1c, LDL, and SBP during the follow-up period. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests were performed to determine which variables were associated with changes in the monitoring parameters after discharge from the RRC. RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine patients were included in this study. For all patients with a diagnosis of diabetes (N = 82), A1c rose from 6.49% to 6.79% (P < 0.001) during the first year and to 7.04% (P < 0.001) during the second year following discharge. For patients diagnosed with dyslipidemia (N = 137), LDL rose after discharge from 81.5 mg/dL to 90.8 mg/dL (P < 0.001) and to 90.9 mg/dL (P < 0.001), respectively. For patients diagnosed with hypertension (N = 132), SBP rose from 126.2 mm Hg to 131.5 mm Hg (P < 0.001) and to 133.9 mm Hg (P < 0.001), respectively. An increase in A1c after discharge was associated with lower discharge A1c (P = 0.014), higher consultation weight (P = 0.009), and higher discharge weight (P = 0.042). A rise in LDL was correlated to higher consultation LDL (P = 0.006), while higher SBP was associated with lower discharge SBP (P < 0.001). Twelve percent of patients were reconsulted to the RRC. CONCLUSIONS: A1c, LDL, and SBP rose after discharge from the pharmacist-managed risk reduction clinic, but these changes may not have been clinically significant based on the low reconsultation rate and values remaining close to generally accepted therapeutic goals. Patients likely to benefit from extending RRC services past goal attainment include those with higher A1c and LDL at the time of consultation and those with higher weight. As a result of this study, recommendations have been made to consider following up every 3-4 months for 2-3 additional visits for patients with baseline A1c > 8% and LDL > 115 mg/dL and those with weight > 220 pounds prior to discharging them from the CGVAMC RRC. Furthermore, we believe that all patients could benefit from extending follow-up to 6 months for 1-2 additional visits or as needed after their therapeutic goals have been reached.

Medicare annual wellness visits conducted by a pharmacist in an internal medicine clinic.

PURPOSE: The clinical and financial outcomes of an initial Medicare annual wellness visit (AWV) administered by a clinical pharmacist practitioner (CPP) in an academic internal medicine clinic are described. SUMMARY: As a result of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Medicare Part B allows for coverage of an AWV at no cost to eligible beneficiaries. The AWV is directed at health prevention, disease detection, and coordination of screening available to beneficiaries. CPPs are pharmacists who are recognized as advanced practice providers in the state of North Carolina and are authorized to administer AWVs. Eligible Medicare beneficiaries at least 65 years of age in an academic internal medicine clinic were mailed invitations to schedule an AWV. Patients who scheduled an AWV were mailed a packet to complete before the visit. During the visit, the packet was reviewed and interventions were made based on prespecified criteria derived from evidence-based medicine recommendations. After completion of the AWV, patients were provided with a detailed and individualized prevention plan. Between August 2011 and May 2012, 98 patients attended an AWV, all performed by the same CPP. The average time from check in to checkout for all patients was 73 minutes. The CPP made 441 interventions during these 98 visits, averaging 4.5 interventions per AWV completed. All initial AWVs were reimbursable up to a maximum of $159.38 per visit. CONCLUSION: A Medicare AMV administered by a CPP resulted in a wide variety of patient interventions and reimbursement for services provided.