Double-blind, multicenter trial to compare the efficacy of intramuscular dihydroergotamine plus hydroxyzine versus intramuscular meperidine plus hydroxyzine for the emergency department treatment of acute migraine headache.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate intramuscular dihydroergotamine in direct comparison with opioid analgesia in the treatment of acute migraine headache. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind trial performed in the emergency departments of 11 general hospitals in the United States. One hundred seventy-one patients between the ages of 18 and 60 years who presented to the ED with acute migraine headache were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1 mg dihydroergotamine (DHE) or 1.5 mg/kg meperidine (MEP) by intramuscular injection. The anti-nauseant hydroxyzine (H) was coadministered in both treatment groups. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-six patients were evaluable. Treatment groups were comparable in sample size, demographics, and baseline measurements of headache pain. Reduction of headache pain as measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale was 41+/-33 mm (53.5% reduction) for the DHE group, and 45+/-30 mm (55.7% reduction) for the MEP group at 60 minutes after treatment (difference=2.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -10%, 14.5%; P=.81). Reduction in the severity of nausea and improvement in functional ability were similar between treatment groups. Central nervous system adverse events were less common in the DHE group (DHE 23.5% versus MEP 37.6%, difference-14.1%: 95% CI -28%, 0%). In particular, dizziness was reported less commonly with DHE than MEP (2% versus 15%, difference=-13%: 95% CI -21%, -5%). CONCLUSION: In this prospective, double-blind trial of a convenience sample of ED patients randomly assigned to one of two treatment regimens, DHE and MEP were comparable therapies for acute migraine. The use of DHE avoids several problems associated with opioid analgesia, including dizziness.

Effectiveness of transnasal butorphanol for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain.

A prospective, open-label study of the effectiveness of transnasal butorphanol in the treatment of pain resulting from musculoskeletal injuries. Twenty-eight patients with strains (n = 20), fractures (n = 6), contusions (n = 1), and stab wounds (n = 1) were included. All patients were examined by an attending level emergency medicine physician and deemed to have pain severe enough to warrant parenteral narcotic analgesia. All patients received an initial 1-mg dose of transnasal butorphanol. Subsequent dosing was flexible depending on response to the initial dose. All patients received pain relief from transnasal butorphanol, and only one requested alternative analgesic medication. Fifty-seven percent (n = 16) of patients noticed at least a little relief of pain within 5 minutes of administration and 93% (n = 26) received at least a little relief within 15 minutes. Seventy-one percent of the patients received a 50% reduction of pain within 60 minutes. No serious side effects were noted, but drowsiness occurred in 82% (n = 23) and dizziness in 54% (n = 15) of the patients. One patient discontinued participation in the study because of nausea. In this limited trial transnasal butorphanol proved to be a rapidly effective opioid analgesic. Further controlled studies comparing transnasal butorphanol with standard parenteral narcotics are needed.

Stab wounds to the abdomen: failure of blunt probing to predict peritoneal penetration.

A study was conducted to examine the usefulness of blunt probing for evaluation of penetrating abdominal trauma. Ten anesthetized adult beagles weighing 8 to 17 kg were sacrificed by ventricular fibrillation following a standardized resuscitation protocol. Immediately thereafter, the abdomen was shaved and ten stab wounds were placed in the abdomen of each dog with #11 blade. A separate individual probed the wounds sequentially with a cotton swab and predicted on the basis of this examination whether the wound penetrated the parietal peritoneum (deep) or not (superficial). The abdomen then was opened and reflected, by a midline incision, and peritoneal penetration was verified visually by two observers. Statistical analysis of data was performed using the z test for binomial proportions. Fifty-nine of the 100 wounds were found to penetrate the parietal peritoneum. Examiners predicted 35 correctly, but called 24 of 59 superficial. Thirty-eight of 41 superficial wounds were identified correctly; three were incorrectly called deep. Sensitivity was .59 (z = 1.432, P greater than .5); specificity was .93 (z = 5.466, P less than .001). Blunt probing may be a useful technique if peritoneal penetration is determined, but it is inaccurate in predicting peritoneal nonpenetration. If violation of the peritoneum is not determined with this technique, other methods must be used.