The choice of chromatographic resin for the purification of recombinant lysostaphin affects its activity.

Lysostaphin is a zinc-dependent endopeptidase that is effective against both antibiotic-sensitive and antibiotic-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Lysostaphin is typically purified on cation-exchange or metal-chelate affinity resins, and there are data indicating potential influence of the chromatographic resin on the lysostaphin activity. In this study, we systematically investigated the impact of the resin used to purify the recombinant lysostaphin on its activity. To this end, recombinant lysostaphin with an additional histidine tag at the C-terminus was purified using a cation-exchange resin, three types of nickel-chelate resins with different strength of metal ion binding, or a zinc-chelate resin. Lysostaphin samples purified on the cation-exchange resin (WorkBeads 40S), the nickel-chelate resin with a strong nickel ion binding (WorkBeads NiMAC), and the zinc-chelate resin (WorkBeads NTA with immobilized zinc ions) had equal activity. On the contrary, the activity of lysostaphin preparations purified on nickel-chelate resins with medium (WorkBeads Ni-NTA) and relatively weak (WorkBeads Ni-IDA) nickel ion binding was significantly reduced. The decrease in activity can be explained by the interaction of lysostaphin with the nickel ions leached from the resin and is caused by either the exchange of the zinc ion in the lysostaphin active center with a nickel ion from the resin, or binding of an additional ion that inhibits the enzymatic activity. Removal of the metal ions from the active site of lysostaphin and subsequent incorporation of the native zinc ions lead to complete restoration of the activity of the enzyme.

A Simple Protocol for the Determination of Lysostaphin Enzymatic Activity.

Antibacterial lysins are enzymes that hydrolyze bacterial peptidoglycan, which results in the rapid death of bacterial cells due to osmotic lysis. Lysostaphin is one of the most potent and well-studied lysins active against important nosocomial pathogen Staphylococcus aureus. Similarly to most other lysins, lysostaphin is composed of enzymatic and peptidoglycan-binding domains, and both domains influence its antibacterial activity. It is thus desirable to be able to study the activity of both domains independently. Lysostaphin cleaves pentaglycine cross-bridges within the staphylococcal peptidoglycan. Here, we report the protocol to study the catalytic activity of lysostaphin on the isolated pentaglycine peptide that is based on the chromogenic reaction of peptide amino groups with ninhydrin. Unlike previously reported assays, this protocol does not require in-house chemical synthesis or specialized equipment and can be readily performed in most laboratories. We demonstrate the use of this protocol to study the effect of EDTA treatment on the lysostaphin enzymatic activity. We further used this protocol to determine the catalytic efficiency of lysostaphin on the isolated pentaglycine and compared it to the apparent catalytic efficiency on the whole staphylococcal cells. These results highlight the relative impact of enzymatic and peptidoglycan-binding domains of lysostaphin on its bacteriolytic activity.

Fusion of Lysostaphin to an Albumin Binding Domain Prolongs Its Half-Life and Bactericidal Activity in the Systemic Circulation.

Antibacterial lysins are promising proteins that are active against both antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains. However, a major limitation of antibacterial lysins is their fast elimination from systemic circulation. PEGylation increases the plasma half-life of lysins but renders them inactive. Here we report the construction of a fusion protein of lysostaphin, a potent anti-staphylococcal lysin, and an albumin-binding domain from streptococcal protein G. The resulting fusion protein was less active than the parent enzyme lysostaphin, but it still retained significant antibacterial activity even when bound to serum albumin. The terminal half-life of the fusion protein in rats was five-fold greater than that of lysostaphin (7.4 vs. 1.5 h), and the area under the curve increased more than 115 times. Most importantly, this increase in systemic circulation time compensated for the decrease in activity. The plasma from rats that received an injection of the fusion protein retained bactericidal activity for up to 7 h, while plasma from rats that received plain lysostaphin lacked any detectable activity after 4 h. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an antibacterial lysin with both improved pharmacokinetic parameters and prolonged bactericidal activity in the systemic circulation.

The Influence of Dimerization on the Pharmacokinetics and Activity of an Antibacterial Enzyme Lysostaphin.

The increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains of pathogenic bacteria is a major healthcare problem. Antibacterial lysins are enzymes that cleave the peptidoglycan of the bacterial cell wall. These proteins hold potential as a supplement or an alternative to traditional antibiotics since they are active against antibiotic resistant strains. However, antibacterial lysins are rapidly eliminated from the systemic circulation, which limits their application. Dimerization of an anti-pneumococcal lysin Cpl-1 has been demonstrated to decrease the clearance rate of this protein in mice. In the present work, we constructed a dimer of an anti-staphylococcal lysin lysostaphin by fusing it with an anti-parallel α-helical dimerization domain. Lysostaphin dimer had a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile with increased terminal half-life and area under the curve (AUC) values compared to monomeric lysostaphin. However, the staphylolytic activity of dimerized lysostaphin was decreased. This decrease in activity was likely caused by the dimerization; since the catalytic efficacy of lysostaphin dimer towards pentaglycine peptide was unaltered. Our results demonstrate that, although dimerization is indeed beneficial for the pharmacokinetics of antibacterial lysins, this approach might not be suitable for all lysins, as it can negatively affect the lysin activity.