Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Interv Cardiol ; 23(4): 377-81, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20624201

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To evaluate the Prokinetic bare metal stent implanted in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: We retrospectively studied ACS patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a Prokinetic stent implantation. Excluded were patients presenting with cardiogenic shock, undergoing PCI to left main coronary artery (LM), or having implantation of additional stents other than Prokinetic. Six and 12 months clinical follow-up was obtained by phone. RESULTS: A total of 140 Prokinetic stents were implanted in 117 patients (age 64+/-13.0 years, 78% men). Thirty two percent of the patients had unstable angina, 36% had non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and 33% had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Forty two percent of lesions were categorized as B2 and 21% as C type. Procedural success was achieved in 99.1% of lesions. Clinical success was achieved in 97.4% of patients. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate was 8.5% and 11.1% at 6 and 12 months follow-up, respectively. The incidence of cardiac death, MI and TLR was 2.6%, 3.4% and 2.6%, respectively at 6 months, and 4.3%, 4.3%, 2.6% respectively at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months after Prokinetic stent implantation are excellent and may be attributable to its unique combination of composition, design and coating.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Stents , Acute Coronary Syndrome/mortality , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Restenosis/epidemiology , Coronary Thrombosis/epidemiology , Coronary Thrombosis/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 10(6): 435-9, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18669142

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many electrophysiologists recommend implantable cardioverter defibrillators for patients with Brugada syndrome who are cardiac arrest survivors or presumed at high risk of sudden death (patients with syncope or a familial history of sudden death or those with inducible ventricular fibrillation at electrophysiologic study). OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and complications of ICD therapy in patients with Brugada syndrome. METHODS: The indications, efficacy and complications of ICD therapy in all patients with Brugada syndrome who underwent ICD implantation in 12 Israeli centers between 1994 and 2007 were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 59 patients (53 males, 89.8%) with a mean age of 44.1 years. At diagnosis 42 patients (71.2%) were symptomatic while 17 (28.8%) were asymptomatic. The indications for ICD implantation were: a history of cardiac arrest (n = 11, 18.6%), syncope (n = 31, 52.5%), inducible VF in asymptomatic patients (n = 14, 23.7%), and a family history of sudden death (n = 3, 0.5%). The overall inducibility rates of VF were 89.2% and 93.3% among the symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, respectively (P = NS). During a follow-up of 4-160 (45 +/- 35) months, all patients (except one who died from cancer) are alive. Five patients (8.4%), all with a history of cardiac arrest, had appropriate ICD discharge. Conversely, none of the patients without prior cardiac arrest had appropriate device therapy during a 39 +/- 30 month follow-up. Complications were encountered in 19 patients (32%). Inappropriate shocks occurred in 16 (27.1%) due to lead failure/dislodgment (n = 5), T wave oversensing (n = 2), device failure (n = 1), sinus tachycardia (n = 4), and supraventricular tachycardia (n = 4). One patient suffered a pneumothorax and another a brachial plexus injury during the implant procedure. One patient suffered a late (2 months) perforation of the right ventricle by the implanted lead. Eleven patients (18.6%) required a reintervention either for infection (n = 1) or lead problems (n = 10). Eight patients (13.5%) required psychiatric assistance due to complications related to the ICD (mostly inappropriate shocks in 7 patients). CONCLUSIONS: In this Israeli population with Brugada syndrome treated with ICD, appropriate device therapy was limited to cardiac arrest survivors while none of the other patients including those with syncope and/or inducible VF suffered an arrhythmic event. The overall complication rate was high.


Subject(s)
Brugada Syndrome/therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Israel , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...