[Prenatal diagnosis of a case with Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to compound heterozygous variants of SCN4A gene].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical and genetic characteristics of a fetus diagnosed with Congenital myasthenic syndrome type 16 (CMS16). METHODS: A couple who had visited Tianjin Medical University General Hospital in February 2018 due to "adverse outcome of two pregnancies" was selected as the study subject. Clinical data was gathered. Peripheral blood and amniotic fluid samples were collected and subjected to whole exome sequencing (WES). Candidate variant was verified by Sanger sequencing. Low-depth whole-genome sequencing was carried out to detect copy number variation (CNV) in the fetus. RESULTS: The couple's first pregnancy had resulted in a miscarriage at 27+5 weeks, when ultrasound had revealed pleural effusion and polyhydramnios in the fetus. Their second pregnancy was terminated at 30+5 weeks due to fetal hand malformations, polyhydramnios and pleural fluid. Both couple had denied family history of genetic conditions. For their third pregnancy, no CNV abnormality was detected, whilst a compound heterozygous variants, including a maternally derived c.3172C>T (p.R1058W) and paternal c.1431delG (p.K477fs*89) in the SCN4A gene were detected. Based on the guidelines from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, the c.3172C>T (p.R1058W) was predicted as a likely pathogenic variant (PM1+PM2_supporting+PP3+PP4), whilst the c.1431delG (p.K477fs*89) was predicted as a pathogenic variant (PVS1+PM2_supporting+PP4). CONCLUSION: The c.3172C>T (p.R1058W) and c.1431delG (p.K477fs*89) compound heterozygous variants of the SCN4A gene probably underlay the CMS16 in the third fetus.

[Genetic analysis of a fetus with mosaicism Y chromosome aberration].

OBJECTIVE: To carry out prenatal diagnosis for a fetus with mosaicism Yq deletion. METHODS: A fetus with high risk of sex chromosomes indicated by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital in July 2021 was selected as the study subject. Prenatal diagnosis of the fetus was performed with combined G-banded chromosomal karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq), real-time fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR), and ultrasound examination. RESULTS: Analysis of the amniocytes at 23 gestational weeks had yielded a 45,X karyotype. However, FISH had shown signals of Y chromosome. Re-examination by cordocentesis had shown a mosaicism of 46,X,+mar[33]/45,X[17]. FISH showed that 69% of the cells had contained Y chromosome signals. The result of CNV-seq was seq[19]del(Y)(q11.1q12)(mos) chrY: g.13200001_ 28820000del (mosaicism rate = 64%), which suggested mosaicism for a Yq deletion, which encompassed the azoospermia factor (AZF) region. Deletion of the AZF region was verified by QF-PCR. The fetal karyotype was ultimately determined as mos46,X,del(Y)(q11.1)[33]/45,X[17]. Although ultrasound examination had shown no abnormality in the fetus, the couple had opted to terminate the pregnancy, and the induced fetus had a normal male appearance. CONCLUSION: The combined use of multiple techniques is beneficial for accurate and rapid prenatal diagnosis. For fetuses with mosaicism chromosomal abnormalities, it may be difficult to accurately predict the postnatal phenotype. It is therefore necessary to further explore their genotype-phenotype correlation in order to provide better guidance upon genetic counseling.

[Clinical application and evaluation of health economics for non-invasive prenatal testing of fetuses in Tianjin].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical efficacy and health economic value of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the prenatal screening of common fetal chromosomal aneuploidies. METHODS: 10 612 pregnant women from October 2017 to December 2019 presented at the antenatal screening clinic of the General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University were selected as the study subjects. Results of NIPT and invasive prenatal diagnosis and follow-up outcome for the 10 612 pregnant women were retrospectively analyzed and compared. Meanwhile, NIPT data for two periods were analyzed for assessing the health economic value of NIPT as the second- or first-tier screening strategy for the prenatal diagnosis of fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13. RESULTS: The NIPT was successful in 10 528 (99.72%) subjects, with the sensitivity for fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 being 100%, 92.86% and 100%, and the positive predictive value (PPV) being 89.74%, 61.90% and 44.44%, respectively. The PPV of NIPT for sex chromosome aneuploidies was 34.21%. Except for one false negative case of trisomy 18, the negative predictive value for trisomy 21, trisomy 13 and other chromosomal abnormalities were 100%. For pregnant women with high risk by serological screening, advanced maternal age or abnormal ultrasound soft markers, NIPT has yielded a significantly increased high risk ratio. There was no statistical difference in the PPV of NIPT among pregnant women from each subgroup. NIPT would have higher health economic value as a second-tier screening until 2019, while compared to 2015 ~ 2017, its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio as a first-tier screening had declined clearly. CONCLUSION: The screening efficacy of NIPT for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 for a mixed population is significantly better than conventional serological screening, but it is relatively low for sex chromosomal abnormalities. NIPT can also be recommended for populations with relatively high risks along with detailed pre- and post-test genetic counselling. From the perspective of health economics, except for open neural tube defects, it is possible for NIPT to replace the conventional serological screening in the future as its cost continues to decrease.

Abnormal chromosomes identification using chromosomal microarray.

In this study, we presented a case series to highlight the chromosomal microarray (CMA) in identifying chromosomal abnormalities which is undetectable by conventional karyotyping or known abnormal chromosomes without clear diagnosis. Extensive studies showed that CMA was gradually accepted as a prenatal invasive testing during pregnancy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic effect of CMA for foetuses with abnormal chromosomes unrecognised by conventional karyotyping. Pregnant women who need prenatal diagnosis with all indications were enrolled in this study. For aberrant cytogenetic findings that cannot be defined by routine karyotyping, single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) was used. Six cases with abnormal karyotype were included in the study. With higher resolution of translocation breakpoints, CMA could detect smaller chromosomal imbalances that were undetectable by karyotyping. This study highlights the value of CMA for the detection of submicroscopic abnormalities in foetuses that cannot be detected by conventional karyotyping. Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Chromosomal microarray (CMA) offers additional diagnostic benefits by revealing submicroscopic imbalances or copy number variations (CNVs) that are too small to be identified on a standard G-banded chromosome preparation.What do the results of this study add? We added a case series to highlight the CMA in identifying chromosomal abnormalities not detectable by conventional karyotyping or known abnormal chromosomes without clear diagnosis.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This study highlights the value of CMA in the case of associated foetuses with submicroscopic abnormalities that cannot detect by conventional karyotyping.

Evaluation of the practical applications of fluorescence in situ hybridization in the prenatal diagnosis of positive noninvasive prenatal screenings.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the application value and limitations of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in prenatal diagnosis of positive results for trisomies 13, 18, 21 (T13, T18, T21) and sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) indicated by noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS). METHODS: Samples from women who underwent prenatal diagnosis for the indication of positive NIPS of T13, T18, T21, and SCAs were collected. Each sample was split into two for both karyotype analysis and FISH analysis. The efficiency and consistency of FISH were assessed for the detection of chromosome abnormalities in the indications of positive NIPS results compared with karyotyping. RESULTS: A total of 649 pregnant women who scored positive for clinical significance of fetal chromosome abnormalities by NIPS were enrolled in our study, including T 13 (6%), T18 (14.3%), T21 (44.7%), SCAs (35.0%). From the following diagnostic test, the positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPS for T13, T18, T21, and SCAs was 17.9, 60.2, 89.3, and 43.6% respectively. FISH analysis was successful in all samples. Compared with karyotyping, the sensitivity and specificity were 98.3 and 100%, respectively. 95.7% (621/649) were fully concordant with karyotyping. 3.2% (21/649) cases were incompletely concordant with the karyotyping, among these cases, the FISH analysis identified all the aneuploidies, but karyotyping analysis provided more information about the chromosomal structure. There were 7 cases (1.1%, 7/649) of anomalies diagnosed by karyotype but missed out by FISH, all of which occurred in cases with the indication of SCAs. If the indications were confined to cases with a positive NIPS of T13, T18, T21, the diagnostic consistency of the two methods almost perfectly agree, and all the aneuploidies were detected by the FISH assay. FISH analysis was highly consistent in determining whether the fetus was euploid or not in the prenatal diagnosis for the patients with positive NIPS results compared with karyotyping (kappa= 0.976, p < .01). CONCLUSION: For the prenatal diagnostic indications of positive NIPS of T13, T18, T21, and SCAs, FISH was equally efficacious in identifying aneuploidies and provided a quick diagnosis to alleviate anxiety. However, the missed risk of FISH analysis for structural chromosomal abnormalities should be taken seriously and fully informed during genetic counseling.

Efficiency of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the efficiency of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for screening fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) through sequencing of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma. METHODS: This is a retrospective study on the positive NIPT results for SCAs collected from our hospital between January 2012 and December 2018. Samples with positive NIPT results for SCAs were then confirmed by prenatal or postnatal karyotyping analysis. RESULTS: After cytogenetic analysis, abnormal karyotypes were confirmed in 104 cases and the overall positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT for SCAs was 43.40% (102/235). The most frequently detected karyotypes included 47,XXY (n = 42), 47,XXX (n = 20), 47,XYY (n = 16), and 45,X (n = 2). Meanwhile, 10 cases were confirmed with mosaic karyotype 45,X/46,XX and 14 cases with numerical or structural chromosome abnormalities, including a double trisomy 48,XXX,+18. Cytogenetic results from the other 131 cases showed normal XX or XY, which were discordant with NIPT results. Upon analysis of parental karyotypes, 29 (12.34%) showed false positivity in NIPT results that were caused by maternal sex chromosome abnormalities. CONCLUSION: NIPT is an effective screening tool for SCA with a PPV of 43.40%. Maternal karyotype abnormalities occurred in 12.34% of the cases with abnormal NIPT. Diagnostic testing of the fetus and the mother are recommended.

Discovery of a Chinese familial deletion 18p syndrome due to a false positive result on noninvasive prenatal testing.

Clinical manifestations of deletion 18p syndrome vary a lot, which makes it easily overlooked in the clinical practice. Familial transmission of deletion 18p syndrome is rare. We report a Chinese familial deletion 18p syndrome, which was diagnosed by anatomizing the underlying reason for the discrepancy between noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and prenatal diagnosis. A 35-year-old pregnant woman was recruited to our center owing to the abnormal NIPT result with a high risk of chromosome 18 monosomy. However, the karyotype of the fetus was normal after amniocentesis. Further analysis indicated that the pregnant woman herself had an abnormal karyotype of 46,XX,del(18)(p11.2), (arr18p11.32p11.21[136,227-15,099,116]×1) and her first 12-year-old son had got the same deletion of 18p as her. A distinct phenotype variability was noted although they share identical deletion. We consider that adequate clinical genetic counseling is vital for women with adverse pregnancy history before getting pregnant. Maternal CNVs may be one of the main causes of the false-positive result on NIPT. NIPT, especially extended NIPT may provide extra valuable evidence when used as routine prenatal screening method.

Fetal aneuploidy screening by non-invasive prenatal testing of maternal plasma DNA sequencing with "false negative" result due to confined placental mosaicism: A case report.

RATIONALE: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is an accurate screening method with high specificity and sensitivity and a low false-positive rate of trisomy 21, 18, and 13. However, false-negative NIPT results could also limit the clinical application of NIPT. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 34-year-old primigravida woman who underwent NIPT at 16 + 3 weeks' gestation was identified as being at high risk for fetal trisomy X (47, XXX). Fetal cardiac defect and hand posture were observed during prenatal ultrasound examination at the 23rd week of gestation. DIAGNOSES: Amniocentesis conducted at the 24th week of gestation. Fetal karyotyping and FISH identified karyotype 48, XXX, + 18, which indicated that the NIPT failed to detect trisomy 18 in this case. INTERVENTIONS: The couple decided to terminate pregnancy at the 26th week of gestation and was willing to undergo further examinations. OUTCOMES: Discordant results between fetus with trisomy 18 and placenta with mosaic T18 were further identified with massive parallel sequencing, which might be due to that the fetal cell-free DNA in maternal plasma for NIPT that was assessed principally originated from the trophoblast cells. LESSONS: The presence of trisomy 18 mosaicism in the placenta might be the reason for the false-negative NIPT result in this case of double aneuploidy with 48, XXX, + 18, karyotype. Although the NIPT is a valuable screening method that has evident advantages in prenatal aneuploidy screening for certain chromosomal abnormalities compared to other methods, it is not a "diagnostic test" yet.

A novel mutation of the MITF gene in a family with Waardenburg syndrome type 2: A case report.

Waardenburg syndrome (WS) is an autosomal dominant disorder with varying degrees of sensorineural hearing loss, and accumulation of pigmentation in hair, skin and iris. There are four types of WS (WS1-4) with differing characteristics. Mutations in six genes [paired box gene 3 (PAX3), microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF), endothelin 3 (END3), endothelin receptor type B (EDNRB), SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 10 (SOX10) and snail homolog 2 (SNAI2)] have been identified to be associated with the various types. This case report describes the investigation of genetic mutations in three patients with WS2 from a single family. Genomic DNA was extracted, and the six WS-related genes were sequenced using next-generation sequencing technology. In addition to mutations in PAX3, EDNRB and SOX10, a novel heterozygous MITF mutation, p.Δ315Arg (c.944_946delGAA) on exon 8 was identified. This is predicted to be a candidate disease-causing mutation that may affect the structure and function of the enzyme.

Genetic polymorphisms of short tandem repeat loci D13S305, D13S631 and D13S634 in the Han population of Tianjin, China.

Short tandem repeat (STR) markers, also known as microsatellites, are extensively used in mapping studies, forensics and disease diagnosis due to their small dimension and low mutation and high polymorphism rates. In recent years quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) has been successfully used to amplify STR markers in the prenatal diagnosis of common chromosomal abnormalities. This method provides a diagnosis of common aneuploidies 24-48 h after sampling with low error rates and cost; however, the size of different alleles, frequency, heterozygosity and distribution of STR markers vary among different populations. In the present study three STR markers, D13S305, D13S631 and D13S634, on chromosome 13 were analyzed in 350 unrelated individuals (200 males and 150 females) from the Han population of Tianjin, China using QF-PCR. Eleven, seven and 11 alleles of each marker were observed, respectively. The frequencies of the genotypes were in good agreement with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P>0.05). The results showed that these three STR markers were highly polymorphic in the Han population of Tianjin, China. The study has provided basic data for use in the prenatal diagnosis of Patau syndrome.

[Diagnosis of Down's syndrome using short tandem repeat loci D21S11, D21S1440 and Penta D].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of genetic diagnosis of Down's syndrome (DS) using short tandem repeat (STR), and to develop a rapid and accurate method for diagnosing DS. METHODS: Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) was used to amplify STR loci D21S11, D21S1440 and Penta D of 719 samples. Three hundred and eighty-nine samples were peripheral blood, 282 were amniotic fluid, 48 were chorionic villous samples. The products were analyzed using eleterophoresis to detect DS. RESULTS: Among 652 samples with a normal karyotype, 635 showed 2 bands with a 1:1 ratio or a single band. The remaining 17 samples showed 3 bands, and were regarded as false positive results. For 67 DS samples, 53 showed 3 bands/peaks with a 1:1:1 ratio and 14 showed 2 bands/peaks with a 2:1 ratio. The sensitivity and specificity of STR loci D21S11, D21S1440 and Penta D were 76.12% and 98.62%, 71.64% and 98.93%, 89.55% and 99.85%, respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of 3 STR loci were 100% (67/67) and 97.39% (635/652), respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional method, author's method is simpler, more stable and rapid, and can be used for large-scale prenatal screening of DS.