Development of Nursing Clinical Judgment Scale

Purpose@#This study aimed to develop a nursing clinical judgment scale (NCJS) and verify its validity and reliability in assessing the clinical judgment of nurses. @*Methods@#A preliminary instrument of the NCJS comprising 38 items was first developed from attributes and indicators derived from a literature review and an in-depth/focus interview with 12 clinical nurses. The preliminary tool was finalized after 7 experts conducted a content validity test based on a data from a preliminary survey of 30 hospital nurses in Korea. Data were collected from 443 ward, intensive care unit, emergency room nurses who voluntarily participated in the survey through offline and online for the verification of the construct validity and reliability of the scale. @*Results@#The final scale comprised 23 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Six factors – integrated data analysis, evaluation and reflection on interventions, evidence on interventions, collaboration among health professionals, patient-centered nursing, and collaboration among nurse colleagues – accounted for 64.9% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the fit of the measurement model, comprising six factors (root mean square error of approximation = .07, standardized root mean square residual = .04, comparative fit index = .90). Cronbach’s α for all the items was .92. @*Conclusion@#The NCJS is a valid and reliable tool that fully reflects the characteristics of clinical practice, and it can be used effectively to evaluate the clinical judgment of Korean nurses. Future research should reflect the variables influencing clinical judgment and develop an action plan to improve it.

Effects of Nurses' Positive Psychological Capital, Self-Leadership, and Relational Bonds on Organizational Commitment / 간호행정학회지

Purpose@#The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between nurses’ positive psychological capital, self-leadership, relational bonds, and organizational commitment, and to identify factors influencing organizational commitment. @*Methods@#The participants in this study were 199 nurses conveniently selected at one general hospital in Seoul. Data collection was conducted between January 1st and March 31st, 2019, and was analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 23.0 program. @*Results@#The mean score for positive psychological capital was 3.31±0.44, for self-leadership, 3.44±0.40, for relational bonds, 3.54±0.79, and for organizational commitment, 3.81±0.76. Positive psychological capital (r=.40, p<.001), self-leadership (r=.33, p<.001) and relational bonds (r=.51, p<.001) showed significant correlation with organizational commitment. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that positive psychological capital and relational bonds were included in the factors affecting the organizational commitment of clinical nurses. These variables explained 29.0% of organizational commitment. @*Conclusion@#Findings indicate that it is necessary to build effective strategies to enhance positive psychological capital and relational bonds for nurses. Such strategies will result in improved organizational commitment.