Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
In Vivo ; 37(6): 2464-2472, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37905640

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: The COVID-19 pandemic led to the rapid spread of the use of ultraviolet C (UVC) sterilizers in many public facilities. Considering the harmful effects of prolonged exposure to UVC, manufacturing of safe skin care products is an important countermeasure. In continuation of our recent study of water-soluble herbal extracts, the present study aimed at searching for anti-UVC components from fat-soluble herbal extracts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human dermal fibroblast and melanoma cells were exposed to UVC (1.193 W/m2) for 3 min. Viable cell number was determined by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Cell-cycle analysis was performed using a cell sorter. UVC-protective activity was quantified by the selective index (SI), i.e., the ratio of the 50% cytotoxic concentration for unirradiated cells to the concentration that restored viability of UVC-treated cells by 50%. RESULTS: Only lemongrass extract, among 12 fat-soluble herbal extracts, showed significant anti-UVC activity, comparable to that of lignified materials and tannins, but exceeding that of N-acetyl-L-cysteine and resveratrol. Lemongrass extract was highly cytotoxic, producing a subG1 cell population. During prolonged incubation in culture medium, the anti-UVC activity of lemongrass extract, sodium ascorbate and vanillic acid declined with an approximate half-life of <0.7, 5.4-21.6, and 27.8-87.0 h, respectively. CONCLUSION: Removal of cytotoxic principle(s) from lemongrass extract is crucial to producing long-lasting UVC-protective effects.


Subject(s)
Cymbopogon , Plant Extracts , Humans , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Pandemics , Skin , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 199(19): 2349-2355, 2023 Nov 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37652749

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to study the dose reduction effect on occupational exposure of operators and public exposure other than operators when a backscatter shield and a rectangular collimator are used in conjunction with a handheld intraoral X-ray unit. The occupational exposure was reduced to 40% when the backscatter shield was attached to the cone-tip, to 13% when the rectangular collimator was attached and to 7.7% when the backscatter shield and rectangular collimator were used together. On the other hand, the public exposure was reduced to 20% when the rectangular collimator was attached, but the backscatter shield was not effective in reducing the public exposure. Attaching a backscatter shield is effective in reducing the occupational exposure, and a rectangular aperture is effective in reducing the occupational exposure, as well as the public exposure.


Subject(s)
Drug Tapering , Radiography, Dental , Radiation Dosage , X-Rays , Protective Devices
3.
Oral Radiol ; 33(1): 38-44, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28111498

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the dosage and imaging conditions for patients undergoing intraoral radiography at Meikai University Hospital and establish assurance and quality control data. METHODS: Tube voltage, exposure time, and air kinetic energy released per unit mass (air kerma) of three intraoral radiography units were measured. To calculate the patient entrance dose (PED) for each radiograph using Insight film, we extracted data for 1063 patients from their exposure records. The PED was compared with the diagnostic reference level (DRL) from the European Commission and the UK. RESULTS: The tube voltage of the three units was maintained at 60 ± 2 kV. Differences in exposure time were less than 1.7 % for all units. The air kerma rates were well maintained within a 4.2 % error. Based on the patient data, there were no significant differences in the mean exposure times for males and females for all anatomical sites. The mean PED ranged from 1.09 ± 0.31 mGy for the mandibular incisors to 2.42 ± 0.33 mGy for the maxillary molars. The mean PED at the mandibular molars using InSight film was 1.59 ± 0.20 mGy, being less than the recommended value based on the DRL for intraoral radiography in the UK. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that radiographic conditions at the hospital have been properly maintained. This basic quality control data may assist other dental radiation facilities to reduce patient dosage.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...