Relationship between left ventricular lead position using a simple radiographic classification scheme and long-term outcome with resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is likely influenced by the location of the left ventricular (LV) lead. PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of LV lead position with outcome after CRT. METHODS: Two-hundred and fifty patients with LV dysfunction, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III (68%) or IV (32%) symptoms, and QRS durations > or =120 ms were followed for a median of 30 months post-CRT. LV lead position was categorized as anterior (n = 20, 8%), lateral (n = 128, 51%), or posterior (n = 102; 41%) using postero-anterior and lateral postoperative chest radiographs. RESULTS: Median age was 69 years and most (68%) had ischemic LV dysfunction. Clinical response, defined by a > or =1 NYHA class reduction, was lower in patients with an anterior (30%) versus lateral (76%) or posterior (73%) lead position (p = 0.001). An anterior versus nonanterior position was independently associated with a two to three-fold higher risk for nonresponse to CRT, cardiovascular death, death from worsening heart failure or cardiac transplantation, and death from any cause. Repositioning of the LV lead from an anterior to a nonanterior position in seven patients who had not clinically responded to CRT after > or =6 months resulted in clinical improvement in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: An anterior versus nonanterior LV lead position is independently associated with an increased likelihood of nonresponse to CRT and a higher risk of serious outcomes. Repositioning of an anteriorly placed LV lead to a nonanterior position should be considered in CRT nonresponders.

Noninvasive risk assessment early after a myocardial infarction the REFINE study.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether combined assessment of autonomic tone plus cardiac electrical substrate identifies most patients at risk of serious events after myocardial infarction (MI) and to compare assessment at 2 to 4 weeks versus 10 to 14 weeks after MI. BACKGROUND: Methods to identify most patients at risk of serious events after MI are required. METHODS: Patients (n = 322) with an ejection fraction (EF) <0.50 in the initial week after MI were followed up for a median of 47 months. Serial assessment of autonomic tone, including heart rate turbulence (HRT), electrical substrate, including T-wave alternans (TWA), and EF was performed, interpreted blinded, and categorized using pre-specified cut-points where available. The primary outcome was cardiac death or resuscitated cardiac arrest. All-cause mortality and fatal or nonfatal cardiac arrest were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Mean EF significantly increased over the initial 8 weeks after MI. Testing 2 to 4 weeks after MI did not reliably identify patients at risk, whereas testing at 10 to 14 weeks did. The 20% of patients with impaired HRT, abnormal exercise TWA, and an EF <0.50 beyond 8 weeks post-MI had a 5.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4 to 11.3, p < 0.001) higher adjusted risk of the primary outcome. This combination identified 52% of those at risk, with good positive (23%; 95% CI 17% to 26%) and negative (95%; 95% CI 93% to 97%) accuracy. Similar results were observed for the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired HRT, abnormal TWA, and an EF <0.50 beyond 8 weeks after MI reliably identify patients at risk of serious events. (Assessment of Noninvasive Methods to Identify Patients at Risk of Serious Arrhythmias After a Heart Attack; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00399503?order=1; NCT00399503).