ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the learning curve of robotic assisted low anterior resection with diverting loop ileostomy (LARDLI) for low and mid rectal cancer performed by novice in robotic-assisted surgery colorectal surgeon in a public hospital with limited access to the robotic platform. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all low and mid rectal cancer robotic-assisted operations was conducted. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon with a once per week access to the Da Vinci® Si™ Surgical System, Intuitive Surgical Inc. Demographic, clinical, and pathological data were reviewed. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was utilized to analyze learning curve for operative time. Results: A total of 107 consecutive patients who underwent LARDLI for lower and mid rectal cancer between November 2011 and July 2020 were included in the analysis. The median patients' age was 65 (range, 32-85) years, 72% were males (n = 77), and 91% (n = 97) received neoadjuvant therapy. Median operative time was 295.5 (range, 180-551) minutes. The conversion rate was 3.7% (n = 4). Median length of hospital stay was 6 (range, 1-41) days. There were 35 (32.7%) postoperative complications, of these 7 (6.5%) were major complications (≥Grade 3, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification). There was only one intraoperative complication (.9%). CUSUM analysis showed that the learning curve was 49 cases to achieve a plateau. Conclusions: The learning curve of robotic assisted low anterior resection for lower and mid rectal cancer for a novice in robotic surgery colorectal surgeon with limited access to the robotic platform is 49 cases. Surgeon and operative team dedication, alongside sufficient hospital support, may lower the number of cases of the learning curve.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS) is a complex surgical condition which involves structural and functional problems which significantly affects quality of life. There is limited information about the Da-Vinci Robotic System use in the treatment of this condition. This study examines the outcomes of robotic-assisted rectopexy. The primary outcome is recovery from surgery, with secondary outcomes including post-surgical complications, length of hospital stay, rehospitalization rate and recurrence after surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of prospectively collected data for patients who underwent robotic assisted surgery for ODS between 2011-2022. A colorectal surgeon performed all surgeries at the Sheba Medical Center using the Da Vinci™ robotic system. This analysis uses descriptive statistics and presents the results as medians and ranges. RESULTS: Out of 33 patients included, 26 (84.9%) were female. Median age was 67 years (Range:19-85 years). Median American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score was 2 (1-3). Median Charlson's comorbidity score was 3 (0-4). Median patients' Body Mass Index (BMI) was 23.2 (15.6-33.4) kg/m2. Eight patients (24.4%) underwent previous procedure for ODS. Most (23) patients included (69.7%) underwent robotic assisted ventral rectopexy. Other interventions included combined anterior and posterior rectopexy (9.1%), combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy (12.1%) and posterior rectopexy (9.1%). No cases of conversion to laparoscopic /open techniques were recorded. Median operation time was 135 minutes (70-270). One intra-operative complication recorded was an injury to the rectum during anterior dissection (3%). No significant blood loss was recorded. A total of 27 patients (81.8%) were operated using the Da Vinci Si system, and the rest (6) using the 6 Da Vinci Xi system. Two patients had post-operative complications. Median length of stay (LOS) was 4 days (2-6 days). Readmission rate within 30 days was 9.1%. Two patients (6.1%) had recurrence of rectal prolapse. Median follow-up was 60 (4-116) months. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted surgery for obstructed defecation syndrome is safe, with fast recovery of the patient and it is efficient during long-term follow-up.
Subject(s)
Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Female , Aged , Male , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Defecation , Retrospective Studies , Quality of Life , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The peritoneum is a common metastatic site of colorectal cancer (CRC) and associated with worse oncological outcomes. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has been shown to improve outcomes in selected patients. Studies have demonstrated significant difference in survival of patients with primary colon and rectal tumors both in local and in metastatic setting; but only few assessed outcomes of CRS/HIPEC for rectal and colon tumors. We studied the perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for rectal cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database between 2009 and 2021 was performed. RESULTS: 199 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC for CRC. 172 patients had primary colon tumors and 27 had primary rectal tumors. Primary rectal location was associated with longer surgery (mean 4.32, hours vs 5.26 h, p = 0.0013), increased blood loss (mean 441cc vs 602cc, p = 0.021), more blood transfusions (mean 0.77 vs 1.37units, p = 0.026) and longer hospitalizations (mean 10 days vs 13 days, p = 0.02). Median disease-free survival (DFS) was shorter in rectal primary group; 7.03 months vs 10.9 months for colon primaries (p = 0.036). Overall survival was not statistically significant; 53.2 months for rectal and 60.8 months for colon primary tumors. Multivariate analysis indicated origin (colon vs rectum) and Peritoneal Cancer Index to be independently associated with DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with rectal carcinoma undergoing CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal metastasis had worse peri-operative and oncological outcomes. Overall survival was excellent in both groups. This data may be used for risk stratification when considering CRS/HIPEC for patients with rectal primary.
Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Hyperthermia, Induced , Peritoneal Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy , Peritoneum/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Rectum/pathology , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Retrospective Studies , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Survival Rate , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Minimization of the surgical approaches to spinal extradural metastases resection and stabilization was advocated by the 2012 Oncological Guidelines for Spinal Metastases Management. Minimally invasive approaches to spine oncology surgery (MISS) are continually advancing. This paper will describe the evolution of minimally invasive surgical techniques for the resection of metastatic spinal lesions and stabilization in a single institute. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent minimally invasive extradural spinal metastases resection during the years 2013-2019 by a single surgeon was performed. Medical records, imaging studies, operative reports, rates of screw misplacement, operative time and estimated blood loss were reviewed. Detailed description of the surgical technique is provided. Of 138 patients operated for extradural spinal tumors during the study years, 19 patients were treated in a minimally invasive approach and met the inclusion criteria for this study. The mortality rate was significantly improved over the years with accordance of improve selection criteria to better prognosis patients. The surgical technique has evolved over the study years from fluoroscopy to intraoperative 3D imaging and navigation guidance and from k-wire screw insertion technique to one-step screws. Minimally invasive spinal tumor surgery is an evolving technique. The adoption of assistive devices such as intraoperative 3D imaging and one-step screw insertion systems was safe and efficient. Oncologic patients may particularly benefit from the minimization of surgical decompression and fusion in light of the frailty of this population and the mitigated postoperative outcomes associated with MIS oncological procedures.
ABSTRACT
The background of this study is to evaluate the impact of the assistant surgeon's in robotic-assisted proctectomy (RAP) on perioperative outcomes. A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent RAP for rectal adenocarcinoma between 2011 and 2020 was conducted. Patient cohort was divided into three groups based on the assistant surgeon's training level: post-graduate years (PGY) 1-3 surgical residents (Group 1), PGY 4-5 surgical residents (Group 2), and board-certified general surgeons (Group 3). Overall, 175 patients were included in the study: 29 patients (17%) in Group 1, 84 (48%) in Group 2, and 62 (35%) in Group 3. The median tumor distance from the anal verge was 8 cm in all groups (p = 0.73). The median operative time was similar across all groups: 290, 291, and 281 min in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p = 0.69). In a multivariable analysis, the lack of association between assistant training level and procedure time maintained when adjusting for the year of operation (p = 0.84). Patients operated with junior residents as assistant surgeons (Group 1) had a more postoperative complications (p = 0.01) and a slightly longer hospital length of stay [7 days, interquartile range (IQR) 3], compared to those operated by assistant surgeons that were senior residents or attendings (6 IQR 2.5, and 6 IQR 2 in Groups 2 and 3, respectively; p = 0.02). Conversion rates (p = 0.12), intraoperative complications (p = 0.39), major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3; p = 0.32), 30-day readmission (p = 0.45), and mortality (p = 0.99) were similar between the groups. Robotic-assisted proctectomy performed with the assistance of a junior resident was found to be correlated with worse postoperative outcomes compared to more experienced assistants. No difference was seen in intraoperative outcomes.
Subject(s)
Proctectomy , Rectal Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Surgeons , Humans , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Retrospective Studies , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Proctectomy/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Malaria is an infectious disease caused by the Plasmodium protozoa and transmitted by the female Anopheles mosquitos. Delayed diagnosis or treatment could evolve to life threatening complications and mortality that typically occur in children or travelers to endemic areas. In this article, we describe a case of a 6 year old healthy child, who travelled with his family to an endemic area in Ethiopia. A week prior to his hospitalization, the patient developed intermittent fever. The disease, its' risk factors and characteristics are described throughout this article.
Subject(s)
Malaria , Plasmodium , Animals , Humans , Female , Child , Ethiopia , Population Surveillance , Malaria/diagnosis , Malaria/epidemiology , TravelABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Small-bowel obstruction (SBO) after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a common complication associated with re-admission that may alter patients' outcomes. Our aim was to characterize and investigate the impact of bowel obstruction on patients' prognosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with SBO after CRS/HIPEC (n = 392). We analyzed patients' demographics, operative and perioperative details, SBO re-admission data, and long-term oncological outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 366 patients, 73 (19.9%) were re-admitted with SBO. The cause was adhesive in 42 (57.5%) and malignant (MBO) in 31 (42.5%). The median time to obstruction was 7.7 months (range, 0.5-60.9). Surgical intervention was required in 21/73 (28.7%) patients. Obstruction eventually resolved (spontaneous or by surgical intervention) in 56/73 (76.7%) patients. Univariant analysis identified intraperitoneal chemotherapy agents: mitomycin C (MMC) (HR 3.2, p = 0.003), cisplatin (HR 0.3, p = 0.03), and doxorubicin (HR 0.25, p = 0.018) to be associated with obstruction-free survival (OFS). Postoperative complications such as surgical site infection (SSI), (HR 2.2, p = 0.001) and collection (HR 2.07, p = 0.015) were associated with worse OFS. Multivariate analysis maintained MMC (HR 2.9, p = 0.006), SSI (HR 1.19, p = 0.001), and intra-abdominal collection (HR 2.19, p = 0.009) as independently associated with OFS. While disease-free survival was similar between the groups, overall survival (OS) was better in the non-obstruction group compared with the obstruction group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: SBO after CRS/HIPEC is common and complex in management. Although conservative management was successful in most patients, surgery was required more frequently in patients with MBO. Patients with SBO demonstrate decreased survival.