Spot urine protein/creatinine ratios are unreliable estimates of 24 h proteinuria in most systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis flares.

The diagnosis of glomerulonephritis flares in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is usually based on whether the magnitude of proteinuria has changed. Our study tests two methods to assess proteinuric change: protein/creatinine (P/C) ratios of intended 24-h urine collections or that of spot urine samples. Sixty-four patients with glomerulonephritis due to SLE followed in the Ohio SLE Study provided bimonthly paired spot and intended 24-h urine collections. Completeness of each collection was estimated as the ratio of the measured creatinine to the expected creatinine based upon Cockroft-Gault. Intended 24-h urine collections with measured/expected creatinine ratios between 0.5 and 0.9 (237 samples overall) showed ratios that were not significantly different from ratios of complete 24-h urine collections with ratios of 0.9-1.1 (159 samples). To compare spot and 24 h P/C ratios, we randomly selected pairs of samples with measured/expected ratios above 0.75. Consistent with previous studies, spot and 24-h urine P/C ratios showed good correlation over the range of values as well as reasonably strong concordance. Over the range of most SLE glomerulonephritis flares, however, correlation was present but concordance was poor. Our work suggests that the use of spot urine P/C ratios will yield more false-positive and -negative diagnoses of glomerulonephritis flares in patients with SLE than the ratio in 24-h urines.

Evaluation of crystals in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections for the differential diagnosis of pseudogout, gout, and tumoral calcinosis.

Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained sections may not allow proper evaluation of birefringence properties of the crystals in the lesions of pseudogout, gout, and tumoral calcinosis. This study was undertaken to verify the application of a special stain that could facilitate the evaluation of the birefringence properties of these crystals for definitive diagnosis. We evaluated previously described nonaqueous alcoholic eosin staining (NAES) method based on the principle of using alcoholic eosin without hematoxylin and any other aqueous reagents for staining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Two observers, in a blinded fashion, evaluated the sections stained with routine H&E and NEAS method without the knowledge about clinical diagnosis. All pseudogout (nine sections from seven cases) and gout (eight sections from five cases) lesions demonstrated birefringence in the sections stained with NAES method. H&E-stained sections showing the respective diagnostic histomorphology failed to demonstrate the birefringent crystals by polarizing microscopy in all the eight sections from gout and in seven of nine sections from pseudogout. Only two H&E-stained sections showed scant calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) crystals in pseudogout. None of the three sections from two cases of tumoral calcinosis showed birefringence with either stain. We conclude that CPPD in pseudogout and monosodium urate in gout may not polarize in the routine H&E-stained sections. However, polarizing microscopy of sections stained with NAES method allowed demonstration of CPPD crystals with positive birefringence in pseudogout, MSU crystals with negative birefringence in gout, and calcium hydroxyapatite crystals without birefringence in tumoral calcinosis. Section stained with NAES method is a significantly useful adjunct to the routine H&E stain for proper evaluation of the crystals under polarizing microscope in these lesions.