A National Survey of Hand Surgeons: Understanding the Rural Landscape.

BACKGROUND: Twenty percent of the US population is described as being rural and may have limited access to hand surgeons, especially on an emergency basis. Little is known about case type, call hours, employment status, and other relevant details of rural hand surgery. METHODS: We surveyed members of the American Society of Surgery for the Hand to begin to describe the problem. RESULTS: There were 471 responses from 2256 members surveyed with 387 completing 100% of questions asked. Ninety (19%) identified themselves as primarily located in a rural population and 381 (81%) in a metropolitan region. In our study, rural hand surgeons were more likely to be employed by a community hospital, followed by independent private practice, multispecialty group, academics, and then locum tenens. Rural surgeons' practices were 80% solely hand surgery, while metropolitan surgeons' practices were 89% (P < .01). Metropolitan surgeons felt that of the transfers from rural facilities, 46% did not need emergency hand care and that 60% of the time, there was not actually a need for specialty hand surgery care. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey begins to shed light on the details of rural hand surgery practice. We found that rural surgeons are more likely to be employed in community hospitals and take more call. When available, hand surgery specialists could prevent unnecessary transfer of patients to metropolitan areas. More work needs to be done to describe the differences between rural and metropolitan hand surgery practices as well as create rural hand surgeons.

Creating a Rural Plastic Surgery Practice: Social and Financial Impacts.

In the United States, 25 million people are without reasonable access to a plastic surgeon. Previous studies have demonstrated that rural populations have limitations to healthcare, and these limitations result in poor quality of life and poor outcomes. New research points to the importance of rural plastic surgery, but still lacks clarity of what the creation and development of a rural plastic surgery practice may entail. Our aim with this study was to discover both the surgical compilation and financial impact of a single rural plastic surgeon's practice. We reviewed the first 1.5 years of a single surgeon's plastic surgery practice from its beginnings in a rural community at a critical access hospital with no previous plastic surgery presence. During the study period, the surgeon completed 2062 clinic visits and 305 surgeries. The practice involved approximately 70% hand surgery and the remaining general plastic surgery. The practice generated approximately $8 million in charges and $3.5 million in collections. Collections were broken down by $2.6 million in surgical procedures, $560,000 from clinical practice, and $330,000 from downstream revenue. A rural plastic surgeon's practice may have noted positive impacts on medical care and financial bottom lines in rural communities.

Understanding the Impact and Misconceptions of Rural Plastic Surgery.

In the United States, 54 million people live in a designated health service area with either no plastic surgeon or less than 1 plastic surgeon per 100,000 population. Previous studies demonstrate that patients in rural communities often have limitations with access to basic primary care services and subspecialty care services. Such limitations can have significant adverse impacts on health care and quality of life. Plastic and reconstructive surgeons offer unique advantages especially within rural settings given their broad scope of surgical skillsets. The purposes of this study are to illustrate the shortage of plastic and reconstructive surgeons within rural America catchment regions, identify and outline certain care offerings provided by these surgical specialists, and highlight the potential impact having such specialists directly involved in provision of care to patients within rural community settings. Our group will present data demonstrating misperceptions and an unawareness by hospital administrators on routine care services provided through plastic surgery practices. We will also report on selective surgical offerings of 2 rural-based plastic surgeons and outline certain financial and reimbursement findings from their practices, while also illustrating the impact of their practice on their patients and the health care systems they provide coverage.