The correlation between lipoprotein ratios and hearing outcome in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients.

OBJECTIVE: Recent reports have identified hypercholesterolaemia as a significant risk factor for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). Therefore, we investigated whether lipid profiles and lipoprotein ratios are correlated with the prognosis of hearing recovery in ISSNHL patients. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients with ISSNHL were classified into four groups (complete, partial, slight and no recovery) according to their degree of hearing recovery using Siegel's criteria and the Sudden Deafness Research Group (SDRG) criteria developed by the Japanese Ministry of Welfare. All patients' lipid profiles were analysed, including total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides. We calculated the ratios of TC/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C and used statistical methods to evaluate correlations between lipid profiles and lipoprotein ratios and ISSNHL prognosis. RESULTS: Hearing recovery was observed in 103 (62.0%) of 166 cases using Siegel's criteria and in 114 (68.7%) of 166 cases using SDRG's criteria. Among the three recovery groups (i.e. excluding the no recovery group), the ratio of LDL-C/HDL-C was found to be associated with recovery outcome by showing the ratio on an upward trend from complete recovery to slight recovery group, and the difference is statistically significant (P = 0.016 by Siegel's criteria, P = 0.041 by SDRG's criteria). Multiple linear regression analysis further revealed a significantly higher LDL-C/HDL-C ratio in slight hearing recovery group compared with complete recovery group (P = 0.007 by Siegel's criteria, P = 0.031 by SDRG's criteria). CONCLUSION: We suggested that lipoprotein ratio of LDL-C/HDL-C may be a prognostic factor for hearing recovery in ISSNHL patients. Further studies should be conducted to determine whether hearing outcomes in ISSNHL can be improved by changing patients' lipid profiles via antilipidemic treatment.

The association of frontal recess anatomy and mucosal disease on the presence of chronic frontal sinusitis: a computed tomographic analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The frontal sinus has the most complex and variable drainage routes of all paranasal sinus regions. The goal of this study was to identify these anatomical factors and inflammation areas relating to chronic frontal sinusitis by comparing radiological presentations in patients with and without frontal sinusitis. METHODS: All adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who had received computed tomography (CT) scans of the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses between October 2010 and September 2011. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare the distribution of various frontal recess cells and surrounding inflammatory conditions in patients with and without frontal sinusitis. RESULTS: Analysis of 240 sides of CT scans was performed with 66 sides excluded. The opacification of the frontal recess and sinus lateralis demonstrated a strong association with an increased presence of frontal sinusitis by multiple logistic regression models. CONCLUSION: Opacification of the frontal recess and sinus lateralis was found to be associated with a significantly increased risk of frontal sinusitis and developing severe blockage of drainage pathways. It provides evidence that mucosal inflammation disease in these two areas is a very important factor leading to chronic frontal sinusitis.

Refractive errors after the use of bevacizumab for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: 2-year outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive outcomes in children treated after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). METHODS: A retrospective, bi-centre study of 34 patients (64 eyes) was conducted. The patients were divided into three groups, patients received intravitreal IVB (IVB group), patients received combined IVB and laser treatment (IVB + Laser group), or patients received lens-sparing vitrectomy (IVB + LSV group). Cycloplegic refraction and axial length (AXL) were evaluated at 2 years old. RESULTS: The prevalences of myopia and high myopia were 47.5 and 10.0% in the IVB group, respectively, which were lower than those in the IVB + Laser (82.4 and 29.4%) and IVB + LSV (all 100%) groups (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001). The prevalences of emmetropia in the IVB group, IVB + Laser group, and IVB + LSV group were 50, 5.9, and 0% (P = 0.001). The AXL were similar among all groups. CONCLUSIONS: At the 2-year follow-up, severe ROP patients treated with IVB alone were more likely to remain emmetropic and had lower prevalences of myopia and high myopia. The development of high myopia in severe ROP patients could not be explained by AXL changes but may be associated with abnormalities in the anterior segment.

The cutaneous adverse drug reactions: risk factors, prognosis and economic impacts.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to explore the factors associated with the occurrence, subsequent prognoses and need for additional medications following cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among inpatients. METHODS AND MEASURES: This is a case-control study, nested in a large cohort study of 473,446 inpatients hospitalised from 2005 to 2008, examined cutaneous ADRs. A 1 : 5 strategy of individually matching age and principal diagnosis was applied to the data of cases (n = 700) and corresponding controls (n = 3365).The severity of ADRs was evaluated using Naranjo algorithms by senior pharmacists in the medical centre. Medical chart reviews and claim data analyses were analysed to explore risk factors associated with the occurrence and impact of cutaneous ADRs. Economic impacts in terms of length of stay and medical expenses were also analysed. RESULTS: The number of drug prescriptions and secondary diagnoses, and the department to which the patient was admitted, significantly contributed to the risk of cutaneous ADRs and subsequent prognosis. In addition to physician's seniority, the Naranjo score was also positively associated with patients' prognosis. Medical expenses associated with cutaneous ADRs patients ($US 916) were more than 2.5-fold higher than those patients who were not afflicted ($US 318). CONCLUSION: The study identified risk factors for cutaneous ADRs in terms of both patient characteristics and drug complexity. The present analyses indicate characteristics and mechanisms of cutaneous ADRs among inpatients, which provide clues for future intervention strategies and management issues in healthcare settings.

Interventions for relieving pain associated with panretinal photocoagulation: a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of pain relief by oral diazepam, acetaminophen, mefenamic acid, intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine, and peribulbar anaesthesia in panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). METHODS: A total of 220 patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy requiring PRP treatment were enrolled in this study. Before laser treatment, the patients were allocated randomly to one of eight groups: group 1: diazepam (n=22), group 2: acetaminophen (n=21), group 3: mefenamic acid (n=21), group 4: diazepam and acetaminophen (n=22), group 5: diazepam and mefenamic acid (n=22), group 6: peribulbar anaesthesia with lidocaine (n=23), group 7: intramuscular injection of ketorolac tromethamine (n=22), group 8: placebo (n=67). Pain after the laser treatment was assessed by a verbal descriptive scale. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured before and after laser treatment. RESULTS: Patients receiving peribulbar anaesthesia had a significantly lower pain score than the control group (P<0.0001). Additionally, the peribulbar anaesthesia-treated group had the significantly least PRP-associated rise in either systolic (P=0.043) or diastolic blood pressure rates (P=0.030). There were no significant differences in pain score using other anesthetic agents when compared with the control group. There were no significant changes in heart rate after PRP treatment. CONCLUSION: Peribulbar anaesthesia is effective in reducing pain and blood pressure increase after PRP treatment. Oral diazepam, mefenamic acid, and acetaminophen (either alone or in combination with each other) are not effective in preventing PRP treatment-associated pain. Intramuscular injection of ketorolac tromethamine is also not effective in reducing PRP-associated pain.