Non-small cell lung cancer in the very young: Higher EGFR/ALK mutation proportion than the elder.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze pathologic characteristics, treatment, prognosis, and tumor epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic large-cell lymphoma kinase (EGFR/ALK) mutation proportion of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients aged <40 years at diagnosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of NSCLC patients diagnosed at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between June 2007 and December 2014, aged <90 years at the time of the diagnosis. RESULTS: We found 5051 cases of NSCLC, including 168 patients who were <40 years (younger group) and 4883 patients aged 40 to 89 years (older group). We found that the younger group had a significantly higher proportion of the EGFR mutation (22.6% vs 16.2%, p = 0.026) and the ALK mutation (4.2% vs 0.5%, p < 0.001) than the older group. Although the younger group included more stage IV patients (60.1% vs 49.6%, p = 0.002), it had a better overall survival (OS) rate (1 year: 73.7% vs 66.2%, p = 0.043; 5 years: 44.4% vs 33.7%, p = 0.004) (median survival time: 55 vs 26 months, p = 0.002). About the histologic subtype of NSCLC, the younger group presented less frequent cases of squamous cell carcinoma (4.2% vs 16.1%, p < 0.001), whereas the adenocarcinoma subtype was similarly frequent in the two groups (76.8% vs 76.5%, p = 0.924). CONCLUSION: The OS rate in younger NSCLC patients was higher than that in the older NSCLC patients, despite the higher rate of stage IV NSCLC patients in the younger group. This survival benefit is most likely due to the higher proportion of the EGFR and ALK mutations and the corresponding tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment.

Efficacy of Paclitaxel plus TS1 against previously treated EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Later line chemotherapy (≥2nd lines) such as Docetaxel or immunotherapy is frequently used. As the life expectancy of lung cancer patients is getting longer, we need to provide more treatment options. Other treatment options are not well documented except for Doxetaxel and immunotherapy. Therefore, the efficacy of paclitaxel plus TS1 (TTS1) is warranted. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the chart records of our non-small cell lung cancer patients who were treated between 2010 and 2013. Clinical characteristics, type of tumor, EGFR mutation status, and treatment response to first-line EGFR-TKI therapy and efficacy of TTS1, were collected. RESULTS: Twenty eight patients were enrolled in this study. No patients archived complete response and seven patients had partial response (ORR: 25%). The disease control rate was 60.7% (17/28). The progression free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months and overall survival (OS) was 15.8 months. Of them, 17 had EGFR mutations, eight EGFR wild type, and three were unknown EGFR status. After TTS1 treatment, patients with EGFR mutations had better PFS (4.9 months vs. 1.8 months) and OS (15.5 months vs. 7.2 months) compared with those of EGFR wild type. CONCLUSIONS: TTS1 are effective later line chemotherapy, especially in tumor EGFR mutated patients. Paclitaxel plus TS1 is another treatment of choice for NSCLC patients before a more effective treatment strategy is found.

Erlotinib Salvage Therapy in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma Patients With Disease Progression After Previous EGFR-TKI Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with promising efficacy in treating pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Treatment choices are few when patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma have failed both EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of erlotinib as salvage treatment for these nonresponsive patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the chart records of our stage IV pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients who were diagnosed and treated between July 2004 and June 2013. Clinical data, including type of response to treatment, time to disease progression, duration between the end of first-line EGFR-TKI treatment and starting erlotinib treatment, and overall survival time, were collected. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were enrolled, and all had been treated with EGFR-TKI, either as a first-line therapy or following platinum-based chemotherapy; of them, 60 patients had a response to initial EGFR-TKI treatment. All received erlotinib as salvage treatment after their disease had progressed following EGFR-TKI treatment. Ninety-three (93.3%) patients had also received previous platinum-based chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival with erlotinib as salvage treatment for patients with and without a response to front-line EGFR-TKI was 4.9 and 3.4 months (P=0.869), respectively. The progression-free survival with erlotinib treatment in the sensitizing EGFR mutation group was 4.3 months, and in the EGFR wild-type group it was 2.6 months (P=0.22). CONCLUSIONS: In pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients who had been heavily treated, erlotinib could still be a choice, regardless of the EGFR mutation status, or whether the patients had responded to previous EGFR-TKI treatment.

The association between tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and multiple primary malignancies in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lungs.

OBJECTIVES: An increased incidence of multiple primary malignancies has been found in recent decades. However, the nature of the association between the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and multiple primary malignancies in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lungs is not clearly understood at this time. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of our patients with adenocarcinoma of the lungs, and evaluated the association between the tumor EGFR mutation status and multiple primary malignancies. RESULTS: From December 2008 to November 2011, 655 pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients with tumor EGFR mutation data were available for analysis. Of them, 359 had EGFR mutations (including 336 classic EGFR mutations), 63 had double primary malignancies, and 7 had triple primary malignancies. Patients with classic EGFR mutations had a higher incidence of multiple primary malignancies than those without (P=0.042). Multiple primary malignancies occurred more frequently in patients with exon 19 mutations (including insertions, point mutations, or deletions) or exon 19 deletions than in patients without (P=0.037 and 0.032, respectively). Patients with any EGFR mutations or classic EGFR mutations survived longer than those who did not (P<0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Patients with multiple primary malignancies survived for a longer period than those without (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple primary malignancies occurred more frequently in patients with classic EGFR mutations, especially those with exon 19 deletions.

Latent TB infection in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients - A multicenter prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer and tuberculosis (TB) share common risk factors and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Coexistence of lung cancer and TB were reported in previous studies, with uncertain pathogenesis. The association between lung cancer and latent TB infection (LTBI) remains to be explored. METHODS: Newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve lung cancer patients were prospectively enrolled from four referral medical centers in Taiwan. The presence of LTBI was determined by QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT). Demographic characteristics and cancer-related factors associated with LTBI were investigated. The survival status was also analyzed according to the status of LTBI. RESULTS: A total of 340 lung cancer patients were enrolled, including 96 (28.2%) LTBI, 214 (62.9%) non-LTBI, and 30 (8.8%) QFT-GIT results-indeterminate cases. Non-adenocarcinoma cases had higher proportion of LTBI than those of adenocarcinoma, especially in patients with younger age. In multivariate analysis, COPD (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.25-4.64), fibrocalcified lesions on chest radiogram (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.45-5.11), and main tumor located in typical TB areas (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.15-3.55) were independent clinical predictors for LTBI. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated patients with indeterminate QFT-GIT results had significantly higher 1-year all-cause mortality than those with LTBI (p<0.001) and non-LTBI (p=0.003). In multivariate analysis, independent predictors for 1-year all-cause mortality included BMI<18.5 (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.06-4.14, p=0.033), advanced stage of lung cancer (RR 7.76, 95% CI 1.90-31.78, p=0.004), and indeterminate QFT-GIT results (RR 2.40, 95% CI 1.27-4.54, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: More than one-quarter of newly diagnosed lung cancer patients in Taiwan have LTBI. The independent predictors for LTBI include COPD, fibrocalcified lesions on chest radiogram, and main tumor located in typical TB areas. The survival rate is comparable between LTBI and non-LTBI cases. However, indeterminate QFT-GIT result was an independent predictor for all-cause mortality in lung cancer patients.

The epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor era has changed the causes of death of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective against tumor EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with the tumor EGFR-activating mutation (EGFRmu) had superior survival, compared to patients with EGFR wild-type tumors (EGFRwt). Many patients with the EGFRmu have had disease progression with EGFR-TKI treatment because of central nervous system (CNS) metastases. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the causes of death in patients with a known tumor EGFR mutation status who had been treated with EGFR-TKIs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the chart records of our patients with advanced NSCLC who had received diagnosis, treatment, and supportive and hospice care in our hospital between July 2005 and June 2010. The tumor EGFR mutation status was analyzed by using a DNA sequence method. All enrolled patients had a documented cause of death. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients had documented tumor EGFR data, had received EGFR-TKI treatment (either erlotinib or gefitinib), and were with or without previous or salvage systemic chemotherapy. Of the 94 patients, 36 patients had EGFRwt and 58 patients had EGFRmu. The overall patient survival after starting EGFR-TKI treatment was significantly longer in the EGFRmu patients (median 17.2 months) than in the EGFRwt patients (median 11.6 months; p = 0.0058). Twenty-nine patients died of CNS metastases and 65 died of organ failure (other than the CNS). Patients who died of CNS metastases had undergone EGFR-TKI treatment significantly longer than patients who died of other organ failure (median, 8 months vs. 1.9 months; p = 0.0003) with a hazard ratio of 2.308 [95% confidence interval (C.I.), 1.452-3.668; p = 0.0004]. A significantly higher proportion of EGFRmu patients (26 of 58 patients; 44.8%) than EGFRwt patients (3 of 36 patients; 8.3%) (p < 0.001) died of CNS metastases. CONCLUSION: The EGFRmu NSCLC patients survived longer and had a significantly higher probability of mortality due to CNS metastases, compared to the EGFRwt patients. This change in the causes of death was noted after the era of EGFR-TKI treatment, and will have an important impact on the strategies and management of supportive and hospice care for patients.

Erlotinib in patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Erlotinib had proved efficacy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, especially adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib in patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSQC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records and serial chest images of consecutive patients who were diagnosed with advanced LSQC and had been treated with erlotinib monotherapy. The primary objective was to evaluate the treatment efficacy and to correlate with patients' clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Totally 55 patients were analyzed (42 men and 13 women, median age of 71 years). In 37 patients who had measurable lesions, 6 had partial response and 13 had stable disease, yielding an overall response rate of 16.2% and disease control rate of 51.4%. In all patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.0 months (95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.4 months) and 10.4 months (95% confidence interval, 0.6-20.2 months), respectively. The PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients who had good clinical response (either the tumor achieved partial response or the patients had disease controlled for more than 6 months) than those who did not (median PFS, 13.0 vs. 1.6 months; median OS, 28.3 vs. 4.9 months; both P values <0.01). Patients who never smoked seemed to have better clinical response and longer survival than those who had smoking history (P = 0.077 and 0.086, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Erlotinib could provide some clinical benefit to patients with advanced LSQC.

Erlotinib has better efficacy than gefitinib in adenocarcinoma patients without EGFR-activating mutations, but similar efficacy in patients with EGFR-activating mutations.

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are an effective treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The objective of the present study was to compare the efficacy of gefitinib and erlotinib in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma, whose tumor EGFR mutation status was known. Pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients who began receiving gefitinib or erlotinib treatment from January 2005 to December 2010, and whose tumor EGFR mutation status had been determined, were included. Clinical data, type of treatment response and survival time data were collected. Of the 224 patients enrolled, 124 received gefitinib treatment and 100 received erlotinib treatment. Of these patients, 146 individuals had tumors with EGFR-activating mutations (exon 19 deletions and/point mutation of L858R in exon 21) and 78 did not. There was no difference in treatment response whether or not the patients had tumors with EGFR-activating mutations at the time they received gefitinib or erlotinib treatment. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the gefitinib and erlotinib groups was 7.6 and 7.9 months, respectively (p=0.4731). PFS was significantly longer for patients without EGFR-activating mutations who received erlotinib treatment (n=48; median, 4.5 months) than for those who received gefitinib treatment (n=30; median, 2.3 months), with a hazard ratio of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.35-0.96; p=0.0339). Patients whose tumors had EGFR-activating mutations displayed no difference in PFS with either gefitinib (n=94; median, 10.5 months) or erlotinib treatment (n=52; median, 10.4 months). In conclusion, PFS showed no difference with either agent in patients whose tumors had EGFR-activating mutations, but was significantly longer in patients whose tumors did not have EGFR-activating mutations when receiving erlotinib treatment.

Phase II randomized trial of erlotinib or vinorelbine in chemonaive, advanced, non-small cell lung cancer patients aged 70 years or older.

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of this study was to compare the response rates of elderly, chemonaive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with daily oral erlotinib versus oral vinorelbine. METHODS: Chemonaive Taiwanese patients aged 70 years or older who had advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive either oral erlotinib 150 mg (E) daily or oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m (V) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: From February 2007 to July 2008, 116 patients were enrolled and 113 were included in the intent-to-treat population: 57 patients in the E group and 56 patients in the V group. Objective response rates were 22.8% (13 of 57) in E and 8.9% (5 of 56) in V (p = 0.0388). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.57 months in E and 2.53 months in V (p = 0.0287), with an 80.6% increase in median PFS for E compared with V. Median survival time was 11.67 months in E and 9.3 months in V (p = 0.6975). Toxicities were generally mild in both groups. Median PFS was longest for epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR)-mutated patients in the E group, followed by EGFR-mutated patients in V, EGFR wild type in E, and EGFR wild type in V (p = 0.0034). Overall survival was longer for EGFR-mutated patients than for EGFR wild-type patients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Erlotinib is highly effective compared with oral vinorelbine in elderly, chemonaive, Taiwanese patients with NSCLC. EGFR-mutated patients had better survival than those with EGFR wild-type disease, regardless of the treatment received.

Third-line or fourth-line chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with relatively good performance status.

BACKGROUND: Our aim here was to explore treatment efficacy of pemetrexed and docetaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who had failed previous chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of our non-small-cell lung cancer patients who received third- or fourth-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or docetaxel in our institution from January 2006 to December 2009. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three patients received treatment, including 85 patients with pemetrexed treatment and 38 patients with docetaxel treatment. There was no difference in tumor response rate and toxicity profiles when using pemetrexed as third- or fourth-line treatment, neither was there difference in docetaxel treatment of third- versus fourth-line treatment. There was also no difference between docetaxel and pemetrexed in response rate and control rate when they were used as fourth-line treatment. However, docetaxel used in fourth-line treatment had higher incidence of neutropenia and more frequent need of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support compared with pemetrexed in fourth-line treatment. Median progression-free survivals (PFSs) were 2.6 months and 3.8 months when using pemetrexed as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively (p = 0.417). Median PFSs were 3.8 months and 4.8 months when using docetaxel as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively (p = 0.882). There was also no difference in PFS between pemetrexed and docetaxel, both in third- and fourth-line treatment. Median survivals were 13.4, 12.2, 13.2, and 13 months for pemetrexed in third-line, fourth-line, and docetaxel in third-line and fourth-line treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study of pemetrexed and docetaxel showed relatively safe toxicity profile, reasonable response rate, and long survival when used as third- and fourth-line chemotherapy. Thus, it is reasonable to give good performance status patients third- and fourth-line chemotherapy. A phase III randomized trial is needed for better clarification of these issues.

A phase II randomized trial of gefitinib alone or with tegafur/uracil treatment in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma who had failed previous chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Tegafur/uracil (UFT) is suitable for metronomic chemotherapy because of its underlying antiangiogenesis mechanism. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of adding daily oral UFT to gefitinib treatment in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma who had failed previous chemotherapy. METHODS: Taiwanese patients who had adenocarcinoma of the lung and failed previous chemotherapy were randomized into gefitinib 250 mg daily alone (G) or plus daily oral UFT (GU). From November 2005 to August 2009, 115 patients were enrolled. RESULTS: There were 58 patients in the G arm and 57 in the GU arm. One-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 18% in the G arm and 36.7% in the GU arm (p = 0.03). Fifty-four patients had tissue samples available for tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sequence analysis: 16 classical mutations and 8 wild types in the G arm, and 20 classical mutations and 10 wild-types in the GU arm. The addition of UFT significantly improved PFS in patients with EGFR mutations (14.4 versus 7.6 months, p = 0.0061). Forty-three patients underwent tumor tissue microvessel density measurement, and a trend favoring the addition of UFT to gefitinib treatment was found in those with low microvessel density (median PFS: 11.8 versus 2.8 months, p = 0.0536). The median survival time was 18.3 months in the G arm and 23.6 months in the GU arm (p = 0.381). CONCLUSION: Gefitinib plus UFT treatment had better PFS than gefitinib alone treatment. Gefitinib is effective in patients with EGFR mutations, and the addition of UFT treatment produced better PFS in these patients with mutations.

Second-line therapy for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer who failed previous chemotherapy is as effective as for younger patients.

INTRODUCTION: It was found that second-line or thereafter therapies for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who failed previous chemotherapy yielded a modest survival benefit. However, whether elderly patients (> or =70 years) benefit and are as suitable for salvage therapy as nonelderly patients (<70 years) are unknown. Whether epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) is more favorable than chemotherapeutic agents as a salvage therapy agent in elderly patients with NSCLC is also undetermined. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed and updated the data of our patients with NSCLC who received second-line salvage therapies, classified them into elderly and nonelderly groups, and compared the efficacy, toxicities, and survival of the patients. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-one cases were reviewed. The nonelderly group had a similar response rate, control rate, and median survival time than the elderly group (p = 0.2, p = 0.9, and p = 0.5, respectively). The median progression-free time was numerically longer in the elderly than the nonelderly patients (p = 0.08). The nonelderly group had statistically insignificantly less hematologic toxicities than the elderly group, but more nausea and vomiting. In addition, the use of EGFR-TKI salvage therapy, compared with salvage chemotherapies in the elderly group, resulted in a similar disease control rate and median survival time and more favorable toxicity profiles. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in the efficacy of salvage chemotherapies and EGFR-TKI therapy, in terms of response rate, control rate, and overall survival, in elderly and nonelderly patients, and the therapies had acceptable toxicities. Age itself should not preclude patients with NSCLC from second-line salvage therapy.

A phase II randomized study of vinorelbine alone or with cisplatin against chemo-naïve inoperable non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly.

PURPOSE: Our aim here was to determine whether or not the addition of cisplatin into vinorelbine (V) treatment is an appropriate regimen for physically fit chemo-naïve non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients aged 70 or older. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized into vinorelbine (V) or vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VP) treatment arms. Treatment consisted of vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion (i.v.) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (V arm), or vinorelbine 22.5 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 every 3 weeks (VP arm). RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were enrolled from May 2005 to December 2006, including 31 who received V treatment and 34 who received VP treatment. Objective response rates were 16.1% in V and 32.4% in VP (p=0.009). Control rates were 51.6% in V and 82.4% in VP (p=0.008). Myelosuppression was more common and severe in the VP arm. Any grade of anemia and neutropenia was significantly higher in the VP arm (p=0.001 and 0.009, respectively). Fatigue sensation was more common and severe in the VP arm (p=0.032). Median time to disease progression was 3.1 months in the V arm and 5.2 months in the VP arm (p=0.0303). The 1-year survival rate was 50.9% in the V arm and 47.2% in the VP arm. CONCLUSIONS: Adding cisplatin to vinorelbine treatment is feasible in elderly patients, and has a better response rate and longer median time to disease progression. However, both statistically significantly higher toxicity and no survival advantage for the combination treatment was observed.

Phase II randomized study of weekly docetaxel alone or plus UFUR treatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients who failed previous chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of adding UFUR (UFT, tegafur/uracil) into weekly docetaxel treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who failed previous platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients were randomized into two arms: docetaxel 40mg/m(2) intravenous infusion (IV) on days 1 and 8 of every 3 weeks (arm D), and docetaxel 35mg/m(2) IV on days 1 and 8 plus daily oral UFUR 150mg/m(2) of every 3 weeks (arm DU), with arm D as a control arm. Treatment was given to a maximum of 6 cycles and carried out in the outpatient clinic. RESULTS: From January 2005 to March 2006, 48 patients were enrolled and randomized into the study, with 24 patients in each arm. The mean number of cycles of treatment was 4 in the D arm and 3.5 in the DU arm. Objective response rates were 29.2% in the D arm and 8.3% in the DU arm (p=0.067). Toxicities were few and mild in degree in both arms. Median time to disease progression was 4.5 months in the D arm and 2.1 months in the DU arm (p=0.4682). Median survival time was 10.9 months in the D arm and 15.2 months in the DU arm (p=0.8442). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of UFUR to weekly docetaxel treatment did not improve response rate and time to disease progression in NSCLC patients who failed previous platinum-based chemotherapy.

Exploring the efficacy of a case management model using DOTS in the adherence of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.

AIM: To explore the efficacy of hospitals using case management with Directly Observed Treatment - Short course (DOTS) to monitor the adherence of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Taiwan. BACKGROUND: Non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy is the major problem in treating patients with tuberculosis. Community-based case management coupled with DOTS has been applied to patients with tuberculosis and has resulted in good results in some countries. Taiwan has a high incidence of tuberculosis, and although it has implemented DOTS, the expected increased efficacy has not yet been realized. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study used a quasi-experimental design. Using age and gender as matching factors, 96 subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups in 2002-2003. Experimental group I was to receive DOTS case management comprising in-hospital education, direct daily observation in the first two months and one home visit per week. Experimental group II received traditional case management comprising in-hospital education and one home visit per month. The control group did not receive any intervention. RESULTS: The adherence, the rate of completion, the treatment success, sputum conversion and chest X-ray improvement of experimental group I were significantly improved compared with experimental group II and the control group. The completion rate in experimental group I was higher than the general rate for Taiwan during the past six years and the treatment success rate met the standards of the World Health Organization. CONCLUSION: Hospitals using case management with DOTS can improve the adherence of tuberculosis patients and the control of tuberculosis-epidemic situations. Relevance to clinical practice. In a rapidly changing healthcare environment, clinical nurses can make a significant contribution to healthcare delivery for tuberculosis patients. This study has provided further insight into the implementation of hospital-to-community level case management using DOTS by nurses.

Lupus erythematosus (LE) cells in ascites: initial diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus by cytological examination: a case report.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease, involving multiple organs. Diverse manifestations may obscure the diagnosis and confuse our thinking process, especially when few clues are present at the beginning. Serositis is one of the various presentations, and the presence of lupus erythematosus (LE) cell in body fluid may be a hint for the final diagnosis of SLE. Herein, we present a young female patient diagnosed of SLE with initial presentation of lupus peritonitis. Finding of LE cell in ascites prompted us for immunologic survey. Diagnosis of SLE was confirmed with high titer of anti-nuclear antibody and antibody to double-stranded DNA. Cytologic examination of body fluid is mainly useful in detecting malignant cells, but high specificity of this marker aids in early diagnosis of SLE.

A randomized phase II study of docetaxel or vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin against inoperable, chemo-naïve non-small-cell lung cancer in Taiwan.

Cisplatin plus a third-generation anti-cancer drug, such as vinorelbine, gemcitabine, or the taxanes, are the standard regimen used in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and there is no significant difference in efficacy among the different regimens. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VC) in chemo-naïve NSCLC patients. From December 2003 to May 2005, 94 patients were enrolled. The treatment dose was D 60 mg/m2 and C 60 mg/m2 intravenous infusion (IV) on day 1, or V 25 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8, and C 60 mg/m2 IV on day 1, every 3 weeks. In all, 209 cycles of DC and 230 cycles of VC were given to the patients in the DC (median five cycles) and VC (median five cycles) arms, respectively. There were 19 partial responses and one complete response (overall 43.5%) in the DC arm, and no complete responses, but 22 partial responses (overall 45.8%), in the VC arm. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity occurring in both arms, with grades 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 72.9% and 71.7% of patients, respectively. Except for alopecia (p=0.005) and diarrhea (p<0.001), which were more common in the DC arm, no significant differences in toxicity profiles were found between the two treatment arms. The median time to disease progression was 4.7 months in the DC arm and 6.3 months in the VC arm (p=0.7355). Median survival time was 13 months in the DC arm and 13.8 months in the VC arm (p=0.9656). The 1-year survival rate was 55.5% and 51.7%, respectively. After treatment, the Lung Cancer Symptom Scales showed no significant difference between the two treatment arms. We concluded that both DC and VC are appropriate regimens for use in the first-line treatment of Chinese NSCLC patients. Asthenia, one of the major side effects of docetaxel, was not a major problem in the present study. Although both regimens produced a high incidence of severe neutropenia, the majority of patients recovered rapidly without sequelae; and VC treatment is still a standard chemotherapy for Chinese NSCLC patients in Taiwan.

A phase II study of oral vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin conducted in Taiwan in patients with unresectable localized or metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin is widely prescribed for the treatment of NSCLC. The objective of this phase II study was to define the efficacy of an oral form of vinorelbine combined with cisplatin for first line treatment of advanced/metastatic NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 2002 to December 2003, 46 chemotherapy-naive patients received 80 mg/m(2) of cisplatin on day 1 and oral vinorelbine at 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: After an independent panel review, the response rate was 37.5 % [95% confidence interval (CI): 22.7-54.2%] in the evaluable population and 32.6% [95% CI: 19.5-48] in the intent-to-treat population. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months and overall survival was 11.2 months. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in 58.7% of patients, with febrile neutropenia and neutropenic infection in 4.3 and 8.7% of patients, respectively. The main non-haematological toxicities were hypotension, fatigue (8.7% for each) and gastrointestinal disorders with rare grades 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the combination of cisplatin at 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 with oral vinorelbine at 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks, is an active regimen, associated with acceptable toxicity. Oral vinorelbine is therefore a good alternative to the i.v. formulation.

Screening of hospital workers for pulmonary tuberculosis in a medical center in Taiwan.

At a medical center in Taiwan, all workers were examined by chest radiography, to determine the prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis. The prevalence of tuberculosis among all hospital workers was 0.12%, that among nurses was 0.35%, and that among externally contracted cleaners was 0.57%. All of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates recovered from 2 nurses and from a patient with pulmonary tuberculosis were the Beijing strain, but the strains had different serotypes.

A randomized trial of different docetaxel schedules in non-small cell lung cancer patients who failed previous platinum-based chemotherapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Docetaxel has shown activity in the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Phase II studies have suggested that weekly therapy with docetaxel probably has a better toxicity profile than the conventional schedule of once every 3 weeks. Our aim was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of different docetaxel schedules in NSCLC patients who did not respond to previous platinum-based chemotherapy. SETTING: National teaching hospital in Taiwan. METHODS: Treatment consisted of the following: (1) docetaxel, 35 mg/m(2) IV infusion (D(35)) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks; (2) docetaxel, 40 mg/m(2) IV (D(40)) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; and (3) docetaxel, 75 mg/m(2) IV (D(75)) on day 1 every 3 weeks. Patients were randomized at a ratio of 2:2:1, with the D(75) arm as the control arm. From 2002 to 2004, 161 patients were enrolled into the study. RESULTS: The number of patients enrolled in each arm of the study was as follows: D(35) group, 64 patients; D(40) group, 64 patients; D(75) group, 33 patients. The mean ages of patients were as follows: D(35) group, 65 years of age; D(40) group, 63 years of age; D(75) group, 64 years of age. The median number of cycles of chemotherapy received in each group was as follows: D(35) group, 4; D(40) group, 3; D(75) group, 4. The objective response rates were as follows: D(35) group, 17.2%; D(40) group, 10.9%; D(75) group, 6.1% (p = 0.615). The major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grades 3/4 leukopenia and neutropenia were significantly higher in the D(75) arm of the study (p < 0.001). Drug-induced pneumonitis occurred more frequently in patients on a weekly schedule than in those on a schedule of every 3-weeks (p = 0.05). The median survival times were as follows: D(35) group, 8.4 months; D(40) group, 7.2 months; and D(75) group, 9.5 months (p = 0.855). The 1-year survival rates were 32.8%, 31.9%, and 28.7%, respectively. Lung cancer symptom scores showed no obvious differences among the different treatment arms, except for some minor items. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly docetaxel chemotherapy produces less myelosuppression, and better compliance and response rates than the conventional chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. These effects were more evident in the D(35) group weekly schedule than in the D(40) weekly schedule. However, physicians should pay more attention to the possibility of a higher frequency of docetaxel-induced pneumonitis in patients receiving treatment on the weekly schedule of treatment.