Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 260(4): 1377-1386, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34655333

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate residual astigmatism following correction with toric implantable collamer lens (TICL) (group I) over a period of 4 years and compare with the change of astigmatism in spectacle wearers (group II). METHODS: Groups I (86 cases implanted with TICL [EVO + Visian ICL, Staar Surgical, Nidau, Switzeland], preop refractive error [sphere and cylinder] - 22.25 DS to - 1.00 DS and - 5.50 DC to - 1.00 DC) and II (80 cases initial refractive error [sphere and cylinder] - 18.00 DS to 0.00 DS and - 7.00 DC to - 1.00 DC) were reviewed annually. Refractive and tomography data were subjected to vector analysis to determine surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), angle of error [Δθ° = angle of target-induced astigmatism (TIA) - angle of SIA], and ΔC [TIA-SIA powers] and total corneal astigmatism (TCA) in group I and induced change in astigmatism (ICA) in group II. RESULTS: In group I, on all occasions, SIA correlated with TIA (p < 0.05); differences between SIA and TIA means were insignificant and changes in TCA were not correlated with ΔC. Mean (± sd, 95% CI) residual astigmatic powers (RA) in attending group I cases (1-4 years) were - 0.40 DC (0.58, - 0.52 to - 0.28), - 0.40 DC (0.59, - 0.52 to - 0.27), - 0.41 DC (0.58, - 0.54 to - 0.28), and - 0.61 DC (0.74, - 0.82 to - 0.40). In group II, the corresponding ICA powers were - 0.47 DC (0.53, - 0.61 to - 0.32), - 0.49 DC (0.48, - 0.69 to - 0.29), - 0.60 DC (0.40, - 0.76 to - 0.44), and - 0.86 DC (0.71, - 1.19 to - 0.52). Differences between RA and ICA were not significant. Of the group I cases presenting at 1-4 years postop, 23, 18, 16, and 28 had RA powers ≤ - 0.75 DC. Of these 12, 10, 6, and 16 were associated with Δθ° > 5° (ΔC - 0.50 to 0 DC) and 5, 1, 4, and 4 were related to ΔC (Δθ° < 5°). CONCLUSION: The development of astigmatism after TICL implantation is on par with the natural change in astigmatism in untreated cases. In about 50% of TICL cases presenting with astigmatism ≤ - 0.75 DC, the residual astigmatism could be neutralized by realigning the TICL.


Subject(s)
Astigmatism , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Phakic Intraocular Lenses , Refractive Errors , Astigmatism/diagnosis , Astigmatism/etiology , Astigmatism/surgery , Disease Progression , Eyeglasses , Humans , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/adverse effects , Phakic Intraocular Lenses/adverse effects , Refraction, Ocular
2.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 32(5): 2638-2645, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34761687

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare changes in astigmatism by refraction and total corneal astigmatism after tPRK, LASIK and FsLASIK. SETTING: Specialty Eye Hospital Svjetlost, Zagreb, Croatia. DESIGN: Partially masked, semi-randomized, prospective, case-by-case, interventional, clinical study. METHODS: Patients with a stable refraction (-0.75DS to -8.00DS, astigmatism ≤1.00DC) underwent tPRK, LASIK or FsLASIK without complication. Astigmatism was measured at both corneal surfaces over the central 3.2 mm zone (approximately using Pentacam HRTM) preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Pentacam and refraction data were subjected to vector analysis to calculate the surgically induced changes in i) total corneal astigmatism (SIATCA) ii) any astigmatism by refraction (SIAR) and the vectorial difference (DV) between SIATCA and SIAR. RESULTS: Reporting key findings (p < .01), there was a significant difference between mean SIATCA and SIAR powers after tPRK (75eyes) but not after LASIK (100eyes) or FsLASIK (100eyes). Mean (±sd,95% CIs) values for DV powers were, tPRK -1.13DC(±0.71, -1.29 to -0.97), LASIK -0.39DC(±0.23,-0.44 to -0.34), FsLASIK -0.55DC(±0.38,-0.62 to -0.47). The differences were significant. For the tPRK and FsLASIK cases, linear regression revealed significant associations between I) SIATCA (x) &DV (z) powers (tPRK z = 1.586x-0.179, r = 0.767, p < .01; FsLASIK z = 0.442x-0.303, r = .484,p < .01), II) sines of SIATCA (x1) &DV (z1) axes (tPRK, z1 = 0.523 × 1 + 0.394, r = .650,p < .01; FsLASIK z1 = 0.460 × 1-0.308, r = .465,p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: tPRK is more prone to unintended changes in astigmatism. The difference between SIATCA & SIAR after tPRK or FsLASIK is mediated by SIATCA. Photoablating deeper regions of the cornea reduces the gap between SIATCA & SIAR.


Subject(s)
Astigmatism , Corneal Diseases , Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ , Photorefractive Keratectomy , Astigmatism/surgery , Cornea/surgery , Corneal Diseases/surgery , Humans , Prospective Studies , Refraction, Ocular , Treatment Outcome
3.
Semin Ophthalmol ; 36(8): 832-838, 2021 Nov 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34010104

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To compare predicted and measured changes in astigmatism at the posterior corneal surface (PCS) after FsLASIK or LASIK.Methods: Astigmatism was measured at both corneal surfaces (PentacamTM) before and 3 months after unremarkable FFsLASIK (roup 1,n = 100) or LLASIK (roup 2,n = 100) for myopia (-7.25DS to -0.75DS) and low astigmatism (≤1.00DC). Photoablation was achieved using Schwind Amaris750STM laser (Aberration Free profile, centered on corneal vertex). Pre-and postop astigmatic data, according to subjective refraction and estimates for the corneal surfaces (over the central 3.2 mm zone), were subjected to vector analysis to calculate surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) by refraction (SIAR), at the anterior (SIAFact) and posterior corneal surfaces (SIABact). The difference vector between SIAR and SIAFact was regarded as the predicted SIA at the PCS (SIABest).Results: Reporting key findings. Mean(±sd,95%CI) SIABest and SIABact powers in group 1 were -0.52DC(±0.35,-0.56 to -0.45) and -0.11DC(±0.08,-0.13 to -0.10) in group 1, -0.35DC(0.20,-0.39 to -0.32) and -0.08DC(0.07,-0.09 to -0.06) in group 2. Differences between SIABest and SIABact were significant for powers but not axes. Significant correlations(p < .01) were revealed between (I) SIAR and SIAFact powers [Group 1, SIAR = 0.370.SIAFact-0.292,r = 0.299. Group 2, SIAR = 0.484.SIAFact-0.394,r = 0.519] but not the axes and (II) ΔC (difference between pre-[x1] and postop measured PCS astigmatic powers) and x1 [Group 1, ΔC = 0.384x1 + 0.119,r = 0.423. Group 2, ΔC = 0.135x1 + 0.047,r = 0.229,p = .022]. There was no correlation between SIABest and SIABact powers or axes.Conclusion: The changes in posterior corneal astigmatic powers according to Pentacam measurements are small and do not account for the deficit between SIAR and SIAFact after FsLASIK or LASIK.


Subject(s)
Astigmatism , Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ , Myopia , Astigmatism/etiology , Astigmatism/surgery , Cornea/surgery , Corneal Stroma , Corneal Topography , Humans , Lasers, Excimer/therapeutic use , Myopia/surgery , Refraction, Ocular , Visual Acuity
4.
Cornea ; 38(7): 873-879, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31170105

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the temporal effect of toric implantable collamer lens (TICL) implantation and location on corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) over a period of 36 months after surgery. METHODS: ECD [number of cells per square millimeter estimated using the Specular Microscope SP-1P (Topcon Europe Medical B.V., Netherlands)] data were collected from cases deemed suitable for the TICL (VTICMO, VTICM5; STAAR Surgical, Nidau, Switzerland). The preoperative refractive error (sphere and cylinder) ranged from -1.00 to -22.25 diopter sphere and from -0.50 to -5.50 diopter cylinder. ECD was evaluated at preoperative and all postoperative sessions. RESULTS: Key findings were as follows: the mean ECD (±SD, 95% confidence interval) was 2720 cells/mm (±272, 2620-2820 cells/mm) preoperatively, which was reduced to 2372 cells/mm (±325, 2250-2490 cells/mm) at 36 months postoperatively (P < 0.001). Linear regression revealed the following significant correlations between the (1) log of the change in ECD (y1) and log of preoperative ECD (x1) at 2 years postoperatively, y1 = 2.513x1-6.2816 (n = 62, r= 0.3503, P = 0.005); (2) mean ECD (y2) and log time (in months, x2), y2= 2543.7-36.997x2-38.99x2 (r=-0.9654, n = 7, P = 0.0004); and (3) mean axial distance between the front surface of the crystalline lens and the TICL back surface (y3) and time postoperatively (in months, x3), y3 = 0.1035x3-5.2808x3 +473.18 (r = 0.8512, n = 7, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Expected ECD loss after TICL implantation by 2 years postoperatively is predictable. On average, over 3 years after implantation, there is (1) an initial rapid decline in ECD, followed by a gradual fall in the rate of cell loss, and (2) a gradual fall in the distance between the TICL and the crystalline lens by 2 years postoperatively, followed by a reversal by the third year.


Subject(s)
Astigmatism/surgery , Endothelial Cells/cytology , Endothelium, Corneal/cytology , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Myopia, Degenerative/surgery , Phakic Intraocular Lenses , Refractive Surgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Cell Count , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...