Crossover Phenomena in Motor Evoked Potentials During Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring of Cranial Surgeries.

PURPOSE: Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) are used to assess the corticospinal tract during surgery. Transcranial motor evoked potentials are elicited by preferentially activating the anode over the target cortex. Crossover occurs when stimulation also induces activation of ipsilateral motor evoked responses. These responses are believed to be generated by activation of corticospinal tract on more caudal neural structures. The presence of cross activation poses a problem in craniotomy surgeries because activation of neural structures occurs distal to the area of interest leading to false negatives. Eliminating crossover may lead to activation of the motor pathway proximal to the surgical site, thus potentially reducing false-negative responses. There are no data on how often crossover signals occur or the conditions in which they take place. This study examines the frequency of crossover, the surgical procedures in which they occur, and their stimulation parameters. METHODS: We reviewed all the TcMEP data files for intracranial procedures performed in 2016 at Keck Hospital of USC. We recorded demographic information about the surgical side, lobe, diagnosis, age, and sex. Only baseline TcMEPs were analyzed. Crossover responses were deemed present if recorded amplitudes were greater than 25µv on the ipsilateral side. We evaluated the rate of crossover presence, the lowest voltage associated with crossover, the highest voltage without crossover, if crossover resolved, and the last muscles to remain present when crossover is eliminated. Transcranial motor evoked potentials were divided into four groups. Group A: crossover present and was not resolved, group B1: crossover present but resolved with desired signals, group B2: no crossover seen with desired signals in both limbs, and group C: crossover resolved with loss of signals in either limb. The Difference between lowest amplitude with crossover and highest amplitude without crossover was obtained for each patient, and the mean of this difference was calculated using paired t-test. RESULTS: We analyzed 186 TcMEPs. Forty-four TcMEPs were in group A, 52 in B1, 68 in B2, and 22 TcMEPs were in group C. Of total crossovers (118), 63% resolved at baseline, whereas 37% did not resolve. The mean difference between minimum value with crossover and maximum value without crossover was 50 V (P < 0.0001). In five TcMEPs, this difference was 0 and the median was 250 V. There was no significant difference between surgical site, stimulation side, pathology, or sex between crossover (A) and noncrossover (B + C) groups. There was a significant association found between age group ≤50 years versus >50 years and being in crossover versus noncrossover groups (P = 0.01). For 95% of the cases in group C, the last muscles to stay were hand muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Transcranial motor evoked potential crossover may pose a problem during surgeries leading to false-negative results. Crossover is a frequent phenomenon that should not be overlooked. Stimulation intensity is the main factor contributing to the reduction of crossover. Crossover can be reduced in most TcMEPs performed (63%) leading to adequate monitoring in 76% of TcMEPs. Despite best efforts, there are still one quarter (24%) of TcMEPs where crossover cannot be eliminated. Newer strategies should be sought to reduce crossover. Teams should focus their efforts on reducing crossover of TcMEPs to make monitoring of intracranial surgeries more reliable.

An Alternative Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Montage to Minimize Ipsilateral "Crossover" Motor Responses.

Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential (TcMEP) is a modality utilized in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring to assess the integrity of the corticospinal tract. Traditionally, TcMEPs are obtained by anodal stimulation of the scalp over the motor cortex of the selected hemisphere and referenced to the contralateral hemisphere. Subsequent compound motor action potential responses (CMAPs) are recorded at various muscles. The muscle responses of interest are usually those recorded in the limb contralateral to the hemisphere of stimulation. However, TcMEPs may elicit simultaneous muscle responses in the limbs ipsilateral to the hemisphere of stimulation, otherwise defined as "crossover" responses. Crossover TcMEPs are thought to be generated when electrical stimulation reaches the corticospinal tract at intracranial structures as deep as the medullary pyramids. If electrical stimulation penetrates deeper than the at-risk structures, false negatives motor evoked potential monitoring may occur. Therefore, in surgeries where cerebral cortical structures may be at risk, TcMEPs may be elicited so that contralateral CMAP responses are present without crossover responses. We present three cases using an alternative TcMEP montage in which anodal stimulation of the target hemisphere is referenced to Fpz at midline. Compared with the C3-C4/C4-C3 montage, crossover responses are minimized with the modified montage. C3-Fpz/C4-Fpz TcMEP stimulation may be a potential tool to implement in certain intraoperative neuromonitoring cases.

Factors Associated With Inadequate Intraoperative Baseline Lower Extremity Somatosensory Evoked Potentials.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring involves the use of various modalities, including somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP), to assess the integrity of the at-risk nervous system during surgeries. Reliable baseline tracings are important because they are data against which future tracings are compared to detect potential injury. In some cases, adequate baselines may be difficult to achieve. Therefore, we analyzed several patient-specific factors to determine which variables are associated with inadequate intraoperative SEP baseline signals. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective chart review of 631 consecutive patients who underwent spine or cranial surgeries between 2010 and 2011. Variables analyzed included age, glucose levels, diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, height, weight, sex, smoking, preexisting neurologic conditions, surgical history, lower extremity edema, and neurologic examination findings. Association between these patient factors and baseline lower extremity SEP signals were analyzed. RESULTS: Height, weight, neurologic deficits, lower extremity edema, and history of neurologic disease are each associated with inadequate baseline lower extremity SEPs after controlling for confounding variables. Baseline signals were able to be acquired in 94.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate baselines are paramount for successful intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring. However, certain patient-specific factors are associated with inadequate baseline SEP signals. Physical examination findings and a detailed chart review can be done to identify these factors and guide expectations during monitoring. Further research related to patient-specific factors amenable to modification can further improve our capacity to protect the nervous system during surgery.

Comparison of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude Responses Between Intramuscular and Subcutaneous Needles in Proximal Thigh Muscle.

PURPOSE: Successful intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is predicated on the presence of adequate baseline-evoked potentials. We have observed that transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) yield more robust responses in the distal muscles compared with proximal muscles. One possible explanation is the distance from the needle to the muscle generator. In this study, we investigate whether TcMEP amplitudes from the rectus femoris muscle are affected by changes in needle length. METHODS: We analyzed rectus femoris TcMEP responses in surgical patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. Needles of two different sizes were placed simultaneously. A shorter 13-mm subcutaneous needle was inserted into the rectus femoris muscle subcutaneous group in addition to a longer 25-mm intramuscular needle (intramuscular group). Each limb was used as an independent control. Transcranial motor evoked potential amplitude responses were obtained using both needles, and statistical analysis was calculated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired data. Secondary analysis was performed to correlate between TcMEP amplitude and skinfold thickness. RESULTS: Twenty-eight TcMEP responses from the rectus femoris (14 patients) were analyzed. We observed that TcMEP amplitude responses were higher in the intramuscular needle group compared with the subcutaneous group (N = 28, P < 0.0001). There was a mean difference of 604 µV between the intramuscular versus subcutaneous group (median 184 µV). There was also a significant correlation between TcMEP amplitude and skinfold thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Higher TcMEP amplitude responses are seen with longer needles compared with shorter needles placed in the same rectus femoris muscle. Transcranial motor evoked potential baselines may be optimized using longer needles. Skinfold thickness can be a good marker to determine appropriate needle size.

Differences in the Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials Between Proximal and Distal Lower Extremity Muscles.

PURPOSE: Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) are the preferred modality to monitor the integrity of motor pathways during surgery. Recently, it has also been used as a method to help with detection of nerve roots injuries. Adequate baseline muscle responses are vital to detect nerve injury. We have observed that TcMEP responses are not homogeneous across multiple myotomes, but this has not been studied systematically. Our objective is to determine whether there are any relative differences in amplitude or morphology of TcMEPs across various lower extremity muscles. METHODS: Clinical and neurophysiological monitoring data from patients who had lumbar spine surgery were obtained retrospectively. Transcranial motor evoked potential responses were evaluated for each limb in the quadriceps, tibialis anterior, and intrinsic foot muscles. We compared TcMEP responses between these muscle groups using paired t-test statistical analysis. Each limb was analyzed separately. Only limbs without deficit in the interested muscle groups were included for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients and 69 limbs were included for analysis. The mean TcMEP amplitude difference between the tibialis anterior and quadriceps muscles was 458 µV (P < 0.0001), and between intrinsic feet and quadriceps muscles was 541 µV (P < 0.0001). Proximal muscles also demonstrated a significantly smaller number of TcMEP phases than their distal counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Transcranial motor evoked potential amplitudes are significantly smaller in proximal lower extremity muscles compared with distal lower extremity muscles. The observed difference might be due to cortical representation or higher subcutaneous tissue in thigh muscles.

Overview of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring During Spine Surgery.

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring has had major advances in the past few decades. During spine surgery, the use of multimodality monitoring enables us to assess the integrity of the spinal cord, nerve roots, and peripheral nerves. The authors present a practical approach to the current modalities in use during spine surgery, including somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, spinal D-waves, and free-run and triggered electromyography. Understanding the complementary nature of these modalities will help tailor monitoring to a particular procedure to minimize postoperative neurologic deficit during spine surgery.

Posterior circulation cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after high flow external carotid artery to middle cerebral artery bypass.

We present the first report, to our knowledge, in which revascularization of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) with a high flow extracranial-intracranial procedure resulted in symptomatic hyperemia of the posterior circulation. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a poorly understood phenomenon that is classically seen in the distribution of a revascularized artery. A 37-year-old woman presented with a 3 month history of cognitive and speech difficulties, persistent headaches, weakness, numbness, and paresthesia which was worse in the right extremities and face. She was found to have bilateral watershed infarcts worse in the left cerebral hemisphere, severe bilateral stenosis of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery, and a small left superior hypophyseal aneurysm. The patient underwent left cerebral hemisphere revascularization with a high flow external carotid artery to MCA bypass with aneurysm trapping. During skin closure, significant changes were seen in her bilateral upper extremity motor-evoked potentials. The patient's postoperative exam was noted for an intermittent inability to follow commands, bilateral upper extremity weakness, vertical nystagmus, and alogia that all dramatically improved with strict blood pressure control. Postoperative perfusion imaging revealed posterior circulation hyperemia. This patient highlights the potential for hyperemic complications outside the revascularized arterial territory. Strict blood pressure control is recommended in order to prevent and manage hyperemia-associated symptoms. Improving our understanding of CHS may assist in identifying at risk patients and at risk arterial territories in order to optimize CHS prevention and management strategies.

Effect of niacin on preß-1 high-density lipoprotein levels in diabetes.

Preß-1 high-density lipoprotein (HDL) is an acceptor of peripheral free cholesterol and thus a participant in reverse cholesterol transport. Because patients with diabetes may have defects in reverse cholesterol transport, we hypothesized that (1) preß-1 HDL might be decreased in diabetes and (2) because niacin improves reverse cholesterol transport and may stimulate preß-1 HDL maturation, niacin would further decrease steady-state levels of preß-1 HDL in diabetes. Absolute levels of preß-1 HDL mass were measured using an isotopic dilution-ultrafiltration assay that measures apolipoprotein (apo) A-I after physically isolating preß-1. Plasma apo A-I concentration and routine lipids were also evaluated in 11 diabetic patients. Diabetic subjects have a nearly 50% reduction of circulating levels of preß-1 HDL to 36 ± 22 (1 SD) µg/mL compared with our previously published values of 73 ± 44 µg/mL in 136 healthy subjects. After niacin therapy, there was a further 17% reduction of preß-1 HDL levels to 30 ± 26 µg/mL (P < .026) compared with baseline. The percentage of preß-1 HDL in diabetic patients, as a percentage of total apo A-I, was about half of the normal value of 6.1% ± 3.6%; after niacin in diabetic patients, the percentage further decreased from 3.3% ± 2.1% to 2.3% ± 1.9% (P < .003). Absolute levels of apo A-I were similar in diabetic patients (1.14 ± 0.29) and healthy subjects (1.24 ± 0.24), and were unchanged by niacin in diabetic patients. We conclude with the novel observations that diabetes is associated with significantly reduced levels of preß-1 HDL and that, after niacin treatment, a further lowering of preß-1 HDL levels occur. Several altered mechanisms of RCT in diabetes are consistent with low levels of preß-1 HDL both before and after niacin treatment.

Tactile spatial acuity differs between fingers: a study comparing two testing paradigms.

Tactile spatial acuity (TSA) is a reliable and reproducible measure of somatosensory system function that has been used to study abroad range of subject populations. Although TSA is most often assessed at the fingertip, published studies employing identical stimuli disagree on whether TSA differs between the fingers of neurologically normal subjects. Using a validated grating orientation discrimination task, we determined TSA bilaterally at the index and ring fingers of 16 healthy young adults. Motivated by earlier work, we utilized two stimulus presentation paradigms, the method of constant stimuli (MCS) and a staircase (SC) method. We found that TSA was significantly higher (the discrimination threshold was lower) at the index than at the ring finger, which was consistent with a prior study. Although mean thresholds at both fingers were higher when measured with the SC than with the MCS paradigm, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = .14). These findings should facilitate both design and interpretation of future studies investigating TSA.