Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Neurophysiol Clin ; 43(4): 243-50, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24094910

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Transcranial electric stimulation elicited muscle motor evoked potentials (TESmMEPs) is one of the best methods for corticospinal tract's function monitoring during spine and spinal cord surgeries. A train of multipulse electric stimulation is required for eliciting TESmMEPs under general anaesthesia. Here, we investigated the best stimulation parameters for eliciting and recording tibialis anterior's TESmMEPs during paediatric scoliosis surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Numbers of pulses (NOP), inter-stimulus intervals (ISI) and current intensities allowing the best size tibialis anterior muscle's TESmMEPs under general anaesthesia, were tested and collected during 77 paediatric scoliosis surgery monitoring procedures in our hospital. Individual pulse duration was kept at 0.5 ms and stimulating electrodes were positioned at C1 and C2 (International 10-20-EEG-System) during all the tests. RESULTS: The NOP used for eliciting the best tibialis anterior TESmMEPs response was 5, 6, and 7 respectively in 21 (27%), 47 (61%) and 9 (12%) out of the 77 patients. The ISI was 2, 3 and 4 ms respectively in 13 (17%), 55 (71%) and 9 (12%) of them. The current intensity used varied from 300 to 700 V (mean: 448±136 V). CONCLUSION: Most patients had 6 as best NOP (61%) and 3 ms as best ISI (71%). These findings support that a NOP of 6 and an ISI of 3 ms should be preferentially used as optimal stimulation settings for intraoperative tibialis anterior muscle's TESmMEPs eliciting and recording during paediatric scoliosis surgery.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Monitoring, Intraoperative , Scoliosis/surgery , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Pyramidal Tracts/physiology , Young Adult
2.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 124(12): 2291-316, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24055297

ABSTRACT

The following intraoperative MEP recommendations can be made on the basis of current evidence and expert opinion: (1) Acquisition and interpretation should be done by qualified personnel. (2) The methods are sufficiently safe using appropriate precautions. (3) MEPs are an established practice option for cortical and subcortical mapping and for monitoring during surgeries risking motor injury in the brain, brainstem, spinal cord or facial nerve. (4) Intravenous anesthesia usually consisting of propofol and opioid is optimal for muscle MEPs. (5) Interpretation should consider limitations and confounding factors. (6) D-wave warning criteria consider amplitude reduction having no confounding factor explanation: >50% for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery, and >30-40% for peri-Rolandic surgery. (7) Muscle MEP warning criteria are tailored to the type of surgery and based on deterioration clearly exceeding variability with no confounding factor explanation. Disappearance is always a major criterion. Marked amplitude reduction, acute threshold elevation or morphology simplification could be additional minor or moderate spinal cord monitoring criteria depending on the type of surgery and the program's technique and experience. Major criteria for supratentorial, brainstem or facial nerve monitoring include >50% amplitude reduction when warranted by sufficient preceding response stability. Future advances could modify these recommendations.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Monitoring, Intraoperative/standards , Neurophysiological Monitoring/methods , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Bites, Human/epidemiology , Bites, Human/etiology , Brain/anatomy & histology , Brain/physiology , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/physiopathology , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/surgery , Cerebrovascular Circulation , Contraindications , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Muscle, Skeletal/anatomy & histology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Neurophysiological Monitoring/standards , Neurosurgical Procedures , Patient Outcome Assessment , Spinal Cord/blood supply , United States
3.
Exp Brain Res ; 211(2): 277-86, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21526337

ABSTRACT

Previous studies examining discrete movements of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients have found that in addition to performing movements that were slower than those of control participants, they exhibit specific deficits in movement coordination and in sensorimotor integration required to accurately guide movements. With medication, movement speed was normalized, but the coordinative aspects of movement were not. This led to the hypothesis that dopaminergic medication more readily compensates for intensive aspects of movement (such as speed), than for coordinative aspects (such as coordination of different limb segments) (Schettino et al., Exp Brain Res 168:186-202, 2006). We tested this hypothesis on rhythmic, continuous movements of the forearm. In our task, target peak speed and amplitude, availability of visual feedback, and medication state (on/off) were varied. We found, consistent with the discrete-movement results, that peak speed (intensive aspect) was normalized by medication, while accuracy, which required coordination of speed and amplitude modulation (coordinative aspect), was not normalized by dopaminergic treatment. However, our findings that amplitude, an intensive aspect of movement, was also not normalized by medication, suggests that a simple pathway gain increase does not act to remediate all intensive aspects of movement to the same extent. While it normalized movement peak speed, it did not normalize movement amplitude. Furthermore, we found that when visual feedback was not available, all participants (PD and controls) made faster movements. The effects of dopaminergic medication and availability of visual feedback on movement speed were additive. The finding that movement speed uniformly increased both in the PD and the control groups suggests that visual feedback may be necessary for calibration of peak speed, otherwise underestimated by the motor control system.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/pharmacology , Feedback, Sensory/physiology , Movement/physiology , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Photic Stimulation/methods , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Feedback, Sensory/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Movement/drug effects , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Periodicity , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Space Perception/drug effects , Space Perception/physiology
4.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg ; 86(1): 1-15, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17881884

ABSTRACT

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease (PD) has become routine over the past decade, utilizing microelectrode recordings to ensure accurate placement of the stimulating electrodes. The clinical benefits of STN DBS for PD are well documented, but the mechanisms by which DBS achieves these results remain elusive. We have created a closed-form mathematical function of the potential field generated by a typical 4-contact DBS electrode and inserted this function into a computational model designed to simulate individual neurons and neural circuitry of significant portions of the basal ganglia. We present the mathematical function representing the potential field itself and the basis for the neural circuitry modeling in this paper.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Models, Neurological , Neural Conduction , Neural Networks, Computer , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Software , Animals , Biophysics/instrumentation , Biophysics/methods , Electrodes/standards , Humans , Neural Conduction/physiology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Software/standards , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology
5.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg ; 86(1): 16-29, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17881885

ABSTRACT

Treatment with deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) has become routine over the past decade, particularly using the subthalamic nucleus (STN) as a target and utilizing microelectrode recordings to ensure accurate placement of the stimulating electrodes. The clinical changes seen with DBS in the STN for PD are consistently beneficial, but there continues to be only marginal understanding of the mechanisms by which DBS achieves these results. Using an analytical model of the typical DBS 4-contact electrode and software developed to simulate individual neurons and neural circuitry of the basal ganglia we compare the results of the model to those of data obtained during DBS surgery of the STN. Firing rate, interspike intervals and regularity analyses were performed on the simulated data and compared to results in the literature.


Subject(s)
Basal Ganglia/physiology , Computer Simulation/standards , Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Models, Neurological , Neural Networks, Computer , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology , Action Potentials/physiology , Animals , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Electrodes/standards , Humans , Parkinson Disease/therapy
6.
Neurology ; 69(7): 681-8, 2007 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17698790

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 60 Hz deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) in 15 consecutive patients with primary dystonia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinic charts relative to 15 consecutive patients with medically refractory primary dystonia who underwent stereotactic implantation of DBS leads within the GPi. Twelve had the DYT1 gene mutation. Frame-based MRI and intraoperative microelectrode recording were employed for targeting. All patients were treated exclusively with stimulation at 60 Hz from therapy outset. The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) served as the primary measure of symptom severity at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: All patients tolerated DBS treatment well and showed a progressive median improvement of their BFMDRS motor subscores from 38% at 1 month to 89% at 1 year (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank sum test). The disability subscores were similarly improved. The clinical response to DBS allowed seven patients to completely discontinue their medications; six additional patients had reduced their medications by at least 50%. Surgical complications were limited to two superficial infections, which were treated successfully. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulation of the internal globus pallidus at 60 Hz is safe and effective for treating medically refractory primary dystonia.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Dystonia Musculorum Deformans/therapy , Globus Pallidus/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Dystonia Musculorum Deformans/physiopathology , Electrodes, Implanted , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
9.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg ; 77(1-4): 101-7, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12378065

ABSTRACT

Intraoperative neurophysiologic methods for localizing targets deep in the brain require the use of specialized monitoring and recording equipment, including stimulators, neurophysiologic recording devices, and image manipulation tools. When using microelectrode recording devices there are some specifications that are more important than others, such as signal-to-noise ratios and amplifier impedance. As more companies develop tools to be used in the operating room, the end users have more choices. Some of the more important specifications are discussed and a comparison is made of the five major brands on the market today.


Subject(s)
Electrodes, Implanted , Electrophysiology/instrumentation , Microelectrodes , Monitoring, Intraoperative/instrumentation , Stereotaxic Techniques/instrumentation , Action Potentials , Electric Stimulation , Electrophysiology/methods , Equipment Design , Humans , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Movement Disorders/surgery , Neural Networks, Computer , Online Systems , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
10.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 94(1): 65-70, 1999 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9934732

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Octreotide, a somatostatin analog, is antinociceptive and increases perception threshold in the rectum. The aim of this study was to determine whether octreotide alters esophageal sensory thresholds and cortical evoked potentials (CEPs) resulting from intraesophageal balloon distension. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers (six men and six women, median age 25 yr, range 21-60 yr) underwent a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of octreotide 100 microg s.c. versus saline. A 30-mm balloon was inserted 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter without topical anesthesia. The balloon was inflated at a rate of 170 cc/s to a maximum of 30 cc in 2 cc steps. Both pressure and volume were recorded. Patients reported first sensation (S1) and maximally tolerated pain (S2). Two cycles were performed both preinjection and 40 min postinjection. Evoked potentials were recorded from Cz to linked ears over 50 balloon inflation cycles (volume = S2). RESULTS: Threshold volume to first sensation (S1) was significantly increased after octreotide injection [median (interquartile range): 24 (14-26) cc vs 13 (9-21) cc, p < 0.02]. No significant alteration in volume causing pain (S2) was noted after octreotide injection [29 (25-30+) cc vs 22 (19-29) cc]. Neither were volumes causing either first sensation [18 (11-24) cc vs 13 (9-18) cc] or pain [27 (23-30) cc vs 23 (21-25) cc] significantly altered by placebo injection. Neither amplitude nor latency of any of the three peaks of the evoked potential recordings differed significantly between postplacebo and postoctreotide recordings. CONCLUSION: Octreotide significantly increased esophageal perception thresholds to balloon distension. It did not alter pain thresholds, nor were cortical evoked potentials to painful stimulation altered in normal subjects.


Subject(s)
Esophagus/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Agents/pharmacology , Octreotide/pharmacology , Sensory Thresholds/drug effects , Adult , Catheterization , Double-Blind Method , Esophagus/drug effects , Esophagus/innervation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
11.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg ; 72(2-4): 150-3, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10853070

ABSTRACT

The authors assess the accuracy of targeting nucleus ventralis intermedius (Vim) with fast spin echo inversion recovery (FSE/IR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 18 successful deep brain stimulator (DBS) implants for medically refractory tremor. FSE/IR-MRI-derived coordinates are compared to the final coordinates employed for DBS lead placement, selected with intraoperative neurophysiology. The authors conclude that FSE/IR MRI is sufficiently reliable to serve as the sole means of anatomically targeting Vim for DBS lead placement. An independent computer workstation is not required for accurate targeting; however, intraoperative neurophysiology remains essential.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping/methods , Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Electrodes, Implanted , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Preoperative Care/methods , Stereotaxic Techniques , Ventral Thalamic Nuclei/pathology , Brain Mapping/instrumentation , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Microelectrodes , Monitoring, Intraoperative/instrumentation , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Tremor/etiology , Tremor/therapy , User-Computer Interface
12.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol ; 98(2): 113-25, 1996 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8598171

ABSTRACT

Previous electrophysiological studies have demonstrated interactions between dichoptic visual stimuli presented to the same location in visual space. In this study, we used non-liner spectral analysis, in particular the bispectrum, to study interactions between the electrocerebral activity resulting from stimulation of the left and right visual fields. The stimulus consisted of two squares, one in each visual field, flickering at different frequencies. Bispectra, bichoherence and biphase were calculated for 8 subjects monocularly observing a visual stimulus. Both phase vs. frequency and biphase vs. frequency plots were made to determine weighted time delays from stimulus application to signal appearance in the EEG electrodes. Bispectral analysis reveals non-liner interactions between visual fields occurring with weighted delay times of 410 + / - 58 msec while non-interactive components propagated with weighted time delays of 202 + / - 39 msec. Evaluating these results in light of the predictions of various models, we were able to conclude that this interaction does not occur in the retina. These results illustrate how bispectral analysis can be a powerful tool in analyzing the connectivity of neural networks in complex systems. It allows different neuronal systems to be labeled with stimuli at specific frequencies, whose connections can be traced using frequency analysis of the scalp EEG.


Subject(s)
Electroencephalography/methods , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Visual Perception/physiology , Color Perception/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology , Humans , Mathematics , Nonlinear Dynamics , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...