Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 39
Filter
2.
Heliyon ; 9(8): e18671, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37593620

ABSTRACT

Quickly and efficiently extracting evoked potential information from noise is critical to the clinical practice of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM). Currently this is primarily done using trained professionals to interpret averaged waveforms. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and compare multiple means of electronically extracting simple to understand evoked potential characteristics with minimum averaging. A number of evoked potential models are studied and their performance evaluated as a function of the signal to noise level in simulations. Methods: which extract the least number of parameters from the data are least sensitive to the effects of noise and are easiest to interpret. The simplest model uses the baseline evoked potential and the correlation receiver to provide an amplitude measure. Amplitude measures extracted using the correlation receiver show superior performance to those based on peak to peak amplitude measures. In addition, measures of change in latency or shape of the evoked potential can be extracted using the derivative of the baseline evoked response or other methods. This methodology allows real-time access to amplitude measures that can be understood by the entire OR staff as they are small, dimensionless numbers of order unity which are simple to interpret. The IONM team can then adjust averaging and other parameters to allow for visual interpretation of waveforms as appropriate.

4.
Neuromodulation ; 26(3): 614-619, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35715282

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms of action of high-frequency stimulation (HFS) are unknown. We investigated the possible mechanism of subthreshold superexcitability of HFS on the excitability of the peripheral nerve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ulnar nerve was stimulated at the wrist in six healthy participants with a single (control) stimulus, and the responses were compared with the responses to a continuous train of 5 seconds at frequencies of 500 Hz, 2.5 kHz, 5 kHz, and 10 kHz. Threshold intensity for compound muscle action potential (CMAP) was defined as intensity producing a 100-µV amplitude in ten sequential trials and "subthreshold" as 10% below the CMAP threshold. HFS threshold was defined as stimulation intensity eliciting visible tetanic contraction. RESULTS: Comparing the threshold of single pulse stimulation for eliciting CMAP vs threshold for HFS response and pooling data at different frequencies (500 Hz-10 kHz) revealed a significant difference (p = 0.00015). This difference was most obvious at 10 kHz, with a mean value for threshold reduction of 42.2%. CONCLUSIONS: HFS with a stimulation intensity below the threshold for a single pulse induces axonal superexcitability if applied in a train. It can activate the peripheral nerve and produce a tetanic muscle response. Subthreshold superexcitability may allow new insights into the mechanism of HFS.


Subject(s)
Axons , Wrist , Humans , Healthy Volunteers , Heart Rate , Peripheral Nerves
5.
Handb Clin Neurol ; 186: 123-132, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35772882

ABSTRACT

During stereotactic procedures for treating medically refractory movement disorders, intraoperative neurophysiology shifts its focus from simply monitoring the effects of surgery to an integral part of the surgical procedure. The small size, poor visualization, and physiologic nature of these deep brain targets compel the surgeon to rely on some form of physiologic for confirmation of proper anatomic targeting. Even given the newer reliance on imaging and asleep deep brain stimulator electrode placement, it is still a physiologic target and thus some form of intraoperative physiology is necessary. This chapter reviews the neurophysiologic monitoring method of microelectrode recording that is commonly employed during these neurosurgical procedures today.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Parkinson Disease , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neurophysiology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Stereotaxic Techniques
6.
Handb Clin Neurol ; 186: 83-99, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35772901

ABSTRACT

While intra-operative neuro-physiologic assessment and monitoring improve the safety of patients, its use may also introduce new risks of injuries. This chapter looks at the electric safety of equipment and the potential hazards during the set-up of the monitoring. The physical and functional physiologic effects of electric shocks and stimulation currents, standards for safety limits, and conditions for tissue damage are described from basic physical principles. Considered are the electrode-tissue interface in relation to electrode dimensions and stimulation parameters as applied in various modalities of evoked sensory and motor potentials as to-date used in intra-operative monitoring, mapping of neuro-physiologic functions. A background is given on circumstances for electric tissue heating and heat drainage, thermal toxicity, protection against thermal injuries and side effects of unintended activation of neural and cardiac tissues, adverse effects of physiologic amplifiers from transcranial stimulation (TES) and excitotoxicity of direct cortical stimulation. Addressed are safety issues of TES and measures for prevention. Safety issues include bite and movement-induced injuries, seizures, and after discharges, interaction with implanted devices as cardiac pacemaker and deep brain stimulators. Further discussed are safety issues of equipment leakage currents, protection against electric shocks, and maintenance.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor , Monitoring, Intraoperative , Electric Stimulation/methods , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Seizures
7.
Neurol Clin ; 40(2): 375-389, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35465881

ABSTRACT

Intraoperative neuromonitoring encompasses a variety of different modalities in which different neuropathways are monitored either continuously or at defined time points throughout a neurosurgical procedure. Surgical morbidity can be mitigated with careful patient selection and thoughtful implementation of the appropriate neuromonitoring modalities through the identification of eloquent areas or early detection of iatrogenic pathway disruption. Modalities covered in this article include somatosensory and motor evoked potentials, electromyography, electroencephalography, brainstem auditory evoked responses, and direct cortical stimulation.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory , Monitoring, Intraoperative , Electromyography , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Humans , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods
8.
Front Neurol ; 12: 723476, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34659089

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Up to 27% of individuals undergoing subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) have a genetic form of Parkinson's disease (PD). Glucocerebrosidase (GBA) mutation carriers, compared to sporadic PD, present with a more aggressive disease, less asymmetry, and fare worse on cognitive outcomes with STN-DBS. Evaluating STN intra-operative local field potentials provide the opportunity to assess and compare symmetry between GBA and non-GBA mutation carriers with PD; thus, providing insight into genotype and STN physiology, and eligibility for and programming of STN-DBS. The purpose of this pilot study was to test differences in left and right STN resting state beta power in non-GBA and GBA mutation carriers with PD. Materials and Methods: STN (left and right) resting state local field potentials were recorded intraoperatively from 4 GBA and 5 non-GBA patients with PD while off medication. Peak beta power expressed as a ratio to total beta power (peak beta ratio) was compared between STN hemispheres and groups while co-varying for age, age of disease onset, and disease severity. Results: Peak beta ratio was significantly different between the left and the right STN for the GBA group (p < 0.01) but not the non-GBA group (p = 0.56) after co-varying for age, age of disease onset, and disease severity. Discussion: Peak beta ratio in GBA mutation carriers was more asymmetric compared with non-mutation carriers and this corresponded with the degree of clinical asymmetry as measured by rating scales. This finding suggests that GBA mutation carriers have a physiologic signature that is distinct from that found in sporadic PD.

9.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 34(5): 590-596, 2021 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34435602

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We will explain the basic principles of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) during spinal surgery. Thereafter we highlight the significant impact that general anesthesia can have on the efficacy of the IONM and provide an overview of the essential pharmacological and physiological factors that need to be optimized to enable IONM. Lastly, we stress the importance of teamwork between the anesthesiologist, the neurophysiologist, and the surgeon to improve clinical outcome after spinal surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, the use of IONM has increased significantly. It has developed into a mature discipline, enabling neurosurgical procedures of ever-increasing complexity. It is thus of growing importance for the anesthesiologist to appreciate the interplay between IONM and anesthesia and to build up experience working in a team with the neurosurgeon and the neurophysiologist. SUMMARY: Safety measures, cooperation, careful choice of drugs, titration of drugs, and maintenance of physiological homeostasis are essential for effective IONM.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Humans , Neurosurgeons , Neurosurgical Procedures , Spinal Cord
10.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) ; 20(4): 419-425, 2021 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33428767

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Segmented deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads, which are capable of steering current in the direction of any 1 of 3 segments, can result in a wider therapeutic window by directing current away from unintended structures, particularly, the corticospinal tract (CST). It is unclear whether the use of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) is feasible during DBS surgery via stimulation of individual contacts/segments in order to quantify CST activation thresholds and optimal contacts/segments intraoperatively. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using MEP to identify CST thresholds for ring and individual segments of the DBS lead under general anesthesia. METHODS: MEP testing was performed during pulse generator implantation under general anesthesia on subjects who underwent DBS lead implantation into the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Stimulation of each ring and segmented contacts of the directional DBS lead was performed until CST threshold was reached. Stereotactic coordinates and thresholds for each contact/segment were recorded along with the initially activated muscle group. RESULTS: A total of 34 hemispheres were included for analysis. MEP thresholds were recorded from 268 total contacts/segments. For segmented contacts (2 and 3, respectively), the mean highest CST thresholds were 2.33 and 2.62 mA, while the mean lowest CST thresholds were 1.7 and 1.89 mA, suggesting differential thresholds in relation to CST. First dorsal interosseous and abductor pollicis brevis (34% each) were the most commonly activated muscle groups. CONCLUSION: MEP threshold recording from segmented DBS leads is feasible. MEP recordings can identify segments with highest CST thresholds and may identify segment orientation in relation to CST.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Parkinson Disease , Subthalamic Nucleus , Evoked Potentials, Motor , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Parkinson Disease/therapy
13.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 33(2): 175-183, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30374759

ABSTRACT

The American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM) was founded in 1989 as the American Society of Evoked Potential Monitoring. From the beginning, the Society has been made up of physicians, doctoral degree holders, Technologists, and all those interested in furthering the profession. The Society changed its name to the ASNM and held its first Annual Meeting in 1990. It remains the largest worldwide organization dedicated solely to the scientifically-based advancement of intraoperative neurophysiology. The primary goal of the ASNM is to assure the quality of patient care during procedures monitoring the nervous system. This goal is accomplished primarily through programs in education, advocacy of basic and clinical research, and publication of guidelines, among other endeavors. The ASNM is committed to the development of medically sound and clinically relevant guidelines for the performance of intraoperative neurophysiology. Guidelines are formulated based on exhaustive literature review, recruitment of expert opinion, and broad consensus among ASNM membership. Input is likewise sought from sister societies and related constituencies. Adherence to a literature-based, formalized process characterizes the construction of all ASNM guidelines. The guidelines covering the Professional Practice of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring were initially published January 24th, 2013, and subsequently that document has undergone review and revision to accommodate broad inter- and intra-societal feedback. This current version of the ASNM Professional Practice Guideline was fully approved for publication according to ASNM bylaws on February 22nd, 2018, and thus overwrites and supersedes the initial guideline.


Subject(s)
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring/standards , Neurophysiological Monitoring/standards , Neurophysiology/standards , Humans , Organization and Administration , Physicians , Societies, Medical , United States
14.
J Clin Neurophysiol ; 36(1): 67-73, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30418266

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Local field potential recordings from deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads provide insight into the pathophysiology of Parkinson disease (PD). We recorded local field potential activity from DBS leads within the subthalamic nucleus in patients with PD undergoing DBS surgery to identify reproducible pathophysiological signatures of the disease. METHODS: Local field potentials were recorded in 11 hemispheres from patients with PD undergoing subthalamic nucleus-DBS. Bipolar recordings were performed off medication for 2 minutes at rest and another 2 minutes with continuous repetitive opening-closing of the contralateral hand. Spectral analysis and bicoherence were performed and compared between the two testing conditions. RESULTS: In all hemispheres, predominance of the beta band frequency (13-30 Hz) was observed at rest and during movement. Beta peak energy was significantly (P < 0.05) increased during movement compared with rest in 6 of 10 hemispheres. Significant beta bicoherence was observed at rest and during movement in 5 of 10 hemispheres. The most robust local field potential recordings were observed at the DBS contact(s) independently chosen for programming in 9 of the 10 hemispheres. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PD, beta activity that increases with repetitive movement may be a signature of the "off" medication state. These findings provide new data on beta oscillatory activity during the Parkinsonian "off" state that may help further define the local field potential signatures of PD.


Subject(s)
Beta Rhythm/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation , Movement/physiology , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/surgery , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiopathology , Aged , Female , Hand/physiopathology , Humans , Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring , Male , Middle Aged , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Subthalamic Nucleus/surgery
15.
Neural Comput ; 31(2): 388-416, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30576619

ABSTRACT

Connectomes abound, but few for the human spinal cord. Using anatomical data in the literature, we constructed a draft connectivity map of the human spinal cord connectome, providing a template for the many calibrations of specialized behavior to be overlaid on it and the basis for an initial computational model. A thorough literature review gleaned cell types, connectivity, and connection strength indications. Where human data were not available, we selected species that have been studied. Cadaveric spinal cord measurements, cross-sectional histology images, and cytoarchitectural data regarding cell size and density served as the starting point for estimating numbers of neurons. Simulations were run using neural circuitry simulation software. The model contains the neural circuitry in all ten Rexed laminae with intralaminar, interlaminar, and intersegmental connections, as well as ascending and descending brain connections and estimated neuron counts for various cell types in every lamina of all 31 segments. We noted the presence of highly interconnected complex networks exhibiting several orders of recurrence. The model was used to perform a detailed study of spinal cord stimulation for analgesia. This model is a starting point for workers to develop and test hypotheses across an array of biomedical applications focused on the spinal cord. Each such model requires additional calibrations to constrain its output to verifiable predictions. Future work will include simulating additional segments and expanding the research uses of the model.


Subject(s)
Connectome , Models, Neurological , Neurons/physiology , Spinal Cord/physiology , Animals , Axons/physiology , Humans , Neural Pathways/physiology
16.
J Clin Neurol ; 14(4): 444-453, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30198227

ABSTRACT

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a common therapeutic technique for treating medically refractory neuropathic back and other limb pain syndromes. SCS has historically been performed using a sedative anesthetic technique where the patient is awakened at various times during a surgical procedure to evaluate the location of the stimulator lead. This technique has potential complications, and thus other methods that allow the use of a general anesthetic have been developed. There are two primary methods for placing leads under general anesthesia, based on 1) compound muscle action potentials and 2) collisions between somatosensory evoked potentials. Both techniques are discussed, and the literature on SCS lead placement under general anesthesia using intraoperative neurophysiological mapping is comprehensively reviewed.

19.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg ; 96(1): 1-12, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29393267

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has effects on axons that originate and terminate outside the DBS target area. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that DBS generates action potentials (APs) in both directions in "axons of passage," altering their information content and that of all downstream cells and circuits, and sought to quantify the change in fiber information content. METHODS: We incorporated DBS parameters (fiber firing frequency and refractory time, and AP initiation location along the fiber and propagation velocity) in a filtering function determining the AP frequency reaching the postsynaptic cell. Using neural circuitry simulation software, we investigated the ability of the filtering function to predict the firing frequency of APs reaching neurons targeted by axons of passage. We calculated their entropy with and without DBS, and with the electrode applied at various distances from the cell body. RESULTS: The predictability of the filtering function exceeded 98%. Entropy calculations showed that the entropy ratio "without DBS" to "with DBS" was always >1.0, thus DBS reduces fiber entropy. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The results imply that DBS effects are due to entropy reduction within fibers, i.e., a reduction in their information. (2) Where fibers of passage do not terminate in target regions, DBS may have side effects on nontargeted circuitry.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials/physiology , Axons/physiology , Brain/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Entropy , Models, Neurological , Nerve Net/physiology , Humans , Neurons/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...